# data[].attributes.headline
What if A.I. took a more prominent role in our judicial system? Would it benefit society to use A.I. in the judicial system? Should A.I. replace judges in court? Defend the group’s final argument in a full paragraph.

# data[].attributes.subject
What if A.I. took a more prominent role in our judicial system? Would it benefit society to use A.I. in the judicial system? Should A.I. replace judges in court? Defend the group’s final argument in a full paragraph.

# data[].attributes.body
Place your group's final argument here.

# data[].attributes.headline
[Connector]: Could the use of A.I. resolve the controversy that is taking place in states like Missouri? Construct a paragraph to explain your group’s conclusion. 

# data[].attributes.subject
[Connector]: Could the use of A.I. resolve the controversy that is taking place in states like Missouri? Construct a paragraph to explain your group’s conclusion. 

# data[].attributes.body
Place your group's conclusion here.

# data[].attributes.body
Evaluate each of the sources posted in the third column using CRAAP and the online verification tips. Explain your verification.

# data[].attributes.headline
Place your finding:  You were asked to find two different sources in which the author considers or explores A.I. taking a part in the judicial system. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Place your finding:  You were asked to find two different sources in which the author considers or explores A.I. taking a part in the judicial system. 

# data[].attributes.body
According to NBC News, it is reported that …

In the article titled, “----”, it is stated that …

# data[].attributes.body
Challenge the students who completed Role D.

Example: Although ...., you failed to consider.....

# data[].attributes.headline
Responses submitted for Role C are very general and vague. Pose questions to those who were given Role C to further their thinking about this topic. What information should they include to strengthen their group's conclusion?

# data[].attributes.subject
Responses submitted for Role C are very general and vague. Pose questions to those who were given Role C to further their thinking about this topic. What information should they include to strengthen their group's conclusion?

# data[].attributes.headline
Place your group's research about the controversy taking place in Missouri in this column. What two sources did you find to explain what has happened?

# data[].attributes.subject
Place your group's research about the controversy taking place in Missouri in this column. What two sources did you find to explain what has happened?

# data[].attributes.body
According to NBC News, it is reported that …

In the article titled, “----”, it is stated that …

# data[].attributes.body
Evaluate each of the sources posted in the first column using CRAAP and the online verification tips. Explain your verification.

# data[].attributes.body
Currency: Is the content up to date?

Relevance: Is the source relevant to your research?

Authority: Who is the author and where is the source published?

Accuracy: Is the source supported by evidence?

Purpose: What was the motive behind publishing this source?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Missouri executes Marcellus Williams despite questions over evidence, after Supreme Court denies final bid for delay

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Marcellus Williams was convicted in the 1998 stabbing death of Felicia Gayle in Missouri, but DNA testing raised questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Currency: Is the content up to date?

Relevance: Is the source relevant to your research?

Authority: Who is the author and where is the source published?

Accuracy: Is the source supported by evidence?

Purpose: What was the motive behind publishing this source?

# data[].attributes.body
If you would like to review the videos shared in class, click on the Google Slides presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
If you would like to review the videos shared in class, click on the Google Slides presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
IBM article was written in 2024 . article is relevant to what i researching like talking about exploring on the idea of A.I. playing in judicial system and what it does. it was made by Eckard Schindler and the source was made on IBM.com .

the accurate is support by evidence since muiltple different article and news anchor have similar statements about the A.I. there is a lot of news talking about A.I. having bias data

# data[].attributes.body
The use of A.I would help resolve the controversy that is taking place in states like Missouri because they could help process information on a higher level than regular humans. They could do deeper research about the crime such as DNA testing and bias-detection. A.I would be able to research better on Marcellus and the DNA and fingerprints on the weapon and would also help research any bias towards the decision to charge the person with the crime. A.I would be very useful when it comes to helping the judge make a final decision if whether or not the person being charged is guilty. Although A.I would be a great help in deciding whether or not people should be charged with the crime, it is still ultimately up the judge and juries to decide, Ai would be a good way of understanding the information in a better and more precise way and should be used and relied on when making the final decision.

# data[].attributes.headline
Two sources that explores A.I taking part in the judicial system

# data[].attributes.subject
Two sources that explores A.I taking part in the judicial system

# data[].attributes.body
According to journal law and legal research development it states, “ the benefit of using artificial intelligence to make decisions in court is a workable way to reduce the backlog of cases in India and other jurisdictions while also guaranteeing quick and long-lasting justice delivery systems globally. " this shows by using A.I it help human make faster decision making and not be stuck on one case at a time and taking long period of time to decide on a case. A.I. is being used in indian which is showing great amount of usefulnes since they are having much easier time making decision on cases.

According to IBM it states, “As the use cases of AI and other technologies continue to permeate the judiciary, judges, lawyers and staff must continue to be at the center of all decisions. Courts, and the legal system as a whole, must also be on alert for bias in data and algorithm” this shows that A.i. can also be wrong and not always right about everything and should be very careful on the data they receive by. Even the fact there’s a chance for the data to be bias doesn’t change the accurate of the decision being provide by A.I compared to humans we make a lots of mistakes unlike A.I. for example tragic case of Marcellus Williams we made a mistake that end a man's life.

# data[].attributes.headline
journal law and legal research development verification

# data[].attributes.subject
journal law and legal research development verification

# data[].attributes.body
the article was written in 2024 and article explain how the use of A.I. can be and give a example where it being use. the author is Siani J.A it was published on journal law and legal research development (found in google scholar) the source give a example of how the idea of A.I. can come in play when it comes to being apart of the judicial system (india) the purpose of publishing this source was to share light on how useful A.I. can be.

# data[].attributes.body
News organization Aljazeera did a cover on Marcellus Williams case, In 2001, Marcellus Williams was convicted for the muder of Felicia Gayle who was a former newspaper reporter and a social worker. Prosecutors said Marcellus Williams broke into her home on August 11, 1998, heard the shower running and picked up a large butcher knife. When Felicia Gayle went to investigate she was stabbed 43 times and had her purse and her husband’s laptop stolen. Marcellus Williams was than said to have taken a jacket to cover the blood on his body and than had the stolen goods in his laptop. It is also on record that he confessed to his cellmate about his murder and provided extremely specific details. Though throughout the 23 years he spent in prison he devoted to Islam and being the imam for the other prisoners. He also worked with the innocence project to help him through his imprisonment. Though forensic evidence was not found on the murder weapon and the bloody footprints and hair didn't match his he was still convicted guilty and executed.

# data[].attributes.body
The case of Marcellus Williams, who was executed on September 24th, 2024, despite doubts about his guilt, shows a serious problem in the justice system. Even the prosecutor, whose job is to argue that Williams was guilty, questioned whether Marcellus was truly guilty. This case shows the significance for better tools to evaluate evidence fairly, which A.I could help provide. A.I can process large amounts of information quickly, organize evidence, and help judges make more accurate decisions, which is shown in slide 5. It can also identify biases and dig deeper into details, like DNA testing and identifying fingerprints to help ensure the right person is charged. However, A.I is not perfect and can still be affected by biased data, so humans need to stay in control of decision-making. While A.I can improve the system by reducing mistakes and improving efficiency, it should only assist judges and juries, not replace them, to ensure fairness and understanding in court decisions.