# data[].attributes.headline
Court rulings regarding the "Duty to Consult "

# data[].attributes.subject
Court rulings regarding the "Duty to Consult "

# data[].attributes.body
Here are some key points regarding court rulings on the duty to consult:

Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) (2004): This case is one of the foundational rulings establishing the duty to consult.The Supreme Court emphasized that the duty to consult arises when the Crown has knowledge, real or constructive, of potential Indigenous rights or claims. It requires the Crown to engage in good-faith consultations with Indigenous peoples to address their concerns and potentially accommodate their interests.

Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Governor General in Council) (2005): This case expanded the duty to consult to include actions that might adversely affect treaty rights.The Supreme Court ruled that the duty extends to treaty rights in addition to Aboriginal rights, broadening the scope of the duty.

Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council (2010):This case further clarified the duty to consult by establishing a proportionality test.

Beckman v. Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation (2010): This case addressed the duty to consult in the context of modern treaties.The Supreme Court ruled that the terms of modern agreements, such as land claims agreements, do not automatically fulfill the duty to consult.The Crown must still engage in consultation, even if there are processes outlined in these agreements.

Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia (2014): This case affirmed Indigenous land rights.The Supreme Court recognized Aboriginal title over a specific tract of land for the first time in Canadian history.

# data[].attributes.headline
Differences in health concerns between indigenous and non-Indigeneous Canadians 

# data[].attributes.subject
Differences in health concerns between indigenous and non-Indigeneous Canadians 

# data[].attributes.body
There is a gap in health status between these people, which creates a disproportional gap for them.
The health concerns of Indigenous peoples in Canada differ from those of non-Indigenous Canadians due to historical, social, economic, and environmental factors. Centuries of colonization, forced relocation, and discrimination have led to intergenerational trauma among Indigenous communities. Socioeconomic disparities, including higher rates of poverty and inadequate housing, contribute to poorer health outcomes, such as chronic diseases. Limited access to healthcare services, cultural and language barriers, and environmental health risks further exacerbate health disparities. Moreover, the decline in traditional customs has contributed to a rise in diet-related illnesses. Tackling these issues entails enhancing access to healthcare tailored to Indigenous cultures, tackling socioeconomic disparities, empowering Indigenous communities in healthcare governance, and revitalizing traditional healing techniques.

# data[].attributes.headline
Necessity to maintain an Indigenous language

# data[].attributes.subject
Necessity to maintain an Indigenous language

# data[].attributes.body
It is crucial to preserve Indigenous language because it focuses on understanding relationships instead of providing a point; it provides the identity of the people and preserves their cultural, historical, and traditional values. Moreover, learning in one's native language has been shown to be more effective for educational outcomes. Its preservation provides unique ways of understanding the world, as it has linguistic diversity. With this understanding, we can attain a complex history of the native and non-native people.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Trauma is a distressing event that overwhelms a person's capacity to cope with emotional and psychological effects. It is difficult to tackle trauma, unlike fear, as it has prolonged effects throughout life.

The term "intergenerational trauma" describes the transfer of trauma from one generation to the next. When one generation experiences trauma, they become mentally and psychologically weak, which further reflects on the next generation.

2. The effects of trauma on indigenous communities are huge, as they directly impact the real victims of residential schools. Native communities faced intense suicide rates and substance misuse, including alcohol, drugs, and mental disorders. They also experienced poverty and other social challenges.

# data[].attributes.body
The residential school system was funded by the government and ruled by the church. In the 20th century, indigenous children were separated from their families for a better education, and it was decided to send them to a residential school for 10 months in a year in order to assimilate into the white culture, values, religion, and languages.

Talking about the impact of the 1960s scoop on indigenous people was very intense. There was cultural disconnection as many children lost their culture, language, and identity by becoming part of non-native families. They also faced trauma in their early lives after being separated from their family members, who became emotionally weak. Further, separation from family and community resisted them from following their traditional lifestyles, and they also lost their support system.

# data[].attributes.headline
Difference between Indigenous knowledge and Western Knowledge

# data[].attributes.subject
Difference between Indigenous knowledge and Western Knowledge

# data[].attributes.body
Indigenous knowledge is defined by Battiste (2002) as the presumptions, ideas, and knowledge that non-Western people have acquired via association with a certain location throughout numerous generations. While western knowledge is defined by proponents of Western epistemology, who contend that since science is global, Indigenous knowledge is limited to a particular location and their perception of the world (Widdowson, 2010).Science is acquired information that is apart from both art and religion and can be held by an individual or a corporation. It is also quantified .Knowledge, according to Indigenous perspectives, is relative and shared by all living things, including plants, animals, mother earth, and even space itself. The relationships that exist between things hold the key to understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
This act was created by the Canadian government in 1876 to control first nations people in Canada and it excludes Metis and Inuit. This act determined the identity, political structures, cultural practices and education of first nations along with Indian status. the act was rewritten in 1951 and changed in 1985 due to its damaging effects on the people. it also introduced residentials school, reserves, renamed individuals with European names, not allowed first nation people to leave without permission, they cannot form political organizations, imposed band council system, forbade first nations people to practice their culture and speak their native language, right to vote, denied people to sell farm products.

# data[].attributes.headline
History of Indigenous people in the growth of Canada 

# data[].attributes.subject
History of Indigenous people in the growth of Canada 

# data[].attributes.body
Indigenous people such as inuit , metis and first nations people lived in canada during 13 and 14 century . Before european contact all family members were treated equally but when Indian act was passed in 1876 women were known by man name. There was also highest amount of trade between inuit and first people before European arrived.

During 1610to 1680: French community were formed . It was the inuit and first people who taught the european how to survive in harsh conditions and provided knowledge about land, in return they granted guns and other materials to the indigenous people.

Taking about metis they are mixed European and indigenous ancestors. They had played crucial role for the settlement of Hudson's bay company .