# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court Justices should have term limits, because it would lessen the possibility of bias. It is also a disadvantage, when Supreme Court justices do not change their opinion based on the world that we live in now.

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme court justices should not have any term limits because they might use this to effect the decisions that they make. If you add a limit they will become less honest because they will feel the need to win over the public during voting times.

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court justices should have term limits. This is b/c it will reduce the odds of becoming biased.  without term limits, the judges do not try as much. They know that they will be there for many years to come.

# data[].attributes.body
The Justices in the Supreme Court should not have any limits, because it would only effect their decisions, in possibly harmful ways, due to public interference. Once the public gets involved, the Justices would then be forced to listen to outside thoughts and not have the rule within the Supreme Court any longer.

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court justices should have term limits. Justices having term limits will reduce the possibility for ideas to be biased because of the Justices that are in office. Additionally, if the same Justices were kept in office, a flow or circulation of new ideas and thought processes would be nonexistent.

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court should have term limits, so that new ideas come up for the justice of the people. Also preventing bias votes and approval and etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court Justices should have term limits, because term limits would lessen the possibility of bias among the justices. In addition, I also believe because the text talks about how many of these justices have thoughts that do not change with growing times, which is a disadvantage, because as times change, we need justices that are open to be flexible to our time period.

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court Justices should not have term limits because then the whole ruling system would be influenced since they basically been doing this all their lives and they would feel some time of way if they had to change their job. Therefore, they would use that grudge and mess everything up. Also, they would be able to influence what they were taught or what the founding fathers or people of the government wanted.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because when the same people are in the court over and over again, they tend to agree with each other more often than not so it creates biased opinions.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because it lowers the chance of someone dying of age while serving their time. A death leads to conflicts between democrats and republicans which prevent them from the doing the job that they're supposed to do. Also we need new ideas and opinions. If you have all older people their ideas may not be like the ideas of the younger generation.This could prevent progress or delay the process.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court justices should have term limits for more opinions to be formed rather than from the same ones for a very long time.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court Justices should not have term limits because then this will influence their rulings. The whole reason why the Supreme Court Justices don't have limits is so that they don't have to adhere to the public votes in an election. By adding term limits, the Supreme Court will become less honest and will need to sway the American public in the electoral times.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because according the the gray many are dying in that age range anyway. Not only that, but we need more diversity and new opinions brought to the table. Due to the rule that the justices serve for a life long term, many of the appointed justices are still white men. Adding different races and different people from different backgrounds will definitely add diversity and more ideas to the table. This will hep the supreme court be less biased.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the Supreme Court Justices should not have terms because of the fact that many have dedicated their lives to serving their nation this way as shown in the graph by justices who have been doing this for decades in order to serve their country what they think is right. Even if the justice's opinion may be seen as wrong, there are the other justices to outweigh this and possibly change their minds. Furthermore, these justices are allowed to resign from this position.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe Supreme Court Justices should have term limits to create more variation in opinions and diversity. Justices can become biased and get away with making biased decisions, so term limits could help stop this issue in many cases. Additionally, new justices will bring in new ideas and new views on important decisions.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court justices should have term limits because it prevents unexpected death while being on the job and death from being overworked

# data[].attributes.body
I think Supreme Court justices should have term limits so that there are new opinions and ideas formed instead of the same old ones. Also it will help the Supreme Court become less biased.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Supreme court justices should have term limits because there can be room for new ideas from new people. Justices like ,regular people, have their own opinions therefore they may be biased or may interpret the constitution differently. Therefore its important to have new opinions and fresh minds from people.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because in order to stop corruption in this system, it is needed. This is so because an endless term can lead to a mass accumulation of power that will be able to largely tip the scales and create confusion. We are trying to stop corruption, and we do this by limiting the rights that an executive has, and this is not supported by the supreme court.

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because we new people and new thoughts that can help our government improve. For almost the same reason we elect new presidents, we should appoint new justices. If they keep the same people it shows that we are not exactly open to change and new opinions.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because with the same people we are not getting new ideas and opinions. In the article, "so each presidential term would bring two new faces to the court." I agree with this statement. This would allow different views on topics and possibly better ideas to handle certain situations in the court house.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court should not have term limits, however they should have the ability to retire. While being a judge for such a long period of time, they can remember first hand cases that might have a connection to a case that they are dealing with. Also,medical conditions could highly impact decisions made for court cases.

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court Justices should have term limits, because this would then allow more ideas to be considered that would be more beneficial to the people.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because over the years, their views may not change on certain topics. For example, if a Supreme Court Justice is old, then their views may be different than what times are like today. This can also cause their opinions to be biased. In order for new ideas to be allowed and a present, modern viewpoint to voice this generation, there should be term limits.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the supreme court should have term limits because without it, the constitution is limited to interpretation. Some justices may interpret the constitution in a more common way, but there are other people in the world that think differently and that may be able to make better decisions. Furthermore, without term limits, the judges do not try as much. They know that they will be there for many years to come, so they just don't put in a lot of effort because it is unlikely for them to lose their job.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme court justices should have term limits because people can become more biased as time goes on. Younger justices will have a more open mind to ideas than the older ones.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court Justices should have term limits so there can be new judges. This would allow for new ideas and unbiased decisions.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the Supreme Court Justices should have term limits instead of a lifelong service. It would be much more diverse and interesting if Justices were constantly changing, ensuring the equal balance of unbiased or impartial powers

# data[].attributes.body
Yes I believe they should because mayors, governors, and presidents have term limits, why should judges be different

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because having the same people can keep the same biased opinions. Also, this will not allow for new ideas to be brought up or for old ones to be removed/altered.

# data[].attributes.body
They should be able to retire because some people who have had strokes and may not necessarily be fit to take up these jobs are pushing through . Also the court may be lagging behind in the nations changing demographics as the article says because of the slow turnover , waiting for someone to die to let someone new come in .

# data[].attributes.body
I think that there should be term limits. This way there may be a possibility of less bais ideas and new varied ideas if there is time for people to change and have a varie of new people . Also this will prevent the overwhelming and overworking that had previously causes a death.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the Supreme Court should have term limits because it will force new ideas and over time people may become more biased. Changing Supreme Court justices every once in a while will prevent this from happening in the long run.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I think the Supreme Court should have term limits. As time goes on, age starts to effect people's perceptions and the way the see things. Age will also bring on mental illnesses, as mentioned in the article, that can hinder a person's performance of their job. They should be able to add new people so that there will be fresh new opinions instead of the same old traditional ones. The new generations should be able to be a part of the Supreme Court because they would have a different outlook on things rather than someone who has been there for most of their life. The Supreme Court needs various opinions instead of the same ones over and over again which is why they should have term limits so there can be changes.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Supreme Court Justices should have term limits to allow new judges to serve in court and propose new ideas. It could be considered unfair that there are only 9 Supreme Court judges appointed to this position for life, while there are other people who should get a chance to serve and offer their services. In addition, once judges serve past the average tenure limit, they become old, and can develop health issues that impact their decisions, therefore, new judges should be allowed to this position to prevent this from occurring.

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme court justices should have limits because if you have the same people for a long time, the court isn't open to fresh ideas. If you bring in new people more often, it may make the public happier with the decisions.

# data[].attributes.body
Justices should have terms. I say this because as time progresses views on society change. The power not being managed can mean that it can possibly be used wrongly.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court justices should have term limits because there should be a new justice every term. Or a change of justices for certain reasons.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the supreme court justices should have limits because the justices should all have different views on evaluating the constitution. Additionally, the same opinions are not gonna always be fair and changing the justices help bring new decisions and ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because bringing new justices to court will bring new ideas and having the same justices will most likely stand by their original views and opinions. In addition, I believe that changing the Supreme Court Justices will have more of an advantage with bringing more knowledge and concepts to the court.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because their views don't change  so people will get tired of them having the same views and not their views to adapt to the next generations.

# data[].attributes.body
The Justices should have terms because new generations bring different ideals. If a person is a just to long they decisions might sway over time. A person might also use the power of being a justice wrongly if they hold power to long.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court Justices should have a term limit because as time goes on they will start to get older and have different views on certain topics. Also by adding in new justices, it opens the door for more new ideas. So in order to keep the ideas that are being made with the time period we are in, Supreme Court justices should have term limits in order to let the younger generation in .

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because as they grow older, they may have biased opinions. If there is a term limit, the younger justices that are new will have open minds to different cases. Also, as they become older, they may become ill and not do their best job.

# data[].attributes.body
There should be term limits because as they get older, they are more vulnerable to sickness. Also, time changes and they may not think up to the time changes.

# data[].attributes.body
i thunk they should have term limits because if you have the same judge for a long time people could get fed up because there views don't change

# data[].attributes.body
i think they should have term limits because people get old and their views don't change they will always have their mind set and not be open to new ones but if there is a new found fresh mind they can be open to other ideas and not just their own.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes I think Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because as time passes new ideas and ideals become standard while if you have a judge that has been on the job for over 20 years he may still have old views and vote differently from others.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I think that Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because if you have different justices over time, you would have more people that would get into this government and wouldn't be as hard. Also, have more opinions out about what to decide.

# data[].attributes.body
They should because as they grow older they become more susceptible to illness and as a result become less proficient at performing their jobs. Changing views should also be considered because as stated, "scholars note, presidents have dug deep to select nominees whose firm convictions aren’t likely to shift over time." This could be a plus for the time period, but as time changes and society starts wavering they need to change to fit the current time period.

# data[].attributes.body
yes, i think that the supreme court justices should have term limits because throughout the years peoples views may change and after a while people may reach a point where it is time to retire. And what about their health? There comes a time where enough is enough, if they have had multiple medical issues in the past and are still going they need a break, let someone who is just as experienced and in their well being to take over.

# data[].attributes.body
No, I don't believe that they should have term limits. If you allowed this, presidents may not want to nominate a justice until a certain year, where after one term, another justice would be chosen by a president of the same party. This is because the presidency basically changes party every 8 years, ever since 1940. Therefore, if the justice had a 10 year term, then a president in 1993 might not nominate a justice until 1999, when in ten years, another person of that party will choose the next justice. Basically, it would still be politicized, but even more so.

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because over time, people get older and their views may become more biased. New Justices will allow new ideas to be open, allowing the Court to prosper. Their beliefs may be outdated, so there should be more younger and different Justices every couple of years.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that their should be a term limits because you can have different judges that can judge the laws the best way it can be

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court Justices should have a term limit because I feel that they have more power then the others. If they had this limit it would be better for checks and balances.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that Supreme Justices should  have their term limited because it allows new people to come in and have new ideas, that are related to their t

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that Supreme Justices should  have their term limited because it allows new people to come in and have new ideas, that are related to their t

# data[].attributes.body
Lastra Woodman 10-3

# data[].attributes.body
I firmly believe that there should be term limits for Supreme Court Justices because it would provide quicker and easier judging of laws as well as introducing more diversity between judges.

# data[].attributes.headline
Supreme Court Justices should have a term limit but not something as short as a president. Supreme Court Justices were added to our constitution to remain and rule and outlive any President's or any Congress' rules. They need a term of between 20 to 30 years so they could have a chance to overturn something the congress of president screwed up.

# data[].attributes.subject
Supreme Court Justices should have a term limit but not something as short as a president. Supreme Court Justices were added to our constitution to remain and rule and outlive any President's or any Congress' rules. They need a term of between 20 to 30 years so they could have a chance to overturn something the congress of president screwed up.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because it allows for new and fresh ideas and concepts to enter to enter the court in a shorter amount of time. Over 16-30 years (most term lengths of Supreme justices) a lot can change in terms of ideals and beliefs. By keeping the same person in the court with ideas reflected on what could be decades ago doesn't allow the court to grow and prosper.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court Justices should not have term limits except when they lean towards a biased view towards the party in which the President that elected was. However, I also believe that if the terms were limited, more people would have a chance to be in the justices, but they may not be as secure as someone that stays for long.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the Supreme Justices should have term limits because time and ideologies of the time changes. Something that may considered constitutional 30 years ago may not be now. If we Supreme Justices continuously changing, then we have a fair chance of having more constitutional outcomes of trials.

# data[].attributes.body
NO, they should not have term limits. Because this can make the Supreme Court Justices feel under pressure to make certain decisions

# data[].attributes.body
No, I believe the only time a judge should resign is if they have a medical issue that would impair there judgement. And if the judge shows that sign of not being fair, showing biased they should resign. Also if the people want them to resign, they should because the government answers to the people. But they should not have term limits because that could lead to having a republican supreme court or vice versa

# data[].attributes.body
yes because it gives everyone a chance and new ideas could arise when new people come in.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes they should because to change the system

# data[].attributes.body
yes the supreme court justices should have term limits because

# data[].attributes.body
Yes the supreme court should have term limits because times change. We don´t want the same old ṕeople who have these one set mindsets making our decisions. No one should be in office for too long of a time also.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because they should change as all of the other politicians change. This is unfair to the others who want to have the same job and can contribute a younger political view in office.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes there should be term limit because peopleś beliefs and opinions change and if people are never rotated out then the country can not become more modern and represent was most Americans want.

# data[].attributes.body
They should have term limits in order to make sure new ideas are being represented. Serving a whole life as a Supreme Court Justice while Presidents change every 4 or 8 years could cause many conflicts of interest and limit the President's power to older ideologies.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the supreme court justices should have a term limit because like any job there is a certain point where you must step down and retire. This will give other people a chance to get on the court and so that they will not always have the same outcome if they have the same people with the same views and will not lead to corruption.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that they should have term limits. Like any other higher position one person should not the able to have it for too long. There should be an opportunity for change and so that one persons judgment dosent get clouded and they do not become corrupt.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, Supreme Court judges should have term limits because every judge has different political beliefs so in order for it to be fair the judges should change frequently to represent different political beliefs.

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court Justices should have term limits. This is because MOST of them are old, white, and generally believe in one thing. If there were younger justices, many more situations will have a better outcome. There will be varying opinions that actually make sense. A younger generation will know and understand many of the things occurring in society now.

# data[].attributes.body
They should have term limits so that nobody can be in office for too long. There should be a change of power and an opportunity for different people to be in this position.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because society and point of views change so there should be a set retirement.

# data[].attributes.body
They should have term limits to help change and cycle the balance between republican and democrat, and prevent court packing

# data[].attributes.body
They should have term limits. No one should be in office for too long. There needs to be a change of power and a chance for different people to be in this position. Also, at a certain age people should retire because the judgement could be clouded.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court should have term limits because the court is divided and currently there isn’t much diversity within it. Since the justice’s term is for life, we have had the same tenures throughout the course of various presidencies, so their point of views change during that time which can cause a divide in the court. Some tenures also have to refrain from retiring after suffering from major health problems such as strokes. Also, since the tenures do not complete their terms very often, they have stayed the same for many years and the majority of them are white men, which reduces the diversity in the court.

# data[].attributes.body
The supreme court should have term limits because some may have biased opinions based on outdated beliefs and younger people may bring better ideas

# data[].attributes.body
The supreme court justices should not have term limits because they have more experience when it comes to similar cases that were decided on in the past. This will help to enforce the laws as most of the cases could be similar. Those who are knew may have a very different interpretation and may rule in favor of something that may not be constitutional.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Supreme Court justices should have term limits because as times change, the justices should also change.

# data[].attributes.body
They should have term limits because as they get older their points of views on things will be changing. Also they have to deal with medical issues which can take away their focus

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion the Supreme Court justices should have term limits just like the President has term limits. This is because as people get older they can have certain medical issues and mental health problems which cause them to impact the way they think big decisions through. They may make poor decisions on behalf of the American people, also if they lessen the term it may give way for more diversity and a change in the number of democratic and republican justices.

# data[].attributes.body
In my perspective, let's say corruption exists within the Supreme Court (however it may be), their term should absolutely be limited by the spectrum of substitution and removal. "Reformers say one solution is term limits. Some suggest an 18-year cap, staggered so each presidential term would bring two new faces to the court. Others think 10 years would be better, an idea supported by two-thirds of Americans in a 2015 poll." These are some ways people may limit their terms.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion the Supreme Court Justices should have term limits because as justices get older they are faced with certain health issues and their points of views can change. For example the article states, "The absence of mandatory retirement has let some aging justices continue working after strokes that caused mental debilitation." Based on this, justices are not allowed to retire even after serious health conditions. Overall, term limits for justices will help the Supreme Court run at the best of its ability.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because if they were to become corrupt or making biased decisions, their term would be limited , and someone who could fulfill the role better would take over.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court should have term limits because as time increases so does people judgement.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, supreme court justices should have limits because as people get older, their capability of leading something can lessen and impact the way they think

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court Justices should have term limits. This is because as the term goes on so do there lives, which means they get older, and as you get older you are not capable of doing everything that you should be doing. There should be a limit. Not only that but there should be some change, especially if the person isn't doing a good job.

# data[].attributes.body
The Syprem

# data[].attributes.headline
They should because as they grow older they become more susceptible to illness and as a result become less proficient at performing their jobs. Changing views should also be considered because as stated, "scholars note, presidents 

# data[].attributes.subject
They should because as they grow older they become more susceptible to illness and as a result become less proficient at performing their jobs. Changing views should also be considered because as stated, "scholars note, presidents 

# data[].attributes.body
I think the Supreme Court should have term limits because times change and therefore we need people that are more informed about whats going on. For example if someone is 80 years old he doesn't know as much about technology as someone that is 20 years old.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes they should have term limits. This is because they get older and their views can change and we need to have fresh insight and ideas on things because it can allow us to become a better nation.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court should have term limits because as time goes on people begin to age and their way of thinking becomes slow and non-efficient. In the article it states, "The absence of mandatory retirement has let some aging justices continue working after strokes that caused mental debilitation." This quote shows that the fact that they are able to work until death and even after a medical issue that the Supreme Court does not have limits to where people are able to work.