# data[].attributes.body
I think the first one would get a better score because it was more detailed and the second one was only a few sentences. I also liked the first one better because it was talking off the page for example when it said the metal detectors wern't something small you could throw in your trunk and drive to the beach

# data[].attributes.body
The difference between the two is that the first one explains why these reasons were disappointing. It is clear that the first one would get a better score on the m-step because they are direct quotes.

# data[].attributes.headline
The difference between the 2 responses is the first one has more details and voice but the second one only stated the reason and didn't give any examples. I think the first one would get a better score because it describes examples of the reason but the second one only said the examples and no details at all.

# data[].attributes.subject
The difference between the 2 responses is the first one has more details and voice but the second one only stated the reason and didn't give any examples. I think the first one would get a better score because it describes examples of the reason but the second one only said the examples and no details at all.

# data[].attributes.body
The difference between the first and second one was that the first one explained the quotes but the second one just had a quote they didn't go into detail. The second one was basicly all a quote, but the first one described more of what the quote meant not just all quote. I think that the 1st one would get a better grade because it was more of a paragraph, and it showed more detail.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked the first one because it gave a lot of detail and you could understand what they were talking about even if you have never read the article. It also included quotes.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the first one was the best because it had a lot of detail.

# data[].attributes.body
The difference between the second and first is the first is very descriptive and the second one doesn't even say much about how they were disappointing. I think that the first would get a better score on a test situation because it doesn't just plop a random quote down it goes into wide detail about why?

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with you
__
_________
_

# data[].attributes.body
that one is the best because it has quotes

# data[].attributes.headline
i think the 1st one would score a better score cause it had a lot of voice.

# data[].attributes.subject
i think the 1st one would score a better score cause it had a lot of voice.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the first one is better because it has more detail and it has qoutes but the second one is short and has a limited amount of details and quotes. I think the first one will get a better grade.

# data[].attributes.headline
i like the first on bc it has a lot of detail on how they did not work and it had a lot of voice 

# data[].attributes.subject
i like the first on bc it has a lot of detail on how they did not work and it had a lot of voice 

# data[].attributes.body
so you can know what their actually talking about.

# data[].attributes.body
The second one is the worst because it is only one quote and it has nothing in its own words.

# data[].attributes.headline
I personally like the first one best BC it has alot lot of voice and i like how it sounds confident when i'm reading it and it's also stretched out and it helps me understand more about an early metal detector but along with the second one it was very very limited and not much detail I didn't like it that much 

# data[].attributes.subject
I personally like the first one best BC it has alot lot of voice and i like how it sounds confident when i'm reading it and it's also stretched out and it helps me understand more about an early metal detector but along with the second one it was very very limited and not much detail I didn't like it that much 

# data[].attributes.headline
i liked the 1 st on because there was a lot of quotes and it sounded good like how they said acording to the text and they supported detail.

# data[].attributes.subject
i liked the 1 st on because there was a lot of quotes and it sounded good like how they said acording to the text and they supported detail.

# data[].attributes.body
like how they gave examples.

# data[].attributes.body
The first one would score better becuase it had voice, It made sense, and it seemed really strong. Practicly all the second one had was a quote, and the quote was not a direct quote,it had been altered.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the first one would be the best because it has quotes and puts it into its own words and it talks about the early life and how it was bad to get one. plus is really good the best one

# data[].attributes.body
the second one would be better because miners were the first ones to ever use one

# data[].attributes.body
the 1st one would get the better score because it is more detailed and the 2nd one had the least detail.