# data[].attributes.headline
Please put anything you need for Chalk in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
Please put anything you need for Chalk in this column.

# data[].attributes.headline
Please put anything you need for Maps in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
Please put anything you need for Maps in this column.

# data[].attributes.headline
Please put anything you need for alignment in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
Please put anything you need for alignment in this column.

# data[].attributes.headline
Please put anything you need for assessments in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
Please put anything you need for assessments in this column.

# data[].attributes.headline
Please put anything you need for LTs in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
Please put anything you need for LTs in this column.

# data[].attributes.headline
Please put anything you need for resources in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
Please put anything you need for resources in this column.

# data[].attributes.headline
Need any help finding materials to support your work in your summative evaluation?

# data[].attributes.subject
Need any help finding materials to support your work in your summative evaluation?

# data[].attributes.headline
Anything that is not already categorized? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Anything that is not already categorized? 

# data[].attributes.body
In a prior communication, Jen Aniano explained performance tasks as formative (process) VS summative (product), which aligns with my previous understanding and educational background.
However, as MGLVA develops SBG, we have been instructed to put process and product both in the gradebook and to accept the highest score as the overall learning target grade. That seems odd to me bc a formative assessment is a) being scored in the gradebook and b) able to hold the overall grade in the category.
Is this accurate?

# data[].attributes.body
I think there is a bit of inaccuracy here. My understanding of process and product is the same as yours. I think we are okay there. Regarding the grade book, I understand that all the scores are eligible to go into the grade book. Each of the formative and summative assessments can be included in the overall grade for the standard. Formative assessments should be a part of the learning process to achieve the perfect product. So, if a student does not achieve a 4 on the whole standard, they should still be given credit for the formative pieces they understand. That will give the student a picture of the whole standard and its parts. If we do not include some or all of the formative pieces, I believe we are saying all or nothing. (That is my belief, not a belief of MGLVA.) That defeats the purpose of the SBG. I know that Lindsey, Andrea, and I will be offering PDs, but I know you want an understanding now. I completely empathize with that. Did this help?

# data[].attributes.body
Before I further confuse everyone, let me talk to Andrea and Lindsey to be sure of what they have stated vs what I have stated. :)

# data[].attributes.body
I would add to this after speaking with Andrea today. Formative assessments that are part of the standard and contributing to the grade should be in the grade book. Participation type formative assessments do not need to go into the grade book. For example, warmups and exit tickets. Hopefully this helps.

# data[].attributes.body
As a part of a the SBG pilot program, I can tell you that formative assessments don't get a grade. They are missing, partially completed, and completed. These process items are not graded because the product is what matters more. The process items can be used as another piece of evidence toward mastery if a student doesn't show proficiency with the product, though. -TR

# data[].attributes.headline
Anything you have with Essential Questions can go here! 

# data[].attributes.subject
Anything you have with Essential Questions can go here! 