# data[].attributes.body
Student will be motivated to learn at their own pace and they will determine the depth of the topic to explore

# data[].attributes.body
Possible. Need collective effort from the Dept members to infuse the stages to IBL. Perhaps, one stage for each level so that at the end of their 6th year, they will have a comprehensive ideal of IBL like way of learning which will enhance SDL too.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel free inquiry is not very apparent in primary schools. However, for Nan Hua primary this may be a domain more commonly seen in Thinking Lessons or GE classes.

With regards to PE lessons, we more frequently fall under guided inquiry. Our more intentional approach to free inquiry would be through lessons such as makers space, creative gymnastics and games creation. However, I do feel that as teachers we often fall short and result to guiding our students due to reasons such as lack of time or wanting our students to succeed.

How we can further implement IBL is to ensure teacher competence. Ensuring that as teachers we are confident to create and carry out such lessons. This will continue to empower our teachers as facilitators as well as our students as learners.

# data[].attributes.body
The only reason I would want to dwell deeper into IBL is to further enhance the learning and their understanding. Its also to cultivate the curiosity beyond their learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Creativity and Adaptability are 2 characteristics i feel will help me be a good inquiry teacher.

Creativity: As i am able to improvise one activity to another active by changing its level of difficulty and at the same time allowing students to think while playing how they can achieve their target.

Adaptability: Able to slow down the lesson and increase the pace as i can understand the level of progression each student is at. I feel this is important as it give more affirmation over the student's learning.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel it’s possible provided they have been guided well from the previous stages. So in pri level, the upper blocked can be explored with on free enquiry

# data[].attributes.body
One reason that stood up to me is that Inquiry-Based learning foster curiosity and a love for learning. By fostering such attitude to learn, students can take ownership of their learning and not learn for the sake of learning. They can become self-directed learners. Such a reason would promote learning beyond the curriculum and schools as they may explore other aspects outside of physical education. (e.g. how PE affects daily live, moving in crowded places, navigating through various terrain or sports excellence pursuit..etc)

# data[].attributes.body
Good at: Inquiry Teachers are curious

Naturally I am somebody who have and ask a lot of questions. I realized that enriched  my learning and making it enjoyable. I realized students learn better as well when we get them to ask or answer more questions.

Work on: Slowing down

I tend to always feel like I need to complete the objectives within a certain period of time. Hence, don’t see how I am able to allow time for them to “wonder”.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
The Good and the AFI. I will just mention my top Good and my top AFI.

# data[].attributes.body
GOOD:
(Inquiry teachers are playful)
I feel that I am generally a playful teacher in order to lighten the mood during lesson. Physical humour (funny faces, random dance moves) works well with the Lower Primary and Middle Primary kids. Sarcasm and witty remarks work well with the Upper Primary kids.

AFI:
(Inquiry teachers teach slowly)
The inclination to cover the topics and skills in a given time result in me "rushing" in order to complete and move on to the next module. I hope to "slow down learning to allow opportunities to deepen understanding, better support the students, and embrace their curiosities, passions, and interests".

# data[].attributes.body
Here are my inputs

# data[].attributes.body
I) Good at I: curious. If a student asked a question and I don't have the answer, I will go and find out. In a recent AHM lesson, one child asked, "Why is diabetes harmful" I only offer surface answer without the exact knowledge to explain in a technical terms. Thus, I did my research and find ways to explain to them.

II) Good at: Reflect and Revise as They go:
In one class, boys did not like to compete against girls. I started the class with boys vs boys, but the lessons go, I started to rotate the boys to play against the girls. Eventually, I got to mix them up and the boys and girls end up working together.

Work on: playful pedagogy - trying new things. Its easy to continue with tried and tested method instead of exploring new ways to teach. I need to look beyond current pedagogy and find ways to infuse new things without compromising what students need. The OE navigation using the pod is new to me and I will try it out soon.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, it is in some Primary Schools, but not all. I believe what was done in NanHua last year's P6 post PSLE activity demonstrate some form of 'Free' Enquiry where students select a topic, do their research and create a PPT. Perhaps, if there is an extension of that activity to a topic of interest of their choice within certain framework design by the school, students will then take ownership of their learning and continue to 'enquire' and learn on their own, leading them to become self-directed learner.