# data[].attributes.headline
How people became involved / how they joined

# data[].attributes.subject
How people became involved / how they joined

# data[].attributes.headline
Intersectional stuff - links with other campaigns 

# data[].attributes.subject
Intersectional stuff - links with other campaigns 

# data[].attributes.headline
positionality and being a person of colour in activist spaces

# data[].attributes.subject
positionality and being a person of colour in activist spaces

# data[].attributes.headline
Getting in to activism - there is a little narrative at the start of each interview

# data[].attributes.subject
Getting in to activism - there is a little narrative at the start of each interview

# data[].attributes.headline
complexities and conflicts of working in institutions

# data[].attributes.subject
complexities and conflicts of working in institutions

# data[].attributes.headline
criticisms of the movement, disappointment and failure

# data[].attributes.subject
criticisms of the movement, disappointment and failure

# data[].attributes.body
Ideas are interconnected across the transcript - it's tricky sometimes to separate ideas

Questions and answers - sometimes these are connected too. Can we sometimes include summarised versions of questions? Sometimes we have asked questions differently, how does this impact things?

What framing/context is needed? We could providing framing or summaries about participants to help people understand the extracts - is some framing needed sometimes to help people understand the extracts? But what does this do to how the extracts are read and interpreted? Do we want to the extracts to 'speak for themselves'