# data[].attributes.body
The author clearly mentions the four branches of research she is contributing to and summarizes them in one to two sentences each.

The research gap is clear due to the novelty of the instrument and she clearly distinguishes her work from a previous study concerned with the same instrument.

The LR is quite short which seems like a big pro as literature is summarized by their common results

# data[].attributes.headline
A Review of Machine Learning Methods Applied to Structural Dynamics andVibroacoustic

# data[].attributes.subject
A Review of Machine Learning Methods Applied to Structural Dynamics andVibroacoustic

# data[].attributes.body
The Abstract states the areas that are covered by the review

-Machine Learning Literature state of the art

-SHM
-Active Control powered by Machine Learning
-Vibroacoustic Product Design by Physics-Driven
Surrogates

On Future Trends and Perspectives:
-Digital Twins
-Physics Guided Machine Learning
-Research gaps and emerging opportunities

# data[].attributes.body
- well defined research question and research gap
- hypothesis are derived from literature
- authors emphasize their contribution
- understandably written

- now the literature is not up-to-date

# data[].attributes.body
Pros

well structured - starts with a key definition, an illumination of the importance of the subject; key literature has been mentioned and critically evaluated - a gap identified
the goal of the study is clear enough

literature review is divided into subchapters with good headings

red threat

a good line of argument
convincing arguments

a gap identified - the contribution of the research is clear to the reader;

the importance of the subject and of the research question has been well explained

argumentation is clear and convincing

good reading flow

cons

too long
several gaps
perhaps a summery is needed