# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Loggers Couldn’t Believe What They Found in the Middle of a Tree!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Snowboarder Girl Chased By Bear I Was Singing Rihanna Work And Didn't Know It Was Behind Me!

# data[].attributes.body
e.g. We think that it is REAL! Another website (www. ???) mentions that ...

# data[].attributes.body
its fake. after some research from straits time and cna which are reliable sources, we found out that The Housing and Development Board (HDB) is filing a police report over a hoax photo of Build-To-Order project Waterway Terraces in Punggol that has been circulating online.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/hdb-files-police-report-over-punggol-waterway-terraces-photo-hoax

https://www.facebook.com/ChannelNewsAsia/posts/no-there-wasnt-a-roof-collapse-at-punggol-waterway-terraces-but-a-false-report-a/10154079797497934/

# data[].attributes.body
Fake

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/hdb-files-police-report-over-punggol-waterway-terraces-photo-hoax

https://mothership.sg/2016/11/all-singapore-stuff-posts-hoax-about-collapsed-roof-at-punggol-waterway-terraces-made-spfscdf-go-down-to-investigate/

Confirmed by straits times and mothership.sg. The collapsed area appears to be an optical illusion from a block behind the main building

Therefore its fake

# data[].attributes.body
It’s real. The source is originated from a government website, fs.fed.us It shows evidence of the mummified dog in the log. It also has other reliable information of other factual incidents. Thus source 2 is real.

# data[].attributes.body
From our contextual knowledge, we can definitely tell that the sound of the bear is a stock sound and the animation of the bear is not really that realistic, with animation almost similar to Masha and the Bear, with makes it worse that the texture of the bear is too soft for the camera quality.

When cross-referencing to https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/article/bears-really-do-chase-skiers-but-this-video-is-fake , which is a reliable source based on my contextual knowledge, it claims that the bear is fake and hence I shall believe it is fake.

# data[].attributes.body
Source 3 is fake as there are more reliable sources such as CNA certified facebook account and MCI ( Ministry of Communications and information ) certified account both came up to clarify that the floor of Punggol Waterway Terraces did not collapse and that the news is a hoax
https://www.facebook.com/ChannelNewsAsia/posts/no-there-wasnt-a-roof-collapse-at-punggol-waterway-terraces-but-a-false-report-a/10154079797497934/
https://www.facebook.com/SingaporeMCI/videos/414028469419927/

# data[].attributes.body
fake

we searched up the sources mentioned in the video, and they turned out to be websites that are completely unrelated to the news.
we also found the real video on youtube, and its contents and story were completely different from the video in source 2.

# data[].attributes.body
this source is fake.
official statement made by national geographic website :
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/article/bears-really-do-chase-skiers-but-this-video-is-fake

# data[].attributes.body
david ridlen commented on the youtube video that the perspective matched the last angle perfectly. He is a VFX of 20 years and quite well known

# data[].attributes.body
Source 3 is false. When i cross refer to straitstimes.com, it holds a different view form the source, as it tells me that it is a hoax, the source states” The Housing and Development Board (HDB) is filing a police report over a hoax photo of Build-To-Order project Waterways Terraces in Punggol that has been circulating online.” This means that source 3 is unreliable as the newspaper has stated it is a hoax. Since straitstime.com contradicts the source 3 it is unreliable and hence not useful.

Source 3 is false when its purpose is considered. The source is mainly produced due to the unhappiness of the previous owners of the units who are unsatisfied with the workmanship to the premises. This led to them having an ulterior motive to tarnish the reputation of the living complex by releasing the doctored photo hoping that future residents would not purchase a unit there. Since the photo has an ulterior motive, it cannot be trusted.

# data[].attributes.body
Source 2 is real. By cross referring to other sources online,
https://www.agweb.com/news/crops/crop-production/bizarre-mystery-mummified-🤬-dog-solved-after-40-years
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/08/17/fact-check-mummified-dog-hollow-tree-display-georgia-museum/8121549002/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/dog-found-mummified-inside-tree/
We can see that other other news sources have also covered it. The YouTube channel
“

# data[].attributes.body
I was there to confirm it’s real

# data[].attributes.body
Fake. By referring to other online sources that are proven to be reliable, the majority of them deduced that the video was edited. Furthermore, the source “JSS CCE” is not reliable as they do not have a large subscriber base(15), neither are they verified.