# data[].attributes.body
🔍 Problem

The poster highlights a common issue:

People show concern online (messages, emojis) but don’t take real action. This is called “bystander effect”—when everyone assumes someone else will help.

💡 Solutions

Take initiative: Don’t wait for others—check on the person yourself.

Direct communication: Knock on the door or call, not just text.

Assign responsibility: In groups, say “Can someone check now?” or volunteer.

Build community: Know your neighbors, especially elderly ones.

Emergency awareness: If something feels wrong, contact local authorities.

🔁 Similar Problems

Ignoring someone who looks unwell in public

Cyberbullying where people watch but don’t help

Accidents where crowds gather but no one acts

Social media “support” without real-life help

🧠 Key Idea

Caring is not enough—action saves lives.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
A photo taken after a fire in an apartment building. He lost his family belongings and sits on the sidewalk wrapped in a blanket. There are thousands of "Get well soon", "We are so sorry" comments and intense interaction under the post shared on social media. However, there is no information that the family is provided with shelter, clothing or financial support.

🕵️‍♂️ Problem:

People react emotionally to the event, comment and share. But no one offers direct help or initiates organized support. The digital crowd is growing, but real support is lacking.

⚖️ Missing Universal Value:

Solidarity, responsibility and social awareness.

💡 My Thoughts on My Digital Conscience:

Saying “get well soon” is a human reflex, but often it is not enough. Real need requires concrete support beyond interpretations. It is easy to witness pain in the digital world; what is difficult is to take steps to alleviate that pain. A blanket, a meal or a little support is worth more than a hundred reviews. Digital conscience is not just to be sad, but to share responsibility.

# data[].attributes.headline
After  The  Fıre  Moren Than  Just Words

# data[].attributes.subject
After  The  Fıre  Moren Than  Just Words

# data[].attributes.body
A photograph taken in the aftermath of an apartment fire. The family, having lost their belongings, sits on the sidewalk wrapped in blankets. Beneath the post shared on social media, there are thousands of comments—such as "We’re so sorry for your loss" and "We are deeply saddened"—along with intense engagement. However, there is no information indicating that the family has been provided with shelter, clothing, or financial assistance.

🕵️‍♂️ The Problem:

People react emotionally to the incident, posting comments and sharing the content. Yet, no one offers direct assistance or initiates an organized support effort. The digital crowd grows, but tangible support remains absent.

⚖️ The Missing Universal Value:

Solidarity, responsibility, and social consciousness.

💡 Reflections on My Digital Conscience:

Saying "I’m sorry for your loss" is a human reflex, but it is often insufficient. Real need calls for concrete support that goes beyond mere comments. In the digital realm, bearing witness to suffering is easy; what is difficult is taking steps to alleviate that suffering. A blanket, a meal, or a small gesture of support is worth more than hundreds of comments. A digital conscience is not merely about feeling sorrow, but about sharing the responsibility.

# data[].attributes.body
📸 Image Description: A dramatic social media post showing a line of fire devouring a forest near Bhimphedi, Nepal. The image is captured from a high angle, showing smoke blanketing the valley. The post has over 22,000 likes and hundreds of shares, serving as a digital alarm for a natural disaster in progress.

🕵️‍♂️ The Problem: I caught a post documenting a devastating forest fire. The engagement is high—22,000 likes—yet this creates a "Validation Paradox." People interact with the post as if their digital engagement provides a bucket of water to the flames. For many students, sharing a tragic photo of a burning forest feels like "doing their part," which often leads to a moral satisfaction that prevents them from demanding actual policy changes or adopting fire-preventative lifestyles.

⚖️ Missing Universal Value: Empathy and Proactive Stewardship.

💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection: This image illustrates "Slacktivism." When we see nature burning on our screens, our first instinct is to "share" rather than "act" or "reflect." The high number of likes on a disaster photo shows how we have become accustomed to consuming tragedy as content. Our digital conscience must move from being "alarmed online" to being "active offline"—supporting reforestation and fighting the climate crisis with more than just a screen tap.

📍 Caught by: Greece

# data[].attributes.body
📸 Image Description: A screenshot of an Instagram Reel from a cleanup creator showing a roadside heavily littered with plastic bottles, packaging, and waste. The caption says "Before and after Cleanup," featuring a person snapping their fingers to trigger a transition. The post has nearly 2,000 likes, symbolizing a trend where environmental restoration is consumed as "satisfying" content.

🕵️‍♂️ The Problem: I caught a post that turns environmental degradation and its cleanup into a 15-second entertainment clip. While it’s great to see areas being cleaned, the "snap of a finger" creates a false sense of ease. Young people watch these videos and feel a momentary sense of relief, but they often ignore the trash in their own neighborhoods because it doesn't come with a background music or a viral reward. The "digital dopamine" from watching someone else clean distracts us from our own lack of initiative.

⚖️ Missing Universal Value: Civic Duty and Consistency.

💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection: This image highlights the "Spectator Effect." We treat environmentalism as a spectator sport where we cheer from the sidelines. Clicking "like" on a cleanup video doesn't offset the plastic we use daily. We need to realize that real-world change isn't a quick digital transition; it’s a slow, unglamorous, and daily commitment to our environment.

📍 Caught by: Greece

# data[].attributes.body
Catch The Problem: Digital Pity vs. Real Compassion

📸 Image Description: A screenshot of a social media post showing a stray cat in a very neglected and unhealthy condition. The post has received 143 likes and 24 comments, representing high digital engagement. While users express their sadness through emojis and supportive comments, these digital interactions do not change the physical reality of the cat's suffering or provide the medical care it urgently needs.

🕵️‍♂️ The Problem: I caught a post highlighting the plight of a vulnerable animal. Despite the post receiving numerous likes and "sad" reactions, the cat's condition remains a physical reality that a digital "like" cannot heal. This represents the core issue of our project: young people respond quickly on social media with "digital sensitivity," but this often fails to transform into the concrete, real-life actions—such as volunteering at a shelter or providing food—needed to solve the actual problem.

⚖️ Missing Universal Value: Compassion and Responsibility.

💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection: This image perfectly illustrates the "Reaction vs. Action Gap". Clicking a heart icon or leaving a comment of pity makes us feel like we have fulfilled our moral duty, but without stepping outside to help a local stray or supporting animal welfare organizations, our "digital conscience" remains inactive. We must move beyond being mere digital observers and become active, responsible citizens who take real-world action.

📍 Caught by: GSRD GIRL AIH Hıgh School

# data[].attributes.body
Lyceum "Scientific" of Kropyvnytskyi City Council (Ukraine)

The problem: The use of artificial intelligence to create deepfake or highly edited videos that imitate reality and mislead viewers. Such content may combine real footage with artificially generated elements, making it appear authentic even when it is completely or partially fake. This creates a serious issue in social media, where people often consume information quickly and do not verify its accuracy. As a result, users may trust and spread content that does not reflect reality.

Description: The image shows a video that appears realistic but is actually digitally manipulated. Different visual elements are combined or altered using AI technologies, creating a scene that may not exist in real life. At first glance, the content looks believable, which makes it difficult for viewers to recognize that it has been edited or generated.

Missing value: Honesty and transparency are missing in this situation. The creator does not clearly indicate that the content is artificial or edited. This lack of openness can mislead viewers and reduce trust in online information, as people expect content to be truthful unless stated otherwise.

Digital Reaction: Many users may react emotionally and quickly — liking, sharing, or commenting on the video without checking its authenticity. This helps the content spread rapidly across platforms. Some users may even form opinions or beliefs based on this misleading information, which increases the negative impact.

Real action idea: Users should develop critical thinking and digital awareness. It is important to question suspicious or unrealistic content, check reliable sources, and avoid sharing information without verification. At the same time, content creators should take responsibility by clearly labeling AI-generated or edited media to maintain transparency and trust online.

# data[].attributes.body
Catch The Problem: Digital Engagement vs. Human Survival

📸 Image Description: A screenshot of a social media video showing a hungry child reaching deep into a large, nearly empty cooking pot to scrape for leftovers in Gaza. The post, titled "Children Struggling with Hunger in Gaza," has received over 2,400 likes and 106 comments. While the digital audience interacts with the video by liking and sharing, the child’s physical hunger remains an urgent, unaddressed reality.

🕵️‍♂️ The Problem: I caught a post highlighting a severe humanitarian crisis involving food insecurity. Despite the post receiving thousands of digital reactions, these "likes" do not provide a single meal to the child in the video. This represents the core issue of our project: young people respond quickly to humanitarian disasters on social media with "digital sensitivity," but this awareness often stops at the screen and fails to transform into the concrete, real-life actions needed to support those in need.

⚖️ Missing Universal Value: Helpfulness and Compassion.

💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection: This image perfectly illustrates the "Reaction vs. Action Gap". Watching a video of a starving child and clicking a "like" button can create a false sense of having helped, while the actual problem persists outside the digital world. To move beyond being mere digital observers, our "digital conscience" must push us to engage in real-world humanitarian support, such as supporting relief organizations or raising effective local awareness that leads to aid.

📍 Caught by: GSRD GIRL AIH Hıgh School

# data[].attributes.body
Catch The Problem: Digital Sympathy vs. Real-Life Poverty

📸 Image Description: A screenshot of a social media post showing a very poor and neglected kitchen in the Tosmur neighborhood. The kitchen has minimal supplies, a small portable stove, and a gas cylinder underneath, reflecting difficult living conditions. The post has garnered 1,203 likes and 223 comments, with many users expressing their concern digitally.

🕵️‍♂️ The Problem: I caught a post highlighting a family living in poverty. Despite the post receiving over 1,200 likes, these digital reactions do not put food on the table or improve the living conditions of this family. This represents the core issue of our project: young people respond quickly on social media with "digital sensitivity," but this often fails to transform into the concrete, real-life actions—such as local charity or community support—needed to solve the actual problem.

⚖️ Missing Universal Value: Responsibility and Helpfulness.

💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection: This image perfectly illustrates the "Reaction vs. Action Gap". Seeing a photo of someone’s struggle and clicking a heart icon makes us feel like we are part of a supportive community, but without taking a concrete step in real life to reduce poverty or help those in need, our "digital conscience" remains inactive. We must move beyond being digital observers and become active, responsible citizens who turn empathy into action.

📍 Caught by: GSRD GIRL AIH High School

# data[].attributes.body
Title: 'Save the little kitty'

Missing value: helpfulness, empathy, responsibility

# data[].attributes.headline
The story of the award winning reporter and the heart breaking photo:

# data[].attributes.subject
The story of the award winning reporter and the heart breaking photo:

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3qzxkANa0E

Eventually it wasn't enough that the reporter gave to the public such a photo.

My digital reflection:

It's not enough to make public tragic events while I can help, so long as I am there. It's not enough to expect others to take action or it's not enough just to shock or to gain a price for notifying people.

Action to save some human being or any other existance saves humanity, saves my own personal self respect and conscience.

Caught by student S.I.

# data[].attributes.body
The Problem:

Social media groups or comment sections can sometimes turn into places where people are excluded or put down. Suddenly removing a friend from a group, leaving mean comments on purpose, or sharing private info without permission creates a deep sense of loneliness for the other person. The "I'm behind a screen anyway" attitude makes us forget that there's a real person with real feelings on the other side.

Our Lost Values:

Unfortunately, we are losing our core values like kindness, respect, and supporting one another. When we forget that the words we type reach a real heart, our ability to empathize fades away. Instead of respecting boundaries, acting destructively causes our digital conscience to silently disappear.

# data[].attributes.body
When we delegate decisions to algorithms or artificial intelligence, we tend to blame the machine when an error occurs. We step aside, claiming, 'the system did it.

The Lost Value: Personal Responsibility. By transferring the responsibility for good and evil to software, we attempt to evade our moral burden.

# data[].attributes.body
Digital Problem: The Comparison Trap

Seeing everyone’s “perfect” moments on social media makes us compare ourselves unfairly. It slowly makes us feel like we’re not good enough.

Lost Value: Self-Confidence (Contentment)

When we compare our real life to filtered photos and edited videos, we forget our own achievements. This damages our confidence and stops us from appreciating what we already have

# data[].attributes.body
Problem:

Photos edited with filters and editing apps on social media distort the sense of reality, causing people to compare themselves with these artificial images and be negatively affected. This can lead to outcomes such as loss of self-confidence and unhappiness, especially among young people.

Lost Value:

In this process, values like honesty, naturalness, and empathy weaken; the responsibility to share more realistic content by considering others decreases, and the sense of digital conscience gradually fades.

# data[].attributes.headline
"Reverse" Digital Conscience & Real Connection

# data[].attributes.subject
"Reverse" Digital Conscience & Real Connection

# data[].attributes.body
​📌 Catch the Problem: "Reverse" Digital Conscience & Real Connection

​📸 Image Description: A screenshot of a messaging app showing several unanswered outgoing messages to a friend named Salvatore. Below the image, the text explains that although the friends barely text or keep in touch digitally, they always end up meeting and going out together in real life whenever one of them feels like it.

​🕵️‍♂️ The Problem:

I caught a post that highlights a "Reverse" digital conscience situation. In this case, there is a lack of "digital reaction"—the messages go ignored or are infrequent—yet there is strong "real-life action". While the project usually focuses on how we react digitally but do nothing in reality, this example shows the opposite: a deep real-world bond that doesn't rely on digital validation or constant online presence. It makes us question: Is our digital life supporting our real life, or is it just a substitute for it?

​⚖️ Missing Universal Value:

Sincerity and Reliability (in the digital context).

​💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection:

This example teaches us that a true bridge between digital and real life doesn't always mean being active on social media. However, it also points out a digital literacy issue: ignoring messages or failing to communicate digitally can sometimes cause misunderstandings. A healthy "digital conscience" should balance being responsive and respectful online while ensuring that our primary focus remains on concrete, real-life social behaviors and friendships.

​📍 Caught by: IC7 Pergolesi2-Italy

# data[].attributes.body
📌 Catch the Problem: The Dying Parrot & Digital Bystanders

​📸 Image Description: A screenshot of a social media post titled "The poor parrot" showing a bird stranded on top of a car. The text describes how people online kept saying they would have helped if they were there, yet two days later, the bird was found in the same spot, barely alive and almost dead.

​🕵️‍♂️ The Problem:

I caught a post that perfectly illustrates the "Reaction vs. Action Gap". While many people expressed digital sympathy and claimed they would take responsibility, no one actually took a concrete step to save the animal in real life. This digital sensitivity creates a false sense of being helpful, but as seen in this example, it does not prevent a tragedy in the physical world. People are "reacting" with words, but the bird is left to suffer because of a lack of "action".

​⚖️ Missing Universal Value:

Active Responsibility and Compassion.

​💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection:

This is a tragic example of the "Bystander Effect" amplified by social media. Saying "I would help" online is a low-effort reaction that provides no real-life benefit. Our project aims to bridge this gap by transforming such digital empathy into concrete social responsibility behaviors. A true digital conscience should push us to stop commenting and start acting before it is too late for those in need.

​📍 Caught by: IC7 Pergolesi2- Italy

# data[].attributes.headline
​📌 Catch the Problem: Loneliness & The Digital Paradox 

# data[].attributes.subject
​📌 Catch the Problem: Loneliness & The Digital Paradox 

# data[].attributes.body
​📸 Image Description: A screenshot of a social media post featuring an elderly woman sitting alone on a sidewalk, selling flowers. The post is overlayed with a large crying emoji and the text, "The loneliest people are the kindest". It has received over 700 likes and 40 comments, with viewers expressing digital sadness through emojis and quotes about loneliness.

​🕵️‍♂️ The Problem:

I caught a post that uses a real person's loneliness to gain digital engagement. While 723 people "liked" the post to show they care, the elderly woman remains alone on the street. This highlights a major issue: young people respond quickly to emotional content on social media by sharing posts or writing comments, but this "digital sensitivity" often stays behind the screen. People are reacting to the idea of her loneliness rather than taking a concrete action to help someone lonely in their own neighborhood.

​⚖️ Missing Universal Value:

Compassion and Empathy.

​💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection:

This is a classic "digital reaction". A "like" or a crying emoji feels like a supportive act, but it doesn't solve the woman's problem or offer her real companionship. Our project aims to help us recognize this difference. A true digital conscience should remind us that our responsibility doesn't end with a click; we need to transform this digital empathy into real-life social responsibility, such as visiting an elderly neighbor or supporting local street vendors.

​📍 Caught by: [Middle School of Glafki] Greece

# data[].attributes.headline
Plastic Pollution & The Illusion of "Liking" 

# data[].attributes.subject
Plastic Pollution & The Illusion of "Liking" 

# data[].attributes.body
​📸 Image Description: A screenshot of a social media post showing a river or valley completely overwhelmed by plastic waste and trash. The post is titled "The power of collective action" and has gained significant digital engagement with over 18,000 likes and nearly 200 comments. While the post calls for action, the vast majority of users interact by merely clicking a button or leaving a supportive comment.

​🕵️‍♂️ The Problem:

I caught a post highlighting a massive environmental disaster caused by plastic pollution. Despite the post receiving 18,000 likes, the pollution itself remains a physical reality that a "like" cannot clean up. This represents the core issue of our project: young people respond quickly on social media, but this "digital sensitivity" often fails to transform into the concrete, real-life actions needed to solve the actual problem.

​⚖️ Missing Universal Value:

Responsibility and Helpfulness.

​💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection:

This image perfectly illustrates the "Reaction vs. Action Gap". Seeing a video of a polluted river and clicking a heart icon makes us feel like we are part of the solution, but without stepping outside to reduce our own waste or participate in local clean-ups, our "digital conscience" remains inactive. We must move beyond being digital observers and become active, responsible citizens.

​📍 Caught by: [Private Secondary School "Leonardo da Vinci", Dobrich]Bulgaria

# data[].attributes.body
📸 Image Description: A screenshot of a viral social media video showing a massive forest fire consuming a pine ridge. The post has over 600 likes and hundreds of shares. While the comments are filled with "Fire" emojis and "Pray for nature" messages, the digital engagement focuses on the visual shock rather than sharing actual prevention methods or support for firefighting efforts.

​🕵️‍♂️ The Problem:

I caught a post showing a devastating wildfire in a forested area. Although the post reached a high number of people (over 600 likes and 600 shares), the interaction remains purely "digital sensitivity". People are sharing the disaster as a "spectacle" or a sad news item, but this digital reaction does not turn into concrete environmental action or awareness about the causes of such fires. We "react" to the smoke on our screens but forget the "action" needed to protect our real-world lungs.

​⚖️ Missing Universal Value:

Environmental Responsibility and Active Citizenship.

​💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection:

This is a clear example of the gap between digital reaction and real-life behavior. Clicking "share" on a disaster video gives a false sense of having "done something" for the environment. However, a true digital conscience should bridge this gap. Instead of just being a digital bystander to destruction, we must internalize the value of responsibility and transform our empathy into real-world prevention and sustainability habits.

​📍 Caught by: [Private Secondary School "Leonardo da Vinci", Dobrich] -

# data[].attributes.headline
Unrealistic Beauty Standards on Social Media

# data[].attributes.subject
Unrealistic Beauty Standards on Social Media

# data[].attributes.body
This image shows how social media can create artificial beauty. In the mirror we see a face that is being “changed” by many hands. It symbolizes filters, editing apps, and the pressure to look perfect online.

On social media people often post heavily edited photos that show an unrealistic version of beauty. As a result, many users start comparing themselves to these images and may feel insecure or dissatisfied with their appearance.

This behavior can harm important values such as honesty, authenticity, and self-acceptance. Social media should not force people to hide their real appearance.

To solve this problem, we should promote natural beauty, diversity, and realistic content. Sharing authentic photos and supporting others instead of judging them can make social media a healthier and more positive space.

# data[].attributes.body
Deniz TTVMTAL

# data[].attributes.headline
THE POWER OF WORDS:THINK BEFORE SHARING SOMEONE'S MISTAKE

# data[].attributes.subject
THE POWER OF WORDS:THINK BEFORE SHARING SOMEONE'S MISTAKE

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
📸 Image Description:(A screenshot of a video titled 'Vicdanların Sesi' (The Voice of Consciences) shows a stray mother cat and her kittens eating food on a sidewalk. The post has 1,599 likes and 194 comments. The hashtags #kedibesleme (cat feeding) and #feedingcats are used. It is a heartwarming scene that usually generates a lot of digital sympathy.)🕵️‍♂️ The Problem:I caught this post because "The Voice of Conscience" shouldn't just be a video title; it should be a lifestyle. With 1,599 likes, it shows people have empathy for stray animals. However, the 'problem' is that many people feel they have fulfilled their moral duty just by watching and liking these videos. In the digital world, we love "cute kittens," but in the real world, stray animals often face cruelty or indifference.⚖️ Missing Universal Value:Sincerity and Active Compassion.💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection:Conscience is not a 'sound' or a 'like' button; it is a movement. Digital sympathy is easy and free, but real compassion requires effort—like providing food, shelter, or advocating for animal rights. We must ask ourselves: "Am I liking this because I care, or am I liking this to feel like a good person without doing anything?"📍 Caught by: Celebi Mehmet AIHL (Türkiye 🇹🇷)

# data[].attributes.headline
The Sound of Conscience vs. The Silence of Action

# data[].attributes.subject
The Sound of Conscience vs. The Silence of Action

# data[].attributes.body
📸 Image Description:

(A screenshot of a social media video from a formal account showing elderly ladies in a care facility or a social gathering. They are seated in comfortable chairs, some with walking aids (walkers) and flowers nearby. The post has over 12.4K 'likes' and 348 comments. It appears to be a heartwarming scene, but it serves as a point of reflection for our project on how we interact with the elderly in the digital age. Note: The source account is a public institution, which complies with e-Safety standards.)

🕵️‍♂️ The Problem:

I caught this post because it represents a common digital habit: "Applauding from a distance." 12,400 people 'liked' this video, showing that they appreciate seeing elderly people being cared for. However, the 'problem' we are catching here is the gap between a digital click and a real-world visit. Often, while thousands of people like such videos on their screens, many elderly people in our own neighborhoods or families still feel lonely. Digital conscience asks us: "Is your 'like' enough, or should you be the one holding their hand?"

⚖️ Missing Universal Value:

Active Compassion and Intergenerational Responsibility.

💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection:

Clicking a heart icon on a video of the elderly is a sweet reaction, but it is passive. A true digital conscience should remind us that our responsibility doesn't end on the screen. We shouldn't let digital 'likes' replace real-world 'visits.' Instead of just being happy that aCare facility is doing its job, we should ask ourselves when we last visited an elderly neighbor or a relative. Real compassion requires time and presence, not just data usage.

📍 Caught by: Celebi Mehmet AIHL (Türkiye 🇹🇷)

# data[].attributes.body
📸 Image Description:

(A screenshot of a short-video social media post on TikTok, showing a split-screen comparison. The left side, titled 'Yangından Önce' (Before the Fire), depicts a green, lush forest with wind turbines against a blue sea background. The right side, titled 'Yangından Sonra' (After the Fire), shows the same landscape completely scorched, black, and desolate, with a dry, dirt foreground. The top text overlay (originally in Turkish) states: '1 Yangın = Bir Hayatın Sonu' (1 Fire = The End of a Life). The important details are the text overlay asking "Bu hale gelmemesi için ne yapılmalı?" (What should be done to prevent it from becoming like this?) and "Sen ne düşünüyorsun?" (What do you think?), and the extremely high number of 'Like' reactions (231.3K), 8,460 comments, and 1,932 shares. This high interaction indicates massive digital support and awareness, but also reveals a pervasive problem: environmental negligence or helplessness. Note: The source account username '@cevreagaci' is a known environmental organization account, so it complies with e-Safety.)

🕵️‍♂️ The Problem:

I caught this post because it shows a powerful disconnect between a massive digital response and a worsening real-world problem. 231.3K people 'liked' this heartbreaking comparison. However, the fact that such devastating fires continue to happen means that the vast majority of people are just 'reacting' digitally, rather than taking concrete 'action' in their real lives (e.g., not littering, reporting hazards, active conservation, behavior change). A true digital conscience should point out that these reactions did not stop the fire, and as a society, we should be doing much more in the digital and physical world to prevent this from happening, rather than just clicking an emoji after it is too late. We are celebrating the 'awareness' but ignoring the 'problem maker'. This is not a physical trash issue; it is a critical awareness problem.

⚖️ Missing Universal Value:

Environmental Responsibility and Critical Awareness.

💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection:

Liking a video about a forest fire doesn't prevent it or bring back the lost ecosystem. A true digital conscience must remind us that the only solution is a real behavior change. We need to stop creating the problem. Instead of being proud of 231.3K people being aware, we should be sad that after this tragedy, people still haven't learned to take care of their environment. Liking something doesn't change reality; our actions do. This isn't just a physical trash issue; it's a serious conscience issue.

📍 Caught by: Celebi Mehmet AIHL (Türkiye 🇹🇷)

# data[].attributes.body
📸 Image Description:

(A screenshot of a short-video social media post from the account '@cevreagaci'. The video continues a forest cleanup story. It shows the same forest area from a different angle, with a large pile of plastic bottles and cardboard, along with a cleaner path. The important details are the text overlay that says "Evet bugün iki yüzüncü..." (Yes, today is our 200th...) and the caption text "Bugün 200. Günümüz..." (Today is our 200th day...). The post has a very high number of 'Like' reactions (38.1K), indicating massive support for the cleanup, but it reveals a pervasive problem: environmental negligence. Note: The username '@cevreagaci' is a known environmental organization account, so it complies with e-Safety.)

🕵️‍♂️ The Problem:

I caught this post because it shows a powerful disconnect between digital celebration and real-world results. People are celebrating the 'cleanliness' process, which is great. It has 38.1K 'likes'. However, the fact that it is now the 200th Day means that new trash is being dumped just as fast as it is being cleaned, or that people continue to ignore the core issue. The digital world is celebrating a 'cleaning process', but a 'digital conscience' should ask: "Why is this still a problem after 200 days?" We are celebrating the 'cleanup' but ignoring the 'problem maker'. This is not a physical trash issue; it is a critical awareness problem.

⚖️ Missing Universal Value:

Environmental Responsibility and Consistency in Action.

💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection:

Liking a video of someone cleaning up a mess is good, but it is not enough. A true digital conscience must remind us that the only solution is a real behavior change. We need to stop creating the problem. Instead of being proud of 200 days of cleaning, we should be sad that after 200 days, people still haven't learned to take care of their environment. Liking something doesn't change reality; our actions do.

📍 Caught by: Celebi Mehmet AIHL (Türkiye 🇹🇷)

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
📸 Image Description:(A screenshot of a short-video social media post reporting the tragic story of a 17-year-old high school student. The text overlay (originally in Turkish) states: 'The life of 17-year-old high school student Aylin ..., which started with peer bullying, ended on the train tracks!' The video shows a split-screen with the 'Haciosman Station' sign at the top and blurred photos of young people at the bottom. The post has a very high interaction rate: 23.3K likes, 2,289 comments, and 1,759 shares, which indicates that many people are reacting to this tragedy, but it also reflects a pervasive problem of youth distress.)🕵️‍♂️ The Problem:I caught this post because it shows the extreme, worst-case scenario and real-life consequences of peer bullying. The sarsıcı (tragic) fact is that a young life was lost due to bullying. There are thousands of 'likes' and 'reactions' (23.3K) to this post. While these 'likes' probably mean sympathy, they are just 'reactions' to a completed tragedy. A true digital conscience should point out that these reactions did not stop the bullying, and as a society, we should be doing much more in the digital and physical world to prevent this from happening, rather than just clicking an emoji after it is too late.⚖️ Missing Universal Value:Kindness, Compassion, and Active Prevention (Intervention).💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection:Liking a news story about a suicide is a reaction, but it doesn't change anything. A true digital conscience must move beyond being a bystander. We need to turn our digital awareness into real-world action. If we see bullying, we must not 'like' it or 'stay silent'. We must report it, support the victim, and build a more compassionate community. This isn't just a social media trend; it's a matter of life and death.📍 Caught by: Celebi Mehmet AIHL (Türkiye 🇹🇷)

# data[].attributes.body
Cyberbullying constitutes a serious problem within digital environments. With the rapid growth of social media, online gaming, and other digital platforms, individuals—especially teenagers—are increasingly exposed to harassment, threats, and harmful behavior. This not only affects mental health but can also lead to social isolation and decreased academic performance. Addressing cyberbullying requires awareness, education, and effective digital safety measures to create a safer online space for everyone."

SHORTCOMİNS OF CYBERBULLYİNG İN THE DİGİTAL ENVİRONMENT :

Here’s a clear English answer about what can be done to address cyberbullying:

What Can We Do About Cyberbullying?

To reduce cyberbullying, both individuals and platforms need to take responsibility. Several actions can help:

1. Raise awareness

People should be educated about what cyberbullying is and why it is harmful.

→ Schools and families play an important role.

2. Report and block

Victims should report abusive behavior and block harmful users.

→ This helps limit the spread of bullying.

3. Stronger platform policies

Social media platforms should improve their rules and enforce stricter punishments.

→ This increases deterrence.

4. Better moderation systems

Using advanced technology and human moderators can help detect harmful content faster.

→ Early education is key.

Conclusion:

Cyberbullying can be reduced through awareness, responsibility, and stronger systems. Everyone has a role in creating a safer digital environment.

Caught by: KEREM AYDINLAR SCİENCE HİGH SCHOOL İN TÜRKİYE

# data[].attributes.body
Missing Value:

Honesty and Self-Awareness

Digital Reaction:

People admire these posts and compare their lives instead of questioning reality.

Real Action Idea:

People should remember that social media is not always real and avoid comparing themselves to others.

Caught by:Kerem Aydınlar Science High School -Türkiye

# data[].attributes.body
📍The shortcomings of the problem

🕵🏻‍♀️>Today, social media and the internet have become an important part of our lives. People now learn about the news mostly from social media instead of television. However, this situation also causes fake news to spread very quickly. Fake news can mislead people, create fear, and cause a lack of trust in society. For this reason, fighting fake news is everyone's responsibility.

First of all, we should not believe a piece of news immediately when we see it. We should pay attention to which website shared the news. Some unreliable pages may share false information just to attract attention. It is also very important to check the date of the news. An old news story may be shared again, and people may think it is a new event. Therefore, we must check the news carefully before sharing it.

In addition, searching the same news on different sources can help us understand whether it is fake or not. If the news exists only on one website, it is probably not true. Also, if the title is very exaggerated and tries to scare people, it may be fake news. For this reason, instead of sharing everything we see, we should think and research first.

In conclusion, we need to be responsible internet users to fight fake news. Spreading correct information and not sharing false news is everyone's responsibility. If we are careful, we can protect both ourselves and other people from fake news.

📍Description of the problem:

🕵🏻‍♀️>1. honesty

Some people knowingly share false information. This shows that the value of honesty is missing.

2. Responsibility

People should check information before sharing it. However, many people share posts without verifying them.

3.Trust

Fake news reduces people's trust in each other and in the media.

4.Respect

False information can sometimes harm a person or a group. This shows a lack of respect.

5. Empathy

Not thinking about how sharing fake news can affect others shows a lack of empathy.

6. Conscious Internet Use

Everyone should be careful when trying to reach correct information, but many people do not pay attention to this.

7.Justice

False news can cause people to be blamed unfairly. This shows a lack of justice.

8. Truthfulness

Not valuing the truth allows fake news to spread easily.

Main Idea of the Topic:

💡Integrity, safe and healthy information

School Name:KEREM AYDINLAR SCIENCE HIGH SCHOOL in Türkiye🇹🇷

# data[].attributes.body
The Problem:

We share stunning visual content on social media and call for "equality" and "awareness." However, we often forget to add "Alt-Text" (Alternative Text) to our images. When visually impaired individuals use screen readers, they only hear meaningless file names like "Image 1" or "IMG_123.jpg." We show a digital "Reaction" by posting, but we fail to take "Action" for true accessibility. We are silently excluding them from the digital world.

Missing Universal Value:

Inclusivity, Equality, and Empathy.

My Digital Conscience Reflection:

True digital conscience means leaving no one behind. Making a post accessible for everyone takes only 10 seconds, but it is a fundamental digital responsibility. If our information or beauty cannot be reached by everyone, there is a lack of conscience. We must make the digital world fair for all.

Caught by: Kerem Aydınlar Science High School- Türkiye

# data[].attributes.headline
Justification of violence is a significant problem

# data[].attributes.subject
Justification of violence is a significant problem

# data[].attributes.body
Lyceum "Scientific" of Kropyvnytskyi City Council (Ukraine 🇺🇦).

⚡️The problem: hate speech on the Internet (Telegram).

✏️Description: I found a post with news about the attack and injury of a police officer in the Kirovohrad region. One of the comments on the post contains justifications for violence against police officers and actually blames the victim.

😢 Missing value: compassion and empathy.

📱Digital reaction: people can write a comment in support of the injured person.

🤝 Real reaction idea: financial assistance to the injured, educational activities against violence.

# data[].attributes.body
Problem Name: Cyberbullying on TikTok (body shaming)

Missing Value: Respect and empathy Digital Reaction: People post toxic comments about appearance or use "laughing" emojis.

Real Action Idea: We should report harmful comments and write words of support to the person being bullied.

# data[].attributes.body
Catch the Problem: Toxic humor and normalizing bullying online ​ Image Description: (A screenshot of a TikTok video with text overlay saying “Unpopular opinion: Bullying is actually fun.” The caption below reads: “Fr tho Like it’s the victim’s fault for being so easy to pick on??…” The post has hundreds of likes and comments, suggesting that many users are engaging with or reacting to this harmful statement, possibly without questioning it.) ​ The Problem: I caught this post because it disguises bullying as humor and shifts responsibility onto the victim. By presenting harmful behavior as a joke, it makes cruelty seem acceptable and discourages people from taking the issue seriously. This spreads harmful attitudes and normalizes cruelty instead of questioning it. ​ Missing Universal Value: Empathy, accountability and respect for others. ​ My Digital Conscience Reflection: Engaging with content like this without questioning it can silently support harmful ideas. Even when something is presented as a joke, it can still cause harm. A strong digital conscience means recognizing when “humor” crosses the line and refusing to support it. Instead of engaging with harmful content, we should promote kindness and help create a more respectful online environment. ​ Caught by: LEPL Tbilisi public school N150 - Georgia

# data[].attributes.headline
Stop the Chaos: The Fight Against Digital Fakes

# data[].attributes.subject
Stop the Chaos: The Fight Against Digital Fakes

# data[].attributes.body
Problem: The rapid spread of unverified information and "fake news" on social media platforms.

School Name / Country: "Naukovyi" Lyceum / Ukraine

Problem Name: Spread of misinformation and "fake news"

Missing Value: Responsibility and Honesty

Digital Reaction: People often share unverified posts quickly, which leads to confusion and panic.

Real Action Idea: We must double-check sources using official channels and fact-checking tools before sharing. Instead of reacting emotionally, we should promote critical thinking and guide others to reliable information.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Center for Information, Technology, & Public Life on X: ”“Labeling “disinformation” as “censorshi… | Communication illustration, Censorship art, Social media poster

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Center for Information, Technology, & Public Life on X: ”“Labeling “disinformation” as “censorship” is a lazy and inaccurate, but effective, frame.” Read the latest “Sounds Off” from CITAP from @alicetiara https://t.co/lMAamevzhB https://t.co/17CljltcuF” / X

# data[].attributes.body
📌 Catch the Problem:

humor and bullying online

​📸 Image Description:

(A screenshot of a TikTok video with funny comments about his dancing style. The post has thousands of likes and comments, suggesting that he dances very funny, as if he's drunk.

​🕵️‍♂️ The Problem:

I came across this post because a child who is really talented and dances well was bullied because of his interesting dancing skills. Making a joke out of dancing leaves a cruel impression and prevents people from taking the issue seriously.

​⚖️ Missing Universal Value:

Empathy, accountability and respect for others.

​💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection:

Discussing such content without questioning it can secretly support bullying of young, talented children. Even when something is presented as a joke, it can still hurt someone. Bullying is cruel. We should encourage kindness and help create a more respectful online environment.

​📍 Caught by: LEPL Tbilisi public school N150 - Georgia

# data[].attributes.body
📌 Catch the Problem: Promoting violence online

📸 Image Description:

(A video shows a girl being bullied by others while someone records the situation instead of helping. The video has many views and reactions, which shows that people are watching and engaging with it. The account appears to be accessible to  public, which is important to recognize for digital safety awareness.)

🕵️‍♂️ The Problem:

I caught this post because it shows a serious issue—bullying being turned into content. Instead of helping the girl, someone chose to film and share her distress online. The fact that the video gains attention through views and likes makes the situation worse, as it spreads harm and humiliation. This is a clear example of “Digital Bystanding,” where people witness harm but choose not to act.

Missing Universal Value:

Empathy, Respect, and Responsibility.

💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection:

Recording someone being bullied instead of helping them is not okay. A true digital conscience means standing up for others, not turning their pain into entertainment. We should think before we share or like such content and ask ourselves if we are helping or harming. Real responsibility means choosing kindness and action, both online and in real life.

📍 Caught by: [public school 150] – Georgia

# data[].attributes.body
A screenshot of a social media video shows a theatre troupe…two beautiful and talented children are dancing. The post has a high number of 'Like' reactions (24.5K), many people support them, but also reveals a massive problem: bullying. I caught this post because it shows two beautiful, talented person, dancing. The post has a huge amount of 'likes, which means people 'react' positively, but the core problem is that someone (or many people) bullies him, because of his style of dancing. We should support him and say loudly that he is very talented!

​

Caught by: 150 public school, Georgia.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
TikTok · Mothership (@mothershipsg) on TikTok

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
511K likes, 6623 comments. “Bullying cases in China have gained significant traction in recent years, with many alleging that juvenile punishments are too mild. The high profile bullying and killing of a 13-year-old boy by three other minors in Northern China in March 2024 triggered widespread outrage, after which authorities vowed to crack down on school bullying. On Jan. 2 this year, another death of a teenage boy who had fallen from his school dormitory in Pucheng, Shaanxi Province also sparked violent protests after netizens deemed his death unnatural.”

# data[].attributes.headline
📌 Catch the Problem:

Toxic humor and normalizing bullying online

# data[].attributes.subject
📌 Catch the Problem:

Toxic humor and normalizing bullying online

# data[].attributes.body
​📸 Image Description:

(A screenshot of a TikTok video with text overlay saying “Unpopular opinion: Bullying is actually fun.” The caption below reads: “Fr tho Like it’s the victim’s fault for being so easy to pick on??…” The post has hundreds of likes and comments, suggesting that many users are engaging with or reacting to this harmful statement, possibly without questioning it.)

​🕵️‍♂️ The Problem:

I caught this post because it disguises bullying as humor and shifts responsibility onto the victim. By presenting harmful behavior as a joke, it makes cruelty seem acceptable and discourages people from taking the issue seriously. This spreads harmful attitudes and normalizes cruelty instead of questioning it.

​⚖️ Missing Universal Value:

Empathy, accountability and respect for others.

​💡 My Digital Conscience Reflection:

Engaging with content like this without questioning it can silently support harmful ideas. Even when something is presented as a joke, it can still cause harm. A strong digital conscience means recognizing when “humor” crosses the line and refusing to support it. Instead of engaging with harmful content, we should promote kindness and help create a more respectful online environment.

​📍 Caught by: LEPL Tbilisi public school N150 - Georgia