# data[].attributes.body
From Source B, Singapore had to separate from Malaysia as there were political issues.
The evidence is"This was due to a series of fundamental clashes between the PAP government in Singapore and the Alliance leaders in Kuala Lumpur over issues ranging from extremist politicking to contentious economic and financial arrangements."
From the evidence Singapore's PAP and Malaysia's UMNO do not agree with each other due to the amount of tax that Singapore has to pay compared to Malaysia when Singapore had 17% the population of Singapore.

# data[].attributes.body
From source B, I can infer that Singapore have to separate from Malaya due to political issues.

From the source, it states that "This was due to a series of fundamental clashes between the PAP government in Singapore and the Alliance leaders in Kuala Lumpur".

This suggest that the PAP government from Singapore and the UMNO from Malaya did not communicate to each other due to the lack of eye to eye communication. On one instance, Malaya force Singapore to pay 40% tax despite having a population of 14% of Malaya. This cause major disputes and miscommunications between the two governing body.

Therefore, Singapore have to separate from Malaya.

# data[].attributes.body
From source B, I can infer that Singapore separated from Malaya due to political reasons.

The evidence from source B is "This was due to a series of fundamental clashes between the PAP government in Singapore and the Alliance leaders in Kuala Lumpur over issues ranging from extremist politicking to contentious economic and financial arrangements. One of these disagreements was over the 39.8 percent share of the new taxes that Singapore was required to contribute even though Singapore’s population was just 17 percent of the total population of Malaysia. "

From the evidence, I can infer that Malaya is using Singapore to boost their growth as they want 40% of Singapore's taxes even though the population of Singapore is just 17% of the total population. This lead to a lot of arguments between the two political groups. They did not see eye to eye and had a lot of arguments such as the extremist politicking problem.

Thus, Singapore separated from Malaya.

# data[].attributes.body
From source B, i can tell that Singapore also had to leave due to political reasons.

From the source,"This was due to a series of fundamental clashes between the PAP government in Singapore and the Alliance leaders in Kuala Lumpur over issues ranging from extremist politicking to contentious economic and financial arrangements."

From the evidence given, i can tell that the political views differed

# data[].attributes.body
From the source, I can infer that Singapore separated from Malaysia due to economical differences.
From the source, "   Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words.  As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy. ", this evidence from the source shows that Malaysia only merged for their own economic benefits and did not bother about what they had promised or Singapore's economy alike. As a result, they were unable to establish a common market for their trades.Therefore Singapore left Malaysia as there was no benefit to them.

From source A, I can also infer that Singapore left Malaysia as they did not agree on the loans.
As the source has shown,"Besides, there was also a great deal of confusion and disagreement on how Singapore should contribute to the Federal treasury and development loans to the Borneo states. " there was a misunderstanding and  on how Singapore can contribute to the Federal treasury and disagreement how it can give that amount of money for the development loan for the development of the Borneo States.
As Singapore and Malaysia could not get to a common understanding, this resulted in Singapore being forced to leave Malaysia.

Megan wrote this source to inform the public on the reasons why Singapore had to leave Malaysia. She wanted the readers to understand the reasons on why Singapore left and not feel that it was unfair on why Singapore left.

# data[].attributes.body
Singapore have to separate from Malaya due to political reasons.

From the evidence from source B "This was due to a series of fundamental clashes between the PAP government in Singapore and the Alliance leaders in Kuala Lumpur over issues ranging from extremist politicking to contentious economic and financial arrangements. One of these disagreements was over the 39.8 percent share of the new taxes that Singapore was required to contribute even though Singapore’s population was just 17 percent of the total population of Malaysia."
From the evidence from source B, I can infer that Malaysia wants to gain more of the shares than Singapore and they are self centred.

# data[].attributes.headline
From Source A, Singapore had to separate from Malaysia due to economical disagreements.                 The evidence is "The economical disagreements began when the Singapore failed to see the Malaysian government prior to the merger.  Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words.  As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy."   From the evidence, I understand that Singapore had to separate with Malaysia as they were not cooperating well with their common markets as the Malaysian government did not stick to their words and only wanted to boost their economy and not caring about the economy of Singapore. Which then affected the economic of Singapore. So that is why Singapore had to leave the merger.

# data[].attributes.subject
From Source A, Singapore had to separate from Malaysia due to economical disagreements.                 The evidence is "The economical disagreements began when the Singapore failed to see the Malaysian government prior to the merger.  Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words.  As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy."   From the evidence, I understand that Singapore had to separate with Malaysia as they were not cooperating well with their common markets as the Malaysian government did not stick to their words and only wanted to boost their economy and not caring about the economy of Singapore. Which then affected the economic of Singapore. So that is why Singapore had to leave the merger.

# data[].attributes.body
From source A, I can infer that Singapore separated from Malaya due to economic reasons

As stated in the source, "Besides, there was also a great deal of confusion and disagreement on how Singapore should contribute to the Federal treasury and development loans to the Borneo states." We can infer that Singapore do not see eye to eye
with the Malaya government over how much Singapore should contribute back. Singapore was expected to contribute back 40% to Malaysia, but Singapore refused to adhere to their conditions, as Singapore only contributes 17% to the total population of Malaysia, and they believe it is unfair for Singapore, who has such a small population, and yet needed to contribute so much to Malaysia. Thus suggesting the separation from Malaya.

# data[].attributes.body
Singapore had to separate from Malaysia because of economic problems.

The source have stated that" Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words"

Both countries could not see eye to eye with economic problems. Malaysia promised to help Singapore and work together to boost their economy. But Malaysia leaders did not keep their words. Therefore Singapore felt that leaving Malaysia was the best solution.

# data[].attributes.body
From the source, I can infer that Singapore have to separate from Malaya due to economic difference.

From the source, it states "the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words."

It suggest that Malaysian government did not keep their promises with Singapore over the economic issues of Malaya. The Malaysian government wanted to push their own trade instead of sharing a common market with SIngapore. This cause dispute and disagreement between the two nations.

Therefore, Singapore have to separate from Malaya

# data[].attributes.body
From the source, I can infer that they separated due to economic reasons.

The evidence that supports my inference is"The economical disagreements began when the Singapore failed to see the Malaysian government prior to the merger. Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words.  As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy.".

Since Malaya only cared about their own economy, they were not able to establish a common market with Singapore. Therefore, Singapore's economy was not boosted and Malaya did not keep its promise.

Therefore, Singapore left Malaya due to economical reasons.

# data[].attributes.body
The reason why Singapore separated from Malaysia was due to economical differences.

The evidence from source A is "Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words.  As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy."

From the evidence, I can infer that Singapore and Malaysia were unable to cooperate on the trades and both countries have different views and opinions and were unable to agree with each other for a long time.

Hence, Due to misunderstandings, Singapore was forced to separate from Malaysia.

Another reason why Singapore separated from Malaysia was because of controversy on the loans.

The evidence from source A is "Besides, there was also a great deal of confusion and disagreement on how Singapore should contribute to the Federal treasury and development loans to the Borneo states. "

From the evidence, I can infer that due to miscommunications and unable to compromise with each other.

# data[].attributes.body
From source A, I can infer that Singapore had to separate from Malaya due to differences in their economies.
This is evident from the source which states, "Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursuing its own trade expansion than to keep its words. As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy."
Therefore, from the source quoted above, I can infer that because in terms of economical issues, Malaysia was not faithful to the promise between Singapore and Malaysia, and was only contributing to its own economy, than the common market between Malaysia and Singapore, thus this did not benefit Singapore in any way, even affecting its own economy. Hence, Singapore decided to separate from Malaya.

From source A, I can also infer that the separation happened due to disagreements in economic policies.
This is evident from the source which states, "Besides, there was also a great deal of confusion and disagreement on how Singapore should contribute to the Federal treasury and development loans to the Borneo states. "
Therefore, from the source quoted above, I can infer that because the Malaysian government had unreasonable demands that Singapore was expected to contribute 40% to the Federal treasury despite being only 17% of the Malaysian population. This is unfair to Singapore as it only boosts Malaysia's economy, not Singapore. Thus, due to being unable to come eye to eye with the economical issues, Singapore left Malaysia. Therefore, for Singapore's own interests, Singapore left Malaysia to pursue its own economical growth.

# data[].attributes.body
From source A, it can be inferred that Singapore separated from Malaya due to economic problems.

This is evident from Source A which states,  "Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words.  As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy. "

This suggest that The merger brought about economical problems such as the Malaysian government was only concern about boosting its own economy resulting the inability to set up a common market . These affected Singapore's economy. Hence it was in Singapore's best interest to separate from Malaya.

# data[].attributes.body
From the source i can infer that they separated due to unreliability
The evidence is that " because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words"
This shows that the Malaysian government is not bothered about helping the Singapore economy and would rather help itself and go back on its word.

Another reason is the economical problems.
the evidence is that "Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy"
This shows that

# data[].attributes.body
I can infer from Source A that Singapore had to separate from Malaysia due to economical issues.

From the source, it stated, "Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words.  As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy."

Malaysia not keeping its word and wanted to gain something on its own will not do Singapore any good. That made Singapore unable to earn profits and in turn caused economical problems.

Thus, Singapore had no choice but to leave.

# data[].attributes.body
From Source A, I can say that Singapore separated from Malaya due to economic reasons.
"Largely, it was because the Malaysian Government was more interested in pursuing its own trade expansion than to keep its words. As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy."
Malaysia focused on their own economy instead of interacting more with Singapore, hence trading in a common market cannot take place, affecting their economy. Singapore did not benefit from this and left, hence Singapore left due to economic reasons.

From Source A,

# data[].attributes.body
From source A, I can infer that Singapore was separated from Malaysia due to Malaysia not agreeing on the same terms.

# data[].attributes.body
From the source, I can infer that Singapore separated with Malaysia due to economical reasons.

The evidence from the source is " Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words.  As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy."

From the evidence above, I can infer that Malaysia did not keep its words and it did not establish a common market. Malaysia cares about their own economical growth and not Singapore's. They did not consider Singapore as one of their own. This made Singapore unable to profit and not grow economically.

Thus, Singapore had no choice but to leave Malaysia.

# data[].attributes.body
From source A, I can infer that the reason Singapore had to separate from Malaysia was due to economical issues. The evidence is "Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words" The above evidence proves that the Malaysian government was more keen to expand their economy than to keep their promise of setting up a common market thus Singapore could not trade with Malaysia and this crippled its economy and thus it was in Singapore's best interest to leave.

# data[].attributes.body
From Source A, I can tell that Singapore separated from Malaya due to economic reasons.

From the source," Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words.  As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy."

From the evidence given, i can tell that the Malaysian government was selfish in the way that they wanted to focus on boosting their own economy instead of Singapore and Malaya boosting each others economy. As the Malaysian government only cared about their own economy and did not care to develop a common market, Singapore had to leave Malaya.

# data[].attributes.body
Singapore had to separate from Malaya due to the economical issues.
From the evidence,"Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words.  As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy".
This shows that Malaysia only care about their own economy and all they want is to boost their own instead of working together with Singapore. This suggest that Malaysia did not keep their promise in boosting both Singapore's and Malaysia's economy instead they went on their own way. Thus, Singapore had no choice but to leave Malaysia.

From the source, I can also infer that Singapore had to leave Malaysia due to the political parties not being able to see eye to eye with each other.
From the evidence,"One of these disagreements was over the 39.8 percent share of the new taxes that Singapore was required to contribute even though Singapore’s population was just 17 percent of the total population of Malaysia. "
From this evidence, this shows that Singapore put down the idea of giving their taxes to Malaysia as they were frustrated that even though they only have a small population but they need to give 40% of their shares to Malaysia when Malaysia is a huge country with a huge population. Hence, Singapore felt really unfair and therefore deciding to leave Malaysia.

# data[].attributes.body
Singapore separated from Malaysia due to economic reasons. The evidence from Source A is "It was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words.  As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy."
From this, I can infer that Singapore had trouble cooperating with Malaysia leaders as all they wanted was to make profit for their own country, and not concentrate on building a common market as stated in the contract. Thus, Singapore was forced to leave.

# data[].attributes.body
Singapore have to separate from Malaya due to economical differences.

The evidence from source A is "Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy.  Besides, there was also a great deal of confusion and disagreement on how Singapore should contribute to the Federal treasury and development loans to the Borneo states."

From the evidence from source A, I can infer that Singapore and Malaya could not establish a common market due to disagreements and different views of economy.
Therefore, Singapore is separated from Malaya due to different views of economy.

Another reason Singapore have to separate from Malaya is due to different views to economy.
The evidence from source A is "Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words."
From the evidence from source A, I can infer that Malaysia is self centred and they did not keep their words in establishing a common market.
Therefore, Singapore separated from Malaya due to the different views they had for their economy.

# data[].attributes.body
From source A, i can infer that Singapore had to separate form Malaya due to economical issues.

The evidence is 'Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words. As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy.'

From the evidence, i can infer that Malaysia only wanted to merge with Singapore for their own benefit instead of both countries benefitting and they could not establish a common market. Therefore i think Singapore had to leave the merger due to economical reasons.

# data[].attributes.body
I can infer from source A that Singapore had to separate from Malaysia due to economic reasons. From the source, it states that " .. it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words. As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with malasyia in a common market." From this i can infer that Malaysia was not interested in helping to grow Singapore's Economy, all they were focused in was to grow their own economy. The source states " Besides, there was also a great deal of confusion and disagreement on how Singapore should contribute to the Federal treasury and development loans to the Borneo states.  " This shows that Malaysia is interested in Singapore to help Boreno states develop and not focus on themselves first, this means that Singapore is unable to fully focus on growing in economy and yet have to give money to grow the Borneo states, thus Singapore would want to leave as Malaysia is not interested in helping them grow as much as Singapore expected them to.

# data[].attributes.body
The reasons why Singapore had to separate from Malaysia were due to economic difference.

The evidence from the source is "the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words.  As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy".

From this evidence, I can infer that Malaysia did not cooperate with Singapore with the pursuit of a common market, but instead focused on it's own economy. Hence, Singapore was at a disadvantage and thus left the merger.

Another reason as to why Singapore left Malaysia was because of the disagreements between the political parties.

The evidence from the source is, "One of these disagreements was over the 39.8 percent share of the new taxes that Singapore was required to contribute even though Singapore’s population was just 17 percent of the total population of Malaysia."

From this evidence, I can infer that Malaysia wanted Singapore to contribute 40% of the taxes to them, regardless of the small population size compared to Malaysia. However, Singapore refused to do so which caused disagreements between the two countries. Hence, due to the unreasonable taxes, Singapore left Malaysia.

Therefore, the reasons why Singapore left to Malaysia was because of both economic differences and the disagreements regarding the shared treasury.

# data[].attributes.body
From Source A, Singapore had to separate from Malaysia due to economical disagreements. The evidence is "The economical disagreements began when the Singapore failed to see the Malaysian government prior to the merger.  Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words.  As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy."
From the evidence, I understand that Singapore had to separate with Malaysia as they were not cooperating well with their common markets and the Malaysian government did not stick to their words. Which then affected the economic of Singapore.

# data[].attributes.body
Singapore had to separate Malaysia because of economical problems.

The source have stated that

# data[].attributes.body
Singapore had to separate from Malaya because  of economic reasons.

The evidence from the source"Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words" and "confusion and disagreement on how Singapore should contribute to the Federal treasury and development loans"

From these evidence i can infer that both of the countries could not see eye to eye as Malaysia did not want to do as what they promised and demanded higher taxes,therefore the Malaysian government was not cooperating with Singapore's demands but instead wanted to make use of Singapore,since Singapore had no advantages in that Situation,it was in Singapoes best intrest to leave

# data[].attributes.body
Source A:
Singapore had to separate from Malaya due to economical issues. From Source A, "the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words.  As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy."
From the evidence, i can infer that the Malaysian government was less interested in setting up a common market with Singapore than its own development.
Therefore, Singapore was forced to separate due to the lack of a common market.

SOURCE C:
Singapore also had to separate from Malaya due to political issues. From Source C, "the PAP continued to ignore these disparities in their repeated cry for a 'Malaysian Malaysia' – the equal treatment of all races in Malaysia by the government which should serve Malaysian citizens without any regard for the economic conditions of any particular race."
From the evidence, I can infer that the PAP(People's Action Party) was nonchalant about maintaining peace between the races. As a result, Singapore had to separate.

# data[].attributes.body
Singapore had to separate from Malaya due to economical issues with Malaya.
From Source A, the text "Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words."
From the evidence given, I can infer that the Malayan government was selfish, as well as unfaithful in terms of their agreement as they wanted to focus only on their economy.
From this, I can tell that both Singapore and Malaya had many economical disagreements and coul

# data[].attributes.body
One of the major concerns was that the PAP continued to ignore these disparities in their repeated cry for a "Malaysian Malaysia" – the equal treatment of all races in Malaysia by the government which should serve Malaysian citizens without any regard for the economic conditions of any particular race. Another contributor was the fear that the economic dominance of Singapore's Port would inevitably shift political power away from Kuala Lumpur in time, should Singapore remain in the Federation.

The state and federal governments also had disagreements on the economic front. Despite an earlier agreement to establish a common market Singapore continued to face restrictions when trading with the rest of Malaysia. The situation escalated to such an intensity that talks soon broke down and abusive speeches and writing became rife on both sides. UMNO extremists called for the arrest of Lee Kuan Yew.

# data[].attributes.body
However, the merger with Malaysia was fraught with difficulties from the onset. This was due to a series of fundamental clashes between the PAP government in Singapore and the Alliance leaders in Kuala Lumpur over issues ranging from extremist politicking to contentious economic and financial arrangements. One of these disagreements was over the 39.8 percent share of the new taxes that Singapore was required to contribute even though Singapore’s population was just 17 percent of the total population of Malaysia. These new taxes were announced bythe federal government on 25 November 1964 in a bid to raise $147 million to address the federal deficit of $543 million.

# data[].attributes.body
The economical disagreements began when the Singapore failed to see the Malaysian government prior to the merger.  Largely, it was because the Malaysian government was more interested in pursing its own trade expansion than to keep its words.  As a result, Singapore was unable to trade with Malaysia in a common market, and this affected its economy.  Besides, there was also a great deal of confusion and disagreement on how Singapore should contribute to the Federal treasury and development loans to the Borneo states.