# data[].attributes.body
Both samples mentioned their academic backgrounds and achievements. As well as motivations, skills, and goals. Both samples were written in a decently professional manner with salutation, introduction, and closing

Sample 1 included contact information of both the writer and the recipient, while sample 2 did not.

Sample 1 expressed their goals more eagerly.

Sample 1 was more precise in including all necessary requirements

# data[].attributes.body
What they have in common:

1. Both letters are written in a formal tone.

2. They both express the applicant's interest in a specific opportunity.

3. Each letter provides a brief overview of the applicant's qualifications and experiences.

4. Both letters express gratitude for the recipient's time and consideration.

5. They both end with a closing statement and the applicant's name.

How they differ:

1. Sample 1 is more detailed and provides specific examples of the applicant's achievements and experiences, whereas Sample 2 is more concise and straightforward.

2. Sample 1 is addressed to a specific individual, Dr. Simon Morgan, whereas Sample 2 is addressed more generically to "Philips," lacking a specific job title or company name.

3. Sample 1 includes a reference to the applicant's past experiences and achievements, such as awards and performances, while Sample 2 focuses more on the applicant's educational background and skills.

4. The structure of the letters differs slightly, with Sample 1 including a reference line ("REF: Application for Admission to the School of Oriental Music") and a list of enclosed documents, whereas Sample 2 does not include these elements.

5. Sample 1 uses more formal language and addresses the recipient with titles ("Dr. Morgan"), while Sample 2 uses a more informal greeting ("Dear Philips").

Tone:

Sample 1 comes across as more formal and detailed, whereas Sample 2 is more straightforward and to the point.

Language:

Sample 1 is slightly more elaborate, with the use of phrases like "take cognizance" and "granted the opportunity," while Sample 2 is more direct and uses simpler language.

# data[].attributes.body
The first letter was having the email, address. Also, it includes name while the second letter did not have email and address and it only include the name of the interviewer.