# data[].attributes.headline
no discussion of methodology - data sources identified but not justified

# data[].attributes.subject
no discussion of methodology - data sources identified but not justified

# data[].attributes.headline
Logical sequence of pedagogical actions across two distinct phases, linking research and context

# data[].attributes.subject
Logical sequence of pedagogical actions across two distinct phases, linking research and context

# data[].attributes.body
Short and succinct. Results of progress tests and confidence of students. No anomalies, outliers or highlights of information.

# data[].attributes.headline
limited detail in lit review - studied listed rather than linked or analysed

# data[].attributes.subject
limited detail in lit review - studied listed rather than linked or analysed

# data[].attributes.body
very focused on quantitative measures; clear data points. Lack of graphs/other visuals.

# data[].attributes.body
Justified paradigm, no methodology. Clear planning and method to obtain data. Minimal ethics - one sentence.

# data[].attributes.body
Solid grounding in theory for three pedagogical methods.

# data[].attributes.body
very short literature review... but clear on which were the key areas that informed their enquiry

# data[].attributes.headline
Litreture was stated clearly, but not synthesised in great detail. Litreture is focused on "negatives" of intervention more. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Litreture was stated clearly, but not synthesised in great detail. Litreture is focused on "negatives" of intervention more. 

# data[].attributes.body
Synthesised literature, very short. Minimal information on each study reviewed. 3 studies used, 1 government research.

# data[].attributes.body
Clear research question. Short and to the point. No evidence of PAT/NAPLAN/career advice stated.5

# data[].attributes.headline
Context including particularities of that class as relevant to the study. Identified the 'learning issue' and presented research question at the end of the intro

# data[].attributes.subject
Context including particularities of that class as relevant to the study. Identified the 'learning issue' and presented research question at the end of the intro

# data[].attributes.headline
The context provided was clear and succint, more depth required for cohort context

# data[].attributes.subject
The context provided was clear and succint, more depth required for cohort context

# data[].attributes.body
Provided a detailed summary of school and class contexts.

# data[].attributes.body
Provided a summary of the research question, context, the methods and the results.