# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Basics of Accommodations and Modifications

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Accommodations Variations  Modifications PPT (3).ppt

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Handout 7- SE Accomodations Modifications Interventions (1)

# data[].attributes.body
Grid of Nine

# data[].attributes.body
Grid of Nine Blank

# data[].attributes.headline
CDE Guidance: Promotion, Retention, and Grading 

# data[].attributes.subject
CDE Guidance: Promotion, Retention, and Grading 

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Promotion and Retention of Students with Disabilities

1. What if a student with a disability fails to meet board-adopted or individualized promotion standards?

If a student with a disability fails to meet board-adopted or individualized promotion standards, the IEP team should reconvene immediately to consider the following:

Is the current IEP for the student's academic, linguistic, social, emotional, and behavioral needs appropriate?

Is the manner of assessment appropriate, including accommodations and modifications identified in the IEP?

Were all the services required by the student to make progress in the general education curriculum appropriately identified in the student's IEP?

Were the linguistic needs of English Learners appropriately identified?

Did the student receive all the services identified in the IEP?

Was the assessment conducted consistent with the IEP?

Was the student's promotion standard appropriate and clarified in the IEP?

2. What if the IEP was written to consider the student's individualized needs, but the student still failed to meet the promotion standards?

If the questions in item #5 above were answered positively, but the student still failed to meet the promotion standards, then the student should participate in intensive supplemental instruction developed by the local board pursuant to Education Code 37252.2 - 37252.8. The IEP team should document all the supports and related services the student will need to benefit from supplemental instruction.

If after intensive supplemental instruction, the student still does not meet the board-adopted or individualized promotion standards, an IEP meeting should be held to develop an appropriate plan to support student progress.

If the questions in item #4 were answered in the negative, the IEP team should determine why such supports were not provided, develop an alternate plan, amend the IEP, provide intensive supplemental instruction, and consider not retaining the student because the district did not provide the supports and services necessary for the student to benefit from the educational program.

3. May students with disabilities participate in intensive supplemental instruction pursuant to Education Code 37252.2 - 37252.8 and Extended School Year (ESY) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) simultaneously?

Yes, a student may participate in the two programs simultaneously, but only if the need for supplemental instruction is documented in the student's IEP. In order to receive both services, ESY and supplemental instruction, the IEP must reflect that the student needs to participate in an intensive supplemental instruction program as part of the ESY services necessary for the provision of a free appropriate public education (FAPE). In other words, the student is receiving supplemental instruction in order to meet the standards-based goals of the IEP, and special education and related services will be provided in order for the student to benefit from that instruction.

Grades, Report Cards, and Transcripts for Students with Disabilities

1. Should a student's grade reflect that accommodations have been made for that student to access the general education curriculum?

No. A student's grade should not reflect that accommodations have been made. Accommodations provide students with disabilities an equal opportunity to participate in the general education curriculum.
An accommodation is a change in the course, standard, test preparation, location, timing, scheduling, expectation, student response, or other attributes that provides access for a student with a disability to participate in a course, standard or test, and it does not fundamentally alter or lower the standard or expectation of the course, standard or test.

2. May a student's grade reflect that modifications have been made for that student to access the general education curriculum?

Yes. If modifications have been made to the curriculum of any course, it is important that the student's grade reflect the student's achievement in the modified curriculum, as long as modified grades are available to all students. However, any modifications to programming, instruction, and grading must be documented in the student's IEP and be directly related to the student's disability. To automatically give modified grades to all special education students would be discriminatory and potentially violate Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

A modification is a change in the course, standard, test preparation, location, timing, scheduling, expectation, student response, or other attribute that provides access for a student with a disability to participate in a course, standard or test, and it does fundamentally alter or lower the standard or expectation of the course, standard or test.

3. May a report card for a student with a disability identify Special Education or other related services or resources being provided for that student or otherwise indicate that the student has a disability? For example, may the report card refer to an IEP or a plan providing for services under Section 504?

Yes. Report cards are provided to parents to indicate their child's progress or level of achievement in specific classes, course content, or curriculum. Consistent with this purpose, it would be permissible under Section 504 and Title II for a report card to indicate that a student is receiving special education or related services, as long as the report card informs parents about their child's progress or level of achievement in specific classes, course content, or curriculum. For instance, a report card for a student with a disability may refer to an IEP or a plan for providing services under Section 504 in order to report on the student's progress on the specific goals in the IEP or plan developed under Section 504.

However, the mere designation that a student has an IEP or is receiving a related service, without any meaningful explanation of the student's progress, such as a grade or other evaluative standard established by an LEA and/or SEA, would be inconsistent with IDEA's periodic reporting requirements, as well as with Section 504 and Title II. Under Section 504 and Title II, in general, the LEA must provide students with disabilities report cards that are as informative and effective as the report cards provided for students without disabilities. See 34 C.F.R. § 104.4(b)(1)(i)-(iv) and 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(1)(i)-(iv). Without more meaningful information, a report card that indicates only special education status provides the student with a disability with a benefit or service that is different from and not as informative and effective as the benefit or service that is provided through the report card for students without disabilities.

4. May a report card for a student with a disability distinguish between special education programs and services and general education curriculum classes through specific notations or the use of asterisks or other symbols?

In general, yes. LEAs frequently distinguish between general education curriculum classes and other types of programs and classes, such as advanced placement, honors, or remedial classes. Making similar distinctions on report cards would be consistent with the general requirements of Section 504 and Title II that individuals with disabilities may not unnecessarily be treated differently than individuals without disabilities. See 34 C.F.R. § 104.4(b)(1)(i)-(iv) and 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(1)(i)-(iv). Under Section 504 and Title II, in order to properly reflect the progress of a student with a disability in a modified or alternate education curriculum, an LEA may distinguish between special education programs and services provided under a modified or alternate education curriculum and regular education classes under the general education curriculum on the student's report card. For instance, where a student's IEP calls for a modified tenth grade literature curriculum to be provided through the special education program, it would be appropriate for the report card to indicate that the student's progress was measured based on the modified education curriculum. This distinction also may be achieved by using an asterisk or other symbol meant to reference the modified or alternate education curriculum as long as the statements on the report card, including the asterisks, symbols or other coding, provide an explanation of the student's progress that is as informative and effective as the explanation provided for students without disabilities.

5. May report card grades for a student with a disability be based on grade level standards?

Yes. Assigning grades (i.e., achievement or "letter" grades) for a child with a disability based on the student's grade level (i.e., year-in-school) standards would not be inconsistent with Section 504 or Title II. Generally, Section 504 and Title II would require that students with and without disabilities in the same regular education classes in the general education curriculum be graded using the same standards. That is, if an LEA assigns grades to nondisabled students participating in regular education classes using grade level standards to reflect progress in the general education curriculum, then the LEA would also use those standards to assign grades to students with disabilities in those same classes. See 34 C.F.R. § 104.4(b)(1)(i)-(iv) and 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(1)(i)-(iv). Nothing in Section 504 or Title II prohibits SEAs and LEAs from deciding how to establish standards to reflect the progress or level of achievement of students with disabilities who are taught using different course content or a modified or alternate education curriculum. To the extent that a student with a disability is not participating in regular education classes, but is receiving modified course content or is being taught under a modified or alternate curriculum, it would be up to the SEA and/or the LEA to determine the standards to be used to measure the student's progress or level of achievement.

6. May a student's transcript indicate that the student participated in a modified curriculum?

Yes. The purpose of the transcript is to present an accurate picture of a student's coursework. If the curriculum content has been modified, the transcript may reflect that modification through some type of symbol or code that indicates that the student received modified grades or completed work at a lower grade level. The explanation of the symbol or code can not indicate that the student has a disability or that the student is in special education.

References

Anderson, Gabrielle E., Whipple, Angela D., & Jimerson, Shane R. (2002). Grade Retention - Achievement and Mental Health Outcomes. National Association of School Psychologists.

Eggert, Dean B. (2001). Grading Students with Educational Disabilities. New Hampshire: Wadleigh, Starr & Peters, P.L.L.C.

Freedman, Miriam Kurtzig, M.A., J. D. (2008). Grades, Report Cards, etc....and the Law. Boston: School Law 1 2 3.

Iowa Department of Education, Bureau of Children, Family and Community Services (1999). Grades, Diplomas and Transcripts for Students with Disabilities.

Iowa Department Of Education. 2017. Grades, Diplomas and Transcripts for Students with Disabilities (1999) Interim Supplement and Updates (PDF).

Jimerson, Shane. R., and Kaufman, Amber M. 2007. "Grade retention and promotion: Information for parents." School Psychology Review 30: 420-437.

Quenemoen, R.F., Lehr, C.A., Thurlow, M. L., Thompson, S. J., & Bolt, S. (2000). Social Promotion and Students with Disabilities: Issues and Challenges in Developing State Policies . Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes

Salend, Spencer J. & Duhaney, Laurel M. Garrick (2002). Grading Students in Inclusive Settings. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 34(3) 8-15.

Great Schools.org. 2011. Repeating a grade: The pros and cons .

Thompson, Charles L. & Cunningham, Elizabeth K. (2000). Retention and Social Promotion: Research and Implications for Policy . ERIC Digest.

Penna, Albert A., and Marilyn Tallerico. 2005. " Grade Retention and School Completion: Through Students' Eyes ." Journal of At-Risk Issues 11.1: 13-17.

United States Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. 2008. Letter to the Field and Questions and Answers on Report Cards and Transcripts for Students with Disabilities Attending Public Elementary and Secondary Schools .

Last Reviewed: Monday, October 11, 2021

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
What if a student with a disability fails to meet board-adopted or individualized promotion standards? If a student with a disability fails to meet board-adopted or individualized promotion standards, the IEP team should reconvene immediately to consider the following: Is the current IEP for the student's academic, linguistic, social, emotional, and behavioral needs appropriate?

# data[].attributes.body
Individual Curriculum Planning

# data[].attributes.body
IEP at a Glance