# data[].attributes.body
Should be concrete outlines, goals or merits set out for these kind of processes to assure equity and fairness.

# data[].attributes.body
In the moment - acknowledge importance of having a list that is more representative of Canadian society/population.

# data[].attributes.body
Go back and re-do exercise to try and select a more diverse group. Could ask for guidance to incorporate when re-doing process.

# data[].attributes.body
Discuss process individual went through in the selection process

# data[].attributes.body
Director to provide clearer guidance - help to select a better, more diverse team.

# data[].attributes.body
Re-assess qualifications of those selected and look for opportunities to include racialized colleagues on the list

# data[].attributes.body
Specific to DOJ - based on high profile situation and visible opportunity, in addition to issue with lack of diversity, issue with lack of appearance of diversity. Complex, high profile situation, Government meant to reflect diversity of Canadian population, may impact efficacy or undermine the initiative.

# data[].attributes.body
Group of colleagues/team-mates may not be a diverse group. Group picking from wouldn't have to be limited to the current team-mates

# data[].attributes.body
Informal discussions/dropping by desk - potential for people to miss out

# data[].attributes.body
Why none of racialized colleagues were on the list

# data[].attributes.body
--> Write your own comment:
1. Click the '+'  under the question you wish to answer
2. type your comments in the pop-up box
3. click 'publish' (upper right corner)

--> React to an existing comment:
1. click thumbs up or thumbs down on the bottom left corner of the comment
OR
2. click the 'word bubble' icon on the bottom right corner to write a direct response