# data[].attributes.body
1. Her claim was that shouting down schools was a mistake during covid
2. I do agree with it because a lot as been going on not being to communicate that with someone could be bad but also there is a lot going on in the streets and getting them off the streets and in the schools helps the students a lot
3. one glow is that she stated all her facts i could point them out clearly and she did a rebuttal

# data[].attributes.body
The thesis is if schools should be on lock down due to covid 19.I agree with her thesis because schools should be on lock down.The thesis was clearly defined.On glow is that its good and one grow is nothing.

# data[].attributes.body
The thesis was how closing down schools during covid was a mistake  I do agree with this thesis because as she stated closing schools did not help in the fight against COVID-19 They stated their thesis with confidence. They could improve the objection.

# data[].attributes.body
Shutting down closes due to covid-19 was a mistake.
I agree with her because during school children children had less distractions and could get help when ever we wanted. But now that we are at home we have more distractions those are Phones,tablets,and TV.
Yes i liked her evidence and everything she did a great job stating everything. One glow was that she found great evidence to support her thesis. But one grow is to have a stronger objection.

# data[].attributes.body
The thesis was that if shutting schools down was a mistake during Covid. Yes I agree with the thesis because online school students have more distractions. Yes the thesis, evidence, reasoning, objection, rebuttal, conclusions was clearly defined. Something she did well was her evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
That not letting kids go to school was a bad idea.yes i am living proof. Yes they were.1 glow maybe like she stated everything clearly. Grow is that she should say things with a little more enthusiasm.

# data[].attributes.body
they both did great they both took there time  she thinks that its bad to let kids go to school because of covid 19 and that it should be shut down they would be  but yeah i dont really know but i agree

# data[].attributes.body
yes
becuase she gave the first example becuase she said that working from home is difficult becuase of the stress and i found that true she did give all her 3 statements correct

# data[].attributes.body
1. The thesis was reopening school was a mistake

2. I feel they were because she brought up a good point to the concerns of reopening

3. One glow is that she met all the points  something that she could grow on  her objection  and rebuttal

# data[].attributes.body
one thing that she did great was making sure that she took her time and made sure that all of her statements where in line. And one thing that she could work on is being louder when she speaks because when she was stating all of most of her points i could not quite hear her towards the end.

# data[].attributes.body
1.The thesis was that schools shouldn't have been closed during covid.
I disagree because if we would have stayed in schools, the would most likely be countless amounts of cases and a risk of health .
2.Yes
3. A glow was her explaining was clear and her pace was good.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The thesis was "uniforms are more harmful than helpful" but I disagree because I think wearing your own clothes is distracting. 2. Yes, they were all clearly defined. 3. One glow is that I could understand everything, and one grow they could make is making their argument longer.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Karla's thesis was if schools should be on lock down due to covid 19. 2. Yes I agree with her claim because many scholars were stressed and less focused. 3. Everything was defined clearly. 4. A glow Karla had was explaining and being clearly.  Something Karla could improve would be changing her objection.

# data[].attributes.body
karlas thesis was covid 19 qurinatine did help students i agree whith her thesis because i struggled from working at home a while back yes she stated THESIS/EVIDENCE/REASONING/OBJECTION/REBUTTAL/CONCLUSION one glow is she stated valid reasoning an grow is just that pause in the middle but she did good

# data[].attributes.body
1. Yes, I agree because with the covid shutdown many people have been having a hard time.

2. Yes it was clearly defined.

3. A glow was the timing, since she knew the requirements, and met them.

4. A grow can be better expressions, since it seemed a little bland.

# data[].attributes.body
Karl's thesis was "locking down schools during Covid 19 was a mistake" I both disagree but yet agree at the same time, I disagree because I think that locking down schools was for our own good and for us not to get sick. Yet I agree because it was hard to get used to transitioning from regular school than being at home sitting on a computer all day. In my opinion I think that all 6 were clearly define. I really liked how she explained everything well and actually made me understand her point one thing she can improve on is probably have to be nothing because she did really good.

# data[].attributes.body
karlas thesis was that it was a mistake that schools where shut down due to covid 19. yes I agree with this whole claim because it dose give kids stress and makes them less concintrated on school. yes she did write every part and I could tell what part were what. one glow was that it did convice me that it was a mistake. one grow is pause a little when changing cause some people couldn't tell each part apart.

# data[].attributes.body
1.Yes I agree with her because  I think that the school shut down cause negative effects on students .
2. Yes they were clearly defined .
3. One grow is that everything was clearly defined .
4. I think that one grow can be that  she paused in one part of the video but she did a really good job.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Yes, I agree with her.

2.I agree because schools shutting down does have a negative impact.

3.A glow that she did was explaining the thesis really well like it was a fact and not an opinion. Something she could do better though, was more emotion.

# data[].attributes.body
The thesis was that we should have schools open during covid. I agree but then I don't agree at the same time because yes students aren't motivated to do work and there is presure at home but then again we should have schools closed because we don't want to spread the virus to other students and to adults. Yes all of her points where clearly defined. One glow is that she had a lot of information and her video was exactly one min, one grow would be like when she is talking make sure that people can clearly hear what you are saying but her flip grid dosent really need a grow and Karla did a really good job.

# data[].attributes.body
1:Karla's Thesis is "locking down school during covid 19 was a mistake."I agree because for some  Children online school stress them out.
2: Yes they were clearly defined
3:One GLOW is how she explained her self clearly.I don't think she could do something to improve because I like her "assignment".

# data[].attributes.body
1).Karla's thesis was that "School should have been shut down because of covid-19" and yes i agree with her thesis because it does cause people to feel more stressed. And i agree because i have had alot of stress and headaches from online school then i did at in person school.
2). Yes,Karla's Thesis/evidence/reasoning/Objective/Rebuttal/conclusion was clearly defined. And was well stated
3). One glow is that the video was easliy understood and really gave me a WOWZA because of how good she stated her evidence and everything really made her claim stand out.
4).One grow i would have is to take time to get all the words in and to not rush.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I agree with the thesis because it did have a negative impact of students.
2. Yes all the points were clearly defined.
3. They stated everything and the time was perfect. They could maybe improve on rephrasing and being clearer with the objection.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I disagree because Covid was becoming a thing and it was important to protect people from it.
2. Yes, it was clearly defined.
3. Something she did well was her explanation and her reasons.
4. Something she could've done better was talking with more expression

# data[].attributes.body
1. I agree with there thesis because school shutting down cause of covid. people are struggling on zoom.
2.I think it bad people cant understand on zoom.
3. she talks about facts.
4.if there was more facts that would match with her facts.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I disagree with safar for children to stay home during a pandemic.

2. It was a little scrambled.

3. good topic make sure you put your stuff in older.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I agree with her because when schools were closing down because of COVID, online school has been hard

# data[].attributes.body
1. I disagree students need to have self control and the school uniforms were made for that reason.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I disagree because if schools didn't shut down schools then kids health would be in danger.
2. Yes the rebuttal was very clear.
3. They explained well why it was a mistake to shut down schools.
4. They could add more details and more facts.

# data[].attributes.body
1.) i  agree because she is proving that ever since we left school not that much COVID cases have went down
2.) I feel like the objection didn’t make much sense because I was confused and like very and then after the objection it went back to topic
3.)and I like that she was not taking fast because I can’t under people who talk fast and I like when people talk slow

# data[].attributes.body
1. I disagree because it's safer for children to stay home during a pandemic.
2.  Yes, the rebuttal was pretty clear.
3. I liked the pacing because she wasn't rushing or taking too long so it was at a perfect pace.
4. One thing she could do better is supporting her rebuttal better with strong evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
I agreed with her thesis because I thought she proved a good point that Covid-19 cases were not going down when kids left school. I don't think that the objection was clearly defined I didn't know what it was. I think her glow was her claim I thought it was excellent. Something I thought she could improve was putting more enthusiasm when she was talking.

# data[].attributes.body
1.   I agree with the girl's thesis because she has great evidence to support it. and because  I think that kids learn better when they are at school cause virtual they get distracted by they cirandings

2.   I think that the girl did put all the steps to make her argument.she has very strong reasons to think that.

# data[].attributes.body
1) I agree with the thesis, because distance learning has been hard.
2) I think it was good, got a little confused for a minute.
3) Her timing was perfect and her transitions we good.
4) One thing she could do better is have a little more enthusiasm.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I respectfully disagree with Carla because, children at school could have increased COVID-19 cases.
2. Yes sort of, I could see her point.
3. Something she did well was meeting the time limit and I liked how she wasn’t talking too fast nor too slow.
4. Something she could’ve done better was be a little louder and showed more emotion.

# data[].attributes.body
1.i agree with the thesis because of the fact that i agree with her argument that COVID-19 could have been haddled diffrently and they shouldnt have been so quick to shut the schools down. they should have found a solution.
2.i got i little confused for a moment but then she got right back on topic
3.glow/ she made the video clear and even though she made a few mistakes they way how she was confident about her argument, and that made up for it
4.grow/ they can make the video i little bit shorter i feel like she was talking to slow.