# data[].attributes.body
Attacking Japan would be the best option because if we tried to focus on Hitler and Japan at the same time it wouldn't work because we would have to split our armies and make the same mistake that Hitler made. This option would also be the best because if we get Japan out of the war Germany might think of the U.S. as a threat.
@DominicMartin

# data[].attributes.body
I'd go right for Hitler. Hitler is basically the main leader of the war. If you take him out people wouldn't know what to do. @Iysabelledavis

# data[].attributes.body
Keeping it peaceful and avoiding violence is best.

# data[].attributes.body
Hitler is the leading cause of WWII so defeating him would be the best option

# data[].attributes.body
It would be best to attack Japan because Hitler hasn't tried anything with us and the Japanese did. They played their hand it's time for us to play ours. Japan is more of a threat because they're right across the ocean while Germany and Hitler are all the way over there.

# data[].attributes.headline
Best because we can scare Hitler with this attack and deal with him after. @TylerThompson

# data[].attributes.subject
Best because we can scare Hitler with this attack and deal with him after. @TylerThompson

# data[].attributes.body
Germany is not the country that bombed us. We need to take the fight to the Japanese. Then when we get it all cleaned up, we can focus on fighting Germany...
@GabrielKnox

# data[].attributes.body
Staying neutral would let us be safer and not lose anyone

# data[].attributes.body
staying neutral would probably be the safest and best option for the United States. Attacking Japan could possibly lead to more violence and conflict, so staying neutral could avoid that and the U.S. would be at peace.

# data[].attributes.body
we should attack japan because they attacked us directly and germany hasn't even touched us yet i say we go to japan and destroy them

# data[].attributes.body
we need to do it cause we can

# data[].attributes.body
Staying neutral would allow us to not create any enemies.

# data[].attributes.body
Staying neutral would be non-violent and a peaceful way of staying safe.

# data[].attributes.body
Japan should be our first priority

# data[].attributes.body
if we stay ntral were not going to have any fun in the war

# data[].attributes.body
if we let hiter stay alive he would have been causing more wars.

# data[].attributes.body
Though we have been bombed, we need to END Hitler ONCE AND FOR ALL ! @Miyah

# data[].attributes.body
Attacking Japan is the best option because if we get to focused on Hitler we will get sidetracked. We also need revenge and to show what that we can stand our ground

# data[].attributes.body
Japan attacked us directly and Hitler hasn't attacked us yet. Attacking Hitler would be the best for everyone but the best for us personally would be to attack japan THEN attack hitler

# data[].attributes.body
I think staying neutral is the best idea cause one its safer and two you could benefit from helping the others out. Also less deaths and loss

# data[].attributes.body
Less deaths

# data[].attributes.body
Staying would be the best option for the US. Because civil disobedience is the best form of non-violence. Just like Gandhi preached.

# data[].attributes.body
By staying neutral, there would be less causalities, less violence, and no more enemies . It's better to just not involve ourselves all that much. - Grace Huber

# data[].attributes.body
Staying neutral would be the best option because there would be less casualties and violence. it was also help prevent creating new enemies that could cause future problems. overall it is best for us just to stay out of it and not involve ourselves as much as possible.

# data[].attributes.body
Staying neutral is beneficial. With no enemies we wouldn't have to watch our backs and could focus on America.

# data[].attributes.body
No one messes with 'Murica. We'll win the war by ourselves.

# data[].attributes.body
Japan attacked us so we need to deal with them first then Germany @BreaAnnaEllis

# data[].attributes.body
Our first priority is to bring the war to Japan. We need to defend ourselves and begin the process of ending the war, but not over stretch ourselves and our supplies. Of course, we should fight Hitler because Germany is allies with Japan. They either they were in on the attack or chose not to give us any warning. Both of these reasons makes them our enemies too.

@ReaganHauke

# data[].attributes.headline
They tried to attack us but don't have the CA HONEYS to fight us with out sneaking up on us.

# data[].attributes.subject
They tried to attack us but don't have the CA HONEYS to fight us with out sneaking up on us.

# data[].attributes.body
We can mess their $#*! up all day long for the rest of. heir lives which will only be as long as their last breath.

# data[].attributes.body
We need to attack Japan first. They are more of a threat because they are closer. Also Hitler hasn't done anything to us and Japan has.
Annabelle Vogt

# data[].attributes.body
Name a war we haven't won... i'll wait

# data[].attributes.body
Normies

# data[].attributes.headline
Attack Japan Directly, get Germany/ Hitler after

# data[].attributes.subject
Attack Japan Directly, get Germany/ Hitler after

# data[].attributes.body
I'd go for Japan first, because they're the ones who bombed us. They killed 2403 Americans, and wounded 1178 Americans. Then, after we get Japan I'd go straight for Hitler and Germany.
-Becca

# data[].attributes.body
yeet yeet

# data[].attributes.body
I think we should stay neutral. Attacking Japan would create more violence and enemies. It would get us involved and that's not what we wanted. Kassy J

# data[].attributes.body
It would be better to directly attack because trying to take on hitler and japan would not be a good idea because of his power