# data[].attributes.body
My top door would be door #2, as it was interactive, had good aesthetics, and was neat and well done. My second choice would be door #3, as it was interactive as well, and had a creative flair to it instead of being all neat and tidy like other doors. My third choice would be door 1. It attempted to include all learners, and was aesthetically pleasing as well as a good design layout.

# data[].attributes.body
My top 3 doors were doors no. 3, 2, and 6. I chose #3 as my top choice becuase it had good visuals, it was interactive, and displayed alot of effort. Door number 2 was my second choice because it offered a great interactive experience, but was a little short on visuals. Finally, door number 6 was my third choice, because it had great visualsvisuals, but wasn't very

# data[].attributes.body
My number 1 choice that fits the criteria the best would be door number 2. It is aesthetically pleasing and also interactive. My second choice would have to be door number 1, because it is pleasing to the eye and it seems like everyone helped, but it doesn't seem to be interactive to me. My final choice would have to be door number 8, because it was pleasing to the eye and it was creative.

Scoring:
Door 2=3
Door 1= 2
Door 8= 2

# data[].attributes.body
My top 3 doors were doors number 3, 2, and 6. I chose door no. 3 as my top choice becuase it had good visuals, it was

# data[].attributes.body
wereoorsddoordpoorwereoorsddoordpoowerewereoorsddoordpoorss

# data[].attributes.body
My top three doors are doors # 1, 2, and 4. Number 2 would be my top choice because it has an interactive element and the concept of pride struggle and determination is a unique theme amount the other doors. Door Number 1 is my second choice because I liked the concept of imagery that was used. The overall door was very pleasing to look at and had all criteria met. My third choice was door number 4 because it really related to the times of today with the whole Instagram thing. The reason why its my third is because the door concept was kinda blatent and had no deep thinking when you look at it.

# data[].attributes.body
My favourite was #2 it was the only truly interactive one and it had a clear message. My second favourite is #1, I liked this due to it's design and message. My third Favourite is #8, I loved the aesthetic aspect of it but it lacked in information.

# data[].attributes.body
My top 3 doors are 1, 2, and 4. My personal favorite was number 4 because it was very creative, but according to nmy rankings that came in third place. The first one had a very good meaning, was visually appealing, and had a clear theme. The second one was interactive, making it very unique from the other doors. The fourth was especially creative, had a clear theme, and was targeted to the right audience- teenagers.

# data[].attributes.body
I really like Mrs. Agarwals door because of its aesthetic design. The crayon one was really original but I think ours was the best becuase of the questions and links and

# data[].attributes.body
My top 3 doors are #1, #2, #8.
The first door looks very good and it seems like a lot of effort went into it, but there is no interactive partinteractpartiveinteractive. My second door is #2 because it lookslooks good, the entire class worked on it, and it is interactive. My last dorrdoor is #8 because it looks great but isis not interactive.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose doors #1, #2, and #4 as my top three picks because of their overall appeal and fulfillment of the given criteria. #2 scored the highest with an 11, as it was the most interactive, clearly collaborative through the class (multiple authors), strong theme, strong message, and neat, but it did lack a special visual appeal that would draw the viewers in. Door #2 scored second highest with a 8, because it had the best visual appeal, it was neat, conveyed a strong message, strong theme, seemed to incorporate many classmates, but clearly lacked an interactive activity for learners. Door #4 came in third with a score of 7 because they had  a great, neat visual appeal, conveyed an original message, looked like it incorporated an average amount of learners, but it lacked an interactive activity for students.

# data[].attributes.body
My top three doors were door #1, door #2, and door #8. Door #1 had a good visual appeal, theme, and class effort but no sign of interactive elements. Door #2, while having interactive elements, could have been better aesthetically but fit the criteria very well overall. Door #8 showed probably the most artistic elements and theme, because it focused more on actual people linked to Black History month. It did not include interactive elements, and didn't show much sign of the entire class participating.

# data[].attributes.body
My rankings were
1. Door 2
2. Door 1
3. Door 4
Door number 1 scored a 3 in all the catigories. It was especially interactive, and was very visually appealing.  It had a clear theme. Door 1 was next. It had a clear theme, and was ver artistically nice. I lacked interaction, andi had to putt lower not he list because of that. Door 4 is third on my list. It has a confusing theme, and is not very interactive. It is kind of visually appealing, and is third on my list.

# data[].attributes.body
My top 3 are 1, 2, and 3. #3 is my first pick because of its aesthetic, interactive, and message. It could be more inclusive for the class though. #2 (ours) is my second pick because it is interactive, has a message, and its inclusive...but its not very pretty. #1 is my next pick because it has a GREAT message, its pretty, and the whole class worked on it, but it has no interactive

# data[].attributes.body
My top door is #2, with a score of 11, because it portrayed a meaningful message, was interactive, and included all learners, but was a bit unattractive. My second best door is #2, with a score of 10, because it was appealing to the eye, included all learners, and had a strong message, but was not interactive. My third best door is #3, with a score of 8, because it was interactive, was appealing (but a bit untidy), seemed to involve all students, and had a fairly strong message.

# data[].attributes.body
My top 3 doors (no particular order) are numbers 1,2 and 3. Each of these doors got an overall score of 11. Door #1 was aesthetically pleasing, included a strong message, and attempted to include all learners. Door #1 was not very interactive and was average when it came to this because they included information that others could read to go along with their door. Door #2 was interactive, included a strong message, and attempted to include others. Door #2 was not very aesthetically pleasing. Door #3 was aesthetically pleasing, interactive, and attempted to include all learners. Door #3 had a message but not a strong  one.

# data[].attributes.body
The door I chose for number 1 is door number 2. This door was not only physically appealing but was also interactive. Not many doors are interactive like this one is. Number 2 goes to  door number 1. Although this door was not interactive it was very neat and portrayed a good message. Number 3 is given to door number 3. Although this door was not very neat, it was interactive and you could tell that everyone in that class worked on it.

# data[].attributes.body
My first choice for the best door would be Door #1. I thought that this door was very consistent and clean, with a good message. I gave them a 3 for aesthetics as well as 3 for including the entire homeroom, since you could clearly see that there were snippets done by each student.
My second choice would be Door #5. The door's aesthetic value was great, and I gave it a 3. The poem was also very clever and well-written, so I gave them a 3 on a strong message. However, they got a low score on being interactive, since it was just the door and the poem.
My third choice would be Door #8. Once again, it had a high aesthetic value, which was a 3. It also showed a strong message (3) and was decent in showcasing the abilities of all students in the class (2). The only issue I had with this door was that it was not interactive at all.

# data[].attributes.body
My first choice for a door would be #2, or our door. I say this because it fits the criterion best. It is visually appealing, so I gave it a three for that category. It is alos interactive, which really sets it apart from all of the other doors and earned it another three. Also it connects to the class and black history month, which I gave it a two for because there was nothing setting this apart from the other doors. Finally its clearly showed all of the input from the students, giving it another three. Overall, I gave this door an eleven out of twelve.
My second favorite door was door #1, or the door from Mr. Wils' class. One drawback is that it was not overly visually appealing, so I gave it a two in that category. Also it was not interactive, so it got a one in that category. I gave it a three in connection to black history month because it went above and beyond in that category. FInally I gave it a three in student input because it looks like it was all done by the students. Overall it got a score of nine out of twelve.
My third choice was door #5. This door was very visually appealing and it got a three in that category. It got a one for interactive because it did not feature anything interactive. In the third category, connection to black history, month I gave it a two because there wasn't very much information. Finally for students' effort I gave it a two because I couldn't tell if all of the students had done anything. Overall it has a score of eight out of