# data[].attributes.body
FEEDBACK:-

Make is more interesting like acting, rap,song etc.

No wow factor

Fun facts

# data[].attributes.body
CRITERIAN A=6😓

In my opinion this is a really bad grade and I aim to achieve a better grade next time.

The reason I got this grade:-

I don't really know because I had tried but best at this criterion but probably it was not enough to get an 8.

I am determined to get an 8 for criterion B

# data[].attributes.body
This wooden pencil box exemplifies functional, ergonomic, and sustainable design principles, making it both aesthetically pleasing and practical. Here are some main points about it.

Durability & Longevity – The wooden material ensures a long lifespan compared to plastic alternatives.

User Experience (UX) – The intuitive opening mechanism and organized compartments enhance usability.

Eco-Friendly & Biodegradable – Unlike synthetic materials, this wooden box is sustainable and won’t contribute to plastic waste.

Timeless Design – The simplicity and elegance make it suitable for users of all ages, from students to professionals.

# data[].attributes.body
This pencil box is functional and aesthetic design using ergonomic and sustainable principles. Here are the most important things about this pencil box.

Ergonomics & Usability –

The smooth-sliding top lid ensures easy access to contents without requiring extra force.

The semi-circular cutout at the front facilitates effortless opening, supporting user-centered design.

Aesthetic & Craftsmanship –

The unique grain pattern in each piece of wood gives every box a distinct, organic appearance, enhancing its natural beauty.

The well-sanded and treated finish adds refinement while also improving durability.

# data[].attributes.body
This wooden pencil box is an excellent example of functional, ergonomic, and sustainable design. Here are some main points about it.

Joinery & Craftsmanship – The finger joint construction at the corners enhances durability, preventing the structure from weakening over time. This method also adds a refined, handcrafted touch, showcasing high-quality woodworking.

Ergonomics & Usability – The semi-circular cutout at the front allows effortless opening, demonstrating user-centered design. Additionally, the round knob on the back provides an alternative grip point for smoother operation.

Aesthetic Appeal – The natural wood finish, combined with its clean lines and warm tones, creates a timeless and visually pleasing design. The grain pattern adds texture and character, enhancing its elegance.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, I worked really hard on this model but it was not the best in the class. Half of my model was 3D printed and half of it was wood. I wanted my model to function and look exactly like my real product but the dowel joint was the problem there wasn't any small sticks so I had to use nails which made it rigid and it couldn't function. That is when everything went downhill to cover the mess up I just made a unique thing to open the box to make it look different.

# data[].attributes.body
CRITERIAN B= 8☺️

In my opinion this is a really good grade; I achieved what I aimed for.

I am determined to get an 8 for criterion C too!!!!

As that can make my final grade high.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
We’re currently checking your connection. This shouldn’t take long.If you keep getting this page, check if there’s a problem with Canva.

# data[].attributes.headline
Clamp the wood after hammering the dowel

# data[].attributes.subject
Clamp the wood after hammering the dowel

# data[].attributes.body
CRITERIAN C= 7☺️

In my opinion this is a really good grade; I achieved what I aimed for.

I am determined to get an 8 for criterion D

As that can make my final grade high.

# data[].attributes.headline
D2: Explain the success of the Solution 

# data[].attributes.subject
D2: Explain the success of the Solution 

# data[].attributes.body
D3: Improvements and Changes, thoroughly outlines critical areas for enhancing the design and construction of the wooden flower vase. The proposed improvements, ranging from precise adjustments to the visual alignment of the vase's top and implementing a more robust rabbit joint for superior structural integrity, to applying a multi-layered waterproof solution for better leak prevention, all demonstrate a keen focus on both aesthetic refinement and functional durability. Furthermore, the emphasis on pre-testing adhesive glue highlights a valuable lesson in material compatibility and finish quality. Collectively, these detailed and well-reasoned changes indicate a comprehensive and reflective approach to perfecting the product, ensuring a more polished, sturdy, and reliable final flower vase.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Easily create surveys and polls to collect customer feedback, measure employee satisfaction, and organize team events.

# data[].attributes.body
D4: Describe Impact on Target Audience, offers a comprehensive evaluation of the wooden flower vase's success and challenges. It highlights that the vase largely solves the client's desire for a personalized and versatile plant display solution, addressing the millennial preference for unique items with its "customised" and stable design, suitable for various planting needs. The product improves upon existing solutions by being durable, waterproof, and visually appealing due to its natural wooden form. Although the initial design brief was adapted from a pencil box to a flower vase, the project successfully delivered a functional product with stable construction and waterproofing. However, the document acknowledges potential negative effects, primarily stemming from issues with the waterproof solution's placement potentially causing leaks and the glue leaving unattractive stains, indicating areas for future refinement despite the overall positive outcome.

Sources

# data[].attributes.headline
What do you think about the final product?

# data[].attributes.subject
What do you think about the final product?

# data[].attributes.body
The survey results for the flower vase offer valuable insights into its reception and areas for future development. Overall, the product was received quite positively, with a strong majority of respondents (73%) deeming the final product "Good" and an additional 27% rating it as "Okay," with no "Bad" ratings. This positive sentiment is further underscored by the high average design rating of 4.18 out of 5, indicating that most users found its aesthetics and form appealing. Furthermore, a significant portion of the audience, 64%, expressed a willingness to pay within the $5-10 range, suggesting a market for the product at an accessible price point, with some even willing to pay more.

However, the survey also clearly highlighted areas ripe for improvement. Despite the positive general feedback, a substantial 73% of respondents indicated a preference for a different style, signaling a desire for greater design diversity. Specific suggestions for improvement frequently revolved around "finishing" and "aesthetics," with comments like "looks hella sad" and suggestions for more intricate designs, smoother surfaces, and contrasting colors. Additionally, feedback on "shaping" pointed towards a preference for rounded corners and more unique or intricate forms over the current design. This suggests that while the fundamental concept and execution are solid, there's significant potential to elevate the perceived value and broader appeal of the vase through more refined craftsmanship and adventurous design choices in future iterations.