# data[].attributes.body
http://www.animalplanet.com/tv-shows/finding-bigfoot/lists/bigfoot-evidence/

This website discusses the belief and the myth surrounding Bigfoot. Although it still isn’t certain if Bigfoot really exists, this website states facts and tries to convince the reader that there have been many signs that it isn’t just a myth. With this, means that red flags are present. One red flag that stands out may be if these facts and pictures are actually real and not fake. Although there are many suspicions surrounding Bigfoot, this website helps clarify the questions and myths surrounding Bigfoot.

# data[].attributes.body
https://video.nationalgeographic.com/video/bigfoot-hoax-sci?source=relatedvideo

This video shows a group of guys that dressed someone up as Bigfoot for video footage. After they finished shooting the video they released the video to the public hoping that it would cause a lot of speculation surrounding the existence of Bigfoot. The red flags that are caused by this is now people will always have doubt knowing that someone did this as a prank to help get attention. Now if someone wants to prove Bigfoot exists they will need much more evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
By: David Winters, Brenden Courville, Taylor Dallas, and Evan Collie

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiLyAayWMCc

This video describes the apparent Bigfoot sighting that the Bradford family had more than a few times. Three of them all have claimed that they have seen Bigfoot at certain times around their property. The family claims that they have had sighting of Bigfoot but have no evidence. This leads to the state of the unknown due to the fact that they have no photo evidence just stories. This means that people won’t know if they are telling the truth or not.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adwK4irr_Yo

This video shows the tops ten Bigfoot sightings in several different places. The red flags may be that in each video the Bigfoot that they are showing on camera look different than the ones they have shown previously. This may lead to more skepticism because it is unknown if it is just people dressed up in costumes and are looking for attention. Although this video has great information, it still is unclear to tell if Bigfoot actually exists because there still isn’t enough factual evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
This article is saying that Bigfoot was supposedly spotted at a Northern Lake in California by a local farmer.  The farmer was interviewed by Fox News' Jeffrey Gonzalez where he said he saw the creature on his ranch near Avocado Lake.  He stated, “One of them, which was extremely tall, had a pig over its shoulder," "And the five scattered and the one with the pig was running so fast it didn’t see an irrigation pipe and it tripped, with the pig flying over." Gonzalez said that there has been three sightings over the past few years across East Fresno County meaning that it not very uncommon. Having this said, a reason for belief here is that these spotting could be true due to the fact that random people who have no relation with each other are all saying and seeing the same thing. Yet on the other hand, a red flag is that there could simply be another animal in the area that could be claimed as "Bigfoot". People always want to believe in paranormal's which is why this can be seen as false evidence because some people just want attention.
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/10/17/bigfoot-reportedly-sighted-in-northern-california-pictures-go-viral.html

# data[].attributes.body
This image is one that was taken on January 5th, 2017 by a family out on a wilderness adventure in Canada. The image is part of a video that a family took that claims they have spotted Bigfoot wondering around a creek. It is easy to be skeptical about this as it can be seen as a "set-up" where someone has put on a suit and said that it was an innocent family who had seen the creature and not some random guy hunting. But in the image we can say that this can easily be a tree but it is more than likely a set-up yet possibly the real deal.  All in all, it all depends how you look at the image and whether or not you want to look at it as an actual creature or a tree or something.

# data[].attributes.body
This picture was taken in Northern California near Avocado Lake. This was taken during a sighting where Bigfoot was apparently seen walking on a farms ranch.  It can be seen as someone has taken the picture as the creature is walking away, or it can be seen as a rock or a broken tree.  A red flag here is the fact that this is a recent picture from 2017 and it could just be someone looking for a little bit attention.  Patternicity has a role here as this can be seen in different ways.  Also, the image is very poor quality which can disfigure the shape of the object we see creating the illusion of an object that we see as Bigfoot.

# data[].attributes.body
This image was taken in 1967 by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin In Northern California during a short film. It is said to be the most convincing picture showing proof of the creature because it is hard to tell whether there's a man in a gorilla suit or if it's the real deal.  The picture has been enhanced to emphasize the shape of Bigfoot and it is clear that it could be real.  The obvious red flag here is patternicity meaning that this could be a tree branch or other piece of oddly shaped wood that has either been placed there on purpose or just coincidentally there.  The reason for belief is that there is a lot of information surrounding this picture and that it was one of the first images ever posted of Bigfoot.

# data[].attributes.body
This article is titled, "On the Trail of Florida's Bigfoot- the Skunk Ape by Joseph Stromberg. Dave Shealy is the one who supposedly spotted Bigfoot while deer hunting with his older brother Jack on day. Jack said that he saw something about 100 yards away that looked like a big hairy man. Dave couldn't see because he was too short and the grass was tall so Jack lifted him up and he claimed to see Bigfoot. A major red flag here is that the brothers were joking around as kids do and that Jack was having some fun with his little brother because deer hunting wasn't as successful as they had planned. Another red flag is that they said it was about 100 yards away which is a decent distant meaning that patternicity could have taken place; the possibility of there being an oddly shaped tree or bush is very high in their given situation.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/trail-floridas-bigfoot-skunk-ape-180949981/