# data[].attributes.body
Isn't it kind of our job to help teachers and students learn how to navigate these tools?

# data[].attributes.body
What's the difference between "basic" and "best practices" for getting a 2 or 3 on the rubric?

# data[].attributes.body
What is appropriate? (only while using app if needed) *Add "Or doesn't use location services" to notes

# data[].attributes.body
Do our current apps require location services and meet all needs on rubric? Do we go back and review all and review rubric or take those apps away?

# data[].attributes.body
Add birthdate as not acceptable

# data[].attributes.body
Combine under PII requirements

# data[].attributes.body
List guidelines first and then say, for more information you can visit...then link sites.

# data[].attributes.body
The component column is very detailed, but the score columns are sparse. How do we ensure evaluators are focusing on all the bullet points in the first column?

# data[].attributes.body
The purpose the app meets the needs of the user.

# data[].attributes.body
Supports auditory, visual, physical, and speech needs of the user. Accessibility features of the iPad can be applied to the app.

# data[].attributes.body
We like the order of bullets in that it prioritizes the alignment to district curriculum.

# data[].attributes.body
-And/or?
-What if users have minimal engagement but not all users are represented? 1 vs 2?
- What is difference between not all and only some users are represented?

Changes suggesting:
wording the same for users:
1- users are not actively engaged in content and only some users are represented
2- users have minimal engagement with content and only some users are represented
3-same

# data[].attributes.body
Good that it focuses on grade level in the score columns for curriculum purposes, rather than student age (PII purposes)

# data[].attributes.body
We like that it mentions advertising specifically. So many apps/websites are full of distractions which takes kids away from their task.

# data[].attributes.body
Just because an app is fun and fits the curriculum doesn't mean it's high quality. :-)

# data[].attributes.body
Involve Tim Krile for CK traffic.

# data[].attributes.body
Say what option to choose to paste your URL - Choose Test your Server

# data[].attributes.body
Where does a T grade go? T = trust issues with the site certificate. Gives you a grade, A-F, if the site would be trusted

# data[].attributes.body
Is there a score that can be assigned when feedback is not applicable within the app... feedback is provided elsewhere?  Creation apps vs. software leveled activities... creation apps may not provide feedback, but can be turned into Canvas (Google Drive) for feedback. Is this a necessary Component for evaluation?

# data[].attributes.body
Add video as a communication option.

# data[].attributes.body
- Does adaptable = individualized
- Some apps are not adaptable but still useful, others are fully adaptable but not useful. We do not think that it is a make or break category at this time.

# data[].attributes.body
Are students 13 and up (or, age required by the specific app) permitted to create their own accounts? If so, we should reflect this in the Rubric...?

# data[].attributes.body
Do we need this category? It seems as if Engagement and Interaction could fall into Educational relevance . However, the description mentions Equity. Does this need to be it's own category?

# data[].attributes.body
Equity: ADA compliant or accessible? Play nice with iPad accessibility features?

# data[].attributes.body
What does "positively reflected" mean? Is this in reference to race, ability, etc...?

# data[].attributes.headline
Accessibility Features for Special Needs

# data[].attributes.subject
Accessibility Features for Special Needs

# data[].attributes.body
Engagement: What do we mean by this? Is it the features that spark creativity? Or, like Notability, just being a useful tool is sufficient?