# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Nurturing the Next-Generation AI Workforce: A Snapshot of AI Education in China’s Public Education System

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
During the past decade, China has made rapid advances in technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and emerged as a leader in many high-tech fields

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
AI Thailand | แผนปฏิบัติการด้านปัญญาประดิษฐ์แห่งชาติเพื่อการพัฒนาประเทศไทย (พ.ศ. 2565 - 2570) - AI Thailand

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
ดาวน์โหลดแผนปฏิบัติการด้านปัญญาประดิษฐ์แห่งชาติเพื่อการพัฒนาประเทศไทย (พ.ศ. 2565 - 2570)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
AI PORTUGAL 2030 - NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR AI Policy - OECD.AI

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The AI Portugal 2030 strategy aims to foster a collective process mobilizing citizens at large and key stakeholders in particular, towards building-up a knowledge intensive labour-market with a strong community of forefront companies producing and exporting AI technologies supported by research and innovation communities involved in excellent high level research.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education has the potential to further customise and personalise students' learning, and encourage self-directed learning. It can also augment teachers' professional practice by automating routine tasks and allowing teachers to spend more time with students and provide more complex guidance to advance learning. However, inappropriate AI use may impede the development of critical thinking skills in students or propagate misinformation.

In Singapore, the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) has introduced the Model AI Governance Framework to guide the responsible deployment of AI solutions. The Implementation and Self-Assessment Guide for Organisations (ISAGO) was also created to help organisations align their AI governance practices with the Model AI Governance Framework.

Specifically, the Ministry of Education has developed the AI-in-Education (AIEd) Ethics Framework, which builds on the Model AI Governance Framework to address education-specific use and risks, and incorporates key beliefs from the Ethos of the Teaching Profession.

The MOE AIEd Ethics Framework seeks to:

1. Guide the safe and responsible development and governance of AIEd systems used for teaching and learning, e.g. by providing key implementation considerations to MOE HQ personnel overseeing AIEd projects and school users deploying and using AIEd systems; and

2. Ensure our AIEd practices are in alignment with our professional beliefs as expressed in our Ethos of the Teaching Profession.

Overview

The MOE AIEd Ethics Framework outlines four principles of Agency, Inclusivity, Fairness and Safety.

Agency

AIEd systems should preserve students' and teachers' choice and control over important personal and professional decisions. Students should be able to decide what, when or how they wish to learn, while teachers should also be able to influence AI-supported decisions.

How agency is practised

To allow our teachers to remain key in designing and facilitating learning experiences which cater to students' learning needs, in line with our Singapore Curriculum Philosophy, we:

Ensure a suitable level of human involvement in AI-supported decision-making.

Guide teachers in exercising professional judgment on how to use AI in an educationally meaningful manner, to allow continued opportunities for the development of, and not diminishing critical competencies such as 21 st Century Competencies.

¹ The Student Learning Space (SLS) is Singapore's national online learning platform.

Inclusivity

We believe that every child can learn and achieve. All users, regardless of background or abilities, should be able to reap the benefits of AIEd systems.

How inclusivity is practised

To provide opportunities for all students, we:

Fairness

AIEd systems should be free from biasand be accurate. The use of AIEd systems should also be transparent (made known to users) and their outputs should be explainable (users should be able to understand why the AIEd system made a particular decision).

How fairness is practised

To equip teachers with accurate information to address students' learning gaps and promote positive impact on students, we:

Avoid data bias by having sufficient representative data for training of centrally deployed AIEd systems.

Make users aware of the use of AIEd systems by being transparent.

Communicate the reason(s) behind decisions made by AIEd systems to users.

Ensure outputs from AIEd systems are accurate and applied within its intended purpose and context.

Safety

Learners' interests, privacy and well-being should be protected, and measures should be in place to ensure the safe use of AIEd systems.

How safety is practised

To fulfil our duty of care towards students and allow them to have a safe learning environment, we:

Ensure data privacy and security.

Have clear accountability and risk management procedures.

Avoid negative social and psychological effects on students and teachers.

² See usage policies or terms of service for ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude.

Educator Resources

Teachers who wish to learn more about the AIEd Ethics Framework to guide their use of AI for teaching and learning can access this lesson on SLS:

· AIEd Ethics Primer

Teachers who are planning to deploy AIEd applications in small-scale localised trials in one or a few schools should complete the following checklist:

· MOE Ethical AIEd Implementation Checklist (requires access to MOE Intranet)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education has the potential to further customise and personalise students' learning, and encourage self-directed learning. It can also augment teachers' professional practice by automating routine tasks and allowing teachers to spend more time with students and provide more complex guidance to advance learning.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Overview

As part of Singapore's National Artificial Intelligence (AI) Strategy, as well as to support the implementation of the EdTech Masterplan 2030, MOE is enhancing the capabilities of the Singapore Student Learning Space (SLS) with AI learning tools to support greater customisation of learning for our students and to augment our teachers' professional practice.

Adaptive Learning System

The AI-enabled Adaptive Learning System uses machine learning to make customised learning recommendations for each student, based on how the student responds to questions and activities as they learn a topic.

In June 2023, MOE launched the Adaptive Learning System for Mathematics for three topics covered at the Primary 5 level. The Adaptive Learning System will be expanded progressively to include more topics, levels and subjects.

Learning Feedback Assistants

From December 2023, two Learning Feedback Assistants, namely the Language Feedback Assistant for English and the Short Answer Feedback Assistant, will be made available via the SLS.

Language Feedback Assistant for English

The Language Feedback Assistant for English provides basic feedback on students' writing in areas such as spelling and grammar, allowing teachers to focus on guiding students in the more complex aspects of language construction, and to develop higher-level skills like creative expression, persuasiveness and tone.

Short Answer Feedback Assistant

The Short Answer Feedback Assistant provides suggested grades and auto-generated content-related feedback for close-ended, short answer questions for any subject and level. This allows teachers to more quickly provide feedback by automatically generating a first draft of grades and comments that they can edit and build on.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Learn about the use of artificial intelligence tools to support your child's learning.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
European Commission - European Commission

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
EU AI Act: What it means for universities

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The European Parliament has been the first to enact a regulatory framework for AI. A risk-based approach to the classification of AI assigns obligations proportionate to the level of risk posed by each AI system.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Artificial Intelligence and Education - Education - www.coe.int

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In a world rapidly transformed by technology, education remains at the heart of progress, and the Council of Europe is committed to fostering a nuanced and inclusive understanding of the multifaceted relationship between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and education, guided by the principles of human rights, democracy, and inclusivity that define the Council of Europe's mission.