# data[].attributes.body
All the protests had one thing in common. It was the disagreement between people and the norms developed in the society.

# data[].attributes.body
Two weren't related to government. They weren't as big as well. I did the same as one of my friend and we had a topic which was not a big of a problem.

# data[].attributes.body
Most of the protests in the past were responded with a negative force so the progress weren't pretty great. I also saw a pattern between some of the protests is that even if a side wins, that wouldn't mean that it made a positive impact on the society.

# data[].attributes.headline
Who the heck put the stuff at the bottom of the padlet?

# data[].attributes.subject
Who the heck put the stuff at the bottom of the padlet?

# data[].attributes.body
nice job, now go back

# data[].attributes.body
keep scrolling

# data[].attributes.headline
Uh, I think they want their 40 seconds of scrolling back instead

# data[].attributes.subject
Uh, I think they want their 40 seconds of scrolling back instead

# data[].attributes.body
Most of the protests that I saw were a group of people that came from similar ethnic or religious backgrounds that had some disagreements with their country (their government) and they all came together as one unified group to protest for change.

# data[].attributes.body
Almost all of them protested because the higher authority stripped them of their freedom and most of them responded with force which resulted in war and many people dying. The governments also at first also ignored the protesters.

# data[].attributes.body
The two protest I chose were climate change and uniform protest. The two protests did not have many patterns or similarities. Because the uniform one was very peaceful and it was an easy change but the climate change was way harder to change, raise awareness. The people involved in the uniform protest were only the head of school and students while the climate change involved government authorities and millions of people.

# data[].attributes.body
nothing is nothing

# data[].attributes.body
A lot of the groups of protestors had something  in opposition to the  government.

# data[].attributes.body
the protest I see were there were people protesting to get their rights and freedom in uniform protest there are footballers protesting to get their rights. and in climate change I see both protest are peaceful protest.

# data[].attributes.body
the pattern I have noticed is that most of the protest start off peaceful and sometimes also very small. and I have noticed that the reaction from the government is what triggers violent protests. it really depends on how the government reacts to the protest.

# data[].attributes.body
I watched the video on climate change and Tiananmen Square protest. They both asked the government for change  and strikes by students.
For the response, government was not really cooperative with the protest. Although they both caused a change, there are still somethings that need to be fixed.

# data[].attributes.body
The 2 protests that I watched about is Climate Change and BLM. In both protests, people chose to do non-violence protest in real life. And both of them has online organizations to support them.
I think their protests were pretty successful because they did gain many people's attention into this protest. And the governments did make some change for their protest.
Also these protests always starts with some long time social problem, when some events came up, people would start to protest.

# data[].attributes.body
Most of the protest groups had something against the government.

# data[].attributes.body
you scrolled this far so here's a cookie: 🍪

# data[].attributes.body
Most of the people in power on the whole, disagreed with what these protests. Also, many people didn't want these changes, because it would change the way they lived their lives

# data[].attributes.body
The smaller problem of the uniforms got an answer right away, whereas the bigger topic on racial abuse is still yet to be fully solved.

What that means is that online racism is a big topic, and it is much harder for social media companies to change that in a split second, or in a matter of a few days or weeks. And racism online and on the soccer pitch is still evident till this day.

(Cyrus)

# data[].attributes.body
Almost all the protests had something to do with the government being too strict or in the wrong. I also noticed that most of them are non voilent until the the government or the oppposition get voilent.

# data[].attributes.body
I watched the climate change protest and the school uniform protest.
Both was not violently、and the both protests started by students. I think these were successful because the government or school has change .

# data[].attributes.body
The patterns between the videos i watched is that the protests were both disturbing the authorities and doing 'harm' to them. They started in small groups and the numbers got bigger and bigger. The authorities for both responded in a violent way.

# data[].attributes.body
Patterns of Protest:
The protest were about inequality; both were peaceful and non-violent.

Patterns of Response:
The norms were forced to change, both authorities were understanding of the protesters.

# data[].attributes.body
I watched the video on climate change and uniform protest. Things they have in common are
- They are both peaceful
- The authorities complied with the protestors' demands.
Also, they are both recent protests. If this were in the 1600s then the authorities might not have complied, so the time of the protest is one thing to consider.

# data[].attributes.body
Patterns between the protests is that they usually fight to change the norms, for good or for worse. For example, the protests against slavery were fighting for black rights, while the KKK protested for white supremacy. There are 2 types of protests. Violent ones, and non viole

# data[].attributes.body
Protests - Apartheid, Tiananmen Square
I watched both of them, and they had a few similarities.

-Both protests

# data[].attributes.body
-I watched racism against football and apartheid.
-Two protests I watched was both fighting against racism.
-One protest was violent and people died from it while the other one was peaceful.
-One was done physically with people going out to protest while one was on social media.
-Both had many supporters but only the Apartheid got rid of the problem. There still is racism in football.
-The Apartheid took 40 years to achieve it's goal, so the football racism would also take a long time to achieve it's goal because it is a big topic.

# data[].attributes.headline
Alvin O: Patterns of Protest- Salt March and Racism in Football

# data[].attributes.subject
Alvin O: Patterns of Protest- Salt March and Racism in Football

# data[].attributes.body
One of the protest was peaceful but one wasn't. Since the protest against racism in football was just a virtuala peaceful protest nobody got hurt. But for the Salt March, people get arrested and injured.
There is usually a pattern when protest take the protest/march to the streets, it is only to a point where they call only call it peaceful. Things don't usually end up well with those protests on the streets and usually ends up with tear gas thrown into crowds or getting shot with rubber bullets.  But in the case of the Salt march, all the people get arrested and most of them were beaten.

# data[].attributes.body
Patterns between protests:
There were financial motives at play in both.
Both started peaceful but the other side initiated violence, and some killings.
They both succeeded because they were in the right, and they both had a large percentage of the population protesting for change. That large portion of the population had influence in that they could go on strike, or quit their jobs.
Both ended with good change for the protesters, in that they received equality by law.
Their is still discrimination today against these people, but it is no longer written in the law

# data[].attributes.body
Out of all the protests that I watched, they were all relating with minorities disagreeing with decisions made by someone in power, ranging from the government to the head of a school. (Tiananmen square and UK uniform protests.) Ultimately, the minorities got together and decided to protest, in the case of the videos which I watched, they were all peaceful other than the Tiananmen square one which became violent. After the protesting, the problem usually improved but it was still not solved. I feel to improve all the protests which I watched, they should have got more support to protest.

# data[].attributes.body
I watched the videos about feminism and Hong Kong protests. They both have a common thing. As time passed, the protest became increasingly violent. Police and protesters attack each other and destruct properties. There are many casualties according to the protest.

# data[].attributes.body
- The two protests were about racism against the black people and it was to raise awareness of what was happening. They were also both peaceful protests.
- Both protests managed to convince people to help but neither of the protests got rid of the problem

# data[].attributes.body
Both of the protests were nonviolent. Both was about taking a stand against police violence, but one was advocating racial oppression, while the other one was for democracy. But I found that the people rioting for democracy were more genuine, and I still found that the people taking part in protests of racial oppression lacked something, and were maybe doing it for their own benefit, and not the betterment of the entire situation.

# data[].attributes.body
Salt March and Racism in Soccer

Both of the protests were peaceful

They both achieved their goals for inducing change.

One took a bit longer than the other to see observable change (a few years)(Salt March)

The other saw a relatively quick response which was just a couple days. (Racism in soccer)

Although both protests were peaceful the responses were inconsistent.

The Salt March had a very violent response.

Many arrests, many beatings.

The online protest, racism in soccer, had no violent response, instead there was a quick response from big social media companies.

# data[].attributes.body
Both protests were peaceful.

There are no other patterns, since one is a small topic on what to wear to school, and another is on racism.

(Cyrus)

# data[].attributes.headline
Calvin: A pattern I found was that world leaders/the authorities mostly disliked what these people were doing

# data[].attributes.subject
Calvin: A pattern I found was that world leaders/the authorities mostly disliked what these people were doing

# data[].attributes.body
Literally nothing was changed as a result of the

# data[].attributes.body
Almost all of the protests had some sort of disagreement with the government. Most of them started as peaceful protests but the endings were not very peaceful. There were many dead people and violence and it was usually the government or the people with more power that annihilated the protestors or the weaker group.