# data[].attributes.body
vague feedback without clear direction

# data[].attributes.body
Grades without any explanation. For example, getting a B on a paper without a rubric or information indicating what I could have done to earn an A.

# data[].attributes.body
highlights or strikethroughs with no additional comments

# data[].attributes.body
broad feedback such as this is not related and not how it isn’t

# data[].attributes.body
Feedback that appears rooted in personal preference rather than an objective standard

# data[].attributes.body
Lack of specific feedback (all looks good or just random strikethroughs)

# data[].attributes.body
I once received a comment on a paper for a graduate level class that said "your writing needs work," but the comments in the paper were mostly about word-choice.

# data[].attributes.body
I often read feedback with a particularly firm and disciplinary tone. There's even some shame and I can get stuck on that tone instead of taking in the feedback.

# data[].attributes.headline
Not having clear expectations set nor guidance on how to write for specific projects that may not follow traditional essay format 

# data[].attributes.subject
Not having clear expectations set nor guidance on how to write for specific projects that may not follow traditional essay format 

# data[].attributes.body
Positive feedback about very specific things. While I like positive feedback about more general things (ie the structure of my thesis, etc), comments that are hyper specific to the paper I am writing (ie good point!), I don't feel like I can take into my other writing

# data[].attributes.body
Not a huge question mark! "?"

# data[].attributes.body
I think for any writing that structure, templates, outlines can be as harmful to the writing process as they are helpful. Sometimes writing something organically or out of order and making sense of it from there is the best way to do it, especially with creative writing.

# data[].attributes.body
When a professor uses phrases such as "awk" or circles or crosses words or sections out without an explanation in the margins. These types of comments seem more arbitrary, in that it is the professor's opinion as to what does not work, rather than making it clear that a specific writing style is not effective.

# data[].attributes.body
Feedback that addresses one small component and doesn;t go into detail about how it connects to the broad picture.

# data[].attributes.body
Feedback is sometimes unhelpful when it only points out a singular instance of an issue, rather than addressing the overall problems that are present throughout my writing.

# data[].attributes.body
I found the feedback lacked explanation unhelpful.

# data[].attributes.body
Simple feedback like "Great Job" because it can be very hard to grow as a writer if you're not being challenged.

# data[].attributes.body
Words such as "interesting" that don't give indication of what the instructor liked and why

# data[].attributes.body
vague, very broad critiques

# data[].attributes.body
not offering any resources or examples to compare my writing with

# data[].attributes.body
grammatical critiques being to sole form of feedback, those are things that don't help change the flow or structure of the writing

# data[].attributes.body
Writing “???” … very vague and doesn’t make clear what the misstep was, especially of wanting to make corrections.

# data[].attributes.body
Feedback without specific details

# data[].attributes.body
When the feedback is too broad, vague, and irrelevant, it does not help improve the student's writing.