# data[].attributes.body
.Use price controls
Evidence: "prevent businesses from charging above the originally prevailing rates for goods deemed to be scarce."
"strategic price controls — government rules on what prices can be charged and how for certain industries or products — could be a useful tool among others in responding to price shocks."

.Stop America from spending money for things not needed
Evidence: "The problem is that once America’s output capacity taps out, any additional stimulus will simply bring inflation rather than additional production — especially when financed in part by Federal Reserve bond purchases."

.Have America produce more goods that bring up the supply.
Evidence: "We can once again make the United States the world’s workshop for democracy. That will reverse not only inflation, but also four decades of decline."

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence for taxes: "High inflation increases the tax burden on business investment, since the tax code does not account for inflation in regard to depreciation allowances"

Evidence for solution: "economists at the Federal Reserve and elsewhere now see persistent inflation attributable in part to the massive monetary and fiscal stimulus issued in the wake of the pandemic."

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence: "Since then, sanctions against Russia, one of the world’s top energy and grain producers, have supercharged food, fuel and fertilizer prices."

# data[].attributes.headline
Gas prices oil prices raised throughout world

# data[].attributes.subject
Gas prices oil prices raised throughout world

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence: "But energy analysts say the rising cost of oil is fueling gas prices across the globe and at home,"

Since Russia is a major export of gas and oil and they are in a war right now the prices are going up.

# data[].attributes.headline
Gas prices Based on peoples outlook for the country

# data[].attributes.subject
Gas prices Based on peoples outlook for the country

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence: “inflation expectations as surveyed by the University of Michigan are highly correlated to gasoline."

The way people think the economy will go usually is how gas prices will go too.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Consumers' long-run inflation expectations reached historical lows in 2016, following a marked decline in gasoline prices. The Wall Street Journal reported that "inflation expectations as surveyed by the University of Michigan are highly correlated to gasoline. The drop in this measure should be no surprise given the epic collapse in pump prices since 2014" (Ip, 2016). A typical explanation for this often-noted correlation between gas prices and inflation expectations-shown in Fig. 1- is the "frequency hypothesis": since gas is purchased frequently, its price is highly salient (Georganas et al., 2014). People also tend to notice and remember extreme price changes and use them to form expectations of the future (Morewedge, Gilbert, Wilson, 2005, Bruine de Bruin, van der Klaauw, Topa). Since gas prices are volatile, although gas accounts for around 5% of consumer expenditures, its price may have a disproportionately large influence on inflation expectations. Indeed, Trehan (2011) claims that consumer inflation expectations are excessively sensitive to energy prices, and Coibion and Gorodnichenko (2015, p. 226) argue that this "remarkably high sensitivity" helps explain the missing disinflation of 2009-11.

The response of inflation expectations to energy prices is important for monetary policy. St. Louis Fed President James Bullard (2011) appeals to the frequency hypothesis when he argues that "With trips to the gas station and the grocery store being some of the most frequent shopping experiences for many Americans, it is hardly helpful for Fed credibility to appear to exclude all those prices from consideration in the formation of monetary policy." ¹ If energy prices have excessive impact on inflation expectations, larger monetary policy responses to energy price changes may be warranted (Cavallo, 2008, Harris, Kasman, Shapiro, West). ²

In this paper, I re-examine the sensitivity of consumers' inflation expectations to gas prices ³ using data from the Michigan Survey of Consumers (MSC). Interpretation of the correlation in Fig. 1 and referenced by the Wall Street Journal and others is not obvious. For starters, the correlation is between the level of gas prices and the expected rate of change of overall prices. I show that this puzzle of mismatched units is resolved by noting that gas prices are mean-reverting, so the level of gas prices is correlated with its rate of change. Thus, expected inflation is also correlated with gas price inflation.

This correlation alone, however, does not necessarily imply that consumer inflation expectations are excessively sensitive to gas prices or that behavioral biases are present. Frequency or saliency bias theories posit that consumers over-weight gas prices relative to the expenditure share on gas when forming perceptions of current inflation, but the observed correlation is between gas prices and expectations of future inflation. I use MSC rotating panel data on both inflation expectations and gas price expectations at the one- and five-to-ten-year horizons to help clarify the propagation of gas prices into inflation perceptions and expectations. The key insight is to use data on expectations for horizons and to infer the relationship between expectations for horizon t (current perception) and . This allows me to examine whether consumers weigh gas prices significantly more than the roughly five percent expenditure share on gasoline. Using data on expectations of both gas and headline inflation also allows me to investigate consumers' beliefs about their joint dynamics: to what extent do consumers expect changes in gas prices to lead to future changes in gas and non-gas prices?

I build a parsimonious model in which consumers differ in their perceptions of current gas and non-gas inflation and in their beliefs about the mean of the inflation process for gas and non-gas prices. A consumer's perception of headline inflation is a weighted average of her perceptions of gas and non-gas inflation, where the weight ω on gas price inflation may not necessarily correspond to the expenditure share on gasoline. Each consumer forms expectations of future inflation using her perceptions of current gas and non-gas price inflation and her model of their bivariate dynamics. The multi-horizon, rotating panel structure of the MSC data allows me to estimate ω and the other parameters describing consumers' beliefs about gas and non-gas inflation dynamics.

I find that if gas price inflation increases by one percentage point, then one-year-ahead headline inflation expectations increase by about 0.01 percentage points and five-year-ahead inflation expectations increase by under 0.003 percentage points. The parameter estimates allow me to account for these changes. First, my estimate of ω is 4%, which is similar to the actual expenditure share on gasoline and does not indicate that headline inflation perceptions are excessively sensitive to gas prices. In other words, headline inflation and consumers' perceptions of headline inflation rise by about the same amount in response to a rise in gas price inflation. Other parameter estimates indicate that consumers believe that gas price inflation is slightly negatively autocorrelated (which is realistic). ⁴ If gas price inflation increases by one percentage point, expected one-year-ahead gas price inflation decreases by 0.16 percentage points. Moreover, consumers believe that the pass-through of current gas price inflation to future non-gas inflation is somewhat larger than in reality, but of the same order of magnitude. If gas price inflation increases by one percentage point, non-gas inflation expectations rise by about 0.02 percentage points. The 0.01 percentage point rise in headline inflation expectations is the weighted sum of the 0.16 percentage point fall in expected gas price inflation and the 0.02 percentage point rise in non-gas inflation, where the weights are 4% and 96%, respectively.

Since gas price fluctuations can be large, even a 0.01 percentage point increase in expected inflation in response to a percentage point increase in gas price inflation is not trivial. This is similar to the estimate found by Coibion and Gorodnichenko (2015), who note that this effect is large enough to account for much of the variation in one-year-ahead inflation expectations from 2009 to 2011. ⁵ However, I show that the magnitude is consistent with consumers using a fairly reasonable model of inflation dynamics, in which the weight on gas price inflation in headline inflation is similar to the expenditure share on gas, and shocks to gas price inflation are not expected to persist. Since the effects of gas prices on inflation expectations fade quickly with forecast horizon, gas price fluctuations seem unlikely to unanchor consumers' longer-run headline or core inflation expectations. Thus I also reconcile Coibion and Gorodnichenko's results with those of Celasun et al. (2012) and Verbrugge and Higgins (2015), who find that energy price shocks have a small impact on longer-run inflation expectations.

These results contribute to a growing literature on household expectation formation. Households' inflation expectations differ substantially from those of professional forecasters (see Fig. 2). Households are less informed about past inflation and monetary policy, and have highly heterogeneous expectations (Binder, 2017a, Binder, Rodrigue, 2018). This paper focuses on both expectations (about the future) and perceptions (about the present), with an explicit model of how they are related and without imposing that perceptions are accurate. In the U.S., consumer surveys more commonly ask about expectations than perceptions, and monetary policymakers emphasize efforts to influence and anchor expectations. Most of the literature has thus focused on expectations of future inflation, but as Detmeister et al. (2016) note, "Insight may come from better understanding individuals' perceptions of recent inflation." Dräger (2015, p. 681) suggests that "to anchor inflation expectations, central banks should explore better communication channels to inform consumers about actual inflation," as perceptions management is an important component of expectations management for monetary policymakers.

This paper also contributes to a broader literature on the macroeconomic effects of energy prices. In recent decades, despite the high volatility of energy inflation, headline inflation has remained relatively stable (Clark, Terry, 2010, Chen, Wen, 2011), with little evidence of a pass-through effect from energy prices to core inflation since the late 1970s or early 1980s (LeBlanc, Chinn, 2004, van den Noord, Andre, 2007, Gregorio, Landerretche, Neilson, 2007, Cavallo, 2008, Chen, 2009, Clark, Terry, 2010, Evans, Fisher, 2011, Chen, Wen, 2011). Mishkin (2007, p. 329) claims that relative to the Great Inflation era, "potentially inflationary shocks, like a sharp rise in energy prices, are less likely to spill over into expected and actual core inflation." I show that the relatively low pass-through from energy prices to core inflation does appear to be reflected in consumers' expectation formation, and that the spill-overs from energy price shocks to expected inflation are correspondingly modest.

Section 2 describes the MSC data on inflation and gas price expectations and presents correlations and reduced form analysis. Section 3 describes and estimates a model of expectations formation, and Section 4 concludes.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Inflation expectations and the price at the pump

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Consumers' long-run inflation expectations reached historical lows in 2016, following a marked decline in gasoline prices. The Wall Street Journal reported that "inflation expectations as surveyed by the University of Michigan are highly correlated to gasoline. The drop in this measure should be no surprise given the epic collapse in pump prices since 2014" (Ip, 2016).

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
U.S. Gas Prices Have Fallen for 91 Straight Days, a Relief for Consumers

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The steady decline is also a welcome development for policymakers trying to cool off the economy.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Gas Prices, a Big Inflation Factor, Are Coming Down Sharply

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A four-week decline has offered some relief to drivers. Weather, war and demand will influence how long the decline lasts.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Crude oil is a major economic input, so a rise in oil prices contributes to inflation, which measures the overall rate of price increases across the economy.

Inflation as measured by the annual gain in the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) set a 40-year high in March 2022 amid COVID-19 supply disruptions. Crude oil prices were the highest in a decade as the U.S. and its allies imposed sanctions on Russia due to its invasion of Ukraine.

Key Takeaways

Cause and Effect

Energy accounted for about 7.3% of the CPI as of December 2021, including the index weighting of about 4% for energy commodities.

In addition to that direct effect on inflation, higher oil prices raise inflation indirectly because crude oil is a key ingredient in petrochemicals used to make plastic. So, more expensive oil will tend to increase the prices of many products made with plastic.

Similarly, consumer prices factor in transportation costs, including fuel prices, and the cost of oil accounts for roughly half of the retail price of gasoline.

The indirect contributions of crude oil prices to inflation are reflected in the core CPI index, which does not include energy or food prices because they tend to be more volatile.

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said in his semiannual testimony before the U.S. Senate Banking Committee in March 2022 that, as a rule of thumb, every $10 per barrel increase in the price of crude oil raises inflation by 0.2% and sets back economic growth 0.1%.

A study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas in September 2021 suggested that if crude oil prices rose to $100 per barrel for three months before retreating, the spike would boost the annual inflation rate by 3 percentage points in the short term, with the effect fading quickly as oil prices pulled back.

Shifting Trends

Crude oil was a bigger contributor to inflation in the 1970s, when it was used much more intensively per unit of economic output. Back then, the U.S. economy consumed more than a barrel of crude per $1,000 of gross domestic product. By 2015, that had dropped to about 0.4 barrels per $1,000 of GDP.

Reduced reliance on energy, and in particular crude oil, promoted disinflation, or the decline in the inflation rate.

Spot oil prices have retained a strong correlation to market measures of long-term inflation expectations, however.

Some analysts have argued that the recent correlation between crude's diminished importance as an economic input and a lower inflation rate may no longer hold as oil is supplemented by less climate damaging but more expensive renewable energy sources and global supply chains give way to costlier domestic or regional sourcing.

Goods Producers Pay the Price

Historically, oil prices have exerted more influence on the Producer Price Index (PPI), which measures the prices of goods at the wholesale level, than the CPI, which measures the prices consumers pay for goods and services.

Between 1970 and 2017, the correlation between oil prices and the PPI was 0.71. That's much stronger than the 0.27 correlation with the CPI, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

"The weaker link between oil prices and consumer prices likely comes from the relatively higher weight of services in the U.S. consumption basket, which you'd expect to rely less on oil as a production input," according to the St. Louis Fed.

The Federal Reserve's preferred inflation measure, the personal consumption expenditures price index, has a lower gasoline weighting than the CPI.

Is Inflation Good or Bad for Oil Prices?

It depends on the time frame. In the short term. higher inflation tends to lead to higher oil prices. In the longer term, if the Federal Reserve raises interest rates and slows economic growth to control inflation, oil prices could decline as a result.

What Type of Inflation Would Be Triggered by an Increase in Oil Prices?

Oil prices have historically had a greater impact on the Producer Price Index (PPI) than on CPI. PPI measures the price of goods at the wholesale level.

What Other Factors Can Cause Oil Prices to Rise?

In addition to the demand for oil to produce a host of products plus its use by the transportation industry, other factors that can cause oil prices to rise include geopolitical tensions, tight supply, and growing economic strength.

The Bottom Line

While the price of oil has historically correlated with inflation, that relationship has become less pronounced since the 1970s. The loosening of this correlation is likely a result of the growth of the service sector which uses energy less intensively than manufacturing.

Since oil is a key input in manufacturing and a major cost factor in shipping, oil prices have tended to have a greater effect on the cost of goods than services, which also explains the relatively weak correlation between oil and CPI and the strong one between crude and PPI.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Inflation and Oil Prices: What's the Link?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Crude oil is a major economic input, so a rise in oil prices contributes to inflation, which measures the overall rate of price increases across the economy. Inflation as measured by the annual gain in the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) set a 40-year high in March 2022 amid COVID-19 supply disruptions.