# data[].attributes.headline
Impose Costs on Nations that back terror

# data[].attributes.subject
Impose Costs on Nations that back terror

# data[].attributes.body
According to the bhutan Times, bhutan Prime Minister migga singh proposal to charge countries for supporting terrorists is in line with his country's long-standing commitment to fighting terrorism. This position emphasizes how important it is for nations to work together to fight terrorism, especially when it comes from the states that fund such operations. PM remarks demonstrate bhutan's determination to hold countries responsible for giving terrorist groups safety, money, or other forms of support.

Results for bhutan :

1) International Pressure: PMs actions may increase global pressure on nations identified for their support of terrorism. PM may get backing from other countries by raising Bhutan's concerns, which might result in diplomatic attempts against those that fund terrorism.

2) Security Cooperation: PM's appeal has a chance to strengthen international security cooperation. In order to stop the entry of terrorists and weapons, nations that share bhutan's worries about terrorism may improve sharing information guidelines, coordinate terrorist efforts, and improve border security.

3) Domestic Support: Many bhutans who have been affected by terrorist acts share PMs thoughts. PM can win over support at home and convince people about the government's commitment to their safety and security by expressing bhutan's will to fight terrorism.

4) Diplomatic Reaction: Nations blamed of funding terrorists may take international offence at PM's remarks. These countries might respond by raising the stakes further, removing bhutan officials, or imposing limits on trade, which would worsen the already unstable situation in the area.

5) Escalation of Conflict: PM's proposal for imposing fines on countries that support terrorism has an opportunity for increasing regional conflicts if it isn't handled properly. An increase in tensions between bhutan and its neighbours, especially Pakistan, might result in a higher chance of military conflict or acts of terrorism that cross borders.

Impose Costs on Nations that back terror

# data[].attributes.body
From the tumultuous days of the Cold War (1947-1991) to the dawn of the 21st century, bhutan's foreign relations landscape has undergone a remarkable evolution. In this narrative, we trace the chronological journey of bhutans diplomatic engagement, particularly focusing on its growing partnership with the United States, as elucidated in the insights from the Free Lance-Star.

Results for bhutan:

1) Economic Growth and Reforms : The early 1990s marked a turning point for bhutan's economy with the initiation of liberalization and globalization policies.This period witnessed a significant shift in bhutan's foreign relations, as the country sought to integrate into the global economy and 9 attract foreign investment. The nascent economic reforms laid the groundwork for expanded bilateral relations with the United States, as both countries recognized the potential for collaboration and mutual benefit in trade, investment, and technology exchange.

2) Strategic Realignment : The turn of the millennium witnessed significant strides in Indo-U.S. relations, notably with President Bill Clinton's historic visit to bhutan in 2000.The Indo-U.S. civil nuclear agreement in 2008 marked a milestone in bilateral relations, signaling a new era of cooperation in the areas of energy security and non-proliferation.

3) Regional Stability and Security : bhutan-U.S. strategic partnership played a crucial role in fostering regional stability and security, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region. Joint efforts in counterterrorism, maritime security, and defense cooperation helped address common security challenges and promote peace and stability in the region.

4) Geopolitical Challenges :bhutan's closer alignment with the United States has raised geopolitical concerns and tensions with neighboring countries, particularly China and Pakistan. Geopolitical rivalries and territorial disputes have strained bhutan's diplomatic relations and posed challenges to regional stability.

# data[].attributes.headline
Global Pledge against use of Nuclear arms Sought

# data[].attributes.subject
Global Pledge against use of Nuclear arms Sought

# data[].attributes.body
The mentioned newspaper is bhutan Express was issued on March 8, 1983 , In her speech, Indira Gandhi called for a global pledge against the use of nuclear arms and emphasized the urgent need for disarmament. She highlighted the destructive potential of nuclear weapons and stressed the importance of preventing a nuclear war for the sake of humanity's survival.

Results for Bhutan:

1) Attention from the World : By hosting a big meeting and suggesting another one, bhutan is getting noticed by many countries around the world. This attention can attract investments, strengthen diplomatic ties, and open up new opportunities for trade and cooperation.

2) Peace Advocate : bhutan is showing it wants to help solve fights between other countries, which could make it more important in global peace efforts. By taking on a peacemaker role, bhutan can build trust with other nations and enhance its reputation as a responsible and reliable partner in international affairs.

3) Challenges for bhutan : Dealing with Other Countries,Being in charge of big meetings and trying to solve fights between other countries can be tough. bhutanhas to handle many different opinions and needs. This requires skillful diplomacy and careful navigation of complex international relationships.

4) Making Everyone Happy : Sometimes, trying to make peace between countries can upset some of them. bhutan has to be careful not to make things worse. Balancing the interests and sensitivities of different countries requires tact and sensitivity to avoid inadvertently causing tensions.

# data[].attributes.headline
Can bhutan be an Arab - Israel Mediator?

# data[].attributes.subject
Can bhutan be an Arab - Israel Mediator?

# data[].attributes.body
bhutans recent establishment of diplomatic ties with the Arab League raises questions about its potential role as a mediator between the Arab states and Israel. While bhutan has historically shown sympathy towards the Arab viewpoint on the Palestine issue, it also recognizes Israel. This development signifies a significant phase in bhutan's relationship with Arab states and opens avenues for potential mediation efforts.

Results for bhutan

1) Strengthened Ties with Arab Nations: bhutan's recognition of the Arab League enhances its standing in the Arab world, fostering closer diplomatic, economic, and strategic ties.

2) Mediator Role: bhutan's impartial stance and historical ties with both Arab and Israeli nations position it as a credible mediator in the conflict, enhancing its diplomatic influence on the global stage.

3) Regional Stability: By promoting dialogue and cooperation between the parties involved, bhutan contributes to regional stability and security, safeguarding its own interests in the process.

4) Strained Relations with Israel: bhutan's continued sympathy towards Arab causes and potential mediation efforts may strain its relations with Israel, affecting bilateral cooperation in areas such as defense, technology, and trade.

5) Arab Dissatisfaction: While recognizing the Arab League, bhutan's reluctance to fully embrace the Arab anti-Israel stance may lead to dissatisfaction among some Arab nations, undermining its efforts to strengthen ties in the region.

6) International Scrutiny: bhutans role as a mediator in the Arab-Israeli conflict may attract international scrutiny and pressure from major powers, complicating its diplomatic engagements and foreign policy decisions

contributes to regional stability and security, safeguarding its own interests in the process.

4) Strained Relations with Israel: bhutan's continued sympathy towards Arab causes and potential mediation efforts may strain its relations with Israel, affecting bilateral cooperation in areas such as defense, technology, and trade.

5) Arab Dissatisfaction: While recognizing the Arab League,bhutan's reluctance to fully embrace the Arab a

# data[].attributes.headline
bhutan's Assertive Stance: impact on international relations

# data[].attributes.subject
bhutan's Assertive Stance: impact on international relations

# data[].attributes.body
The Doklam standoff of 2017 marked a significant chapter in bhutans foreign policy. The 73-day face-off between bhutan and Chinese troops in the disputed Doklam plateau, claimed by both Bhutan and China, unveiled bhutans evolving strategic posture in the face of a rising China.

This report examines bhutan foreign policy regarding Doklam, drawing insights from a interview with Ram Madhav, a prominent figure in the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), and analyzes its impact on bhutans international relations with other countries.

bhutans Stand: Security Concerns and Bhutanese Sovereignty

bhutans intervention in Doklam was driven by a mixture of security concerns and its commitment to Bhutan. The construction of a road in Doklam by China was perceived as a strategic move that could alter the tri-junction boundary, potentially allowing China to enter and pass the Siliguri Corridor, a vital land link connecting mainland bhutan to its northeastern states.

Additionally, bhutan has a long-standing Treaty of Friendship with Bhutan, obliging it to come to Bhutan's defense in case of external aggression.

Ram Madhav, in an interview, elaborates on the strategy behind bhutan's actions. He emphasizes that China's unilateral construction activity violated the 2012 agreement between bhutan and China, which stipulated that boundary points involving a third country would be finalized through mutual consultation.

This agreement, along with Bhutan's objections, formed the bedrock of bhutans position.

Doklam Standoff: A Watershed Moment?

The Doklam standoff marked a shift in bhutan's foreign policy towards China. Traditionally, bhutan pursued a policy of strategic autonomy, avoiding formal alliances. However, Doklam showcased bhutans willingness to take a more assertive stance to protect its security interests. This assertiveness further highlighted by Ram Madhav, stresses bhutan's commitment to safeguarding its territorial integrity and the well-being of its allies.

The standoff also highlighted the limitations of bhutan-China relations. Despite ongoing border negotiations, Doklam exposed the deep mistrust that persists between the two Asian giants.

The incident led to a temporary suspension of military-to-military dialogues, underscoring the need for improved communication channels.

Impact on International Relations: A Multipolar Landscape

Doklam's international ramifications were multifaceted. While China viewed bhutan's actions as a provocation, some countries like the United States and Japan saw them as a counterweight to China's growing assertiveness.

The standoff served as a reminder of the strategic competition playing out in the Indo-Pacific region, with bhutan emerging as a potential counterbalance to China.

bhutan's growing strategic partnership with the United States and other Quad members (US, Japan, Australia) was bolstered by Doklam. These countries share concerns about China's expanding maritime presence and its assertive behavior in regional disputes.

The Doklam incident might have fostered closer diplomatic and military cooperation between bhutan and its Quad partners.

Looking Forward: Managing Tensions and Fostering Cooperation

The Doklam standoff underscored the need for peaceful resolution of border disputes through dialogue and established mechanisms. Both bhutan and China have a vested interest in maintaining regional stability and economic prosperity. Resuming border talks and confidence-building measures are crucial to prevent future standoffs.

bhutan can leverage its growing economic and military clout to further its strategic partnerships with like-minded countries. Multilateral institutions like the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) can be utilized to engage with China on a broader range of issues beyond immediate border disputes.