# data[].attributes.body
Nuclear Weapons: first of all thanks for addressing such a complex topic and bringing ethics angle out for discussion. I think nuclear weapons shall be banned, as under no circumstances it will be proportionate use of force, will always cause uncontrolled civilian deaths and also leave long term effects. UN and other international organizations shall step up, drive decision and collective monitoring of the ban implementation.

# data[].attributes.body
As a short time solution it would work fine but as time goes, the country threatened will make their own nukes and start a nuclear war.

# data[].attributes.body
Like,  someone could bomb hitler's house after he comes back from the dead and i still wouldn't think its ok. Its inhumane. We are all humans. We must treat each other as such.

# data[].attributes.body
should not be used against anyone.

# data[].attributes.body
If all countries removed their nuclear weapons, then whichever country remakes it first could harm whichever country they want.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think nuclear weapons should be existing for any reasons because the fact that it exists causes conflicts

# data[].attributes.body
I think that if there is a strong reason for the country to use the nuclear which in this case, to save the civilians and country itself, it is ethical. Even though some people will suffer and even may loose their life, if the government thinks and shows that by using a nuclear weapon, then they are able to help the country then it is better if they do use nuclear weapons.

# data[].attributes.body
It kill innocent citizens, and the radiation effect will be last at least 50 years. And no matter what happens, you should not kill innocent citizen or destroy their personal properties.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The bombs were dropped over 75 years ago. Then, people did not know of radiation and its effects. People were not evacuated so the effects of radiation were detrimental.

The fight against radiation is hard and can for the rest of one's lifetime. When the bombs were first dropped, there was no treatment, and there were endless patients.

People who were in stable condition after the initial blast soon would get worse. Some even died. Radiation does not show on the surface, like a burn. It's deep inside the body and it takes time.

Please listen to the words of the survivors, in this video.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The bombs were dropped over 75 years ago. Then, people did not know of radiation and its effects. People were not evacuated so the effects of radiation were detrimental. The fight against radiation is hard and can for the rest of one's lifetime.

# data[].attributes.body
I do think it is ethical to implement self defense to protect your own country. Having said that, I do not believe it is the most effective way to protect our communities.

# data[].attributes.body
Because the nuclear race is only getting more competitive every year.

# data[].attributes.headline
Is it ethical to implement nuclear deterrence (threatening to use atomic weapons) as a self-defense strategy?

# data[].attributes.subject
Is it ethical to implement nuclear deterrence (threatening to use atomic weapons) as a self-defense strategy?

# data[].attributes.body
国を守る為に核兵器を使用するのは許されるべきなのか？

# data[].attributes.body
it is not ethical to use nuclear weapons as a mean to protect themselves, because it creates a standard of power, which would become nuclear weapons

# data[].attributes.body
In order to change the standard of world power from the number of nuclear weapons, it is necessary to stop the use of nuclear weapons

# data[].attributes.body
I think that nuclear weapons should not be used and produced because evidently, there is a major effect not only on the humans but the land itself.

# data[].attributes.body
It can never be right to launch a nuclear attack against civilians. It can never be right to do that to a military, a government, or even a deserted island. There is no reason to use such unnecessary weapons when the only outcomes are consequences on the lives of many and the land that we are dependant on: the Earth.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think nuclear weapons should be used against anyone.

# data[].attributes.body
To save the countries. I think it's the last way that you can protect your own countries.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that nuclear weapons should be banned and not used in any situatiosn within countries. Through the exhbition, we were able to learn about the effect on the organisms and how it leaves devastating circumstances.

# data[].attributes.body
There shouldn't even be a reason to start something for another country to be in a self defense. People as well as countries should try their best in order to understand and match others needs and wants.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think that nuclear weapons should have been used in the first place. Therefore, I believe that they shouldn't be used in the future either.

# data[].attributes.body
核兵器はまだ製造されるべきか？

# data[].attributes.headline
Is using a nuclear weapon morally permissible under some circumstances?

# data[].attributes.subject
Is using a nuclear weapon morally permissible under some circumstances?

# data[].attributes.body
核兵器の使用は、場合によっては許されるのか？

# data[].attributes.headline
Can it ever be right to launch a nuclear attack against civilians?

# data[].attributes.subject
Can it ever be right to launch a nuclear attack against civilians?

# data[].attributes.body
国民に対して核攻撃を行うことは正しいことか？

# data[].attributes.headline
If technology goes out of existence over time, why do we still have nuclear weapons after the Cold War? 

# data[].attributes.subject
If technology goes out of existence over time, why do we still have nuclear weapons after the Cold War? 

# data[].attributes.body
戦後、なぜ核兵器の開発だけ進歩しているのか？