# data[].attributes.headline
(Jazmine Gomez):United States V. Luke Noel Wilson 

# data[].attributes.subject
(Jazmine Gomez):United States V. Luke Noel Wilson 

# data[].attributes.body
Luke Wilson had possession of child 🤬 in Gmail email account. However, Google reported it to a company that reported it to another company where an officer opened the images without a warrant.

1. What is the policy and protocols when coming across photos as severe an employee in the Google emailing privacy department to other companies?

2. How come there was not a report of this and a warrant before opening these images?

3. What is the policy that protects the privacy of civilians? and how does that change when they committed a crime?

(Jazmine Gomez)

# data[].attributes.body
Noel Conway is a 68-year-old man with terminal motor neuron disease. Conway wishes to die peacefully on his own terms. Was denied the right and was even allowed present his own case was decided by doctors and individuals who had never met him.  Basically, making known that Conway's choice for end-of-life care isn't his choice but the Supreme Courts' choice.

1)At what point is an assistant physician-assisted suicided, considered an act of kindness? When is a healer no longer a healer?

2.) What are reparations down the line when someone is considered a person right to die from a terminally ill person and a 100% healthy person? When is the right of the court to decide who gets to live and die?

3.) How would listening to the Conway's statement on his decision on terminating life affect the case outcome?

-Dezi Flores

# data[].attributes.body
Death charges against social workers responsible for the case of the Palmdale boys were thrown by Gabriel Fernandez

How many were other high-risk situations examined and misinterpreted as a trivial occurrences?

Is the system on the verge of collapsing?

Why is dcfs concerned about the public finding to see what they're up to with the cases?

# data[].attributes.body
Kyle Rittenhouse took the lives of Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, and injured Gaige Grosskreutz. His case was nationally televised allowing social media to make a huge influence on how people viewed the case and let them voice their opinion to the masses. Despite how popular and entertaining this case became, the jury was able to focus on the facts that were presented in court and not what was in the media.

1.     How can social media influence our point of view on cases that will shape our nation’s future?

2.     What determines self-defense?

3.     Would the verdict have been different if this case was not nationally televised?

-Kytzia Diaz

# data[].attributes.headline
'Self-defense is not illegal': Kyle Rittenhouse

# data[].attributes.subject
'Self-defense is not illegal': Kyle Rittenhouse

# data[].attributes.body
1. What must be a reason to kill someone for self-defense?

2. why were some disappointed with the verdict?

3. Even if it was self-defense why do people want Kyle to be punished, is it because of his race?

~ Jonathan Munguia

# data[].attributes.headline
UAS America Fund LLC, Skypan International Inc, Peter Sachs, and FPV Manuals LLV vs. The Federal Aviation Administration

# data[].attributes.subject
UAS America Fund LLC, Skypan International Inc, Peter Sachs, and FPV Manuals LLV vs. The Federal Aviation Administration

# data[].attributes.body
"The Government should not restrict the use of personal drones."

1) Will ruling in favor of the drone users lead to a miscommunication of what regulations are still in place?
-i,e, will we now have an increase or decrease of drone related lawsuits?

2) How could this ruling hurt the people that rely upon drones to make their living?
-I found a really cool document source about this.

3) If verdicts continue to fall in drone favor, how will this harm our communities?

# data[].attributes.headline
People of the state of California v. Brock Turner

# data[].attributes.subject
People of the state of California v. Brock Turner

# data[].attributes.body
Brock Turner a 19 year-old Stanford University student who was sentenced to 6 months in jail while only serving 3 months for 3 felony charges for the sexual assault of an unconscious woman.

1) Why were the 🤬 charges for this case dismissed even though there was testimonies and evidence that Turner was thrusting his hips into the unconscious woman?

2)  How might Turners race may have affected the outcome of this case?

3) How does this court case show the discrepancies of sexism in the justice system?

-Marita Pereira

# data[].attributes.body
A 23-year-old male Rogel Aguilera-Mederos was sentenced to 110 years in prison. He was charged with 42 counts. This court case became so controversial that it came on the news and 4.5 million people signed a petition.

Why is racially profiled really common in court cases?

Is self-defense not an option to protect yourself in court anymore?

Is there non-discrimination law in the court system that helps people during trial?

-Lilibet Perez

# data[].attributes.body
Bucklew v. Precythe

Russel Bucklew, before being sentenced to death, has claimed that lethal injection could violate the eighth amendment due to a unique condition that he and others suffer from.

Should other execution methods be considered if some could violate the eighth amendment?

What freedoms to prisoners still have?

Should death row inmates medical conditions be considered?

-Francisco Alvarez

# data[].attributes.headline
A teenager who killed two people and shot another was dismissed of first-degree intentional homicide and four other felony charges. The court's decision to this day stays controversial. 

# data[].attributes.subject
A teenager who killed two people and shot another was dismissed of first-degree intentional homicide and four other felony charges. The court's decision to this day stays controversial. 

# data[].attributes.body
- What is self-defense even considered anymore?
- What makes self-defense justifiable?
- In the perspective of law, will self-defense ever be considered a crime?

- Aryan A.

# data[].attributes.body
Judge Aaron Persky, with an unreasonable setencing, displayed that Male athletes recieve a lower chance of serving a minimum incarceration sentence for sexual assualt.

1. If male athletes were convicted with full term punishments would they be less likely to commit the crime?
2. Should judges be held accountable for the leniency of multiple time offenders?
3.Should we hold athletes to a high standard, as public figures, for commiting sexual assualt crimes?

- Mercedes

# data[].attributes.body
Although the US has many laws protecting against the use of child and slave labor, Judge Burroughs, through the dismal of the Tomasella Vs Nestle US, has presented a loop hole for the use of child and slave labor by manufactures without having to present said practices in an upfront manner to the consumer.

What does the law deem the definition of deception to be?

How common is the use of slave and child labor in countries that we import good from, and are any laws in place against the important of said goods?

What protections are in place by the government to protect consumers from  being deceived by manufactures?

Sylvie Schoenen

# data[].attributes.headline
The Supreme Court, by ruling that the parents of a teenager shot and killed from across the United States and Mexican border will not receive damages, has effectively stated that the actions of Border Patrol Agents, no matter how severe, will not cause the Agent's to face any consequences. 

# data[].attributes.subject
The Supreme Court, by ruling that the parents of a teenager shot and killed from across the United States and Mexican border will not receive damages, has effectively stated that the actions of Border Patrol Agents, no matter how severe, will not cause the Agent's to face any consequences. 

# data[].attributes.body
Are American lives more valuable than any other?

Whom does the Bill of Rights protect in international law?

What impact does Immigration have on the United States today?

What is deemed necessary to protect the Country's borders?

-Adam O'Neill

# data[].attributes.headline
Robert's Court has decided that employers with religious beliefs have a valid reason to exempt employees from healthcare, deeming religion more important than preventative health care.

# data[].attributes.subject
Robert's Court has decided that employers with religious beliefs have a valid reason to exempt employees from healthcare, deeming religion more important than preventative health care.

# data[].attributes.body
From a legal standpoint, how far can religious employers limit an employee’s health care until it becomes unlawful?

How does preventive health care is seen in the eyes of the court differ from what preventive health care is considered outside of the court?

What other exemptions could religious employers be allowed to place in contrast to non-religious employers?

-Charlotte Hatch

# data[].attributes.headline
Within one of the most significant documents in the United States, Declaration of Independence, is declared a natural right to all it’s citizens. Nevertheless, Judge Bruce Schroeder endorsed that seeking liberty disvalued a life. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Within one of the most significant documents in the United States, Declaration of Independence, is declared a natural right to all it’s citizens. Nevertheless, Judge Bruce Schroeder endorsed that seeking liberty disvalued a life. 

# data[].attributes.body
• What is considered as “manslaughter” in the eyes of the law?

• In the perspective of the law, what is the difference between a "minor" and a "adult?"

•When does self-defense stop becoming self-defense?

- Horacio Alvillar Jr

# data[].attributes.headline
Religion is a personal freedom that is protected in America however, in the City of Philadelphia there are limits as to how far the first amendment can protect you, especially when it comes to integrating these beliefs within the foster-care system.

# data[].attributes.subject
Religion is a personal freedom that is protected in America however, in the City of Philadelphia there are limits as to how far the first amendment can protect you, especially when it comes to integrating these beliefs within the foster-care system.

# data[].attributes.body
+ What is the difference between exercising religious freedom and personal beliefs?
+ How do non-discrimination policies play a role in a court's decision?
+ What is considered as religious discrimination in court?

- Luna F