# data[].attributes.body
https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/
This is a site made by a department of a government as we can see in the URL ".gov", this gives a much higher chance of reliability into the matter.
This link shows many references at the bottom, they list a lot of references which means they collected their data from many places to come up with their conclusion. The purpose of this site is to inform the general public on the current situation

http://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/global-warming-effects/
This site is maintained by a leading television channel and is included in many other things surrounding science. This adds to the reliability of the source as they wouldn't ruin their reputation as this is how they well known. This article has been around in the last few years which makes it a current standpoint in the situation.

http://www.mfe.govt.nz/climate-change/how-climate-change-affects-nz/climate-change-impacts
This is a site of the New Zealand government addressing the problem the nation faces along with the rest. This is a reliable source as the the information would be checked over by multiple persons to confirm it's reliable as it is the official government website for New Zealand. This gives links to additional information and related publications, also showing maps for primary evidence. Their purpose is the same as my first source, to inform the general public.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.doc.govt.nz/1080
This is a .govt site indicating its credibility.

http://safe.org.nz/disclaimer-privacy-policy
The ways this source is credible are: they seem like a reliable source, you can find ways to contact them and they are transparent about their purpose

http://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/83517754/Biggest-fraud-in-NZ-history-1080-drops-to-start-near-Queenstown
The reliability of this is, the fact that it is a well trusted official news website.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/regulation-health-and-disability-system/medicines-control/prescribing-cannabis-based-products
This site is creditable because it has govt. It has many resources for help, and also Ministry websites.

http://www.health.harvard.edu/mind-and-mood/medical-marijuana-and-the-mind
This site is reliable as it has edu, this is for educational purposes. It is current, last updated 2017. Also has references at the bottom of the page.

https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/marijuana-medicine
has .govt and lots of sources down the bottom. Also has a contact phone number and email address. Last updated March 2017

http://www.cmcr.ucsd.edu/
Has .edu which means it's reliable/ for educational purposes

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.familyplanning.org.nz/news/2016/had-unprotected-sex
This is a .org site which shows that it is credible. Because it has updated information and services you can contact for help. There is an address available to any needs.
https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/healthyliving/safe-sex
Credible because it is .gov the government has given consent to publish. The information is up to date.
http://kidshealth.org/en/teens/bc-chart.html
This site is credible as it is an .org site and they have resources of who they got their information from.
https://www.plannedparenthood.org/
It is a .org site which means it is credible, because the site has services where you can ask and get help. They also have contact details.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.babycenter.com/0_how-smoking-during-pregnancy-affects-you-and-your-baby_1405720.bc
-this is a credible source as it has a professionals opinions and knowledge. there is also a large amount of information.

http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/pregnancy-week-by-week/in-depth/smoking-and-pregnancy/art-20047021
-this is a credible source of information because it has a good amount of references and is written by clinical staff

https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/tobaccousepregnancy/index.htm
- . gov proves that this is a credible website and can be trusted as it means it is a government website
-frankie

# data[].attributes.headline
Health risks that come as a side effect of chemotherapy-Brydie and Tyler

# data[].attributes.subject
Health risks that come as a side effect of chemotherapy-Brydie and Tyler

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatments-and-side-effects/treatment-types/chemotherapy/chemotherapy-side-effects.html
-This source is reliable as it is the Official American Cancer Society. As well as the site being well known it also provides an 'About Us' section which has an official copyright and also provides contact  information.

http://www.healthline.com/health/cancer/effects-on-body
-This site is reliable as it provides the authors and also states that the information has been looked over by a medical professional, it also provides facts and statistics rather than opinionated information-opinionated information could come from people who had per say experienced chemo or know some who had.

http://www.cancer.net/navigating-cancer-care/how-cancer-treated/chemotherapy/side-effects-chemotherapy
-This is credible as the information provided on this site has been approved by the Cancer.Net Editorial Board, this was done a short time ago meaning that the information is also current. The site also provides sources and places to find additional information.

# data[].attributes.body
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoking_and_pregnancy
-this is an unreliable source of information as it can be changed online and false information can be entered.
-frankie

# data[].attributes.body
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safe_sex
It is unreliable because people can edit and change the facts and information which could lead them to being more opinionated.
https://www.livescience.com/17445-drinking-alcohol-unsafe-sex.html
Because it is written by Canadian Researchers which means that they are not professional which also means it could not be right.

# data[].attributes.body
tigers - unreliable
- does not have author, doesn't say if its up to date, written by many.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger

-  Unreliable - does not have author, date of how old the information is,  any contact details, site looks poorly designed.
http://fiestiegirl2003.tripod.com/FunFacts.htm

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.worldwildlife.org/species/tiger
this website is credible because it has contact details and statistical information instead of opinions.

http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/unifeed/asset/U101/U101118i/

this website is credible because there is no opinions. It has contact details and is updated frequently.

http://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/mammals/b/bengal-tiger/

this is crediable because it is fact has contact details, and "about us"

https://www.livescience.com/27441-tigers.html

Has about us page, when its written and who the article is written by.

# data[].attributes.body
ww2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II unreliable because people can just edit it and change things around.
http://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/world-war-ii-history
Its unreliable because it doesn't give us much info.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.webmd.com/brain/ss/slideshow-medical-marijuana
This site is unreliable as it wants us to subscribe, but also it was last updated may 2016, this is not current. Doesn't have any resources.

http://lifehacker.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-medical-marijuana-1772508364
lots of ads, looks like it is a post by a user of the website rather than an official person Posted april 2016 which isn't too long ago but facts might have changed since it is a controversial topic of today.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.radiolive.co.nz/SHOCKING-Effect-of-1080-poison-in-water/tabid/491/articleID/11048/Default.aspx
This website was last updated in 2009 making it unreliable as more research has happened since then

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.mfe.govt.nz/air/overview-air-quality/air-pollution-and-new-zealands-air
This website is credible because it has the govt.nz. It also has authority, people to contact.  It was updated not long ago.
http://www.ehinz.ac.nz/indicators/air-quality/health-effects-of-air-pollution/
This website in credible because it has references about the information. It was modified not long. There is authority, people to contact via email/phone.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.stylist.co.uk/people/lucy-mangan/the-problems-with-under-age-sex#art
This site is unreliably because they're not talking about facts but opinion. The site doesn't have an about us or when its last been updated

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.silkroadfoundation.org/newsletter/volumeonenumberone/origin.html
^^ This website has a lot of information on chess. This website also has a list of resources which all reference to books. The guy who wrote this article also has his own Wikipedia page and appears to be credible.

# data[].attributes.body
ww2
http://www.historynet.com/contact-historynet-and-world-history-group
this is reliable because it has correct address and supplies us with an email address.

http://corporate.britannica.com/contact/
has given us all the information we need such as a phone number the hours it is open the fax and an email address and an address.

https://nzhistory.govt.nz/war/new-zealand-and-the-second-world-war-overview
Has a P.O box and a phone number.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/health_effects/effects_cig_smoking/index.htm
This is reliable because the url has gov in it which means it is linked to the government which is know to be a reliable source and information used would be current and reliable
https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/tobacco/cessation-fact-sheet
This website is reliable because it shows facts about the information of the cigarettes and shows how the chemicals inside can cause cancer.
http://www.smokefree.org.nz/smokefree-environments/legislation
This source is known to get people to stop smoking so people that work here and run this website know what they are on about because the know stats and facts about cigarettes and are up to date about what happens with the cigarettes

# data[].attributes.headline
Risks of having underage sex (Eve&Zahne 

# data[].attributes.subject
Risks of having underage sex (Eve&Zahne 

# data[].attributes.body
http://remotehealthatlas.nt.gov.au/under_age_sexual_activity.pdf
This site is Credible because it has a gov in the link and is from the department of heath

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/european-immigrants-united-states
- This appears reliable as it has quite a lot of sources at the bottom and also quite a lot of graph's along with crediting the photo's
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/08/europes-fear-of-muslim-immigration-revealed-in-widespread-survey.html

# data[].attributes.headline
Health risks that come as a side effect of chemotherapy-Brydie and Tyler

# data[].attributes.subject
Health risks that come as a side effect of chemotherapy-Brydie and Tyler

# data[].attributes.body
https://cool-jams.com.au/1635-2/
-This site is unreliable as it is most likely biased, the site is attempting to sell a product to prevent ONE side effect of chemotherapy, although there are many more side effects the site describes this effect as being the worst as to convince the reader to buy the product, even through this is likely untrue about it being such a big issue.

# data[].attributes.headline
Health risks of using codeine for illegal and recreational use stan

# data[].attributes.subject
Health risks of using codeine for illegal and recreational use stan

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.google.co.nz/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=22&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiW2qDW28jUAhUDvbwKHY3lB7MQFgiIATAV&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.urbandictionary.com%2Fdefine.php%3Fterm%3Dpurple%2520drank&usg=AFQjCNFCe2i2aO0l_Deka40xeDN1p9U9BA

urban dictionary

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.nhsborders.scot.nhs.uk/patients-and-visitors/our-services/general-services/underage-sexual-activity-interagency-guidance/sex,-young-people-and-the-law/

This website is credible because it tells us about the laws associated with underage sex, it also tells us about the board and telling us it is reliable because it provides responsible health care services.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.starherald.com/opinion/opinion-smoking/article_96ec611c-79db-11e4-955e-7febf0048328.html
This website seems unreliable because it is set on the opinions of people and has lots of polls around other topics also the article has not been updated since 2014 and this could not be up to standards with the Currency in C.R.A.P

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/european-immigrants-united-states -
While it may seem good, other then the graphs there aren't any sources, and its important to note this is a site of a NEWS company NOT a goverment one.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.unicef.org/sowc96/2csoldrs.htm
In this write-up, UNICEF uses multiple sources for their information and lists these in a references page.
https://www.dosomething.org/facts/11-facts-about-child-soldiers
Sources have been listed to back up the facts.
http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/specialseries/2017/04/child-soldiers-reloaded-privatisation-war-170424204852514.html
Al Jazeera is a well known radio and they list sources.

# data[].attributes.headline
Health risks of using codeine for illegal and recreational use stan

# data[].attributes.subject
Health risks of using codeine for illegal and recreational use stan

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.drugs.com/codeine.html Drugs.com is the most popular, comprehensive and up-to-date source of drug information online.  it also uses a team of registered pharmacists to ensure accuracy in their articles.
http://www.narconon.org/drug-abuse/purple-drank-effects.html
NARCONON’S MISSION is to provide an effective path for rehabilitation from drug abuse and to assist society in preventing the scourge of drugs worldwide, using evidence based articles to inform people of drug addiction

http://drugabuse.com/library/lean-purple-drank/

mentions references in the bottom of the article

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-pregnant-risks-idUSBREA191DE20140210
This site looks reliable because mentions refrences at the bottom

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.numbeo.com/pollution/country_result.jsp?country=New+Zealand
This might not be credible source as there is no references or authority. Quote 'These data are based on perceptions of visitors of this website in the past 3 years.'

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/17/opinion/child-soldiers.html?_r=0
This NY Times article is an opinion and does not have a reference list.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a poorly designed website which shows it could be made by anyone in the public and shows no sign of expertise.