# data[].attributes.body
cubestats are very helpful, they are small and compact easy to get to different places. they are very beneficial because they are good quality and cheap.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that cubesats are very useful they are cheap and small so they take less fuel due to a smaller weight. They can be produced a lot faster and are easier to get into space.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that cubesats are a very good idea. They are cost effective and can preform simple and more dangerous tasks. We also need to be careful that we don't overuse them either. They could easily add to the space junk instead of cleaning it up. However, cubesats should not replace the older satellites.

# data[].attributes.body
cubesats are extremely durable and cost effective. they are also small and compact with high definition cameras for great picture quality

# data[].attributes.body
After looking at the pros and cons of cubesats, I would definitely recommend their use. They are compact, cost-effective, and relatively easy to make.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that CubeSats are very useful because they are cost effective and the pictures that re taken are high quality. They are also very small making it an easier way to get them to space.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend the use of CubeSats, because they are cheap and can be produced faster. They also take up less space and they are very useful. they can take better pictures than we have been able to do with past inventions.

# data[].attributes.body
I Think that Cubesats would be beneficial to the environment in space and around our planet. They would take up less space so asteroids are less likely to hit them and also they are more cost efficient.

# data[].attributes.body
I highly recommend Cubesats, for a number of reasons. First of all I believe that the low cost will prove beneficial, so that most of the funds may go into larger projects. Secondly,  I believe that it would be using our resources wisely so that we can save some room in the orbit.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Cubesats are a wise use of technology that allows us to explore space using less resources and spending less time building them. I would recommend their use, but we should tread carefully into the future, knowing that 'space junk' is a very apparent problem in our atmosphere, and we should make it a top priority to keep our planet clean.

# data[].attributes.body
Cubesats are an extremely low cost way to collect data and are a really good way to use our money. Since they are very small it may not be able to carry as much data as something that is 5 times the size and costs a bunch more.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend cubesats because they are low cost and can do many things for us like collect data. Although they cant carry heavy payloads or much at all. I think cubesats would be good to collect data on planets we haven't been on.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend cubesats, they are an effective way to collect data and they are less cheaper than normal satellites, they are 1/1000th the mass. But it depends on how much data can be store and how fast data can be sent to earth.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend using cubesats because it is a cheaper and faster way of putting a satellite into space. Also from one of the video they were talking about how the cubesats take better photos of Earth than the current satellites. Lastly, the cubsats don't leave as much space junk than the big satellites we have now

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend that the use of CubeSats continue. The cost of standard satellites is massive compared to the cost it would take to produce CubeSats. the amount of junk already in space wouldn't grow if we used smaller satellites.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend the use of CubeSats because they are small, affordable, and and easier to use than normal satellites. With CubeSats, it would allow us to put more in space and save lots of money than putting the tradition big, heavy, and expensive satellite up in space. There are few cons, but overall the cubesat is the best alternative for satellites.

# data[].attributes.body
CubeSats are smaller, cheaper, and simpler to use than most traditional satellites. I see no reason to use a form of technology with these positive traits, despite whatever cons they present.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that cubesats are cheaper and smaller than other satellites, but that also means that production would be higher than that of older satellites and there would be a lot more stuff in the space around the earth. Because of new technology, the cubesats would be able to gather better data, but it just depends on how space efficient we are with them.

# data[].attributes.body
I would highly recommend CubeSats, they are very cost effective and are fast to make. We would be able to save a lot of money with the uses of cubesats. Also, they would be able to take great pictures of our earths orbit.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that CubeStats will be the most effective way to record information. They are cheaper and faster to produce, and reduce the amount of "junk" we launch into space, In addition we can use CubeSats to monitor agriculture, urban growth, and monitor water security.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend the use of CubeSats, because they are cheap and can be produced faster.

# data[].attributes.body
I recommend CubeSats because they're much cheaper and easier to put together with easily accessible materials. They can take better pictures from space than what we currently have in orbit.

# data[].attributes.body
CubeSats are a pretty good idea. They are cost effective and can preform simple sometimes more risky missions without a major loss than it's predecessors. We also need to be careful that we don't overuse them either. They could easily add to the space junk instead of cleaning it up. It is also good to note that CubeSats should not replace the 'old' satellites either as they cannot take another curiosity rover to Mars currently or take humans to Io.

# data[].attributes.body
I recommend CubeSats because they are very cost efficient, are minimalistic, and much easier to construct when compared to other satellites. Over time, the money saved from using CubeSats would allow for greater technological advancements

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend the cubesats because not only are they faster to design, build, and deploy, but they also cost far less than the satellites we are using right now and take higher quality pictures from space.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend using cubesats because they are cheaper and faster to design and build, and they cost less to send into space while also taking better pictures than the satellites currently in space.

# data[].attributes.body
Cubesats are designed to be less costly and more space effective. This would aid in the growing pollution of our orbit, as cube sats take up less space. They can also be devoted-due to their low cost- to high risk missions that NASA would have avoided. I would recommend them, as long as we keep them to a minimum. Even if they are a smaller better alternative to hulking satellite, to much of them in orbit would still over pollute. Its all about finding that balance.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the use of CubeSats would be beneficial to future because they are cost efficient ,take up less space, and are effective.If we start using them eventually we could improve on the flaws to make them even more effective and come up with new technologies to build and repair them.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend the use of CubeSats because it's smaller than a regular satellite and its less expensive too. It can track and find science data easily but it needs to survive while traveling in the deep space in order to receive data.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend CubeSats they are more cost effective, they are easier to build, and are smaller in size. CubeStats are easier to produce due to low production cost and small size. One of the downsides is that the required hardware of a large satellite cannot fit in the CubeSat, but with enough research we can fix this. The best part of the CubeStat is that if the network gets disconnected it can be reconfigured remotely.

# data[].attributes.body
Due to the cost efficient nature of a smaller satellite device, I believe CubeSats are a revolutionary step in the right direction for space exploration and exploitation for the good of humanity.

# data[].attributes.body
Since CubeSats are small and can do what most other satellites can do it makes more affordable and less of a problem to deal with financially and as junk, they seem to be quite efficient and give a new movement towards space travel and exploration.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend using CubeSats to further our knowledge about space because compared to the big, expensive satellites already out there, they are a very good alternative. Not only are they inexpensive and small, but they are also able to hitch a ride on previously planned missions. This would also lower the cost of how much it would be to get them into space. We could kill two birds with one stone. I think that this a very productive way to find out more about space and collect even more data.

# data[].attributes.body
Compared to the much larger satellites, I would say that CubeSats are several times better.  One of the reasons is because they don't require many launches to bring up into space and take more detailed images of Earth. But the most important reason would be because of their extremely low cost.

# data[].attributes.body
CubesSats, I believe should be used because they are cheaper to make and Launch. They also will not take as much space up as the traditional satellites do.  The CubeSats also will only stay in orbit for a year or two and will then will come back to Earth. This is great because it helps control the debris in space.

# data[].attributes.body
I think CubeSats are worth continuing to use in the future. They provide a very small and compact alternative to standard satellites, and can be used for many purposes. Their technology is limited right now, but it is growing to a point where they won't be very limited soon.

# data[].attributes.body
I think CubeSats are very beneficial to finding out more about space, especially with its low cost and small size. As long as propulsion systems are improved, these cubes should be used over the average, bulky satellite.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend cubesats, they are an effective way to collect data and they are less cheaper than normal satellites. Plus, they are 1/1000th the mass. But it just depends on how much data it can store and how fast it could send data down to Earth.

# data[].attributes.body
CubeSats are an effective way to collect data and do it in a more cost-effective way. I personally think, that they are very useful considering the amount of data that can be collected within such a small device.

# data[].attributes.body
Due to their low cost and swarms that orbit the Earth, which allow for rapid refresh, I would recommend CubeSats over the bulky and expensive traditional satellites that we have today.

# data[].attributes.body
Cube data are a wonderful and give off a very wonderful incite of of how data can be saved. The cost is very efficient and weighs way more less then a regular satellite, Very USEFULLL!!!

# data[].attributes.body
I think CubeSats are a very effective way of data collection plus they are considerably smaller than traditional satellites and might be easer to dispose of in Earth's atmosphere when they reach the end of their lives.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that CubeSats are very useful and cost efficient. Since their smaller and weigh less than normal satellites making launching them into orbit a lot easier.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that CubeSats are very useful and cost efficient. Since their smaller and weigh less than normal satellites making launching them into orbit a lot easier.

# data[].attributes.body
CubeSats are inexpensive, compact cubes that provide a way to collect data. The data being vital to our description of these planets.
They're much cheaper when compared to a satellite and take up less space.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that CubeSats are a very effective use of resources. They are cost effective and they are compact. They would also cut back on the excess of space trash without having to forfeit satellites.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that CubeSats are a very good idea, and are very useful. They are more inexpensive than a regular satellite. Also you can have way more of them in orbit without cause as much clutter or traffic.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend using the CubeSats because they are smaller and more compacted than other satellites. They are also a lot cheaper and use a lot less space.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that CubeSats are a great idea because they are very inexpensive. Also, they are very efficient and we can store them on missions that we have already planned. They are also very small so they can be stored in very small spaces.

# data[].attributes.body
I think CubeStats are very efficient. They are cheap and small meaning we use less money and less space.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the Cubesats are very useful, as they provide a cheaper method of space research due to how they can be assembled from low-cost components, as well the fact that multiple can be released from the use of a single rocket.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the Cubesats are very effective and efficient ways to collect data at such a low building and design cost. However, I think that Cubesats need better propulsion methods so they don't drift of into space and become space junk.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the CubeSats are a useful way to collect data with them being so small it is much easier without having to spend more money on weight.

# data[].attributes.body
I think CubeSats are highly beneficial with the low cost and size. These projects are highly efficient and can change the way we view our planet and gather data.

# data[].attributes.body
These CubeSats are very vital to learning more about the earth and space in general. They are low in manufacturing costs because of the materials they are made out of but they do leave debris in the atmosphere which can be harmful to satellites in the area.

# data[].attributes.body
These little CubeSats are an amazing technological device that NASA needs to use. These small little devices could revolutionize the way we explore outer space and be a way safer option. The low cost is way less risk than sending a billion dollar rocket up and it exploding and wasting money and taking lives away.

# data[].attributes.body
Personally, I believe Cubsats are worth the manufacturing and technology necessary to keep them in orbit. They are revolutionary to learning about space and what we need to change on Earth to benefit us. I do think a major con is the debris they leave in space, which I believe needs to be repaired quickly.

# data[].attributes.body
The CubeSats are an amazing piece of technology as they are very small and are way cheaper than all of the other equipment NASA sends into space. This would be a great recommendation to anyone.

# data[].attributes.body
Cube Stats are a huge leap forward from a cost and technological standpoint. Their small size is the largest advantage they hold. I would recommend them for anyone. There is no doubt that their mainstream use is inevitable in the near future.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the CubeSats are a good idea because we are a nation in debt and we don't need to be spending more money on satellites. Satellites also pollute the atmosphere so by putting small cubes into space we will take up less room and pollute less.

# data[].attributes.body
I recommend the Cubesat because its compact size is idle for helping our orbit clutter problem, while also staying efficient enough to finish missions that a regular satellite could do. It does this in addition to also being cheaper.

# data[].attributes.body
The small size and low cost makes them effective for use in missions rather than larger satellites, but risks such as temperature and propulsion could hold them back.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend the cubesats due to them being smaller and cheaper than other satellites.

# data[].attributes.body
I think cube sat are a very different alternative to traditional satellites however the problems are going to be tough to get past because unless the cube sat is made bigger with more space for fuel we have no chance of deep space travel with current technologies so at the moment I would not recommend cube sat as the best

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend using the cubesats because they are inexpensive and they are 10 by 10 by 10 centimeters which is a very small size.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend cube stats because of the low cost. Also their compact design is ideal.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend using CubeSats because of the low cost and small size.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend using CubeSats. They are able to complete recon more cheaply while we can experiment on them to develop human transport.

# data[].attributes.body
I would definitely recommend the use of CubeSats in regards to the low cost and easy ability to be manufactured on large scales. The CubeSats can also be used in large "Swarms" in order to gather large groups of data

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend CubeSats over the traditional sate-lights because even tho they are small and harder to control and as of now success has only been 50%, still the pros are much more important, because there will be more space for research, these are very adjustable, and most importantly the cost overall is much less.

# data[].attributes.body
CubeSats should be implemented in comparison to other satellites because of their low cost, small size, material requirement, and expend ability. They are very efficient tools for research.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend using CubeSats over traditional satellites because of their low cost and having the same capabilities as a satellite would. NASA could mass produce these and send them to space rather than sending a satellite that would cost millions of dollars.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend using CubeSats for shorter researching missions because of their low cost and being capable of doing basically everything a large satellite would do. They also would be easier to get into space in large masses and easier to produce.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that CubeSats would be drastically more effective at what satellites already. They have a cheaper cost, and are expendable. They lack propulsion options for mobility, but that isn't their primary focus. They are meant to be expendable, that way, you would get multiple tries in case the trajectory is off and the sat goes off course.

# data[].attributes.body
Cubesats are largely beneficial compared to traditional satellites in terms of cost, space, and materials, and should be considered for future applications.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend CubeSats because of their much lower cost compared to other methods of exploration. Furthermore, the incredibly small satellite, which is a standard units of 10 cm x 10 cm x 10 cm, would allow NASA to send multiple at CubeSats at a time giving us more information quickly,

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend Cube Sats 100%, mostly because of the reduced cost. Along with the cost being lower, they are also very small, so one rocket can get lots of them into the atmosphere.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend due to their incredibly small dimensions of 10 cm X 10 cm X 10 cm. They also weigh around 3 pounds! The reduced costs are a large benefit and add to the pros. Finally, I would recommend on regards to their ability to send multiple small satellite payloads, opening the doors for quicker and more extensive space exploration.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend the use of cube sats because of the different uses they have and how small and cheap the cubes are.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend using cubesats because they will help us grow as a economy

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend using Cubesats because they are small and are very affordable.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend cubesats because they are much smaller and more compact than current satellites, which would make using them more convenient. Also they are less expensive than alternatives.

# data[].attributes.body
Weighing the pros and cons of cubesats, do you think you would recommend their use? Why or why not? Share your opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend using CubeSats because of how much more versatile and cheap they are to use in comparison to bigger traditional satellites.

# data[].attributes.body
I think its a great idea because they are small, compact and cheap and can be used for effective research.

# data[].attributes.body
I would for sure reccomend cubesats because of how easy they are. They are small, cost a little amount, and are easy to launch into orbit. Compared to other satalites that gather data, cubesats are the better option. But they can get messed up easily going into orbit or striking other cubesats

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend cubesats because they are smaller and cost less than a normal satellite would to send to space. Another thing is that it provides an educational purpose for teachers and students. One thing that is bad about them is that they are harder to operate than a normal satellite after launch.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend cubesats, because while they can't make major trajectory adjustments they are less expensive than traditional satellites.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend their use because they are much smaller than the satellites we have now, much less to operate, and they would help decrease the clutter in space.

# data[].attributes.body
Some of the pros to a cubesat is that they are small, not as expensive as a normal satellite, and they do not weigh very much. One of the negatives to a cubesat is there lack of mobility. After launch, the cube cannot really guide itself to different directions. The positives to the cubesat out weigh the negatives so I would recommend it.