# data[].attributes.body
This person would have to edit the evidence and of

# data[].attributes.body
1. Over all the paragraph is pretty good.
2. But in the begging it says he who is he?

# data[].attributes.body
Who is the he?

# data[].attributes.body
This was confusing and hard to read. It made me think twice on what I was reading

# data[].attributes.body
I'm just a bit confused about the mastery part.

# data[].attributes.body
It was good and gets right to the point of it but it's not specific

# data[].attributes.body
This does explain what the paragraph is about, but is very specific, rather than being broad.

# data[].attributes.body
It was a little confusing

# data[].attributes.body
That is a little confusing and also who is the scientist?

# data[].attributes.body
It is talking about a central idea for the person but it is fuzzy

# data[].attributes.body
Doesn't make any sense

# data[].attributes.body
Explain who is He but this person explained a bit that is good

# data[].attributes.body
1. I like the sentence starter
2. This is confusing. Who is "he"

# data[].attributes.body
The example is pretty good but they need to remove some details.

# data[].attributes.body
It was good but they did not really say it in a good way

# data[].attributes.body
I didn't really understand this

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think around the end the student did a decent job.
2. I think they could simplify and fix their grammar.

# data[].attributes.body
One thing: it is not nice to use the authors last name in a paragraph, use some respectful phrases.

# data[].attributes.body
Is he the author?

# data[].attributes.body
I don't get it? Who is he?

# data[].attributes.body
Was a run on sentence kinda and a few errors of wrong words and needed some more periods and commas.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the summary there is nothing wrong with it

# data[].attributes.body
The central idea is good but is not specific

# data[].attributes.body
1.good paragraph
2. But who is he it's really confusing

# data[].attributes.body
This was a clear summary of the article, but It was a little too long to be a detail

# data[].attributes.body
Who is he

# data[].attributes.body
Who is the he?

# data[].attributes.body
To short

# data[].attributes.body
I understand that there trying to compare something but it doesn't make sense.

# data[].attributes.body
It was good but the sentence became to long

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like they could cut out a few details.

# data[].attributes.body
Who is he?..

# data[].attributes.body
Doesn't she the article and makes no sense

# data[].attributes.body
The paragraph is pretty good.

# data[].attributes.body
It tells what the paragraph is about, but it says almost exactly what the paragraph says, instead of saying something in different words.

# data[].attributes.body
This is repetitive from the article. They did not put (most) of their own words. This was though clear about the summary.

# data[].attributes.body
It was very good and specific

# data[].attributes.body
This is really good

# data[].attributes.body
Explains good
But again who is he

# data[].attributes.body
Good but the grammar is a little off

# data[].attributes.body
It central idea is on the dot but it has 2 ideas that are distant and combined them.

# data[].attributes.body
They did good at the paragraph but they added to much details

# data[].attributes.body
Very general it's very short and doesn't even state the central idea and is very confusing

# data[].attributes.body
I like the beginning
It was long but good detail

# data[].attributes.body
In the text, it says that the cheeseburger WAS created by accident.

# data[].attributes.body
The exampl has good information but should remove one of the evidences.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the person did a good job with the beginning but toward the mid-end, it got confusionsing and added extra detail.

# data[].attributes.body
The paragraph states a bunch of facts which is great
2. i think this paragraph needs to be fixed.

# data[].attributes.body
This really good and spesfic

# data[].attributes.body
Too short and general

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it is a run on sentence but it is good

# data[].attributes.body
I get it, but the author already states that our ancestors found fire not made it.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I like this one. It states a lot of details the only thing is it might be toooo much<------ (that's my improvement thingy)

# data[].attributes.body
Too lonf

# data[].attributes.body
100 percent right

# data[].attributes.body
It was good and was specific and not general

# data[].attributes.body
It is good bit make sure your words make sense

# data[].attributes.body
No sense making

# data[].attributes.body
Who is he is the author

# data[].attributes.body
I think they did good but I think they added the same info and add a lot of details

# data[].attributes.body
A bit confusing
Add more

# data[].attributes.body
You used evidence twice, and you should probably use a synonym.

# data[].attributes.body
To short and didn't make sense

# data[].attributes.body
This this one is good but there is too much

# data[].attributes.body
I would not use just the authors Last name. You could use "the author" or "Justin O'Niell"

# data[].attributes.body
Who is he?

# data[].attributes.body
Can you be more specific

# data[].attributes.body
Need to be more specific

# data[].attributes.body
Good detail

# data[].attributes.body
Give more examples
But good job

# data[].attributes.body
It is good but I think their words were kind of confusing

# data[].attributes.body
It did not make any sense

# data[].attributes.body
They added the same words and some words were confusing

# data[].attributes.body
They need a to be more specific in the sayings