# data[].attributes.body
revenue decreases -

Reduced taxes if we cannot enforce rules

Hurts businesses

Black market - cannot regulate the regular market

# data[].attributes.body
Informal sector is predominant - do not pay taxes

people do not want to pay because of corruption

costs of corruption

# data[].attributes.body
increased cost both on the side of the citizens and the government (administrative expenses)

lowering incentives for news investments

loss not only of capital but also of working hours as the system is complicated

potentially greater possibility of tax evasion

# data[].attributes.body
Protecting your money

Access to credit - ability to reinvest

Lack of bank infrastructure, need to have banking through phones

# data[].attributes.body
loan sharks - higher interest rates

gender and banking -

# data[].attributes.body
unequal distribution of resources - education, healthcare

lack of investment

poor stays poor - poverty cycle

# data[].attributes.body
perhaps less competitiveness

harm in international relations with other countries

increased inequality - Lorenz curve

less human capital

political instability - protests, violence, crime rate

# data[].attributes.body
colorism in bangladesh

racism in mexico

discrimination against Roma people in Europe

# data[].attributes.body
inflation and commodity dependency - heavily dependent on oil - largest export

when price rises, it's good for people when reinvested

when dropped, unsustainable development

perhaps not a long term solution to development

# data[].attributes.body
political instability

capital flight - selling bolivars

brain drain and emigration - flee

corruption and lack of good governance

# data[].attributes.body
bosnia's inability to reach consensus slows down the economy

# data[].attributes.body
emigration, capital flight, general dissatisfaction with politics

# data[].attributes.headline
question -  Using real-world examples, discuss the significance of gender equality for economic development

# data[].attributes.subject
question -  Using real-world examples, discuss the significance of gender equality for economic development

# data[].attributes.body
Countries with higher gender equality tend to have stronger economies. Countries with the most gender equal economies have an average annual GDP growth rate of 0.8 percentage points higher than those with the most unequal economies.

# data[].attributes.body
decreases AS/AD

limits labor market/consumer market

implications on childcare - poverty trap

instability in the society (political instability)

lack of representation in decision making - deepening inequalities

intersectionality

wage gap in Russia - women paid 1/5th less - wasted potential earnings

# data[].attributes.body
in 2021 female labour participation rate was 22 percent, therefore portion of the potential workforce is not being used - lower productivity, efficiency and economic growth

The potential gains from greater inclusion of women in the economy are large: closing the gender gap in Pakistan could boost GDP by about 30 percent.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Only around 6% of women are in formal employment compared to nearly 70% of men, excluding almost half the population from economic activity, limiting national productivity.

2. Education for girls in Yemen is severely limited due to poverty, early marriage, and social restrictions. As a result, female literacy rates and education levels remain low. This limits innovation and economic productivity as women's contribution to technology and business is restricted.

3. Overall household income decreases as unequal pay gaps affect the total household earnings which limits consumption affecting economic growth and productivity.

4. Lack of support for women entrepreneurs makes it harder for innovative women to start their own businesses which hinders the productivity of the country.

# data[].attributes.body
Civil conflict

Deforestation

Lack of property rights is associated with lower welfare and investment for the indigenous of land.

# data[].attributes.body
Change of political parties in the country.

Prioritizing agriculture

Indigenous losing their land, homes.

# data[].attributes.headline
Israeli Land Grabs in Historical Palestine

# data[].attributes.subject
Israeli Land Grabs in Historical Palestine

# data[].attributes.body
To take control over Indigenous peoples' lands, the Israeli government took different approaches:

1. declaration of Palestinian lands as state land (Between 1979 and 1992, 16% of the West Bank was declared as state land for Israeli settlements)

2. Military seizures: (November 2014, 12,852 dunams (3,176 acres) were confiscated of Palestinian land for military purposes.)

These land grasp cause the following economic effects:

1. Destruction of Palestinian crops and trees and contamination of agricultural lands: Palestinians dependent on their agricultural production for income, experienced major losses due to the destruction of corps by Israeli land grabs.

2. Barriers and land confiscations have forced many Palestinian farmers to seek permits to access their own lands, disrupting farming activities and leading to economic losses.

3. Increase in prices of agricultural products and fall in farmers incomes, pushing more people into poverty and increasing the inequality gap in Palestine/Israel.

4. The destruction of water wells and infrastructure by Israeli forces has further strained Palestinian agriculture, pushing production costs higher. More poor Palestinians cannot farm anymore as they can't afford farming anymore due to high water prices.