# data[].attributes.body
We should keep Antartica wild because Antarctica is one of the few continents that are not invaded with a lot of pollution. So when other continents start to be lacking in resources the people will start looking in other places for them . And if Antarctica is already developed there would not be enough resources in other continents so we should keep Antarctica undeveloped until there is a great necessity of its resources in the whole world.
Questions
What is the exactly amount of resourses that can e abailale in Antactica? What are them?
In case of an emergency how many

# data[].attributes.body
I think that people should just leave  Antarctica alone. People who want to go and live in Antarctica wouldn't survive due to the weather. I just hope that people leave Antarctica alone.Just because Antarctica has valuable resources doesn't mean you have to go and take it.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose argument 1 because if you destroy where these animals live where would they go. Developing Antarctica can harm delicate ecosystems. The animals there will become extinct because there home gets destroyed. And they're so used to where they live and how they live. So when that all changes they won't know how to deal with it.And the water under the ice has minerals, but it's minerals for the the living things. If the people use all the minerals that the living things can use then it can be a major drought or lots of animals can become extinct as I said.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Antarctica should be kept wild. It should be wild because if people come just to mine resources ,then the environment can become polluted.What if it gets developed like a city? Then the wildlife can become extinct. If people come to Antarctica then it should because they want to save the environment not because they want to mine coal or oil.

# data[].attributes.body
Keep Antarctica Wild-Johnny Sevilla:
I agree with argument number one because in my opinion natural life is more important than electricity.One question I would ask is, how would you be able to protect wildlife in Antarctica.My second question is how can you be able to prevent or not cause any decrease to any population like polar bears and how can you prevent any pollution into the environment.People shouldn't build any factories or anything to affect animal population because we shouldn't harm any type of species so that they don't go extinct

# data[].attributes.headline
Argument One: Develop Antarctica Kamari Jones

# data[].attributes.subject
Argument One: Develop Antarctica Kamari Jones

# data[].attributes.body
I chose argument one because I wouldrather have Antarctica developed than to develop it.  Keeping it wild can cause  cause more animals to live. When scientist visit Antarctica they can investigate how the animals live and what resources they use compared to the same animal species on hotter continents.

# data[].attributes.body
I go with argument 1 because Antarctica is home to many other animals. That is their habitat.
You wouldn't like people coming and destroying your home.
1. How would you like it if people came to change America?
2.Why do you want to change. it?

# data[].attributes.headline
Argument one keep antarctica wild Ezekiel Dsouza 

# data[].attributes.subject
Argument one keep antarctica wild Ezekiel Dsouza 

# data[].attributes.body
We should keep Antarctica wild because it has animals that can only survive there and if they go extinct the next generation will not be able to learn about the animals and that is not fair. Why should we destroy another organisms home for our own benefit.And how many endangered animals live Antarctica.For example the Rockhopper Penguin is endangered and it is still decreasing same with the macaroni penguin.

# data[].attributes.headline
Argument 1: Wld Antarctica  Kaliyah Smith

# data[].attributes.subject
Argument 1: Wld Antarctica  Kaliyah Smith

# data[].attributes.body
I choose argument 1 because keeping antarctica wild can conserve its natural resources. Having all the oils and minerals conserved can make the minerals and oils last longer if people take it individually for their country instead of having buildings use those resources all as a group.

# data[].attributes.body
I am on the side of keeping antarctica wildlife I think this because we are so close to fully converting to solar power. I personally think by the year 2023 we would've fully switched to electric battery powered cars. I do know that this would be a very hard change for gas companies. I would ask a politician if he/she would keep Antarctica or use its land. I would also ask whichever side they're on what's their most valid point.

# data[].attributes.body
They should keep Antarctica wild.I think we should because we want to keep the wildlife alone.We don't want any more endangered species.There are resources there that some of the wildlife need.For example polar bears are very known for their fur and agility to adapt quick to their environment.They use it to protect themselves from the cold.They are also very agile with their environment,which means very easy to adapt.They basically move pretty easy and quick in their environment.The oils that are found there may be something that the wildlife there really need.Believe it or not there is a lot of resources there that we need but are there for the wildlife.We can't just take away their resources and environment just for this?We as humans and people on Earth have to protect wildlife and nature.We must keep them safe.For example what if someone took away your food,family,home,shelter,or anything you needed to survive.What would you think?That these people that did this must not have compassion.These wildlife also have the right to stay where they are.I think we should keep the wildlife in Antarctica safe.

# data[].attributes.body
We should keep antarctic wild because when we use up all the our natural resource we have like a plan  b were when we need those resource we have antarctic to provide what we need until we have our own natural resource.

If we were to develop antarctica what are some things are you thinking of doing?

What are some restriction you are taking to keep antarctic wild?

# data[].attributes.body
I think we should leave Antarctica alone.Ithink we should leave Antarctica alone because there is a lot of animals that live there like penguins and polar bears.There is also a lot of natural resources that need to be conserved, like coal and oil.Also if you let people into antarctica they will bring a lot of exotic species,like dog species and cats.They will also bring pollution with their cars.

-What would you do to Antarctica?

-How will people survive in Antarctica?

# data[].attributes.body
I think Antarctica should  be keeped wild because it is a great environment for the unique animals that live there.I also think it should be keeped because we shouldn't be  using coal for energy because it pollutes the environment,we should use solar energy.
1.Why don't we use solar panels or wind turbines,so we don't

# data[].attributes.body
I would chose argument one because the animals need a perfect environment and if we develop antarctica it would ruin the ecosystem. We need to protect the animals that live there or they could possibly die.
The people will be harming the animals homes. We may need the oil and minerals but animals need homes and a perfect condition ecosystem.

1.) Why would people harm the environment

# data[].attributes.body
We should keep Antarctica wild because it is home to many unique wildlife habitats.Antarctica is a source of oil,coal, and iron.If we develop it then we are destroying the animals habitat.The side I chose is to keep it wild because if we were the animals and our habitat got destroyed then we would eventually die out because there would be no place to go or live.Like penguins they live on land but the only time they leave their habitat is to go get food and if we destroy their habitat they will have nowhere to live unless they migrate to a different area.Does developing help it with global warming? If we develop it what happens when everything pollutes the air or What happens to the minerals and oil after it has been developed?

# data[].attributes.body
I am the  side where you keep Antarctica wild  because there is nothing wrong with Antarctica. It should remain undeveloped. There is animals there and the animals have there own habitat. why would we want to mess that up? If antarctica is a source of oils and other things why would people want to change it? If the wild life there is to no harm why would we want to extinct that. There is also a valuable minerals under its thick ice. What would happened  to the animals if we change there habitat. Would the animals be in danger?