# data[].attributes.body
Pros:
a) a visualization that allows comparison and contrast.

b) effectively includes multiple characteristics into one visualization.

c) builds a narrative/story of what happened to the army including where, when and at what temperature.

Cons:
a) too much information might instead confuse the audience.

b) a proper explanation or key is needed to understand the visualization (even though it might have been written in French, it could be more clearer in some way).

# data[].attributes.body
It was difficult to tell what was being shown in the visualization without a key on what the beige and black lines represent. The chronological and antichronological information of the graph was also confusing when they were put on the same graph. The information about the temperature, though useful, was confusing as well as the axis were small.

# data[].attributes.body
- Temperature can be misleading as people might think the only reason that troops were dying is because of the temperature
- Effective in combining 3 sets of information in a clear and concise way
- Audience: most likely historians

# data[].attributes.body
The amount of information and number of factors presented on such a small graph is very impressive. However we found it hard to intuit the direction the army was moving, os perhaps an arrow indicating this would be helpful.

# data[].attributes.body
Positives

Simple lines are conveying a lot of information

Useful annotations

The temperature markers were a good detail that is often overlooked

The scale is not deceptive and makes a lot of sense

Negatives

Doesn’t pass the squint test

Doesn’t show time markers or reasons for loss of soldiers

# data[].attributes.body
Positives
- Trend lines are a good representation of the soldiers that passed away (helps visualize it without )
- Very good at telling a narrative (e.g., the narrative of soldiers that died at low temps while crossing a river.
-Uses scale effectively

Negatives
- Detail can be overwhelming (a lot of small text, lines and details can be a lot to interpret at first glance for a reader)

Other visualisation Interpretation:
- It is simpler to understand as information is minimised (no lines, specific details)
- However, it is less in depth and thus does not represent the narrative as effectively.