# data[].attributes.headline
Gilets Jaunes: gare aux fake news sur les réseaux sociaux

# data[].attributes.subject
Gilets Jaunes: gare aux fake news sur les réseaux sociaux

# data[].attributes.body
L'audio est de "BFM TV". Dans la source d’audio ils parlent de la crise de la “fake news” sur les reseaux sociaux. Les réseaux sociaux permettent les personnes de relayer les fausses informations très rapides, et les rumeurs polluent sur l’internet. Dans cette audio, une vidéo a diffusé sur l’internet d’un homme qui a dit “Je vu des feuilles qui déclencherait une guerre mondiale en même pas une heure”, et il est faux. Cette fausses informations est très dangereux parce que il est une manipulation de la vérité, et si beaucoup des gens croient il cela pourrait provoquer le violence.  Les documents de l’onu dites les informations de l’immigration, et les personnes pouvaient penser qu'il y avait une vrai guerre mondiale. Les gens ont decouvert que ce la video disit la "fake news" mais apres il soit repandu sur l'internet. Donc, les réseaux sociaux ne sont pas une source d’information fiable et ils sont dangereux parce qu’ils créent les rumeurs très fort.

# data[].attributes.headline
Source Graphique: Confiance et Precision

# data[].attributes.subject
Source Graphique: Confiance et Precision

# data[].attributes.body
Ce graphique a été fait par "PEW Research Center," et décrit la confiance que les gens ont dans les informations qu'ils obtiennent des réseaux sociaux. Dans le graphique, il dit que 22% des Américains faire confiance aux informations qu'ils obtiennent dans les médias locaux, 18% font confiance aux médias nationaux, et 14% font confiance à leurs familles et amis pour l'information. Sans surprise, seulement 4% des adultes font confiance aux informations qu'ils voient sur les réseaux sociaux, et 30% des adultes font confiance à un peu. Ce graphique prouve que très peu de gens font confiance aux information des réseaux sociaux en raison de la multiplication des fausses actualités.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Gilets Jaunes: gare aux fake news sur les réseaux sociaux

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Dans cette crise, les réseaux sociaux ont permis aux Français de se mobiliser en nombre, quitte parfois à relayer de fausses informations. Les " fake news " et les rumeurs pullulent sur le net.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
Pew Research Center's Journalism Project

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Only about two-in-ten Americans (22%) trust the information they get from local news organizations a lot, whether online or offline, and 18% say the same of national organizations, slightly higher than the 14% who say this of the information they get from their friends and family.

# data[].attributes.headline
Fiables d'Information: Les mensonges se propagent plus rapidement sur les réseaux sociaux

# data[].attributes.subject
Fiables d'Information: Les mensonges se propagent plus rapidement sur les réseaux sociaux

# data[].attributes.body
L'article décrit comment les fausses actualités peuvent être trouvées dans les médias sociaux et se propage très rapidement. Sur Twitter, les fausses actualités sont retweetées plus souvent que les vraies actualités et vont plus loin. Les histoires de fausses actualités ont 70% plus de chances d'être retweetées que les vraies nouvelles, et de nombreux utilisateurs de Twitter ne connaissent pas la différence. L'article dit que la fausse actualité est plus susceptible de se répandre parce que c'est nouveau, et beaucoup de gens aiment être les premiers à partager l'histoire.

Quand les gens voient de nouvelles histoires, ils les partagent parce qu'ils veulent que leurs amis entendent de nouvelles informations.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
If it seems like fake news is everywhere, that may be because it is.

Falsehoods spread like wildfire on social media, getting quicker and longer-lasting pickup than the truth, researchers reported on Thursday.

A deep dive into Twitter shows that false news was re-tweeted more often than true news was, and carried further.

"Falsehood diffused significantly farther, faster, deeper, and more broadly than the truth in all categories of information, and the effects were more pronounced for false political news than for false news about terrorism, natural disasters, science, urban legends, or financial information," the team, led bySinan Aral of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, wrote in the journal Science.

"It took the truth about six times as long as falsehood to reach 1,500 people."

And it wasn't bots spreading most of the falsehoods, they found. It was real people doing most of it. Usually ordinary people, too, they found: so-called 'verified' users and those with many followers were not usually the source of some of the most popular untrue viral posts.

It might be because false statements sound more surprising, they said.

"We found that false news was more novel than true news, which suggests that people were more likely to share novel information," they wrote.

It should come as no surprise that the internet has spawned a resurgence of fake news. Congress and the FBI are investigating evidence that Russian and other foreign users deliberately flooded social media with untrue reports and posts intended to mislead people about political candidates.

And the term "fake news" has taken on its own life, referring not only to untrue reports but being increasingly used to dismiss reports that the user does not wish to agree with.

So Aral's team decided to use the term "false news" instead. They also used a broad definition of "news". "We refer to any asserted claim made on Twitter as news," they said.

The study started with PhD research by MIT's Soroush Vosoughi, who was struck by the false reports that spread rapidly after the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings, in which three people were killed and 264 injured.

"Twitter became our main source of news," Vosoughi said in a statement. "I realized that ... a good chunk of what I was reading on social media was rumors," he added.

"It took the truth about six times as long as falsehood to reach 1,500 people."

To objectively separate truth from lies or mistakes, Vosoughi and colleagues used sites devoted to fact-checking: factcheck.org, hoax-slayer.com, politifact.com, snopes.org, truthorfiction.com, and urbanlegends.about.com. The six sites agreed on which reports were true about 95 percent of the time, they said.

For the report, they examined 126,000 stories tweeted by about 3 million people more than 4.5 million times.

They found that false news stories were 70 percent more likely to be retweeted than true stories were.

Untrue stories also had more staying power, carrying onto more "cascades," or unbroken re-tweet chains, they found.

When they looked at who was spreading the wrong stuff, they found it was ordinary users of social media.

"We conclude that human behavior contributes more to the differential spread of falsity and truth than automated robots do," they wrote.

Why retweet that post before you know whether it's actually true?

Status, Aral said. "People who share novel information are seen as being in the know," he said.

But don't forget about the bots, argue Filippo Menczer of Indiana University and colleagues. They estimate that 60 million "bots" post automatic updates on Facebook and up to 48 million are on Twitter.

"The spreaders of fake news are using increasingly sophisticated methods," Menczer said in a statement.

Why do people fall for it, whether it's from a bot or a real friend?

"False news is more novel, and people are more likely to share novel information," Aral said. Plus, people like to repeat information that seems to affirm their beliefs.

"People prefer information that confirms their preexisting attitudes, view information consistent with their preexisting beliefs as more persuasive than dissonant information (confirmation bias), and are inclined to accept information that pleases them," David Lazer of Northeastern University and colleagues wrote in an editorial.

And fact-checking can backfire, they noted. "Fact-checking might even be counterproductive under certain circumstances," they wrote. "There is thus a risk that repeating false information, even in a fact-checking context, may increase an individual's likelihood of accepting it as true."

They call for more high-quality research into the false news problem and what can be done about it, pointing to reforms in the early 20th century that gave rise to legitimate newspapers with ethics promoting objectivity and credibility out of the ashes of a boisterous yellow press.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Want something to go viral? Make it fake news

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Fake news, lies and falsehoods spread like wildfire on social media, a new study confirms. People share wrong information faster than they pass along the truth.

# data[].attributes.body
Il y a un gros problème dans société avec les sources d’information qui ne sont fiables. Les réseaux sociaux font permettent aux information de se répandre rapidement sans être vrais. Il est très difficile pour les gens eux de savoir ce qui est vrai. “Fake news” ont souvent des titres provocateurs, et ensuite, les personnes partage les articles avec leurs famille et amis. De temps en temps, les personnes partage les choses pour attirer l’attention. Donc, les réseaux sociaux n’ont pas une reliable source d’information. Tout des personnes peuvent poster leurs opinions et les “fake news” dans twitter ou facebook.

# data[].attributes.body
Les réseaux sociaux créent un lieu où de nombreuses personnes peuvent partager de fausses informations. Il se propage très rapidement, peut être vu par un grand nombre de personnes en peu de temps et est très facile d'accès. Les adultes apprennent à ne plus faire confiance aux réseaux sociaux et il est nécessaire de mettre fin à cette crise. On ne peut pas faire confiance aux réseaux sociaux et beaucoup de gens ne savent plus quoi croire.