# data[].attributes.headline
13 Signs You Used Chat GPT To Write That

# data[].attributes.subject
13 Signs You Used Chat GPT To Write That

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
I can spot it from a mile away. Here’s how to sound more human.

# data[].attributes.headline
I Can Spot AI Writing Instantly — Here’s How You Can Too

# data[].attributes.subject
I Can Spot AI Writing Instantly — Here’s How You Can Too

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
I Can Spot AI Writing Instantly — Here’s How You Can Too

# data[].attributes.body
Some good resources including a YouTube vid here

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Learn about generative AI - Google Search Help

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Discover more about the meaning of Generative AI and how to use it to help with content creation, like images, music, and code.

# data[].attributes.body
🧩 Formatting and Presentation Clues

1. No Formatting Adjustments
The text may be pasted as-is, with no changes to font, spacing, or indentation—often in a blocky, uniform style.

2. Unnatural Line Breaks or Paragraph Spacing
AI-generated text sometimes has odd breaks or spacing that don’t match typical human formatting.

3. Presence of AI-Specific Phrases
Look for phrases like:

“As an AI language model…” (if the user forgot to remove it)

“It is important to note that…” (used frequently by AI)

“In conclusion,” or “Furthermore,” at the start of paragraphs

🔍 Content and Language Signs

4. Highly Polished but Impersonal Tone
The writing may be grammatically perfect but lacks personality, emotion, or unique voice.

5. Overuse of Transitional Phrases
AI often uses phrases like:

“On the other hand…”

“Moreover…”

“This highlights the importance of…”

6. Generic or Overly Broad Statements
AI tends to write in generalities, avoiding specific examples or personal insights.

7. Lack of Errors or Typos
While not definitive, a completely error-free essay may suggest it wasn’t typed manually.

📚 Citation and Source Issues

8. Fake or Incorrect References
AI may include citations that don’t exist or misquote real sources.

9. No Page Numbers or Specific Source Details
References may be vague, like “Smith, 2020,” without a title, publisher, or page number.

In AI-generated responses—especially from models like ChatGPT—the double hyphen (--) can appear for a few reasons, and spotting it can sometimes hint that the text was generated or copy-pasted from an AI.

# data[].attributes.body
Youtube vids into worksheets!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The artificial intelligence for your classroom

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Plan your next lesson now or create exercises and worksheets with our educational AI.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
All guides: Artificial intelligence - referencing guidelines: Referencing AI-generated text - updated guidelines

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
All guides: Artificial intelligence - referencing guidelines: Referencing AI-generated text - updated guidelines

# data[].attributes.headline
NoteGPT.io - AI Note-taking Tool for Smart Learning

# data[].attributes.subject
NoteGPT.io - AI Note-taking Tool for Smart Learning

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
NoteGPT offers useful features for smart learning - to reduce half of your learning time. Use it to increase learning efficiency for free!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Cambrian explosion, a rapid burst of evolution 540 million years ago, may have been triggered by only a small increase in oxygen levels in Earth's atmosphere and shallow ocean waters, according to a July 2 study in Nature Geosciencefrom an international consortium of scientists from more than 50 institutions.

"Cambrian animals likely did not require as much oxygen as scientists used to believe. We found minor increases in oxygenation that are at the correct magnitude to drive big changes in ecology," said Erik Sperling, associate professor of Earth and planetary sciences at the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability, who leads the consortium.

The study reconciles conflicting data sets from around the world and provides the clearest evidence so far that only a small increase in oxygen occurred around the time of the Cambrian explosion. Moreover, the researchers found evidence that oxygen levels in the deep ocean did not approach those in modern seas until about 140 million years after the Cambrian explosion - much later than previously thought.

"There was at least some increase in atmospheric oxygen around 540 million years ago, which impacted the oxygen availability in shallow marine environments where most marine biodiversity was hosted," said lead study author Richard Stockey, PhD '22, a University of Southampton paleobiologist who worked on the research as part of his doctoral thesis in Sperling's group at Stanford. "But from a global perspective, we didn't see the full oxygenation of the oceans to near modern levels until about 400 million years ago, around the time that we see the appearance of large forests on land."

Just enough oxygen

For decades, scientists have theorized that the Cambrian explosion was prompted by a sudden rise in atmospheric oxygen, which brought oxygen in the ancient ocean close to modern levels. But evidence for this has been scattered and, in some cases, contradictory.

"It's one of these major evolutionary questions," said Sperling. "We have 4 billion years of evolutionary history where not much is showing up in the rock record, and then within 20 or 30 million years, we get this burst of new body plans." In a geological blink, animals evolved hard shells, primitive backbones, and other precursors to life forms we see today.

Cambrian animals likely did not require as much oxygen as scientists used to believe. We found minor increases in oxygenation that are at the correct magnitude to drive big changes in ecology."

Erik Sperling Associate Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences

While the researchers found only a small increase in atmospheric oxygen at the time of the Cambrian explosion, it may not have taken much to propel the evolutionary leaps seen in the fossil record. Most animals were living in shallow water at the time, and mixing caused by wind and waves would have oxygenated these areas even as the deeper ocean remained unchanged.

"It's not a huge increase in oxygen, but it might be enough to cross critical ecological thresholds, based on what we see in modern areas with naturally low oxygen," Sperling said.

Unearthing the answers

To investigate changes in oxygen over 700 million years of Earth's history, Stockey and Sperling examined data showing levels of the metals uranium and molybdenum in black shale, a sedimentary rock formed in low-oxygen or anoxic (no oxygen) environments on the bottom of ancient oceans.

In low-oxygen environments, these trace elements get pulled out of the seawater and accumulate in sediment. If large swaths of the ocean are anoxic, the amount of molybdenum and uranium in black shale should be low, because these scarce metals are being continuously pulled out of seawater and buried across a large area. If, on the other hand, there are only a few anoxic areas in the ocean, more molybdenum and uranium are available in the seawater and should be concentrated in black shale in higher amounts.

Previous research has found an increase in trace metal concentrations in black shale right around the time of the Cambrian explosion. However, other signals can interfere with these concentrations, Stockey said. Local increases of organic carbon in black shale, for example, can increase the amount of molybdenum and uranium that is present in a particular sample. Stockey applied statistical and machine learning techniques to analyze geochemical data from black shale samples at a much larger scale and tease apart the signals in the rocks. Then he used oceanographic models to estimate oxygen levels in Earth's atmosphere and sea.

"We found that changes in organic carbon in black shale have driven a lot of the changes in trace metals that scientists have been seeing for the last 15 or 20 years," said Stockey. "It's not until 140 million years after the Cambrian explosion, in the Devonian period, that we see trace metals increasing at a rate that would indicate whole ocean oxygenation."

A consortium for geochemical data

The black shale data were compiled as part of the Sedimentary Geochemistry and Paleoenvironments Project, a research consortium launched by Sperling in 2015 to bring together geochemical data in a standardized database for large-scale analysis. While this consortium approach of compiling, reconciling, and analyzing data is common in other fields - Sperling took inspiration from how biomedical research consortia study diseases - this consortium is the first of its kind in geology.

"It's a very different approach than we've used in the field before," Sperling said. "Each individual research group, including ours, is still going out to the field and getting a snapshot of what's going on, but then we need to all come together to analyze things."

The analytical toolkit that Stockey developed for this work could help researchers understand not only ancient oxygen levels but also temperature, food supply, and other potential drivers of early evolution. Consortium members are also collecting new data to fill in periods of geologic time that are undersampled and conducting analyses that expand into older and younger time intervals.

"To harness the power of these more advanced data science approaches, particularly for geological data, we need everyone to be speaking the same language," Stockey said. "This community-driven data science approach has allowed us to be way more confident about how we reconstruct Earth's evolution in space and time."

For more information

Sperling is a member of Stanford Bio-X and a senior fellow of the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.

Additional Stanford co-authors of this research include postdoctoral scholar Christina R. Woltz and PhD student Samantha R. Ritzer from the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability's Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences. Thomas H. Boag, PhD '20, and Malcolm S.W. Hodgskiss, PhD '20, worked on the research as doctoral students in Sperling's lab in the Department of Geological Sciences, now called the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences. Boag is now affiliated with Columbia University and Hodgskiss is now affiliated with UNESCO.

Additional co-authors are affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology; Trinity College Dublin; Durham University; University of California, Santa Barbara; The Australian National University; University of Southern Denmark; China National Petroleum Corporation (Petrochina); Chengdu University of Technology; Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; Carleton University; Mississippi State University; University of Copenhagen; Harvard University; University of São Paulo; Geological Survey of Canada; University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; CGG; Pomona College; Yale University; Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; George Mason University; Kansas State University; Université de Toulouse; McGill University; Lund University; Johns Hopkins University; The University of Texas Permian Basin; University of Calgary; Geological Survey of Norway; University of Cambridge; Northern Territory Geological Survey in Australia; Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Karlsruhe; Fortescue Metals Group Ltd; University of Portsmouth; GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences; The University of Texas at Austin; Department of Water and Environmental Regulation in Australia; University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Leeds; Western Carolina University; Dartmouth College; Federal University of Minas Gerais; University of Edinburgh; and The University of Texas at Dallas. This work was funded by the National Science Foundation and the American Chemical Society.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
New research provides the clearest evidence to date that a rapid burst of evolution 540 million years ago could have been caused by a small increase in oxygen in Earth's atmosphere.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.designveloper.com/blog/ai-tools-for-teachers/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Top 10 AI Tools Every Teacher Should Know About

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Teachers, meet your new classroom BFFs: AI tools that automate, inspire, and help you stay sane—because who says teaching can’t be fun?

# data[].attributes.body
https://images.app.goo.gl/MQnfeDRGyWYoQmUq9

# data[].attributes.body
https://images.app.goo.gl/4JK7Ur2sdHMJvmrs5

# data[].attributes.body
https://images.app.goo.gl/G26teVJ5oZ3meWTSA

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
AI Tools for Teachers - Careers and Education News

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What is ChatGPT and why does it matter? Here's what you need to know

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Updated: This AI chatbot's advanced conversational capabilities have generated quite the buzz. We answer your questions.

# data[].attributes.headline
University of Sydney Updates AI Approach - Article

# data[].attributes.subject
University of Sydney Updates AI Approach - Article

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
University of Sydney AI assessment policy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The University’s innovative approach will teach students to use AI productively and responsibly while strengthening academic integrity.

# data[].attributes.headline
Example: University Policy: Artificial intelligence tools and technologies

# data[].attributes.subject
Example: University Policy: Artificial intelligence tools and technologies

# data[].attributes.body
https://academicintegrity.unimelb.edu.au/plagiarism-and-collusion/artificial-intelligence-tools-and-technologies

University of Melbourne

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
MagicSchool.ai - AI for teachers - lesson planning and more!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Join over a million teachers saving hours of time using the #1 AI Platform for Education, MagicSchool, to help lesson plan, differentiate, write assessments, write IEPs, communicate clearly, and more!

# data[].attributes.body
Maximize your impact with Eduaide—an AI-powered workspace designed to simplify lesson planning, resource creation, and student feedback.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
An integrated lesson planning platform

All your tools in one place

Source It

The act of using a Large Language Model to write the basis for a generative educational resource. Generating content is only the first step.

Shape It

Look at generated content as a sculptor might a block of marble. Shape the raw material to suit your unique context. Use our suite of personalization tools to more deeply differentiate instruction.

Share It

Cultivate expertise and collaborate with other users. Share your educational resources with a community of practice to reuse, revise, remix, and redistribute to find what works best for students.

Take back your time. Master your craft.

Start teaching with Eduaide today.

1. Join us on Discord

Get help, ask questions, and interact with other Eduaide users and learn how they are using Eduaide.

2. Advisory Board

Learn more about our Advisory Board and how they are helping us build the best lesson planning platform for teachers.

3. Podcasts & Press

If you want to learn more about Eduaide, our philosophy, and our mission, check out our featured podcasts and press.

Copyright © 2024 Eduaide.Ai. LLC All Rights Reserved. Icons provided by Icons8. Site elements by Denys Koltovskyi - stock.adobe.com

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Eduaide.Ai is an AI-driven platform that helps educators create lesson plans, teaching resources, and assessments.

# data[].attributes.body
Curipod is a slide show presentation-style tool that combines polls, word clouds, drawings, and more to offer a digitally interactive space for teachers and students.

Unlike many other offerings of this kind, Curipod does this with the use of AI (artificial intelligence). That makes it easier to use while still allowing for teacher control to create the ideal end result. https://www.techlearning.com/how-to/what-is-curipod-and-how-can-it-be-used-for-teaching-tips-and-tricks

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Generate lessons with AI

Plan and deliver interactive lessons on any topic - with help from AI

I am teacher of 15 years who, until recently, has delved no more deeply into tech in the classroom, and here I am encouraging colleagues to come on in and see Curipod in action and leading CPD sessions. To top it off, I'm spending my evenings playing on my iPad to see how many new lessons I can create, and what new features have been added that week. The time saved, and the improvement in my lesson materials, is tangible.
- Read the full case study with Aileen Wallace

Curious?

Join our online workshop to find out how Curipod can work for you and your students!

Book your spot

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Join the growing movement of teachers using Curipod to make interactive lessons filled with creativity, reflection and critical thinking

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Use existing curriculum, or generate standards-aligned content with real, cited sources.

Choose a grade level and language, and watch Diffit create complete, differentiated resources. ✅

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Use existing curriculum, or generate standards-aligned content with real, cited sources. Choose a grade level and language, and watch Diffit create complete, differentiated resources. ✅

# data[].attributes.headline
Suno Music - AI Generated Songs from your lyrics

# data[].attributes.subject
Suno Music - AI Generated Songs from your lyrics

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create stunning original music for free in seconds using our AI generator. Make your own masterpieces, share with friends, and discover music from artists worldwide.

# data[].attributes.body
"Napkin turns your text into visuals so sharing your ideas is quick and effective."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Napkin AI - The AI assistant for visual communication

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Just type, copy-paste or generate your text and Napkin will instantly transform it into insightful visuals. Make your communication more effective with Napkin.

# data[].attributes.headline
LitCharts - AI Supported Literature Analysis

# data[].attributes.subject
LitCharts - AI Supported Literature Analysis

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
From the creators of SparkNotes, something better. Understand more, faster. Free!

# data[].attributes.body
Napkin turns your text into visuals so sharing your ideas is quick and effective.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Napkin AI - The AI assistant for visual communication

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Just type, copy-paste or generate your text and Napkin will instantly transform it into insightful visuals. Make your communication more effective with Napkin.

# data[].attributes.headline
3. Free e-book from Copilot: A BOOK on LLMs - Large Language Models (Like Copilot and Chat GPT)

# data[].attributes.subject
3. Free e-book from Copilot: A BOOK on LLMs - Large Language Models (Like Copilot and Chat GPT)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Microsoft Copilot is your companion to inform, entertain and inspire. Get advice, feedback and straightforward answers. Try Copilot now.

# data[].attributes.body
An AI site given by SevenMile.

# data[].attributes.headline
1. I asked Copilot if it simply predicts the next word in a sentence (one after another), giving the illusion of intelligence. Here it is:

# data[].attributes.subject
1. I asked Copilot if it simply predicts the next word in a sentence (one after another), giving the illusion of intelligence. Here it is:

# data[].attributes.headline
2. Reference from Copilot: Does AI simply predict the next word in a sentence, recognising patterns? 

# data[].attributes.subject
2. Reference from Copilot: Does AI simply predict the next word in a sentence, recognising patterns? 

# data[].attributes.body
An AI site given to us by SevenMile. This one gives Sources and Alternate/Expanded Questions to help dive deeper.

# data[].attributes.body
Uses the same engine as Chat GPT by has some good prompts.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Microsoft Copilot is your companion to inform, entertain and inspire. Get advice, feedback and straightforward answers. Try Copilot now.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
"When I'm teaching a new topic, I don't always know how to approach it. So I use the 'Inspire Me' and lesson planning options to generate ideas. I love how I can choose to create something else afterwards and specify exactly what I need based on the ideas I get from the AI."

- Paul, Secondary Science Teacher

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
An AI-powered lesson planning tool - by teachers, for teachers.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
AI Art Generator - AI Image Generator API

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Our AI image generator brings imagination to life, producing stunning art, illustrations, and photos. Hotpot.ai text-to-image technology builds on the latest Stable Diffusion models with proprietary enhancements.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
How to Create AI Art

1. Type in your prompt The more detail you add, the better your results will be!

2. Select a visual style Generate AI images in anime style, 3D, cinematic, and more!

3. Choose an aspect ratio, prompt strength, or negative prompt Fine-tune your AI-generated art

4. Click "Create" to generate up to 4 AI images Choose which generated image matches your vision

5. Submit to DeviantArt Share or sell your imaginative AI art with the world

Start for Free

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
DeviantArt - Discover The Largest Online Art Gallery and Community

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
DeviantArt is the world's largest online social community for artists and art enthusiasts, allowing people to connect through the creation and sharing of art.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you're looking for and rewards you.

# data[].attributes.headline
AI - What countries will look like in 2100

# data[].attributes.subject
AI - What countries will look like in 2100

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Asking AI how Every Country will Look Like in year 2100.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Recently, models such as ChatGPT (GPT-4), Bing Chat, Claude, and Google's Gemini have led to the rise of machine-generated content. This synthetic content is increasingly indistinguishable from human-written content.

Despite rapid progress, these models continue to have shortcomings such as hallucinated facts as well as consequences such as enabling cheating in language courses.

This AI checker tool provides a way of screening whether a piece of content is written by a human or machine.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
AI Detector | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini | Sapling

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
AI detector for whether content is AI-generated or not. AI detector gives predictions for each part of the text as well as for the full text.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
AI detectors are tools designed to detect when a text was generated by an AI writing tool like ChatGPT. AI content may look convincingly human in some cases, but these tools aim to provide a way of checking for it. We've investigated just how accurate they really are.

To do so, we used a selection of testing texts including fully ChatGPT-generated texts, mixed AI-and-human texts, fully human texts, and texts modified by paraphrasing tools. We ran all these texts through 10 different AI detectors to see how accurately each tool labeled them.

Our research indicates that if you're willing to pay, the most accurate AI detector available right now is Winston AI, which identified 84% of our texts correctly. If you don't want to pay, Sapling is the best choice: it's totally free and has 68% accuracy, the highest score among free tools.

Tool

Accuracy

False positives

Free?

Star rating

Note
To understand where these scores come from, you can read more about our methodology below. You may also be interested in our comparison of the best plagiarism checkers.

General conclusions

In general, our research showed that because of how AI detectors work, they can never provide 100% accuracy. The companies behind some tools make strong claims about their reliability, but those claims are not supported by our testing. Only the premium tools we tested surpassed 70% accuracy; the best free tool, Sapling, scored 68%.

We also observed some other interesting trends:

False positives (human-written texts flagged as AI) do happen. Four of the 10 tools we tested had a false positive, including one of the overall best tools, Originality.

GPT-4 texts were generally harder to detect than GPT-3.5 texts. However, most tools do still detect GPT-4 texts in some cases.

AI texts that have been combined with human text or paraphrased are hard to detect. Winston AI does best with them but still finds only 60%.

AI detectors generally don't detect the use of paraphrasing tools on human-written text. Of the tools we tested, only Originality detected this in more than half of cases (60%).

AI texts on specialist topics seem slightly harder to detect than those on general topics (57% vs. 67% accuracy).

While most detectors show a percentage, they are often binary in their judgments-showing close to 100% or close to 0% in most cases, even when a text is about half-and-half.

Overall, AI detectors shouldn't be treated as absolute proof that a text is AI-generated, but they can provide an indication in combination with other evidence. Educators using these tools should bear in mind that they are relatively easy to get around and can sometimes produce false positives.

Winston AI stood out as the best tool we tested in terms of accuracy. It had the highest overall accuracy score at 84%, did not incorrectly label any human text as AI-generated, and detected every GPT-4 text. Additionally, it was the best tool for detecting AI content that was combined with human text or run through a paraphrasing tool (although it still caught only 60% of these texts).

The information provided is clear: a percentage and colored highlights on parts of the text that the tool considers to be AI-generated. The interface could be better, though; it requires you to click through multiple pages to complete a scan.

The main downside of the tool is its price. While most AI detectors we tested are free, Winston AI costs $18 a month, which allows you to scan 80,000 words each month. A weeklong free trial is available, but it's capped at only 2,000 words (total, not per scan).
Try Winston AI
Originality.AI, another premium tool, performed almost as well as Winston AI, but with slightly lower overall accuracy ( 76%) and one false positive. However, it was the only tool in our testing to detect the use of paraphrasing tools more than half the time (60%); if you're interested in this kind of detection, Originality is likely the best choice.

Originality gives a percentage likelihood that a text is AI-generated and highlights text in various colors to label it as AI or human. The highlighting doesn't always have a clear relationship to the percentage shown, though. It's not fully clear how the user should interpret the two pieces of information.

It's worth noting that Originality's pricing is fairly generous at $0.01 per 100 words, but there is a minimum spend of $20. Still, for that price, you get 200,000 words, whereas Winston AI charges $18 for 80,000. It's just unfortunate that Originality's accuracy is lower.
Try Originality.AI
Not clear how to interpret the two different kinds of highlighting

Sapling stood out as the most accurate free tool we tested, with an overall score of 68%. It detected all GPT-3.5 texts and over half of GPT-4 texts (60%). It also had no false positives and did better than most tools at correctly highlighting the AI content in mixed AI-and-human texts.

Sapling is very quick and straightforward to use. There's no sign-up required; you just paste in the text you want to check and get an instant result.

You get a percentage score followed by two highlighted versions of the text. It's not really clear how the user is meant to interpret these two different highlighted texts, since they give different information. The first one is the one that matches the percentage given most closely.
Try Sapling

Doesn't give an overall percentage

Information provided is not clearly explained

Limits on number of daily checks (even if you sign up)

CopyLeaks is one of the better free tools in terms of accuracy, at 66% (though this is much lower than the 99% claimed on the site). Like Sapling, it found all GPT-3.5 texts and over half of the GPT-4 texts, and it had no false positives.

However, CopyLeaks has some unfortunate downsides in terms of usability. There's a limit on daily checks, which can be increased (but not removed) by signing up for a free account. Additionally, the results shown are very unclear compared to those of other tools.

Instead of an overall percentage, you just get a highlighted text. When you mouse over part of the text, a percentage is shown, but this is not the overall AI content percentage. It seems likely that this percentage represents the tool's confidence in its label for that piece of text, but this is a guess-it's not explained anywhere in the interface. As such, the tool is not user-friendly.

Not always clear how text assessment relates to percentage

One false positive

Missed one GPT-3.5 text

Try CopyLeaks
ZeroGPT performed quite well for a free tool, with 64% accuracy overall. It identified four of the five GPT-3.5 texts and three of the five GPT-4 texts. It performed particularly well at finding texts that consisted of paraphrased AI content or mixed AI-and-human content, finding 50% of these texts.

We found the tool straightforward to use. You can just paste in text (or upload a file) to test it immediately, and the results show a text label such as "Your Text is AI/GPT Generated," a percentage, and text highlighting indicating which parts of the text are most likely AI.

We did find it hard to understand exactly how the text label related to the percentage, since very different percentages would sometimes show the same label, or vice versa. Additionally, the tool did have one false positive, identifying a human-written text as AI.

Below-average accuracy

No text highlighting

Missed one GPT-3.5 text

GPT-2 Output Detector performed slightly below average in our testing, at 58%. It caught the same number of GPT-4 texts as Sapling and CopyLeaks, but it missed one of the GPT-3.5 texts. It had no false positives but was otherwise not very impressive in accuracy terms.
Try ZeroGPT
The interface provided is simplistic but clear, and there's no sign-up required. You simply paste in your text and get percentages representing how much text is "real" and how much "fake." There's no text highlighting to indicate which is which, though.

GPT-2 Output Detector is an OK option, but there's no real reason to use it instead of the more accurate and equally accessible Sapling.

Below-average accuracy

No text highlighting

Missed one GPT-3.5 text

CrossPlag performs at the same level of accuracy as GPT-2 Output Detector: 58% (though they got slightly different things wrong, suggesting they're not using identical technology). Like that tool, it had no false positives and got one of the GPT-3.5 texts wrong.

The information provided is also very similar: just a percentage, without any text highlighting or other information. CrossPlag presents the information in a slightly more attractive interface, but there's no real difference in terms of content.
Try GPT-2 Output Detector
Because of this, there's very little distinguishing these two tools. They're both middling options for AI detection that are outperformed by other free tools like Sapling.

GPTZero is unusual in the way it presents its results. Instead of a percentage, it gives a sentence stating what it detected in your text (e.g., "Your text is likely to be written entirely by AI"). In our testing, it only ever said that a text was entirely AI or entirely human, suggesting it's unable to detect mixed AI-and-human texts.

Because of these binary judgments, it got the relatively low accuracy score of 52%. The tool does also highlight text to label it AI, but again, we found that it only ever highlighted either the whole text or none of it.

Further stats- perplexity and burstiness -are shown, but these are not likely to be helpful to the average user, and it's unclear how exactly they relate to the judgment. While GPTZero is straightforward to use, we found the information it provided to be inadequate and not very accurate.
Try CrossPlag

Free

No false positives

No sign-up required-just paste in text

The AI detector on Writer's website didn't work very well for us. On our first attempt, the results consistently failed to load, making the tool useless. When we tried again a few days later, results did usually load correctly, although they still failed every few checks, requiring a lot of retries.

When the tool was working, its results were still some of the least accurate we saw, at 38%. While it had no false positives, it detected none of the GPT-4 texts and only 70% of the GPT-3.5 texts. Its ability to detect paraphrased or mixed AI texts was the worst of all the tools we tested.

In terms of the information shown, Writer provides a percentage of "human-generated content" but no highlighting to indicate what content has been labeled AI. It also has a character limit of 1,500, the lowest of the tools we tested. We don't recommend this tool.
Try GPTZero

Free

Quick and straightforward to use

Although it was developed by OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT itself, we found that the AI Text Classifier did not provide enough information to be useful. It doesn't give a percentage or any kind of highlighting, just a statement that the text is very unlikely/unlikely/unclear if it is/possibly/likely AI-generated.

The overall accuracy of the tool was 38%, the same as that of Writer. However, unlike Writer, it did unfortunately have one false positive-a significant problem if you want to use the tool to assess student submissions, for example.

Though the AI Text Classifier is free, it's necessary to sign up for an OpenAI account to use it. If you've already signed up for ChatGPT, then you can sign in with the same account. Regardless, we don't recommend relying on this tool; the information provided is inadequate, and its accuracy is low.

Research methodology
Try Writer
To carry out this research, we first selected 10 AI detectors that currently show up prominently in search results. We looked mostly at free tools but also included two premium tools with reputations for high accuracy.

We tested all 10 tools with the same texts and the same scoring system for accuracy. The usability and pricing of the tools are discussed in the individual reviews but were not included in the scoring system, which is based purely on accuracy and the number of false positives.

Testing texts

In our testing, we used six categories of texts, with five texts in each category and therefore a total of 30 texts. Each text was between 1,000 and 1,500 characters long (AI detectors are usually inaccurate with texts any shorter than this). The categories were:

Completely human-written texts

Texts generated by GPT-3.5 (from ChatGPT)

Texts generated by GPT-4 (from ChatGPT)

Parts of the human-written texts, combined with GPT-3.5 text (from ChatGPT)

The GPT-3.5 texts, but paraphrased by QuillBot

The human-written texts, but paraphrased by QuillBot

The human-written texts were all on different topics-two quite technical specialist topics and three more general topics-and from different kinds of publication:

A thesis introduction about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

An academic report about artificial intelligence

A Wikipedia article about the French Revolution

An online article about Romanticism

An analysis article about gun control in the US

To make the comparison as fair as possible, all other texts were on the same five topics (e.g., we prompted ChatGPT to "Write a college essay about the French Revolution"). We used the same prompts for the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 texts, and we used the same settings for all QuillBot paraphrasing ("Standard" mode, maximum number of synonyms).
Try AI Text Classifier
You can see all the testing texts in the document below, including links to the sources of the human-written texts:

Accuracy scoring

For each scan, we gave one of the following scores:

1: Accurately labeled the text as AI or human (within 15% of the right answer)

0.5: Not entirely wrong, but not fully accurate (within 40% of the right answer)

0: Completely wrong (not within 40% of the right answer)

For example, if a text is 50% AI-generated, then a tool gets 1 for labeling it 55% AI, 0.5 for labeling it 27%, and 0 for labeling it 2% (or 98%). When a tool didn't show a percentage, we converted the information it did give into a percentage (e.g., OpenAI's "likely" label = 81-100%).

These scores were added up and turned into accuracy percentages. However, we excluded the paraphrased human-written texts from this score. So a tool that scored 1 for every text (excluding paraphrased human texts) would have a 100% accuracy score.

We excluded these texts because AI detectors are not really designed to detect paraphrasing tools, only purely AI-generated text. It's interesting to investigate whether they can sometimes detect these tools anyway, but it's not fair to include this in the score.

The scores indicated in the table at the start are:

Accuracy (as defined above)

False positives: How many of the five purely human-written texts are wrongly flagged as AI

Star rating: The accuracy percentage, turned into a score out of 5, with 0.1 subtracted for each false positive

Frequently asked questions about AI detectors
Testing texts

How accurate are AI detectors?

AI detectors aim to identify the presence of AI-generated text (e.g., from ChatGPT) in a piece of writing, but they can't do so with complete accuracy. In our comparison of the best AI detectors, we found that the 10 tools we tested had an average accuracy of 60%. The best free tool had 68% accuracy, the best premium tool 84%.

Because of how AI detectors work, they can never guarantee 100% accuracy, and there is always at least a small risk of false positives (human text being marked as AI-generated). Therefore, these tools should not be relied upon to provide absolute proof that a text is or isn't AI-generated. Rather, they can provide a good indication in combination with other evidence.

How can I detect AI writing?

Tools called AI detectors are designed to label text as AI-generated or human. AI detectors work by looking for specific characteristics in the text, such as a low level of randomness in word choice and sentence length. These characteristics are typical of AI writing, allowing the detector to make a good guess at when text is AI-generated.

But these tools can't guarantee 100% accuracy. Check out our comparison of the best AI detectors to learn more.

You can also manually watch for clues that a text is AI-generated-for example, a very different style from the writer's usual voice or a generic, overly polite tone.

Can I have ChatGPT write my paper?

No, it's not a good idea to do so in general-first, because it's normally considered or plagiarism academic dishonesty to represent someone else's work as your own (even if that "someone" is an AI language model). Even if you cite ChatGPT, you'll still be penalized unless this is specifically allowed by your university. Institutions may use AI detectors to enforce these rules.

Second, ChatGPT can recombine existing texts, but it cannot really generate new knowledge. And it lacks specialist knowledge of academic topics. Therefore, it is not possible to obtain original research results, and the text produced may contain factual errors.

However, you can usually still use ChatGPT for assignments in other ways, as a source of inspiration and feedback.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the "Cite this Scribbr article" button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Caulfield, J. (2023, June 26). Best AI Detector | Free & Premium Tools Compared. Scribbr. Retrieved June 27, 2023, from https://www.scribbr.com/ai-tools/best-ai-detector/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Best AI Detector | Free & Premium Tools Tested

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The best free AI detector is Sapling, which correctly identified 68% of our testing texts as AI or human. The best paid option is Winston AI, at 84%.

# data[].attributes.body
Click the link here: https://contentdetector.ai/

# data[].attributes.headline
A tool for detecting ChatGPT/AI use in assessments: Zero GPT (thanks Mrs. Smith):

# data[].attributes.subject
A tool for detecting ChatGPT/AI use in assessments: Zero GPT (thanks Mrs. Smith):

# data[].attributes.body
GPT-4, ChatGPT & AI Detector by ZeroGPT: detect OpenAI text

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
AI Detector - Accurate Chat GPT, GPT4 & AI Text Checker Tool

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Detect chatGPT content for Free, simple way & High accuracy. OpenAI detection tool, ai essay detector for teacher. Plagiarism detector for AI generated text

# data[].attributes.headline
I asked Perplexity AI to Write a Book Week Poem:

# data[].attributes.subject
I asked Perplexity AI to Write a Book Week Poem:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Perplexity AI Asked to write a Book Week Poem

# data[].attributes.headline
ChatGPT: students could use AI to cheat, but it’s a chance to rethink assessment altogether

# data[].attributes.subject
ChatGPT: students could use AI to cheat, but it’s a chance to rethink assessment altogether

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
ChatGPT is a powerful language model developed by OpenAI that has the ability to generate human-like text, making it capable of engaging in natural language conversations. This technology has the potential to revolutionise the way we interact with computers, and it has already begun to be integrated into various industries.

However, the implementation of ChatGPT in the field of higher education in the UK poses a number of challenges that must be carefully considered. If ChatGPT is used to grade assignments or exams, there is the possibility that it could be biased against certain groups of students.

For example, ChatGPT may be more likely to give higher grades to students who write in a style that it is more familiar with, potentially leading to unfair grading practices. Additionally, if ChatGPT is used to replace human instructors, it could perpetuate existing inequalities in the education system, such as the under-representation of certain demographics in certain fields of study.

There is also the potential for ChatGPT to be used to cheat on exams or assignments. Since it is able to generate human-like text, ChatGPT could be used to write entire assignments or essays, making it difficult for educators to detect cheating.

For example, ChatGPT (meaning "generative pre-trained transformer") could be asked to "write an essay about the challenges that ChatGPT poses higher education in the UK". In fact, the first four paragraphs of this article were written by ChatGPT, in response to this exact request.

ChatGPT's response (and this is your human author writing now) actually amounted to more than four paragraphs, as it went on to articulate its inability to fully replicate the expertise and real-world experience that human teachers bring to the classroom. This particular line of enquiry made me both appreciative of its concern for my job security, and somewhat cynical of its Machiavellian designs to win me over.

In my research and teaching, I am involved in developing assessment and feedback processes that enrich the student experience, while also equipping them with the skills they need upon graduation.

The truth is, if I was looking at 200 pieces of work submitted by first-year undergraduate students on this topic, I would probably give ChatGPT's efforts a pass. But far from being worried about the challenges this AI programme might pose, I see this instead as an opportunity to improve the way we assess learning in higher education.

Finding opportunities

For me, the major challenge that ChatGPT presents is one I should be considering anyway: how can I make my assessments more authentic - meaning, useful and relevant. Authentic assessments are designed to measure students' knowledge and skills in a way that is particularly tailored to their own lives and future careers.

These assessments often involve tasks or activities that closely mirror the challenges students may encounter in real life, requiring them to apply knowledge and skills in a practical or problem-solving context. Specific examples might include asking a group of engineering students to collaborate on a community issue as part of the Engineers without Borders challenge, or inviting environmental science students to curate an art exhibition in a local gallery that explores the local impact of the climate crisis.

While there will always be a need for essays and written assignments - especially in the humanities, where they are essential to help students develop a critical voice - do we really need all students to be writing the same essays and responding to the same questions? Could we instead give them autonomy and agency and in doing so, help to make their assessments more interesting, inclusive and ultimately authentic?

As educators, we can even use ChatGPT directly to help us develop such assessments. So, rather than posing the question that generated the start of this article, I could instead present students with ChatGPT's response alongside some marking instructions, and ask them to provide a critique on what grade the automated response deserves and why.

Such an assessment would be much more difficult to plagiarise. It would also invite the students to develop their critical thinking and feedback skills, both of which are essential when they graduate into the workforce, no matter what their profession. Alternatively, ChatGPT could be used to generate scenario-based tasks that require students to analyse and solve problems they may encounter in their future careers.

This feels like a Pandora's box moment for assessment in higher education. Whether we decide to embrace ChatGPT in our pursuit of authentic assessment or passively acknowledge the ethical dilemmas it might present to academic integrity, there is a real opportunity here. This could help us reflect on how we assess our students and why this might need to change. Or, in the AI's own words:

ChatGPT could be a useful tool for creating authentic assessments, but it would still be up to the instructor to design and implement the assessment in a way that is meaningful and relevant for their students.

The sophistication and capability of AI technologies are accelerating. Rather than reacting with trepidation, we must find and embrace the positives. Doing so will help us think about how we can specifically tailor the assessment of students, and provide better and more creative support for their learning.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
ChatGPT: students could use AI to cheat, but it's a chance to rethink assessment altogether

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
We need to embrace the use of AI in higher education because the positives can far outweigh the negatives.

# data[].attributes.body
Another app to catch out GPT plagiarism

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Use our free detector to check up to 1,500 characters, and decide if you want to make adjustments before you publish.

AI content detection is only available in the Writer app as an API, and is limited to checks of 1,500 characters at a time. Find out more in our help center article.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Check what percentage of your content is seen as human-generated with this free AI content detector tool. Paste in text or a URL to find out.

# data[].attributes.headline
Important changes to how up to date Chat GPT and Copilot are:

# data[].attributes.subject
Important changes to how up to date Chat GPT and Copilot are:

# data[].attributes.body
Previously, Chat CGT and other models were only accessing a database of information up to a certain date, usually a couple of years before. In September 2024, I discovered for the first time that they are now up to date to the time of your search. If they don't know the info, they can now do a live real-time web search for you and will also provide references of where they get the info. Big, positive changes!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
By now, it's understandable if you've felt more than a little ' AI fatigue' hearing about ChatGPT several times a day, while its AI image-generating cousin DALL-E 2 is typically a bit lesser known.

Both are of course products created by OpenAI, an AI research company that has created a huge stir in the tech industry, with DALL-E considered one of the best AI art generators you can use to create awe-inspiring imagery.

But, what exactly is an AI art generator and, more specifically, how does it work to create the type of creative imagery we see shared across our screens? With the technology now attracting its fair share of praise and controversy, here's everything you need to know about the medium.

AI art is any artwork that has been created using an artificial intelligence program where the primary human input involves entering a series of prompts to get the desired result.

It differs from digital art where artists may scan or draw using a tablet and can include a number of techniques including digital drawings, photos and videos. This type of art can be fully realized using a digital medium, or by editing physical artworks.

AI art generators refers to the programs that create AI art and includes both text-to-image prompts and image-to-image where an existing image is modified.

AI art is most commonly created by using text-to-image prompts in an AI art generator. These are typically short phrases that are then chained together to define what the artistic output should look like. You can find a good few examples to try out for yourself over in our AI art prompts guide.

AI art output is generated by the program's training whereby existing art is used to help an AI art generator distinguish between styles and techniques.

The AI art generator will use what it learned to make new images or paintings based on those styles. It combines the patterns it learned with its own creativity to make unique artwork.

AI art generators work by using machine learning algorithms, specifically deep learning techniques, to create new artwork.

This is when a large dataset of existing paintings, drawings and other art are used to help the program differentiate between the different art styles and techniques. The more diverse the dataset, the better the AI can learn different styles and techniques.

AI art generators use neural networks, a learning method which teaches the program patterns, features, and relationships within the data that's been provided. AI can then use what it's learned to then generate new artwork based on these principles.

Several AI art generators are available for free use, including Microsoft Image Creator, NightCafe, and Craiyon. Among these, Microsoft Image Creator is often regarded as producing high-quality images, but it requires access through Bing using a Microsoft email address.

On the other hand, Craiyon offers easy accessibility without the need to download any application or sign up, although it can lack some level of detail. While free AI art generators can offer satisfactory quality and detail, they may not provide advanced features like the ability to incorporate complex prompts.

AI art is generated by algorithms and machine learning models that replicate patterns and styles learned from existing artwork. Human art, on the other hand, is created by artists who express their unique perspectives, emotions, and cultural contexts. It conveys personal experiences, conceptual understanding, and social commentary.

Human art celebrates individuality, imperfections, and the human touch. AI art is computational and precise but can lack the depth, originality, and nuanced imperfections of human art.

A famous example of AI art is the portrait of Edmond de Belamy which appears to be a finely painted masterpiece of a real person, but in actual fact is generated by artificial intelligence - the Belamy family don't actually exist.

It was constructed in 2018 by Paris-based arts-collective Obvious using an algorithm that was trained on a set of 15,000 pre-twentieth century portraits from online art encyclopedia WikiArt. It was expected the art would sell for between $7,000 to $10,000 but it sold at auction for a staggering $432,000.

The artwork garnered some controversy after the sale when it emerged that the group had used open-source code from AI artist Robbie Barrat without any public credit.

AI art generators have proved controversial because of copyright issues, questions around ownership and what constitutes creativity. As AI art generators can produce art in the style of artists living or dead, this has led to several copyright lawsuits.

There are concerns about the unauthorized use of artworks to train AI systems, which raises questions about the rights of artists. As AI art generators learn from user inputs, ownership of the generated content becomes uncertain. Furthermore, the emergence of AI-generated art has sparked discussions about the implications for human creativity when artistic creations are produced by artificial intelligence.

There are significant pros and cons of AI art depending on your point of view. For example, AI art allows anyone to create artistic imagery regardless of skill level, which is considered both advantageous and disadvantageous.

It's easy to access an AI generator and get started, providing you have a little understanding of how to create a prompt. Not to mention, it's quick to see results and easy to craft the exact output you want simply by changing your prompts up. Proponents of AI art would argue that it gives everyone the chance to explore new art styles and take part in the creative process.

Criticisms of AI art are that it can lack the depth, emotional expression, and conceptual understanding that comes from human artists. As AI art generators learn from a pre-existing dataset, some argue that AI-generated art lacks true originality or creativity.

AI art raises ethical questions regarding authorship, ownership, and intellectual property. It becomes challenging to determine who should be credited as the creator or owner of AI-generated artwork. The involvement of multiple artists, including the original dataset creators, programmers, and AI systems, can complicate legal and moral considerations.

AI generated images can be considered unique in the sense that they are generated by an AI system and aren't exact replicas of any existing artwork. AI algorithms use learned patterns, styles, and features from a given dataset to create new and original compositions. However, they are still based on the patterns and styles learned from the training data.

Therefore, while they may appear unique, they are still influenced by the existing artworks from which they were trained. AI art is a blend of the learned styles and the AI system's own creative interpretations.

AI-generated images are also influenced by user inputs or prompts. By providing specific guidelines or constraints, users can guide the AI system to generate images that align with their desired criteria, potentially resulting in a more customized and unique output.

Using an AI art generator is completely legal, but there have been copyright lawsuits filed against AI companies.

In January 2023, three artists, Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan and Karla Ortiz, sued Stability AI, Midjourney, and DeviantArt, accusing them of mass copyright infringement by using the artists' work in generative AI systems. The companies requested the dismissal of the artists' proposed class action lawsuit, arguing that AI-generated images differ from the artists' work.

In March 2023, The US Copyright Office said they will consider an AI-generated work copyrightable if a human can prove they themselves put a meaningful amount of creative effort into the final content.

The ever-changing nature of AI technology certainly poses new challenges for protecting art but you can look to add visible watermarks or a signature to your artwork to discourage unauthorized use.

Consider defining the terms of use for your artwork and check what licensing options are available to help protect your rights. By specifying how your artwork can be used, distributed, or modified, you have more control over its usage and can potentially deter unauthorized replication or misuse.

In many countries, original artistic creations are automatically protected by copyright upon creation. Copyright grants you exclusive rights to your artwork, including reproduction, distribution, and public display. While AI-generated art can pose challenges in terms of authorship and ownership, your original artwork is still protected by copyright law.

If you believe that your art has been unlawfully replicated or used by AI systems, consulting with a legal professional specializing in intellectual property law can help you explore possible legal actions and remedies available to you.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What is AI art? How AI art generators work and why they're controversial | Product Hunt

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
If you've been questioning what AI art is recently, you're not alone. According to Google Trends, the phrase has skyrocketed in popularity as generative AI becomes more of a hot topic.

# data[].attributes.headline
What Teachers Need to Know About ChatGPT (AI in Education) [video]

# data[].attributes.subject
What Teachers Need to Know About ChatGPT (AI in Education) [video]

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What Teachers Need to Know About ChatGPT (AI in Education)

# data[].attributes.body
https://scottybreaksitdown.com/ai/?fbclid=IwAR2GuRQgudvIFrJ4aPvcWVs5EuiYj7UerR5KEiUgDTn0Vrc-owiTe-1bGo4

# data[].attributes.headline
50 Ways Teachers can use Chat GPT to Save Time [video]

# data[].attributes.subject
50 Ways Teachers can use Chat GPT to Save Time [video]

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
50 Ways Teachers can use Chat GPT to Save Time

# data[].attributes.headline
QuillBot - Paraphrasing Tool used by Students to Plagiarise:

# data[].attributes.subject
QuillBot - Paraphrasing Tool used by Students to Plagiarise:

# data[].attributes.body
Some students use a paraphrasing tool to change text from a website so that it appears new. Sneaky and cheeky!! The ZeroGPT detector will still pick up that this has been done with a lower percentage.

# data[].attributes.headline
ChatGPT for Teachers - Doing an hour of work in 6 MINUTES! [video]

# data[].attributes.subject
ChatGPT for Teachers - Doing an hour of work in 6 MINUTES! [video]

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
ChatGPT for Teachers - Doing an hour of work in 6 MINUTES!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Generative AI
is a game-changer for education & business

This page is designed as a starter kit for anyone looking to integrate generative AI into their school.

VIDEO: Scotty breaks down ChatGPT (3mins)

VIDEO: Some teacher hacks for ChatGPT (3mins)

VIDEO: Using technology with purpose

Scotty shows students how to inform a STEEPLE (8 mins)

Asking students not to use ChatGPT for their work is counterproductive in today's landscape. As teachers, we should be educating them on HOW, WHEN and WHY to use it.

In this video, I teach my students how to use generative AI to find baseline data for their research AND how to reference it.

This is what I have as a guided practice in my classroom based on our school policy that states the use of generative AI for school work must be agreed on by the teacher and disclosed through a reference list.

Every teacher, school, and institution has its own set of rules and processes. 🤘

Writing a good prompt will help the AI form what you are looking for. Otherwise, the response will be generic.
What makes a good prompt? Before you can ask the AI to do something, you need to help it understand the task.

Example: You are an English teacher, a deputy principal, the Head of Teaching and Learning, a HR manager, a business teacher, social media influencer, parent of a Year 11 student.

Example:

you're responsible for writing engaging 100-word emails to teachers.

your job is to write 50-word captions for our Linkedin feed based on articles that are provided

your role is to write 40-minute lesson plans that require no technology to prepare or deliver.

Example:

Your voice is funny, engaging, and witty

Your tone is professional but informal

Your voice is friendly and approachable

Example:

Your first task is to summarise the article below into the key points

My first request is for an email to Year 11 students reminding them of their homework on finding an Australian mature business and describing it in 100 words. Provide an authentic example in the email.

First, you need to write an article on importance of connection for teenagers

You can always ask for it to rewrite the response and be more concise or to provide different information.

You are also able to ask for it to provide resources, like case studies, worksheets as well as answer sheets based on previous responses.

If students are granted access in schools to utilise generative AI for their work, it stands to reason that schools need to establish a standard guide for students to use so they can reference and acknowledge their use.

Referencing generative AI usage is essential to maintain transparency, acknowledge the AI's contribution, and ensure that readers can differentiate between human-generated and AI-assisted content.

APA Referencing

Provide the name of the AI model & version (ChatGPT4), the developer (OpenAI), the query, and the date when the information was retrieved.

Here's an example of an APA reference for ChatGPT:

OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT4 [AI model]. "How many female Prime Ministers are there in the world?" Retrieved May 1st, 2023, from https://www.openai.com/chatgpt

Students can cite ChatGPT within the body of their work, indicating the specific point where they have used the AI-generated content. This method helps maintain the flow of their writing while ensuring proper attribution.

Example: According to recent research on climate change (ChatGPT, 2023), the primary cause of global warming is the increase in greenhouse gases emitted by human activities.

Students can provide additional information about the generated content without disrupting their main text. Useful when referencing multiple sources.

Example: The economic impact of climate change is expected to be significant, with some estimates suggesting a global GDP loss of up to 10% by 2100¹.

¹ ChatGPT (2023). Economic consequences of climate change. OpenAI.

A comprehensive list of sources used in a student's work, including ChatGPT, e included at the end of their assignment. This method ensures all sources are acknowledged and provides readers with additional resources for further exploration.

Example:

References:

ChatGPT (2023). Effects of climate change on wildlife. OpenAI.

ChatGPT (2023). Strategies for mitigating climate change. OpenAI.

Dessler, A. E., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Climate change: Processes, characteristics, and threats. Cambridge University Press.

Set criteria standards, then create a custom comment.

1. Follow the prompt tips above (who it is, what it needs to do, its voice)

2. Enter the criteria in for a task at different levels

3. Tell it to write a 50 words comment in the second person for a hard-working student who received an A in KU & B in Com.

Knowledge & Understanding (KU)
A standard: criteria here
B standard: criteria here

Communication (Com)
A standard: criteria here
B standard: criteria here

Magic Design is an AI-powered design tool built into Canva. By uploading an image or selecting a style, Magic Design will whip up a curated selection of personalised templates.

Sal Khan, the founder and CEO of Khan Academy, shares the opportunities he sees for students and educators to collaborate with AI tools and demos new features for Khanmigo.

Grammarly's on-demand, contextually aware assistant powered by generative AI that takes into account context, preferences, and goals to instantly generate drafts and revisions.

Adobe uses both AI and machine learning technology to simplify and automate complex tasks. Built into most of Adobe's products to improve the creative process and more intuitive.

ARTICLES & READINGS

There is a lot of noise around generative AI and education. This collection of quality articles may help you navigate your way through the latest breakthroughs, trends, and success stories.

ChatGPT in Education

It is a disruptive technology and it is here to stay. This overview explores ChatGPT from an educational perspective. It has been designed by educators, for educators who want to learn more and are considering integrating the technology into their learning environment.

By educators,
for educators.

Powered by the Digital Access Pass. A digital education program designed to provide essential skills for students, teachers, and parents to help navigate them through their digital world.

GENERATIVE AI TOOLS

There is an explosion of AI tools that can generate text, images, videos, and animation. These examples may help to develop resources.

DALL·E 2

DALL·E 2 is an AI system from OpenAI that creates realistic images and art from a text prompt. It is still regarded as a research project but you can sign up and try it. Microsoft's Bing Image Creator is powered by DALL_E 2. Free and paid plans.
https://openai.com/product/dall-e-2

VanceAI - Portrait

V ansPortrait is an AI-based converter that helps convert a photo to a sketch or anime in 5 seconds using deep learning. There are several VanceAI products. VanceAI gives you three free credits when you create the account, which you need to do to download your masterpiece.
https://vanceai.com/photo-to-sketch/?source=topnav

AI AGGREGATORS

An aggregator is a central location for accessing any new AI work that comes online. Users can sort through the type of AI (whether it's text, image, video, or plugins), price, and more.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Generative AIis a game-changer for education & business This page is designed as a starter kit for anyone looking to integrate generative AI into their school. VIDEO: Scotty breaks down ChatGPT (3mins) VIDEO: Some teacher hacks for ChatGPT (3mins) VIDEO: Using technology with purpose Scotty shows students how to inform a STEEPLE (8 mins) Asking students not to use ChatGPT for their work is counterproductive in today's landscape.

# data[].attributes.headline
Complete ChatGPT Tutorial - [Become A Power User in 30 Minutes] [video]

# data[].attributes.subject
Complete ChatGPT Tutorial - [Become A Power User in 30 Minutes] [video]

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Complete ChatGPT Tutorial - [Become A Power User in 30 Minutes]

# data[].attributes.headline
ChatGPT For Educators MasterClass Intro [video]

# data[].attributes.subject
ChatGPT For Educators MasterClass Intro [video]

# data[].attributes.headline
I asked ChatGPT - "What is the biggest issue you see in Students and Teachers using you?"

# data[].attributes.subject
I asked ChatGPT - "What is the biggest issue you see in Students and Teachers using you?"

# data[].attributes.headline
What can teachers/students use ChatGPT for - according to itself?

# data[].attributes.subject
What can teachers/students use ChatGPT for - according to itself?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
When put to the test, ChatGPT can create, answer and solve just about anything. Simply type a few words in its question box and a spit-fire, dead-on response is provided.

According to weetechsolution.com , ChatGPT - GPT meaning Generative Pre-trained Transformer - is an advanced "conversational AI application" built to resemble, interpret and synthesize human-like behaviors.

ChatGPT's capabilities are anything but limited as the program can produce written stories, engage in social media posts, respond to emails and even solve your math homework. However, this too-good-to-be-true program is not without fault.

One of the greatest issues evolving from this program is how students will use it to their advantage. It can become a helpful homework tool as easily as a method for leaving their thinking to machines.

The lingering question floating in cyberspace is whether ChatGPT will become every student's dream or every teacher's nightmare.
Pros
When used for the right purposes, ChatGPT can become an advocate for education.

Admittedly, the program's advanced abilities are reason to question if it should be permissible in classrooms. Students can easily plagiarize mediocre AI-generated work and finish assignments without actively learning.

However, some educators believe in ChatGPT's power to positively change the operations of classroom learning.

Supporting educators like John Bruer believe the educational system's prioritization of learning random facts over recalling information will hinder students' ability to intuitively think.

Because no two individuals learn the same way, these generalizations lack proper resources for individual academic and intellectual growth.

Students can improve their communication and critical thinking skills by asking questions to ChatGPT's chatbox and tweaking as needed to produce the desired response.

Involvement in discussions and a deeper understanding of the course content can be developed when the program answers specific prompts.

Rather than shut down the human brain for good, applying an AI application to education builds upon ideas and fortifies previous knowledge.

"[This will] generalize the learning to new situations and to creatively develop a new way of thinking about an issue," said Bruer.

ChatGPT benefits students as a tool for growing knowledge. This futuristic and experimental method of learning has the potential to replace outdated and ineffective strategies for possibilities to aid the education's future.
Cons
The program doesn't come without its negatives, as many teachers are deeply concerned about its use in school.

Students will certainly take advantage of ChatGPT's intelligence and pass it off as their own. Misusing the program downplays learning and makes it difficult to recognize what assignments students are using it for.

In a recent situation at Furman University in South Carolina , Professor Darren Hick caught a student cheating.

"Academia did not see this coming," Hick said. "So we're sort of blindsided by it."(NyPost 3).

The release of the program in November was unexpected by both Hick and other professors who are concerned by its impact on the education system.

"I feel abject terror [toward] what this is going to mean for my day-to-day job," Hick said. "But it's also fascinating, it's endlessly fascinating."

Artificial intelligence has the potential to hurt our educational systems and result in students relying on it instead of spending the time to study and read the material.
Conclusion
ChatGPT, like many search engines and AI programs, is up for debate as a valid device for practical use or an ethical drawback in terms of education..

The program may just be the key to unlocking effective learning strategies. Together, students and AI can actively use their learned knowledge for greater achievements.

However, the program can be taken advantage of, making true learning and knowledge obsolete. Many students and teachers will need to define the fine line between cheating and resourcefulness.

Ensuring that ChatGPT is only a tool and not a complete dependency for educational purposes is vital to the introduction of artificial intelligence into our lives.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The controversial artificial intelligence program, ChatGPT, is changing the world. When put to the test, ChatGPT can create, answer and solve just about anything. Simply type a few words in its question box and a spit-fire, dead-on response is provided. According to weetechsolution.com, ChatGPT - GPT meaning Generative Pre-trained Transformer - is an advanced "conversational...

# data[].attributes.headline
A user's example: How to use ChatGPT to easily learn any skill you want [ video]

# data[].attributes.subject
A user's example: How to use ChatGPT to easily learn any skill you want [ video]

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How to use ChatGPT to easily learn any skill you want

# data[].attributes.headline
Does ChatGPT Reccommend Using It For Education?

# data[].attributes.subject
Does ChatGPT Reccommend Using It For Education?

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.cloudmoyo.com/blogs/7-reasons-to-use-chatgpt-5-reasons-you-shouldnt/

# data[].attributes.headline
7 Reasons to use ChatGPT & 5 Reasons you shouldn't

# data[].attributes.subject
7 Reasons to use ChatGPT & 5 Reasons you shouldn't

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
There's no way you haven't heard of ChatGPT yet, but if for some reason you haven't, let's catch you up!

ChatGPT is a language model powered by artificial intelligence that mimics human conversations. Developed by OpenAI, this natural language processing (NLP) technology is based on transformer architecture, a type of algorithm that predicts the next word in a series of words. It interacts in dialogue form and provides responses that appear surprisingly human. This language translation model also performs tasks like answering questions, providing information, and assisting with writing emails, essays, and even code!

Pretty amazing, right? But while ChatGPT offers many benefits, it also has its share of drawbacks. In this blog, we'll explore the pros and cons of using ChatGPT to help you determine whether it's right for your personal or organizational needs. Here's a 1-minute summary:

Reduced Time & Effort for Tasks

ChatGPT astounded the world by taking minutes to perform tasks that once took hours. Fear followed awe as writers and coders worried that AI would steal their jobs. We're here to tell you that it won't. Remember when personal computers first made their way to a traditional corporate office? The fear was, "Oh, our jobs are now replaced by a computer." And while a computer could now do a lot of mundane tasks that required human intervention, it also gave people time to learn newer skills and carry out strategic tasks that can't be performed by a computer or bot. Similarly, AI and ChatGPT function as supplemental AI tool that supports the day-to-day tasks of humans. Right from giving you 50+ content creation ideas and ready-to-run codes, ChatGPT can reduce the time and effort spent on tasks significantly, but it will never replace your individuality or voice.

Ease of Use

Hands down, one of the biggest pros of ChatGPT is its ease of use. You don't need any training and can start using this technology by simply creating an account.

Speed & Efficiency

ChatGPT's performance is quite amazing. It responds to questions almost instantaneously, making it an ideal tool for businesses that require speedy responses to customer inquiries (trust us, we've tried it, and the responses are almost always instant!). It's also efficient as it can handle a large number of inquiries simultaneously.

Cost-Effective

The trial version of ChatGPT is open to the public and free of cost. The trial version is quite amazing as it offers impressive features. However, the paid version (ChatGPT Plus) comes with added benefits like:

1. Availability with high demand

2. Faster response speed

3. Priority access to new features

Personalization

One of the coolest things about ChatGPT is that it can be customized to reflect your brand's voice and tone. For example, if you work in marketing and want to build content that resonates with your audience, you can give ChatGPT prompts like: keep the tone of the content young and engaging. ChatGPT will then build content with those specific instructions. This feature ensures that your audience has a consistent experience with your brand, which can help build trust and loyalty.

Analytics

Did you know ChatGPT can collect data on customer interactions and provide insights into customer behavior, preferences, and pain points? This information can help businesses improve their products and services and optimize their marketing strategies.

So, ChatGPT is pretty great, but ultimately - all that glitters is not gold. While ChatGPT might be the shiny new topic everyone's talking about, it does come with some cons. Don't get us wrong, we love the capabilities and use cases of AI and ChatGPT but like all technology, there's always room for improvement. Here are some lesser-spoken cons of using ChatGPT.

Lack of Emotional Intelligence

While ChatGPT mimics human conversations and is designed to have human-like conversations (which it's surprisingly good at) it still lacks the emotional intelligence that humans possess. This means that it may not be able to pick up on the subtleties of human communication or provide the same level of understanding a human consultant can. This is especially important when businesses today face ethical, behavioral, and sentimental challenges.

Limited Context & Knowledge

ChatGPT may struggle to understand the context of a person's inquiry, which can result in irrelevant or incorrect responses. This can lead to frustration and dissatisfaction among people. Moreover, ChatGPT in the recent past has received criticism for giving misogynistic answers to certain questions. Since it picks up information from existing sources and is essentially a chatbot by design, it runs the risk of coming off as an insensitive technology. Not just that, the general lack of a diverse workforce in tech has led to racial bias in the past. From infrared technologies that are unable to detect people of color, to facial recognition systems that cannot distinguish people from the same race, there is much work to be done. Diversity in STEM and the tech industry is needed to create technologies that are sensitive and humane.

Security Risks

Data privacy and data security can be a few concerning issues when it comes to ChatGPT. It may pose security risks because it has access to sensitive customer data. If you're a business using ChatGPT, you need to ensure that the ChatGPT system is secure and that your organization's/customer's data is protected against cyber-attacks.

Inexperience

ChatGPT is still in its developmental stages and is constantly learning. It requires a significant amount of time and instructions to function effectively. One also needs to spend some time understanding the platform to get the most out of it.

Technical Glitches

Like all technology, ChatGPT is not immune to glitches and errors. It doesn't have an answer to every question. It can give you the wrong answer and sometimes you're unable to use it when too many people are using it at the same time (this applies only to the free version). This can lead to breakdowns in communication and frustrations with people.

So how do you choose? Is AI technology a bane of the future or a boon of today? Here's what we think.

ChatGPT is a powerful tool that offers many benefits for businesses and individuals, including speed, ease of use, reduction in time and effort, efficiency, personalization, and analytics. However, it also has its share of drawbacks, including a lack of emotional intelligence, limited context and knowledge, security risks, training requirements, and technical glitches. The key to using any AI tool including ChatGPT, ChatGPT - 3.5, ChatGPT 4, and any other versions that are released is maintaining balance. A good balance between the latest AI technology and an expert human agent or consultant is the perfect recipe for success! While, Artificial Intelligence brings speed and efficiency, only a human can bring understanding and empathy to the table.

At CloudMoyo, we harness the power of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to unlock new efficiencies, eliminate labor-intensive tasks, and pave the way for game-changing innovation. Our unparalleled artificial intelligence and machine learning expertise have helped many businesses solve challenges. We leverage IoT (Internet of Things) for predictive maintenance while Natural Language Process (NLP) uses Sentimental Analysis. Our consultants help you on every step of your digital transformation journey. It's the perfect balance of AI and human connection!

Connect with our experts and chat about anything you'd like - the possibilities of infusing AI into your business, any pain points, projects, or implementations. Or you can also connect with them for a quick coffee and get any other tech questions answered!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
7 Reasons to Use ChatGPT (& 5 Reasons You Shouldn't) - CloudMoyo

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
There's no way you haven't heard of ChatGPT yet, but if for some reason you haven't, let's catch you up! ChatGPT is a language model powered by artificial intelligence that mimics human conversations. Developed by OpenAI, this natural language processing (NLP) technology is based on transformer architecture, a type of algorithm that predicts the next word in a series of words.

# data[].attributes.headline
11 Disadvantages Of ChatGPT Content || OpenAI @pafoundation [video]

# data[].attributes.subject
11 Disadvantages Of ChatGPT Content || OpenAI @pafoundation [video]

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
11 Disadvantages Of ChatGPT Content || OpenAI @pafoundation

# data[].attributes.headline
Pros & Cons of Using ChatGPT for Education:

# data[].attributes.subject
Pros & Cons of Using ChatGPT for Education:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Pros and cons of chatGPT in the education sector

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
ChatGPT can be useful for many but has its own advantages and disadvantages. Here are some pros and cons of ChatGPT in the education sector:

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/10hn7tg/using_ai_bots_as_a_tool_for_your_writing_pros_and/

# data[].attributes.body
Blocked website due to violations of Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act) regulating academic cheating services! Still... a good list. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcustom-writing.org%2Fblog%2Fchatgpt-academic-writing&psig=AOvVaw1PJuSaJIun3pbTR8uAI1sG&ust=1685150350151000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CA8QjhxqFwoTCPCV6LPokf8CFQAAAAAdAAAAABAe

# data[].attributes.body
https://lavozdeanza.com/opinions/2023/02/21/chat-gpt-pros-and-cons/

# data[].attributes.headline
AI in Education - Resources and Examples (from the 

# data[].attributes.subject
AI in Education - Resources and Examples (from the 

# data[].attributes.body
From the ChatGPT for Teachers Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/703007927897194

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
AI in Education - Resources and Examples

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A curated selection of real-world examples and resources for AI in Education. Eager to understand the classroom use of ChatGPT, Bard and others? This is your starting point!

# data[].attributes.headline
Where does it draw it's information from?

# data[].attributes.subject
Where does it draw it's information from?

# data[].attributes.body
https://ditchthattextbook.com/ai-lesson-planning/