# data[].attributes.body
*Upload your team slideshow here. HERE IS THE LINK

# data[].attributes.body
*link your team's drive folder here

# data[].attributes.body
Comment potential answers to the RQ as you read IRRs

# data[].attributes.body
Why should we fund the study of mirror universes to better our understanding of cosmology and quantum mechanics?

# data[].attributes.body
ESTABLISH THE PROBLEM:

Why is it a problem?

What is the situation?

# data[].attributes.body
UNDERSTAND AND EVALUATE CONTEXT:

Has the presentation considered more than one solution?

# data[].attributes.body
ESTABLISH ARGUMENT:

Is the argument for the solution

clear, coherent, and complex?

# data[].attributes.body
IMPLICATIONS AND LIMITATIONS:

What are the implications of the proposed team solution?

What are the limitations of the proposed team solution?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Login to access and create your next design.

# data[].attributes.body
Here are some examples of the types of questions your teacher might ask you during your oral defense. These are examples only; your teacher may ask you different questions. Make sure your answers include specific details about your team’s project.

-Student A, how did the group decide to include Student B’s perspective/lens/conclusions into the overall presentation?

-Student A, give one specific way that your thinking changed as a result of learning about Student B’s findings.

-Reflecting on your colleagues’ work, which one had the greatest impact on your overall understanding of the problem your group identified?

-What is an example of a compelling argument from one of your peer’s individual reports that you decided to exclude from your team presentation and why?

-What is a way in which your team’s resolution makes you think differently about your own individual research?

-Describe an argument from one of your peer’s individual reports that made you think differently about your team’s solution or conclusion?

-If you had another team member, what other perspectives or limitations could they have researched that would have made a useful contribution to the project?

# data[].attributes.body
Peer-Reviewed System

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Frontiers | Industry Collaborations of Research Teams: Are They Penalized or Rewarded in the Grant Evaluation Process?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This paper explores the relationship between the industry collaborations of grant applicant teams and the outcomes of a multistage grant evaluation process.…