# data[].attributes.headline
A local cartoon from a Facebook social commentary group

# data[].attributes.subject
A local cartoon from a Facebook social commentary group

# data[].attributes.body
Point: The cartoonist's attitude about Singapore's freedom of speech is _____________________ because ______________________.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that____________________________________________________________.

Explanation: This shows that___________________________________.

# data[].attributes.body
Point: The cartoonist's attitude about Singapore's freedom of speech is pessimistic because he knows that no one would dare to talk.

Evidence: This is evident from the source , which shows that there is a speaker corner with covered with cobwebs and only occupied with one dog.

Explanation: This shows that the cartoonist thinks that the allowance of free speech does not mean anything as no one would speak up.

# data[].attributes.body
Point: The cartoonist's attitude about Singapore's freedom of speech is pessimistic because it shows nobody in the speakers corner.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that the dog is sleeping.

Explanation: This shows that free speech in Singapore is limited.

# data[].attributes.body
The cartoonist attitude towards Singapore free speech is pessimistic because Singapore speech is not good.
This is evident from the source which shows a dog not able to say a word

# data[].attributes.body
Point: The cartoonist's attitude about Singapore's freedom of speech is pessimistic because he knows that no one would speak up.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that there is a speaker corner sign covered with cobwebs, along with a dong sleeping behind.

Explanation: This shows that no one would go and speak up to the government.

# data[].attributes.body
The cartoonist's attitude about Singapore's freedom of speech is unsupportive because it would not turn out well.
This is evident from the illustration showing that at the place of Singaoore's freedom of speech has no one and has been empty for a long time, evident from the cobwebs that can be seen on the sign.
This shows that the cartoonist is disapproving about Singapore's freedom of speech.

# data[].attributes.body
Point: The Cartoonist is pessimistic about freedom of speech because citizens aren’t able to voice out their opinions without the government being ignorant about it.

Evidence: This is depicted in the source which shows a sign labeled as the Speakers corner which is empty and looks abandoned. Furthermore, a dog is shown sleeping, which represents the ignorance of the government which is ironic considering that the poster’s point is about Singapore allowing free speech.

Explanation: Thus this shows that the government does not listen to the opinion of the citizens despite allowing freedom of speech as the irony described in the photo shows that the government doesn’t actually listen to our complaints which leaves the speakers corner barren.

# data[].attributes.body
The cartoonist's attitude about Singapore's freedom of speech is unsupportive because there is only one place to have freedom of speech. This is evident from the source, which shows that Hong Lim Park and nobody is speaking. This shows that Singaporeans are used to not having freedom of speech that when they have an opportunity, which is Hong Lim Park, they won't use it as it feels weird and people will judge you since nobody talks freely

# data[].attributes.body
Point:The cartoonists attitude about Singapores freedom of speech is disapproving and unsupportive.

Evidence: this is evident from the source which shows that there is no one at the speakers corner as freedom of speech is not accepted in Singapore.

Explanation: thus this shows that freedom of speech is prohibited in Singapore and it is unacceptable.

# data[].attributes.body
the cartoonist attitude about sg’s freedom of speech is unsupportive because there is no one in the speech corner. This is evident from the source,which shows that speech corner has no one around and empty.This shows that the government does not allow singaporeans to have a speech

# data[].attributes.body
Point: The cartoonist is very upset about Singapore's freedom of speech as Singapore's freedom of speech is very  limited, preventing people from fully voicing their concerns and views.
Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that the freedom of speech corner is empty and that there are cobwebs growing there. Also, there is a cartoon of a dog which is sleeping, showing how quiet the corner is as no one uses it.
Explanation: This shows that the freedom of speech in Singapore is very limited as no one voices their concerns.

# data[].attributes.body
Point: The cartoonist's attitude about Singapore's freedom of speech is disapproving because it give people a chance to say what they don't like.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that a dog is sleeping and there is spiders on the sign that says speaker corner.

Explanation: This shows that the sign is not needed and noone is complaining which means the government is good.

# data[].attributes.body
The cartoonist attitude about Singapore’s freedom of speech is unsupportive because it shows the opposite of what it said. This is evident from the source which shows that free speech is only allowed in a certain area and free speech is a crime outside the “free speech area”.
Thus this shows that free speech is not really supported in singapore and that they are only saying it because they want citizens to think that free speech is allowed

# data[].attributes.body
The cartoonist attitude about Singapore's freedom of speech is unsupportive because no one will be utilizing the space for free speech.
This is evident from the source, which shows that the sign with the words "Speakers' corner" is covered in spider webs with a spider nearby, as well as an animal on the side sleeping face up on the ground.
This shows that Singaporeans will not utilize the space for what it is intended rendering the space useless, probably because there is not much of an audience to listen to the speaker in Hong Lim Park

# data[].attributes.body
Point: The cartoonist's attitude about Singapore's freedom of speech is pessimistic and unsupportive because there is a lack of people at the speakers' corner.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that the sign labeled as "Speakers' Corner" is covered is cobwebs and there is a dog in a corner sleeping.

Explanation: This suggests that nobody dares to speak and that it is being neglected, hence nobody bothers to give a speech.

# data[].attributes.body
Point: The cartoonist's attitude about Singapore's freedom of speech is pessimistic because the cartoonist know that no one would try to speak freely.

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows a signage with the words " Speaker's corner" having cobwebs and spiders residing on it and having no one near it.

Explanation: This shows that corner is barely even being used to speak freely. It also shows irony as the title of the picture says that Singapore allows free speech even though no one usually use the speaker's corner.

# data[].attributes.body
Point: The cartonist's attidue about Singapore's freedom of speech is unsupportive because no one is using the corner to have a speech to the public

Evidence: This is evident from the source, which shows that the there are spider webs on the sign that says "Speakers' Corner" and the dog sleeping.

Explanation: This shows that the cartoonist think that no one would be using the speech corners as there is nothing to say to the public.

# data[].attributes.body
Point: The cartoonist's attitude about Singapore's freedom is pessimistic because the speakers corner is empty and no one is even there.

Evidence: from the picture, it shows that the speaker corner is empty. No one ever use it that its has a spider growing cobwebs except that one dog who is talking to show how only a few people or no one used it

Explanation: thus, this shows that the cartoonist is disapproved about the freedom of speech because maybe no one is maybe daring to speak up which leaves it empty and leave it to the government to do what he wants to do for Singapore

# data[].attributes.body
The cartoonist's attitude about Singapore's freedom of speech is pessimistic because no one seems to be speaking up.
This is evident from the source which shows a sign labelled Speaker corner, however it has alot of cobwebs on it and shows that its abandoned. Moreover, there is also a dog at the back sleeping.
This suggests that no one seems to be speaking up as it would be ignored.

# data[].attributes.body
The cartoonist’s attitude towards Singapore’s freedom of speech seems pessimistic as they know that even if Singapore allows freedom of speech, no one would speak up.
This is evident from the source which shows a text that says “Singapore allows free speech!” but in contrast, the picture shows a field that has a speakers’ corner covered in cob webs and spiders, along with a dog that is laying on the grass dead.
This shows that even when Singapore allows free speech, people would not be brave enough to be able to speak against the government, knowing that they are alot more powerful than citizens. Citizens knows that it would be useless even to speak up.

# data[].attributes.body
Point:The cartoonist’s attitude about Singapore’s freedom of speech is Pessimistic because he knows no one will dare Talk to them.
Evidence:This is evident from the source, which shows that there is a picture is a picture of singapore allowing free speech with the sign saying “speakers corner” with a dog sleeping behind it.
Explanation:This shows that everyone is not bothered to talk to the government.The dog represents the people of singapore.

# data[].attributes.body
The cartoonist attitude about Singapore’s freedom of speech is pessimistic because he know no one would there talk to the government about it
This is evident from the source which shows a sign labelled Soeaker corner however it’s covered cobweb which shows that nobody cares about it  there’s was even a sleeping dog over there and no one cared about it

# data[].attributes.body
the cartoonist attitude towards sgs free dom of speech is pessimistic it is beacuse no one seems to ba talking, this is evident from the. source which statesa sign saying speaking corner and it has alot of webs thus this says that it is abandoned.also there is a dog taking a nap. thus this says that when someone talks they will be most probably ignored

# data[].attributes.body
The cartoonist is pessimistic towards Singapore's freedom of speech because in the cartoon, the cartoonist thinks that no one dares to speak up for themselves.

This is evident from the source that shows the speakers corner being empty, filled with cobwebs and that there is just a dog sleeping there.

This shows that even though there is a freedom of speech in Singapore, the citizens is afraid to speak up to the governments.

# data[].attributes.body
The cartoonist has a negative attitude about Singapore's freedom of speech because the nobody is at the speaker's corner.

This is evident from the source, which shows that the speaker corner is deserted which contradicts the text at the top of the cartoon which states "Singapore allows free speech".

This shows that even though Singapore has freedom of speech, the citizens don't speak about their problems to the government