# data[].attributes.headline
More and more features, continuously updating can make a map more suitable 

# data[].attributes.subject
More and more features, continuously updating can make a map more suitable 

# data[].attributes.body
One source is accounting for almost 80% of all features, we should check whether this source is reliable

# data[].attributes.headline
Analysis of the different types of the road network, houses/structures (are clearly visible), resources are mapped, south-east corner seems to be low-lying and flood-prone

# data[].attributes.subject
Analysis of the different types of the road network, houses/structures (are clearly visible), resources are mapped, south-east corner seems to be low-lying and flood-prone

# data[].attributes.body
Green light

# data[].attributes.headline
poor orientation due to less information of different roads and landmarks

# data[].attributes.subject
poor orientation due to less information of different roads and landmarks

# data[].attributes.body
Alingment to findings, except for delay in updating amenities

# data[].attributes.headline
like to give yellow as it is not in detail

# data[].attributes.subject
like to give yellow as it is not in detail

# data[].attributes.headline
We think our map is useable. It has two main roads and river. It has some significant buildings like bus stop and military base as land marks. We just think that it needs to be printed on A3 or A0 since the buildings are too small. one last point: we noticed that one of the globes were cut a little bit. We are not sure if that will effect the end result when we share back.

# data[].attributes.subject
We think our map is useable. It has two main roads and river. It has some significant buildings like bus stop and military base as land marks. We just think that it needs to be printed on A3 or A0 since the buildings are too small. one last point: we noticed that one of the globes were cut a little bit. We are not sure if that will effect the end result when we share back.

# data[].attributes.body
There was a large increase in the amount of data added to the map in a single period. Does this validate the assumption that the lack of poi is down to there not being that many in reality?

# data[].attributes.body
Green - street names, some PoI, bus stops

# data[].attributes.body
Green. Matches what we decided, however mentions about a lack of points of interest for orientation. Is this due to there not being many, or lack of data added to the map?

# data[].attributes.body
We orient ourselves well on the map

# data[].attributes.body
Although according to report highway features might not be correct

# data[].attributes.body
We can orientate ourselves well on the map (road names, points of interest, buildings, etc.)

# data[].attributes.headline
We would give it a green light - it it very detailed and they are easy to understand 

# data[].attributes.subject
We would give it a green light - it it very detailed and they are easy to understand 

# data[].attributes.body
Green - in terms of quality

# data[].attributes.body
We can orientate ourselves well due to the road names buildings and points of interest. A0 map is highly detailed.

# data[].attributes.body
Would give a green light for the quality of the map

Road names, buildings, some points of interest (churches, hotels) on the map

# data[].attributes.headline
What are your most important findings from the report?

# data[].attributes.subject
What are your most important findings from the report?

# data[].attributes.headline
What is the overall analysis result of the map? (Which colour of the traffic light?)

# data[].attributes.subject
What is the overall analysis result of the map? (Which colour of the traffic light?)

# data[].attributes.headline
How well can you orient yourself on the map?

# data[].attributes.subject
How well can you orient yourself on the map?

# data[].attributes.headline
What traffic light colour would you give the map?

# data[].attributes.subject
What traffic light colour would you give the map?