# data[].attributes.headline
Salvator Mundi- Leonardo da Vinci- $450.3 million

# data[].attributes.subject
Salvator Mundi- Leonardo da Vinci- $450.3 million

# data[].attributes.body
kyle, miranda, rhea, jackson

# data[].attributes.headline
Untitled by Jean Michel Basquiat for 110.5 million

# data[].attributes.subject
Untitled by Jean Michel Basquiat for 110.5 million

# data[].attributes.body
- matt and jasjit

# data[].attributes.body
$284 million
Brooklyn, Frankie, Ravjot, Khizrah

# data[].attributes.headline
Salvator mundi by Leonard Da vinci. Sold at auction for : $450.3 million

# data[].attributes.subject
Salvator mundi by Leonard Da vinci. Sold at auction for : $450.3 million

# data[].attributes.body
Nadia,Kaleigh,Balqees

# data[].attributes.headline
Interchange by William De Kooning Price: $300 million

# data[].attributes.subject
Interchange by William De Kooning Price: $300 million

# data[].attributes.body
jessica, prabhleen, someyyah

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/5f/Photo_of_Interchanged_by_Willem_de_Kooning.jpg

# data[].attributes.headline
Factors - Brooklyn, Frankie, Ravjot, Khizrah

# data[].attributes.subject
Factors - Brooklyn, Frankie, Ravjot, Khizrah

# data[].attributes.body
- what people are willing to pay for
- different tastes
- different trends (what is considered popular)
- new perspectives

# data[].attributes.body
sold for 110.7 million dollars
- Frankie

# data[].attributes.body
- Authenticity
- Condition
-  Historical Significance
- Popularity of Artist
- The medium

# data[].attributes.body
Nadia,Balqees,Kaleigh
_  The amount of time
-- Popularity of the artist
-- Backstory of the art
--

# data[].attributes.body
- Supply and demand
- Colour choice
- Meaning behind the artwork
-  If the artist isn't alive since they can't make any others making it exclusive
prabhleen, someyyah, jessica

# data[].attributes.body
$850 million-US Yusuf, Nicole, Jess

# data[].attributes.headline
Pendant portraits of Maerten Soolmans and Oopjen Coppit – Rembrandt

# data[].attributes.subject
Pendant portraits of Maerten Soolmans and Oopjen Coppit – Rembrandt

# data[].attributes.body
$180 Million

# data[].attributes.body
Jasjit and Matt
- quantity
- amount of time it took
- demand
- popularity of artist

# data[].attributes.body
The entirety of the  Van Gogh museum in Toronto is virtual. All the artwork shown is projected onto walls.
rhea, kyle, miranda

# data[].attributes.body
I think VR or AR artwork should cost money, but maybe not too much, since the technology itself is already expensive, so it should be at least a 1/3 of the original artwork itself, which is already expensive. - Brooklynn, Frankie Jasjit, Ravjot

# data[].attributes.body
Van Gogh's bedroom in a AR
The AR has made this shift from imagination into  a reality experience.The Ar shows his bedroom and allows us enter his room and explore the environment and feel the mood

# data[].attributes.body
https://miro.medium.com/max/1924/1*KwrwE-eqlj-xA0HyQAlhRA.jpeg
- A girl is swinging and her shoe flew off
- The artwork looks  like a pop-up
jessica, prabhleen, someyyah

# data[].attributes.body
I do not see why not, VR/AR Artwork is still a form of art, it takes time and money so it should have the same treatment as any other form of art.

# data[].attributes.body
i don't think the VR or AR should cost money to do because you aren't right there with the real art work you are just looking at it through camera which you could just look online and find the same photos just not movable, yes it is a cool experience but i don't think it should cost money or at least cost a lot of money.

# data[].attributes.body
- If other paintings cost a lot of money, then so should ar/vr
- The artists worked really hard so they should then receive money for it
- Takes time to make
- Also its a very cool and different form of art
victoria, prablheen, jessica, someyyah

# data[].attributes.body
I know of an app called "Adobe Aero" which brings your artwork to life. Personally, I've never tried it. Below is an image of a painting being transformed into a digital 3-D looking sculpture, with a "liquid effect" on a tablet. - Ravjot, Brooklyn, Frankie, Jasjit

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes,i think VR or AR artwork should cost money?

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes,i think VR or AR artwork should cost money?

# data[].attributes.body
Nadia,Balqees,Kaleigh,Matt
-- The  the artist still has to put a lot of effort into it
-- It gives a better experience

# data[].attributes.body
I think the only reason he's anonymous is to add expression and make up a new trend to his legacy. There's many ways of looking at this. One way is that he wants to remain safe and secretive about who he is and not get caught doing graffiti. Graffiti is art, and art is made through an objective or meaning, and the same can go for his anonymity. Not only is it that art can express so many things in a variety of ways, but even he can express his artistic self by remaining an anonymous person, which adds a lot his own creative character.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Banksy tries to stay anonymous because what he does is illegal, but it also makes him more intriguing, and he thrives off of drama and mystery

# data[].attributes.body
I think Bansky fought to remain anonymous to avoid receiving fines or ending up in jail.And It could also increase the value and meaning of his art.His anonymity adds to his artistic legacy because that way people are likely to pay attention to his messages

# data[].attributes.body
banksys art isnt about him and trying to gain money, so while being anonymous people pay more attention to the art and Banksy is able to lead a private life

# data[].attributes.body
Banksy may choose to remain faceless for many reasons. One of which being that he can still stay private. If he were to reveal who he is people will try to find him, and he won't be able to live his life like a normal person. By choosing to remain faceless he still has the privacy he may want. It also adds to his character, by choosing to remain private there's mystery around his artwork.

# data[].attributes.body
If someone paints on your property I don't think you can legally claim it as your own art work. You aren't the one who painted it or came up with the idea. You can choose what you want to do with  the art work, weather that means keep it or paint over it, but it isn't yours because you didn't paint it.

# data[].attributes.body
We believe that if someone were to paint on property, it would be the property owners artwork. since they did paint on someone's property. Because of that the property owner should be allowed to decide what to do with the artwork since it's on their building. They should be able to decide whether they want to keep it up or not.

# data[].attributes.body
Graffiti is considered a piece of art. When one creates art, they are considered the owner. Creating art on someone else's property is like trespassing. If one were to trespass, they would be escorted out of the property. So, when one owns the property, they do not own whoever enters the property. Therefore, art that is made by an individual should be owned by that same individual. They are responsible for the creation and the property owner is responsible for their own possessions.

# data[].attributes.body
Graffiti is owned by the artist who creates it.We think that if somebody paints on your property,  you  cant legally claim the artwork as your own.For a first morally its not right. And if you created the work with your own ideas you have every right to claim it,

# data[].attributes.body
I think you should only graffiti on your own property., I think that if someone does graffiti on your property, you should technically own it

# data[].attributes.headline
If someone does graffiti on your property, you should, technically, own the art.

# data[].attributes.subject
If someone does graffiti on your property, you should, technically, own the art.

# data[].attributes.body
- matt

# data[].attributes.body
Banksy is more impactful, that is because a lot of his artwork has messaged behind it, which can impact people. Because of these big impacts he makes it makes him successful also.

# data[].attributes.body
Banksy is a very impactful and successful person in terms of covering the issues there in the world and in an ordinary society. His own anonymity has made the world chase after him and give them a desire to know who he really is. That component itself tells us that he's successful in terms of grabbing people's attention and discussing things a new perspective. Through graffiti, he displays a meaning behind his own art, rather than explaining it. He puts on our visual thinking cap.

# data[].attributes.body
Bansky is more impactful and more successful because it has more of a reality type of meaning.

# data[].attributes.body
Banksy is a like successful because it has a lot more meaning of what reality type would be. He basically made the world chase him for anonymity that he has created.