# data[].attributes.body
Young customers vs Older customers

# data[].attributes.body
Article One is enthusiastic and encouraging of the change
Article Two is highly critical of the change
Article One - Younger audience
Article Two - Older audience --> fear of being left behind

# data[].attributes.body
Astaire primarily addresses her audience of potential customers, and as such uses a more light and jovial tone. In contrast, the local member of the community is far more confrontational, as she is referring directly to the business.

# data[].attributes.body
Astaire argues with an optimistic and reassuring tome whilst Morricone is angered and bemused

# data[].attributes.body
In Article 1, the author questions her local shoppers to accept the shift to electronic payment by questioning "what will it change?". Conversely the writer of Article 2 calls for Astaire to reconsider her decision by asking for her to consider those "on a pension"

# data[].attributes.body
Young Customers compared to Elderly Customers

# data[].attributes.body
Article 1 promotes the opportunity of a cashless society where "all transactions will be done electronically". This serves as a clear contrast to Article 2 that is evidently hesitant in such changes, suggesting through anecdotal evidence that "my mother in her 80s relies on cash"

# data[].attributes.body
tone, article 1 is happy and excited
article 2 is assertive and concerned

Article 1 is invoking a happy occasion whereas article 2 is invoking concern to readers

# data[].attributes.body
Asstair tone is jubilant
Article 2 is critical

# data[].attributes.body
Article 1 has inclusive language and rhetorical questions in order to  position all readers to reconsider their understanding of the general store. Whereas, Article 2 has anecdotal evidence

# data[].attributes.body
the doctor says it chill. showing corrupt gov

# data[].attributes.body
Drugs/pills should be banned
Pills ban

# data[].attributes.body
Wilcox supports pill-testing by undermining the NSW Government's rejection for pill-testing, by highlighting how the absence of pill-testing results in death. Such support is exemplified with a body covered by a sheet in a hospital with the doctor commenting how the "pill was lethal".

# data[].attributes.body
this is illustrated
through the picture showing the dire consequences of not going through Pill testing.

# data[].attributes.headline
Wasted, I'm on these drugs, I feel wasted

# data[].attributes.subject
Wasted, I'm on these drugs, I feel wasted

# data[].attributes.body
Astaire has an excited and optimistic tone, while Morricone uses

# data[].attributes.headline
Pills will kill people who are unwilling to stop taking 

# data[].attributes.subject
Pills will kill people who are unwilling to stop taking 

# data[].attributes.body
Cathy Wilcox is for pill testing

# data[].attributes.body
Cathy Wilcox is for pill testing.

# data[].attributes.body
she is shwoing the consequence of pill testing not being enacted

# data[].attributes.body
Less people take the L and get the Number 1 Victory Royale

# data[].attributes.body
Cathy Wilcox is for pill testing, and displays the result that can occur when pill testing is rejected at festivals.

# data[].attributes.body
Cathy Wilcox is for pill testing. The cartoon she includes is of a Doctor conducting the pill test following the death of a presumed couple's daughter. Cathy includes this cartoon because pill testing is a method for situations exactly like those in the cartoon to be avoided or completely removed.

# data[].attributes.headline
The rejection of pill testing is lethal and often result in death

# data[].attributes.subject
The rejection of pill testing is lethal and often result in death

# data[].attributes.body
Because Pill testing is banned she took her life into her own hands.

# data[].attributes.body
Wilcox is for pill testing. The meaning of this image is that the NSW Government is removing the chance for people who are taking illicit substances in a festival environment where it is inevitable, to do so in a safe manner where harm is minimised

# data[].attributes.body
Through the cartoon which depicts a dead individual and her sorrowful (assumed) parents, it is evident that Wilcox is an advocate for pill-testing, implying that without its institution in New South Wales, as was the stance of the Government, avoidable deaths may occur.

# data[].attributes.body
She is implying that without pill testing in NSW the only pill testing that will take place is when people die from the pills.

# data[].attributes.body
The image represents the futility of pill testing at hospitals as they cannot prevent them from taking them once they ded.

Or they just saying that pills kill ppl and ppl die; society will burn with the inevitable creep of time.
--------------------------------------------------------
Article 1 has a more jovial tone and emphasizes on the benefits of going cashless while Article 2 is more critical and weighs and questions the benefits from Article 1 with the problems that may plague his more conservative audience who are generally older.

# data[].attributes.body
She's for pill testing as people may die from taking legal pills if they aren't tested

# data[].attributes.body
pills kill,
the dead person took a deadly pill and died in the ER
her parents(i think) are sad
author is saying that pill testing could have saved the life. no one knew that the pill was deadly