# data[].attributes.headline
One argumentative strategy and writerly choice.

# data[].attributes.subject
One argumentative strategy and writerly choice.

# data[].attributes.body
An argumentative strategy I saw Enriquez use is humanizing the other. A writerly choice I saw Enriquez use was conversating with the students.

# data[].attributes.headline
Argumentative Strategy and Writerly Choice

# data[].attributes.subject
Argumentative Strategy and Writerly Choice

# data[].attributes.body
Centering intersectional differences was prominent in Enriquez's text, and she invokes this through student interview in which they share their unique expericences.

# data[].attributes.headline
What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez?

# data[].attributes.subject
What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez?

# data[].attributes.body
Enriquez argues that race impacts how individuals are viewed, especially when it comes to "illegality." In the specific case of undocumented immigrants, through study and interview of undocumented college students, she compares the experiences of Latinx and API students to contrast the way they are treated and viewed, despite their similar legal status.

# data[].attributes.body
Enriquez explains that although Latine  immigrants are most to be stereotyped as criminal or illegal (undocumented), they are the ones that receive the most resources. Resources for undocumented students are usually targeted towards Latine undocumented students rather than API communities.

# data[].attributes.headline
What was most impactful about this article to you, and why?

# data[].attributes.subject
What was most impactful about this article to you, and why?

# data[].attributes.body
I found it impactful that Enriquez delved into the intricacies and difficulties that are faced across marginalized groups. In DOC, and in general, we often talk about the instances and implications of a hegemonic group actively working against marginalized group(s), but we do not tune in all that much to how marginalized groups can affect other marginalized groups. I found her analysis of Latinx students and the undocumented status opposed to Asian Pacific Islander students to be something I had never thought of before. I think it is important to recognize the impact marginalized groups can have on each other.

# data[].attributes.body
The main argumentative strategy I found was humanizing the other based on his depiction of LatinX discrimination in the US.

# data[].attributes.headline
what was most impactful about this article and why?

# data[].attributes.subject
what was most impactful about this article and why?

# data[].attributes.body
I thought it was very impactful how she proved her argument by finding her own evidence that there is this experience of racialized illegality where the Latinx community are more likely assumed to be undocumented. Her putting in the work to prove her point makes her argument a lot stronger.

# data[].attributes.headline
What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez?

# data[].attributes.subject
What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez?

# data[].attributes.body
The main argument forwarded by Enriquez is that undocumented students face racism and being stereotyped, and this "racialized legality" can have both positive and negative effects and demonstrates the development of racial formation.

# data[].attributes.body
undocumented to be an impactful moment, mostly because they weren't even accepted as that. The racialized stereotypes and mental bounds were so deep that even telling someone that they were undocumented could not shake the racialized image of what "undocumented" looks like.

What was most impactful about this article to you, and why? RESPONSE
What was most impactful about this article to you, and why? RESPONSE
I thought it was really impactful that the writing inital focused her carrer on immigration just to find how closely related race is. This was impactful as the writer herself didnt think she would be focusing on racilization with the legal system

Main argument
Main argument
Enriquez argues that the race of undocumented immigrants influences the perception of the legality of their immigration status. Enriquez discusses how the deeply racialized perception of legality impacts the experiences of undocumented immigrants, specifically Latine and API undocumented university students.

One argumentative strategy and writerly choice
One argumentative strategy and writerly choice
I saw Enriquez use the strategy of centering intersectional differences and a writerly choice would be the interviews with undocumented students.

What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez?
What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez?
Undocumented Latinx and API students are racialized differently in US society in relation to each other. Latinx students are more likely to be categorized as undocumented while API students are less likely to be – this racialized illegality leads to differences in opportunity and feelings of exclusion and inclusion within both groups and their spaces. Racial formation of groups happens in relation with each other along with the white center.

One argumentative strategy
One argumentative strategy
Humanizing the other. Enriquez holds interviews with undocumented college students in Southern CA to provide a real glimpse into their experiences. Author provides a voice to marginalized groups.

What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez?
What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez?
I thought the main arguement that Enriquez was trying to make was how the experiences of immigrants are often driven by race and legality. She centers this paper on latina/o expriecnes as they have been racilized as undocumented immigrants.

What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez?
What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez?
I thought the main argument forwarded by Enriquez was how Latinx students face challenges in relation to Asian Pacific Islander students on the basis of citizenship and documentation and how this can create a divide amongst students.

What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez?
What is the main argument forwarded

# data[].attributes.body
The main argument forward by Enriques is that there is a racial gap in criminalizing stereotypes and perceived illegality amongst Asian and Latino communities. Asians have a popular stereotype of being obedient and law abiding, while Latinos have a criminalized image. With this, Latino people are more likely to be seen as undocumented, experiencing exclusionary interpersonal interactions.

# data[].attributes.body
Q1: The experiences of undocumented Latinx and API are different because the difference in cultural representations/perceptions which are upheld by society and government. Additionally Latinx and API vary in terms of their identity: culture, race, gender, etc. The intersectionality of these factors also contribute to an individuals experience.

# data[].attributes.headline
What was most impactful about this article to you, and why?

# data[].attributes.subject
What was most impactful about this article to you, and why?

# data[].attributes.body
I found the example of one API student as they "came out" as undocumented to be an impactful moment, mostly because they weren't even accepted as that. The racialized stereotypes and mental bounds were so deep that even telling someone that they were undocumented could not shake the racialized image of what "undocumented" looks like. It highlighted the depth of these boundaries, which I found impactful throughout the article.

# data[].attributes.headline
What was most impactful about this article to you, and why? RESPONSE 

# data[].attributes.subject
What was most impactful about this article to you, and why? RESPONSE 

# data[].attributes.body
I thought it was really impactful that the writing inital focused her carrer on immigration just to find how closely related race is. This was impactful as the writer herself didnt think she would be focusing on racilization with the legal system

# data[].attributes.body
Enriquez argues that the race of undocumented immigrants influences the perception of the legality of their immigration status. Enriquez discusses how the deeply racialized perception of legality impacts the experiences of undocumented immigrants, specifically Latine and API undocumented university students.

# data[].attributes.headline
One argumentative strategy and writerly choice

# data[].attributes.subject
One argumentative strategy and writerly choice

# data[].attributes.body
I saw Enriquez use the strategy of centering intersectional differences and a writerly choice would be the interviews with undocumented students.

# data[].attributes.headline
What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez? 

# data[].attributes.subject
What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez? 

# data[].attributes.body
Undocumented Latinx and API students are racialized differently in US society in relation to each other. Latinx students are more likely to be categorized as undocumented while API students are less likely to be – this racialized illegality leads to differences in opportunity and feelings of exclusion and inclusion within both groups and their spaces. Racial formation of groups happens in relation with each other along with the white center.

# data[].attributes.body
Humanizing the other. Enriquez holds interviews with undocumented college students in Southern CA to provide a real glimpse into their experiences. Author provides a voice to marginalized groups.

# data[].attributes.headline
What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez?

# data[].attributes.subject
What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez?

# data[].attributes.body
I thought the main argument forwarded by Enriquez was how Latinx students face challenges in relation to Asian Pacific Islander students on the basis of citizenship and documentation and how this can create a divide amongst students.

# data[].attributes.headline
What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez? 

# data[].attributes.subject
What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez? 

# data[].attributes.body
I thought the main arguement that Enriquez was trying to make was how the experiences of immigrants are often driven by race and legality. She centers this paper on latina/o expriecnes as they have been racilized as undocumented immigrants.

# data[].attributes.body
What was really impactful to me from this article was how her focus on intersection was between race and illegality, and it's an intersectional identity I've never really critically thought about before. It was really powerful and eyeopening to see how the way undocumented individuals are perceived are dependent on the different ways they are racialize.

# data[].attributes.headline
What does justice look like within the context of Enriquez's text?

# data[].attributes.subject
What does justice look like within the context of Enriquez's text?

# data[].attributes.headline
One argumentative strategy and writerly choice?

# data[].attributes.subject
One argumentative strategy and writerly choice?

# data[].attributes.headline
What was most impactful about this article  to you, and why?

# data[].attributes.subject
What was most impactful about this article  to you, and why?

# data[].attributes.headline
What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez?

# data[].attributes.subject
What is the main argument forwarded by Enriquez?