# data[].attributes.body
Row 9:

Criteria:

Distinction:

Concise and accurate summary of research; detailed, intriguing introduction and context; state a meaningful aim addressing the research gap; demonstrate relevant and significant results and exceptionally explain and interpret results at a reasonable level; State conclusion clearly and suggest future implication.

Merit:

Show a brief and clear summary of research; include clear and concise background information; explain results effectively but lack the level of interpretation; State conclusions and give few suggestions for future implication.

Pass:

Show some summary and introduction related to research and context; state a obscure aim, no research gap is mentioned; State conclusions less clearly and give several suggestions of future implication.

Fail:

Show a unclear summary related to research and context; doesn't state a clear aim, no research gap is mentioned; doesn't give a clear conclusions and give no suggestions of future implication.

# data[].attributes.body
Criteria 1: Logical flow

Criteria 2: Detailed

Criteria 3: Language clarity

Criteria 4: Clear context and objectives

scoring scale:

Distinction: exceptional work that shows a complete understanding of the concepts with adequate details on significance, results, and methods. Very well written.

Merit: Shows a clear understanding of the concepts and facts, is clear with accurate amount of detail

Pass: Shows a basic understanding of the concepts, gives a decent amount of relevant material

Fail: Little to no understanding of fundamental concepts, very vague, poor outlining of the main components of an abstract, not very readable

# data[].attributes.body
1. Structure

1. Proportionate and clear structure with all key elements present

2. Communication

1. Readability, flow, written communication (grammar/spelling etc.), appropriate scientific lanaguage

3. Content

1. Accurately conveys the relevant context

2. Accurate content

3. Inclusion of statistics in results.

# data[].attributes.body
logical flow and structure: clearly communicates the hypothesis, methods, findings and conclusions of the study

background and relevance: context is clearly described and gaps in knowledge is identified

key findings: the main findings are identified and given statistical evidence, with conclusions stated. the conclusions are linked back to the background and future directions in the field.

clear and formal language: use objective and scientific language. Engage the audience but still stay concise with word choice.

# data[].attributes.body
Row 10

Clear description of background and objective of the research, but it’s too detailed to compare different patients’ outcomes and can give a little bit more about his/her own thoughts when talking about results. And also highlight the significance of their study.

Results 58

# data[].attributes.body
Point scoring system of 0-5

0= very poor

1= poor

2= average

3= good

4= very good

5= excellent

We will be judging the following criteria

Structure and pacing

Clarity

Balanced and accurate representation of the study

# data[].attributes.body
1. Includes all the sections (intro, background, aims, methods, results, conclusion) in a coherent manner. Clear structure

2. Clarity and detailed linguistics, easy to understand

3. Content is within the parameters of the research and findings. Does not overstate or overexplain

4. Provides sufficient evidence to support findings

5. Includes future research/directions and limitations of the study.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Clear and logical structure.

2. Precise content, including the key details and P-value.

3. Formal and objective language and avoiding personal point of view

4. Future research directions.

# data[].attributes.body
Structure (logical flow)

Technical detail / specificity

Interpretation of findings (not over or under-interpreting)

Takeaway message for audience

Good with imperial criteria :)

# data[].attributes.body
Row 8.5:

·      Concise, objective and logical language

·      Clear objectives stated

·      Coherent, evenly distributed structure

·      Accurate representation of the study

Imperial rubric guidelines

# data[].attributes.body
ROW 8

Clear context and objectives stated: Introduction/gap in knowledge/aims

Methods and results are stated quantitatively and concisely (p-values, n numbers)

The conclusion is critical and suggests future implications and the relevance of results

Logical flow and clear, convincing communication backed by evidence

Scoring scale

poor, below average, average, good, very good, excellent