# data[].attributes.headline
No the fourth amendment does not protect students because school officials such teachers or any school staff do not have the right to search you for any unreasonable reason.

# data[].attributes.subject
No the fourth amendment does not protect students because school officials such teachers or any school staff do not have the right to search you for any unreasonable reason.

# data[].attributes.headline
Teachers don't really violate the first amendment because you don't really have to pray if you dont want to.

# data[].attributes.subject
Teachers don't really violate the first amendment because you don't really have to pray if you dont want to.

# data[].attributes.headline
School newspapers do receive the first amendment because students are allowed to to put anything as long as its not hurtful or insulting . 

# data[].attributes.subject
School newspapers do receive the first amendment because students are allowed to to put anything as long as its not hurtful or insulting . 

# data[].attributes.headline
Most schools don't give students the freedom to express themselves due to dress code and the use of some words. I think that more schools should ask the students what some rules should be instead of forcing them on students resulting in punishment if the rules are broken.

# data[].attributes.subject
Most schools don't give students the freedom to express themselves due to dress code and the use of some words. I think that more schools should ask the students what some rules should be instead of forcing them on students resulting in punishment if the rules are broken.

# data[].attributes.headline
Case 7 sounds most interesting to me because I don't think all kids would be doing drugs, and I don't think they all should be forced to test

# data[].attributes.subject
Case 7 sounds most interesting to me because I don't think all kids would be doing drugs, and I don't think they all should be forced to test

# data[].attributes.body
case 8 stood out to me the most.

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment, but the Eighth Amendment does shape certain procedural aspects regarding when a jury may use the death penalty and how it must be carried out.

# data[].attributes.body
The court ruled that the policy violated students' Fourth Amendments rights and that prior holdings were limited to random drug testing of student athletes only. Moreover, the court noted that there was no evidence of drug problem among students in general at Tulia schools, or among those in extracurricular activities.

# data[].attributes.body
Under FERPA a school may not disclose a student's grades to another student without the prior written consent of the parent or eligible student. ... This change clarifies that peer-grading does not violate FERPA.

# data[].attributes.body
In 1943, the United States Supreme Court weighed in on this issue in the matter of West Virginia v. Barnette. It ruled that a requirement that all pupils salute the flag was unconstitutional.

# data[].attributes.body
The Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, applies to searches conducted by public school officials. But the rights of students must be determined in light of special characteristics of a school environment.

# data[].attributes.body
Sounds interesting because it talks about juvenile because I always wondered if they give a death penalty or not.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, the most interesting case was Case 7, due to the fact I've seen videos and portrayals of these type of people who use the Declaration of Independence to spread nonsense and, the topic of Case 7, giving their kid a shot.

# data[].attributes.body
A group of parents, including Steven Engel, challenged this school prayer as a violation of the establishment clause of the First Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled that the school-led prayer violated the First Amendment, citing the importance of separating government and religion.

# data[].attributes.body
Generally, no. Student publications at public colleges and universities have the same First Amendment rights as professional newspapers. The courts have generally held that the Hazelwood decision applies only to high school papers.

# data[].attributes.headline
Students can speak, write articles, assemble to form groups and even petition school officials on issues. The U.S. Supreme Court has said that students “do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech and expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

# data[].attributes.subject
Students can speak, write articles, assemble to form groups and even petition school officials on issues. The U.S. Supreme Court has said that students “do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech and expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

# data[].attributes.body
I think that a juvenile's death sentence violates the 8th amendment, because they could just leave them in jail for a while instead of executing them.

# data[].attributes.body
Sounds most interesting in my opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
case 1 sounds the most interesting to me because it talks about school rights

# data[].attributes.body
A schools random drug test does not violate the 4th amendment. I guess because a lot of kids do drugs so maybe that's why

# data[].attributes.body
I know there's a lot of people that use the 1st amendment as an excuse to have their child not get vaccinated. Hell, this almost got me into a rant right now. I don't think it violates the 4th amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 8 sounds the most interesting to me and stood out to me the most. The other cases are pretty cool as well, but case 8 is a really good question and it makes me the most curious to know the answer. The other questions makes me want to know the answer, but not as much as case 8.And it does incldue life and death making it more important.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the case 7 sounds interesting. Because is pretty weired.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 8 sounded the most interesting to me because there are plenty of controversy debating around the death penalty in general.

# data[].attributes.body
case was the most interesting because you are not 21 and you can get a death sentence

# data[].attributes.body
For me Case 7 was the most interesting because you usually never hear of drug tests at a school environment. It was also interesting to see everyone's takes on this because some people saw it as violating. While others don't see it as violating.

# data[].attributes.body
The case that sounds the most interesting to me is Case 5. In case 5 they question whether if compulsory or requires flag solutes un public school violates the First Amendment. it is interesting to be because t=the case is too hard to determine if making a school of students salute to a Flag of their country is wrong or ok.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 7 sounds the most interesting because it was a case I would've never thought about. The case about drug testing in schools is quite the move because yes, we do want to be healthy, but with the Fourth Amendment, its debatable with the outcome and reasoning.

# data[].attributes.body
in my opinion case 8 sounded really interesting because there are alot of factors that can contribute to the fact if the death penalty is the complete form of justice that is used on a young person that can eradicate him from life.

# data[].attributes.headline
Which case sounds the most interesting to me?

# data[].attributes.subject
Which case sounds the most interesting to me?

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, Case 8 sounded the most interesting to me. I used my solid opinion on it, but there are so many factors on that topic that it can become a big topic amongst others. Some examples are age, type of punishment, and a mental disability. (If they had one)

# data[].attributes.body
this one is the most interesting to me, because it happens so often and I strongly dislike it. a student should have the right to keep the grade they got to themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 1 sound the most interesting to me. Kids shouldn’t be limited to express themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, case 7 sounds the most interesting because most of the cases that were presented were mostly about the first 5 freedoms or expressions. However, this case really stood out to me even in the midst of violation of the 4th amendment because it is a case I want to say more about. It intrigues me into learning more detailed information about random drug tests, statistics, and the 4th amendment. I want to "dive" more deeper into cases that involve violations, searches and seizures, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Case 7 too me is very interesting because its pretty weird of how they talked about drugs in school, and what would happen if drugs was given to a kid in school

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading does not violate a student's right to privacy and confidentiality. It's only paper work and it is nothing that concerns something important about you.

# data[].attributes.body
Honestly, from my experience, I don't think that Peer Grading should be a good grading method. I think it's a situation that depends on how sensitive the person is.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it some-what violates the 1st amendment. I mean, some schools make it extra points

# data[].attributes.body
The fourth amendment allows you to decline unreasonable searches and seizures unless by professionals. To sum it up, the 4th amendment doesn't protect you from searches by school officials

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence doesn't violate the death sentence. They can have done it on purpose even though they have problems. And if they recieved the death sentence then they must have done it more than once.I don't think they would just give out a death sentence because of a small crime. And it isnt really cruel, becasue they have also done something cruel as well.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does not violate the 8th Amendment because if the juvenile thought about this for a long time than the must've been aware of the consequences. Even though yes they are a child it doesn't give them a right to just get away with a big crime and not suffer an equal level punishment.

# data[].attributes.body
Juvenile's death sentence does not violate the 8th Amendment. Although children at a young age are still developing their minds, They should know the difference between right and wrong, and at least know the laws. In order for them to be executed they have to commit 1st degree murder. If the crime was little like stealing a dog, a death sentence will not be appropriate. That will be considered cruel and unusual punishment.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence violates the 8th Amendment. The death penalty is cruel, unusual, and not fit for a juvenile's punishment for a crime that they have committed; the government should not be allowed to put someone to death. Their brains are not fully developed and are less capable than adults to make responsible decisions.

# data[].attributes.body
The juvenile's death sentence does violate the 8th Amendment. This is because those that are under age don't have as many rights as those who can vote and be in prison for longer. Then again, we must be careful with how you punish the juvenile because they still need to learn what they did wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
no it does not violate if the crime is cruel enough.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does violate the 8th Amendment. They are still young and it would be cruel to give a child the death sentence.

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test does violate the Fourth Amendment. This is because the body tests will be random and without any warrant or permission, it can be illegal. I believe that certain doctors have the ability to do that, though, due to health and safety of others.

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test does not violate the 4th amendment. I mean if they test you then there must be some kind of reason to do the test. It can also be becasue of safety issues.

# data[].attributes.body
if its random, yes. If there was any drugs found around the school or in the school then it has a reason and is ok.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think that teachers violate the First Amendment if they aren't shoving it down your throat. A bit of-topic, but I think that's why That Vegan Teacher got fired from her job.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does violate the 8th Amendment. A death sentence for a child is a cruel and unusual punishment.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does not violate the 8th Amendment. But they may get it.

# data[].attributes.body
School's random drug test doesn't  violate the 4th Amendment. If a student was highly suspected for taking drugs they should be taking the drug test. The student may or may not be harmful to other students. The school must take the chance to find the student who was taking the drugs.

# data[].attributes.body
It could depending on the reasoning. So in conclusion it does not violate the 8th Amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
The Juvenile death sentence can depend on the outcome of the situation and how it correlates to the death sentence so it should be able. In my opinion if The juvenile has enough charges it is no excuse for age to be a factor playing in the death sentence and all charges should be accountable, But with little no evidence, and depending on the charges of a crime the juvenile's criminals charge should immediately go to a death sentence, on the charges given through court.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence violates the 8th Amendment. I think this because the juvenile is just a child who can't even vote and should just stay in prison for longer rather than execute them all together.

# data[].attributes.body
The school's random drug test does not violate the 4th Amendment because at this age it is not okay to be taking drugs. So the school is just taking precautions to make sure at this age you aren't taking any drugs.

# data[].attributes.body
no is do not violate the 4th Commandment is they have veiled proof

# data[].attributes.body
a random drug test is not violating the 4th amendment because school officials might and could be concerned with your health and could seek help for you

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading doe snot violate a studnet's right to privacy and confidentiality. It's only paper work and it is nothing that concerns something important about you.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence could and couldn't violate the 8th amendment. It could violate the 8th amendment if the juvenile did not do a harsh crime. It could be exceptions for others. However, it wouldn't violate the 8th amendment when a juvenile does a harsh crime like murdering someone. If they don't learn from their actions while being in prison, the last resort wouldn't violate the 8th amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test violates the 4th Amendment. This is because they are searching the entire student body without evidence of drug usage, making it an unreasonable search.

# data[].attributes.body
School should not do the drug test. Because drug is a bad thing. Bad thing should not appear in front of student.

# data[].attributes.body
No

# data[].attributes.body
the schools drug test does not violate the 4th amendment. This is due to the fact that if there is good reasoning between searches it is reasonable for drug searches to happen.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes it is, it is violating your body.

# data[].attributes.body
Does not violate the 4th amendment

# data[].attributes.body
The juvenile's death sentence does not violate the 8th amedment.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading doesn't violate a student's rights to privacy ad confidentiality. I think this because everyone has the same assignment and this can be for others to get to know the class and where their difficulty levels are.

# data[].attributes.body
Does not violate privacy

# data[].attributes.headline
peer grading violates a students right to privacy because if the student got the score he/she didn't want, it would be a privacy issue 

# data[].attributes.subject
peer grading violates a students right to privacy because if the student got the score he/she didn't want, it would be a privacy issue 

# data[].attributes.body
yes it violates privacy and confidentiality because i may have wanted to keep that grade to myself.

# data[].attributes.body
The juvenile's death sentence does violate the 8th amendment. I think it would be cruel and scary because there just kids they can learn from there mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does violate the 8th Amendment. People under age don't have their mind completely developed.

# data[].attributes.body
peer grading is not a violation, if they deserved whatever they got they should get it

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test does not violate the 4th Amendment. This is because they are making sure there aren't people doing drugs and shouldn't have them at school.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading does not violate a student's right to privacy and confidentiality because everyone did the same assignment.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading does violate a student't right to privacy and confidentiality. This is because people chose to keep their scores to themselves or can be embarrassed by how their grade turns out.

# data[].attributes.body
The random drug test does not violate the 4th amendment

# data[].attributes.body
No peer grading does violate a students privacy. This is due to the fact that the student is expected to do his work, and is good for students to check each others notes, so they couldn't cheat.

# data[].attributes.body
No it is not violate the students right to privacy and confidentiality is the name is covered

# data[].attributes.body
The school's random drug test does not violate the 4th amendment. If the school has a somewhat decent evidence or strong reasoning, I believe that drug tests do not violate the 4th amendment. It could be a safety hazard for the numerous students on campus.

# data[].attributes.body
do not violate the first amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
Students have freedom of expression in school, but some schools don't allow it. For example: some schools have strict dress codes that force them to wear something.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading does not violate a student's right to privacy. When grading, they can only see the grade on one assignment; which is the current one in their hand, not the entire grade of the student added up altogether.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading violates a students right to privacy and confidentiality. Why does another student get the right know and inspect a students grades. The student's scores are for only the teachers' and students' eyes. It can be embarrassing for the student.

# data[].attributes.body
yes making someone salute is a violation

# data[].attributes.body
The random drug test does not violate the 4th Amendment. I think this because the school is just showing it is concerned for you and is trying to keep you healthy and keep you out of drugs

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test does violate the 4th Amendment. The 4th amendment protects against unreasonable searches and schools should not give us a drug test.

# data[].attributes.body
no, it is not protected because you dont have a choice

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading do violate a student!

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading does not violate a student's right to privacy and confidentiality because ones actions and minds need to be changed when something is wrong or done inappropriately.

# data[].attributes.body
They do receive First Amendment protection of freedom of the press. Because of freedom of speech they can't do anything about it.

# data[].attributes.body
Compulsory or required flag salutes in public school do violate the first amendment.Some people might not want to salute to the flag, but it is required so it kinda is violating the first amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading do not violate a student's right to privacy and Confidentiality.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes it violate the first amendment if they are required to flag salute it is violating the first amendment