# data[].attributes.body
I loved the idea of these and no point in reinventing the wheel, however I do feel that we need to look at the topics covered and see if we can marry them up to the Science Planners so that we could kill two birds with one stone. This would also allow for cohesive planning progression.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the simplicity of these planners as they are concise and easy to follow.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the literacy plans I think they are very clear to what should be covered at each stage

# data[].attributes.body
I like that it has the planning pyramids and progressive plans for the likes of science. This makes it easier to plan in a sequential manner.

# data[].attributes.body
Needs simplified and streamlined. Not very manageable as a working document.

# data[].attributes.body
I felt that the assessment area of the folder was an honerous task and took ages to do and then wasn't really all that relevant, certain aspects of it.

# data[].attributes.body
I'd like to echo that I think collegiate planning time would be useful. Also as it allows staff to see how others use their planning folders effectively, as I felt a little lost using it at the start of the year. It would also allow for some moderation between stages, which I feel like I haven't done much of.

# data[].attributes.body
it would be great to have planning collegiate time to update planning and identify what we want changed as a staff.

# data[].attributes.body
It is quite time consuming and difficult to find time to keep it up to date. I find it adds a lot of time to the planning process. I think it would be easier to maintain if it was digital, although I realise this would be difficult to create and some people prefer doing planning on paper. For example, a spreadsheet where you can colour code experiences as they are covered, and a box to add comments (I can type a lot faster than I can write)!

# data[].attributes.body
I did like the original A4 size for ease of taking home to plan and update as the A3 puts you off carrying it everywhere. However, it depends how much planning stuff is actually required to be kept inside it.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked the A3 size especially as I then don't need my glasses, however it would be more manageable if it was bound across the top so it could be folded over on itself...Eureka...could be designed to stand for a quick refer to or to incorpoarte A3 4 Part Lesson Model. Would take up less table space.

# data[].attributes.body
I do find a3 very bulky on my desk and when being carried between home and school. So I think I’d rather a4

# data[].attributes.body
I would prefer A4 as it makes it easier to carry around.

# data[].attributes.body
Groups - showing work covered, completed and understood or needing revisited for Literacy, Numeracy and Health. Assuming the German and Science Planners have been followed termly as prescribed in the plans. IDL topics covered and also the E's and O's covered, understood and achieved.

If flexible groupings, again you need to know what has been covered and what work has been fully achieved or attained.

# data[].attributes.body
List of groups and core resources used
Numeracy pyramids
Records of understanding for literacy and numeracy
Writing levels
Topics covered

# data[].attributes.body
Reading and Core resource reading records for each group.
Writing groups list
Numeracy groups lists

# data[].attributes.body
A concise summary for each curricular area- what has been covered, what hasn't been covered, and who are the the kids that didn't manage to achieve the E's and O's or are well above the others.

# data[].attributes.body
I really like pyramids per group ticked and dated as it clearly shows strategies covered per group as it can be confusing if all on one level but all at different stages to identify what strategies have been covered by whom.

# data[].attributes.body
If you use a core resource, it would be excellent to have a copy per group to show what has been taught and worked on.