# data[].attributes.body
The fool who follows the fool because the follower makes the conscious decision and lets go of their own conscious conforming to following.

# data[].attributes.body
in my opinion the fool who follows him since the fool who follows i think has the chance to avoid the fool and not do or believe what he says or copy what he does

# data[].attributes.headline
BAUTISTA, Lloyd Miguel James R. Bautista | SPT 12 - A

# data[].attributes.subject
BAUTISTA, Lloyd Miguel James R. Bautista | SPT 12 - A

# data[].attributes.body
The fool who follows him . For me It's saying that the person who blindly follows someone foolish is even more foolish themselves. But, it's not always that simple. Sometimes, the follower might not even realize the leader's being foolish. Or maybe they're sticking around out of loyalty or because they feel like they don't have any other choices. So, it's not always fair to judge them too harshly.

# data[].attributes.body
For me, the more foolish one here is the one who followed the fool. I say this because, the one who followed the fool, knows that he/she is a following a fool, ignoring their own judgment or better instincts.

# data[].attributes.body
the fool that follows the fool, because that would mean that you are blindly following someone without checking if they are credible or reliable to be followed.

# data[].attributes.body
I would say that the more foolish would be the one who follows. Knowingly, having to be in a position where on would be following another would put with having to be in situations where one does what the other says. In society, Philippine society, this is something that is more often done. To follow one’s lead as someone who’s older, someone who has more responsibilities, who is it to say that one has more knowledge on what has to be done? Everyone has a different perspective.

# data[].attributes.body
The fool that follows because they didn't check the outcome of what would happen if they followed the initial fool. I would also say the fool who follows could be pressured into following like how everyone in society follows what seems right.

# data[].attributes.headline
Cabradilla, Althea Brean Marie B. | SPT 12 - A

# data[].attributes.subject
Cabradilla, Althea Brean Marie B. | SPT 12 - A

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, the fool's followers are more foolish since they voluntarily adopt their wrong acts or beliefs, and lack self-awareness, and confidence within their own intellectual knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
Who follows a fool is a fool. If you know you are following a fool, that makes you a fool.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that following the fool is more foolish because the fool being followed might not even know he's a fool. Also this shows that somehow the follower lacks trust in himself and is probably insecure regarding the situation.

# data[].attributes.body
Personally, I think the fool who choses to follow them is more foolish. They willingly follow the fool which means they're basically digging their own grave. Like they say "Fool Me Once, Shame on You; Fool Me Twice, Shame on Me"

# data[].attributes.body
The way I see it, the fool who follows is the one at fault. They are essentially the sheep who blindly follow the command of the shepherd, not knowing if they are on the path of goodness or on the path to slaughter. They are given a choice to see the truth, yet the choose to stay in the comfort of their own bubble. Thus, their willingness to remain ignorant, makes it so that they are more foolish than the fool who leads them.

# data[].attributes.body
The fool who follows him, I think it is very important that us humans are to always take accountability with the actions that we decide whether in life, career, or with the principles that we believe. We do not simply become a fool if we do not follow someone who is foolish, rather; it is when we try to become that fool itself.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the one who follows the fool is more foolish because knowing that the first fool was already a fool that did not consider other circumstance on what may the topic be, and the next person has the option to not do what the first person did. The next person can avoid making that mistake. But in the end, the second person still did the same; therefore, the person who who follows a fool is more foolish.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, it would be the fool who follows him - in every journey there would be a fool that will make the first mistake, whilst making the mistake produces a new found lesson and for the fool who've seen this and make the same mistake yet again feels ignorant to the fact of what's happening or what has done.

# data[].attributes.body
Both the Fool, and the Fool that follows the Fool are equally bad for following the foolishness of the fool. The first one acted upon his foolishness and the follower that is foolish enough to follow the Fool becomes a Fool of the Fool. If you don't recognize that the behavior is foolish till afterwards you are wiser as a result but neither greater or lesser to start.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the one following is the more foolish of the pair. We can assume that this person is labelled as another fool, not because of a lack of knowledge, but because he has knowledge and still chooses to follow a person who is doomed to walk them off of a cliff.

Even if the one who follows is just as oblivious as the fool, he still fails to question whether or not he should follow this person.

# data[].attributes.headline
Manalo, Catherine Alexandria | ADT 12-B 

# data[].attributes.subject
Manalo, Catherine Alexandria | ADT 12-B 

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like the one who's more foolish is the one who follows the fool. Mainly because this person had a choice to step back and assess if following the foolish person is for the best. Yet, they still decided to follow the foolish. This mere action shows how some people might really get blinded and be fooled by the fool himself, this is why it's vital to always step back and assess things before making decisions, no matter how big or small.

# data[].attributes.body
For me, it's the fool itself. Why not the one follow him?

Just think about what if the follower following him wanted to benefit from him does this still count as a fool that you have a goal and reaching your benefited goal?

Maybe the follower knows how fool is the fool but doesn't tell him because the follower can get benefits. The fool is like being praised and doesn't realize he is a fool himself.

# data[].attributes.body
I would say the fool that follows, however, I can also consider that the fool themselves is the more foolish one. Because imagine if you attract more fools that follow, it will eventually lead to something out of the fool's control. However, I see that both parties could be the foolish ones.

# data[].attributes.body
From my perspective, I view it as the individual who follows the fool is more foolish because you had the chance to be yourself or follow someone that is better, yet they choose to blindly follow someone that will lead them to the wrong direction.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the more foolish one is the one who is following the fool. For me I think the people you follow are a reflection of who you are as a person and if you are following a fool voluntarily then you are more foolish.

# data[].attributes.body
The person who blindly follows a fool is more foolish because they neglect to question the fool's actions and apply logic. By unquestioningly following the fool, they end up committing foolish acts, despite having the opportunity to learn from the previous example.

# data[].attributes.body
I say the Fool who follows is more foolish, because it's essentially like the blind leading the blind. If the second fool knew about the first one being a fool, then surely they wouldn't go along if they weren't that foolish. But in the case that they did know and went by the 'great minds think alike' perspective, then the 2nd would prove the second part of that saying 'but fools tend to differ'

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the fool is the one who follows. Similar to the saying “Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, shame on you.” The follower should have observed and learned from the previous fool that there is a mistake being made. The first person was not even corrected, which can still be tolerated, but the second person allows this to happen and follows suit. That is the fool.

# data[].attributes.body
For me, Following a fool makes you a fool because it means you're ignoring your own opinion or perspective on the situation. Instead of thinking for yourself, you're basing your decisions on the fool's knowledge and not considering whether it aligns with your own knowledge or belief.

# data[].attributes.body
For me, the more foolish one in this context would be the follower. The follower can have the most knowledge between the two and can have the choice to not follow the fool at all. The follower can have the power and understand the situation that fool is indeed a fool and should not be followed.

# data[].attributes.body
The fool who chooses to follow a fool is more foolish than the fool who chose to be a fool due to unknown circumstances. The first fool became a fool unknowingly while the following fool had the ability to choose not to follow the first fool and yet continued doing so.

# data[].attributes.body
For me, it is the fool who follows the fool is more foolish. Because they should at least have a sense that the person they are following are doing not so nice things. Before following, they had a choice if they should follow or not and they can also be influenced in a bad way.

# data[].attributes.body
I think there is no distinction between the fool and the one that follows the fool. It is possible that the fool was also a victim that made him/her that way. And the same goes to the follower who will be influenced by the actions of the fool.

# data[].attributes.body
“Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on ME”

Personally, I believe that people who are seen to be as fools are already not to be trusted, or we should at least me a little more cautious when interacting with them. I do like to think about it though — Does believing a fool make us a fool for doing so?

I do find it an interesting discussion as to why people still seem to believe in fools even after they’ve already been fooled by them. Haven’t we learned from their actions? Do we believe them out of the hope that they’ve changed? Do we believe them again because we are fools too?

I feel like love and relationships is a good example of this. Why do we keep going back to people who have made a fool of us? When do we learn to take our losses and call it quits. When can we muster up the courage to say we’ve had enough. Why do we allow ourselves to be blind sided by such fools?

# data[].attributes.body
It is the fool. I still believe that both are at fault, the fool for not questioning his knowledge, and the follower for not doubting the fool's knowledge. But what if there are no resources for either to question that? What if they are not equipped with the art of questioning and logical reasoning to think that they are fools?

If we apply it to politics, who is more foolish? The dictator who manipulates the people or their followers?

# data[].attributes.body
I believe they're equally bad for being fools. The fool starts the bad decisions and foolishness and the one who follows is equally accountable for following it. Both are accountable for the foolishness they cause.

# data[].attributes.body
In this situation the foolish one is the one who follows the fool since it solely depends on how you handle it in such situation because we're always responsible of our actions and knowing what is right or wrong is our right to choose

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, the fool who follows is the more foolish one, as they willingly follow the foolish. It's as if they cannot think for themselves or have any values whatsoever. At least with the foolish, they are capable of having values and ideals they stand by.

# data[].attributes.headline
MANCILLA, Kiara ‘Ryan’ Cassandra C. | ADT 12-B

# data[].attributes.subject
MANCILLA, Kiara ‘Ryan’ Cassandra C. | ADT 12-B

# data[].attributes.body
While there will always be fools who are fools either intentionally or unintentionally, I personally believe that you’d have to be even more foolish to be the person that follows after that same fool. If you’re going to face the consequences of being a fool, you should let this be done by your own actions, and not because you were blindly following after another fool.

# data[].attributes.body
For me, it is the follower who is foolish as he autonomously decided to follow a fool. Sure, maybe the follower might have an inadequate resources to know that the person he is following is a fool, but do u need a lot of resources to think and reflect for a minute if the one leading you is a fool? Maybe he knows about it and the consequences of following the fool, but that would make him even more foolish if that was the case. Ultimately, it is his decision that made me think that the follower is more foolish than the fool.

# data[].attributes.body
Both. How can we make sure if the follower has the resources that can provide him with the knowledge of knowing that he is following a fool. If the follower has the opportunity to learn and has access to knowledge but choose not to use them and blindly follows him, it would make more sense that the more foolish one is the follower.

# data[].attributes.headline
LUALHATI, Raymond Vittorino R. | ADT 12-B

# data[].attributes.subject
LUALHATI, Raymond Vittorino R. | ADT 12-B

# data[].attributes.body
The person that follows the fool that doesnt try to know the truth because the follower that just accepts things as they are without trying to know the truth is also a fool

# data[].attributes.body
The fool who follows. This can reveal a lot about a person. Those who choose to follow are either taking a risk without ensuring the consequences of their actions, or simply following because they trust the person. Either way, assessing said person comes first in most scenarios. Voluntarily following a person without understanding the scenario or situation just makes you an ignorant fool.

# data[].attributes.body
The foolish one is the one who follows the fool since they may have assessed who to follow before deciding on who to follow. Following the fool is a foolish act since simply following without studying/analyzing the background of the one you’re following makes you a mirror of the one you followed.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the fool who follows him is the more foolish of the two. This is because if you are aware and are willing to follow the fool, you are the greater fool. They may follow the fool because their beliefs are aligned. However, They should recognize what is happening rather than blindly agree with the fool.

# data[].attributes.body
Fool me one time, shame on you (Ayy)
Fool me twice, can't put the blame on you (Ayy)
Fool me three times, freak the peace sign)

(this is a J. Cole song. Apologies.)

The true fool is the fool who chooses to follow the other fool! It is assumed he is a rational, normal individual with the resources to fact-check and ponder about the true foolishness of the original fool! In this way, he has chosen his own fate! Unlike the original fool, who just happens to be a fool.

I think the two fools are in love!

# data[].attributes.body
The fool who follows him. A person who blindly follows someone with no positionality or argument to their own beliefs and ideas is the foolish of all. It's basically believing a liar or a cheat and willingly choose to ignore those characteristics for the sake of "loyalty" which will eventually backfire on them and be the first one to bite the dust rather than the fool.

# data[].attributes.body
The fool who follows the fool is more foolish than the two.

The follower could have taken the time and enlightened themself with the truth but instead, they decided to blindly agree with the ideals and beliefs of the fool, making them an even greater fool.

# data[].attributes.body
The one who follows the fool can be said to be foolish as although they can choose to evaluate the fool's actions, they choose not to (hence why they follow the fool). But when put in the context of something such as Halalan 2022 wherein many individuals have fallen for propaganda of ill-fitting candidates because of the system that they we born in that didn't provide enough resources for media literacy, it makes us kinda question if they are the more foolish ones. WHAT IM TRYING TO SAY IS I AM STILL DEBATING MY ANSWER HELP

# data[].attributes.body
The more foolish one is the fool who is following the fool. Usually, the person who can follow would also be presented with the opportunity to notice the foolishness and do better.

# data[].attributes.body
In my VERY SUPER HUMBLE OPINION. I think the fool is those who follow the fool. It is already foolish enough to choose what is wrong, but to follow those who made the mistake is similar to selecting the wrong choice. And I think what weighs the "more foolish" is the gravity of their decisions on what they followed or chose, you can both choose the wrong option and still end up in two different circumstances (IDK SIR IM uh ah yes huhu)

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the fool who follows is the one who's more foolish. Reason behind is the person who followed chooses to follow the fool without regards to assessing if the fool is right. Which ends up leaving the person who followed more lost than the fool who the foolish person followed.

(I'm not sure if this made sense)

# data[].attributes.headline
COMIA, Maria Carmelita Gabrielle R. | ADT 12 A

# data[].attributes.subject
COMIA, Maria Carmelita Gabrielle R. | ADT 12 A

# data[].attributes.body
I would say the fool who follows because they would just be repeating the same mistakes the fool did.

# data[].attributes.body
Im my opinion, the quote “Who is more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him? the follower might actually be more foolish. While the fool acts unwisely, the one who choose to follow is aware of the folly and still goes along with it, which is even more foolish.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that someone who isn't foolish should be able to distinguish true from false and good from bad. In that sense, the fool who follows the fool is the more foolish one--because, in the first place, why would they condone and/or follow the actions of the foolish? They should be wise enough to know and do better, and that also includes having a better role model to follow.

# data[].attributes.body
The fool who follows is more foolish as the first person was not given a choice to choose but the second one does and were given the time to think and assess about the situation.

# data[].attributes.body
The fool who follows the fool is more foolish. The fool may be unfortunate to be called such, as they might've been at fault accidentally for whatever caused them to be recognized as foolish. However, the fool who follows them is throwing away his own consciousness to follow something foolish.

# data[].attributes.body
I'd say both were equally foolish. Both share the responsibility, one is unwise while the other too naive or unassuming, forfeiting their autonomy. The leader is responsible for initiating the poor decision, and the followers are responsible for not questioning or providing alternative solutions. Although, in another view, both the fool and the follower can be seen as victims of inaccessibility or lack of knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
The one following the fool is more foolish. It would be as if they are following the idea of the fool without even considering their own idea, maybe it seems like they do not know right from wrong because they can't seem to see if there are flaws in the fool.

# data[].attributes.body
The one who follows is the foolish one. Letting someone decide for you can already tell your lack of care for situations and it makes you dependent on others even if that means not knowing exactly the intentions of who you're trying to follow.

# data[].attributes.body
For me, the fool who follows is more foolish, it is shown that they are individuals blindly taking a risk on following, they should take consideration about fact-checking, they have the chances of having more time to notice the foolish act. Rather than seeking the light, they stayed in the dark, ignoring what is real and staying in what they think is right.

# data[].attributes.body
The true fool is the one who follows a fool. When you choose to follow someone, it is important to understand their approaches and principles. Blindly following a leader without scrutinizing their values is a path fraught with danger. By not exercising critical judgment, you risk on amplifying their shortcomings and making their mistakes your own.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the foolish one is the one who follows the fool. They have the option to follow the fool or not and choosing to follow the fool, despite Knowing that They Are A Fool, then makes them more foolish. Being aware of the person's foolishness yet choosing to ignore it and follow them makes them more of a fool than the fool themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
The fool who follows is more foolish than the fool. While I understand that both are at fault in this matter, we cannot simply follow the tides or the people leading without forming our understanding or having our own thoughts. The follower is dependent on the fool that they do not know to question their actions. However, one must not be a blind follower but an independent and free thinker who also thinks about one's self.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the more foolish one is the one who follows the fool. If they are able to make the conscious decision of following them and are aware, then they are becoming a fool by doing so. If at first, they are not fully aware of what they are doing, then it is the fool who is foolish for letting someone follow their actions. However, once the follower faces the consequences and still continues to follow, then they are even more foolish.

# data[].attributes.body
Someone asked me this question before and I answered them back with a question. How does the follower know that who they followed is a fool? I guess the fool themselves is a fool because if the fool knows they are one, why would they gather followers and teach them untrue knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
The foolish one is the one who follows because they choose to follow that person regardless knowing that he is a fool, and if they are not aware, they could have used the time to observe and analyze his actions to determine if it is a good idea to follow him.

# data[].attributes.body
The fool who follows the fool is the fool. It is assumed that the one who follows is unaware of the person's level of foolishness. However, in the case that he is foolishly following another fool, he is presented with the reality that what the fool is doing is otherwise. Until he seeks the truth (which may be that the fool is not actually a fool), he is stuck with the notion that he is doing no wrong. Of course it would be "logical" to say that he is foolish in knowing the mindset of the fool because then he is able to discern his values and morals. The fool himself does not necessarily force others to follow in his actions, and the follower has made the choice to imitate the actions of the fool.

# data[].attributes.body
The fool who follows the fool is more foolish. Before doing something someone told you or ordered you to do, you still have time to think and decide whether you should do it. A non-foolish person would also be able to determine what is right and wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it ultimately depends on the context and/or situation.

If a situation presents itself where there is a good or bad path, and both the fool and the follower go down the bad path, then it is the follower who is more foolish.

If the follower is able to see that the fool is making a bad decision and chooses the better path, then the first fool is more foolish.

# data[].attributes.body
For me they are both foolish, It would be foolish to follow a fool but in the first place do they know that they where following a fool shouldn’t they think for themselves, But also the fool would also be foolish, does he even know that he is one?, The fools ignorance makes him foolish.

# data[].attributes.body
For me the fool who follows is more foolish, because I think there's nothing wrong with following, but blindly following is unwise since you can choose who you want to follow.