# data[].attributes.body
Family, children

# data[].attributes.body
Increase the number of teachers.

# data[].attributes.body
-feeding children, offering meals to take home, offering income incentives

# data[].attributes.body
Policy makers, teachers and administration, community groups, families

# data[].attributes.body
PRO: increasing the amount of food and nutrition given to the poor population, incentive for people to come to school

CON: potential high cost, low profit for those producing the food

# data[].attributes.body
The case study lists some of the pros as expanded enrollment, particularly for girls. A con that came with this is that other recourses were not expanded, so teachers had to make due teaching more students with the same amount of time and materials. This showed a negative effect on the testing cores, especially of children not enrolled in the program, or classified as "poor" suggesting that new enrollees may have been behind and needed more attention.

# data[].attributes.body
Teachers, Families, Community Groups, workers, food suppliers

# data[].attributes.body
Teachers, families, policy makers

# data[].attributes.body
The policy effects everyone in different ways. if it be more work, more food, or a better say in what happens

# data[].attributes.body
Teachers, government, families.

# data[].attributes.body
Pro: The children can go to a place where they are able to get a meal as well as education.
Con: There might be an overcrowding of classrooms and the individual outcomes may be decreased. There also maybe a decrease in the quality & quantity of food if there are more children in the classroom.

# data[].attributes.body
Families, community as a whole

# data[].attributes.body
Pros are increased attendance and test scores as well as decreased hunger. Cons are increased work for school employees and leakages.

# data[].attributes.body
policy makers, government, FFE (Food for Education)

# data[].attributes.body
The food provided for the nutrients and keeping kids in school.

# data[].attributes.body
Reducing the cost in food, then put that towards education.

# data[].attributes.body
PRO: incentive for attendance, impacts whole family, if children cannot attend school they still get food, addresses poverty issues
CON: higher costs than school feeding

# data[].attributes.body
Dedicated mentors/teachers are in demand to improve education and distribute food appropriately.

# data[].attributes.body
School supplies and food more available

# data[].attributes.body
children/students, families, communities, policy makers

# data[].attributes.body
Community leaders that guide the implementation of the programs.

# data[].attributes.body
Implementing more jobs in the community that supports education

# data[].attributes.body
reducing costs, finding nonperishables to supply in schools

# data[].attributes.body
Increase demand for teaching, so the then there are more teachers per student. Getting the demand for teachers present in the school systems.

# data[].attributes.body
PRO: test scores increased, attendance rate, lowered the dropout rates, especially amongst women attending
CON: more work for school employees

# data[].attributes.body
Pros: more girls in school and getting feed.
Cons: funding and resource and distribution.