# data[].attributes.body
Through parallelism, Levitt and Dubner emphasize the interconnectedness of individual desires and societal dynamics in economics. Levitt illustrates that economics is not just about isolated choices but rather about navigating a complex web of competing interests. Levitt’s technique effectively underscores the point that understanding incentives is essential for grasping the broader implications of economic behavior, showing the audience the relationships that define economic systems.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors use conditional phrasing to create a scenario that invites readers to consider the mindset of a cheater. They authors not only engage the audience’s imagination but also highlight the ethical boundaries that are crossed when one contemplates cheating. Additionally, the use of the phrase "that would clearly be a tip-off" introduces a sense of irony. While the act of cheating is presented as a strategy many people could use, the very acknowledgment of it exposes the flaws and risks involved. They emphasize that even when one is cheating, there are obvious signs that betray their intentions, therefore reinforcing the notion that integrity is ultimately more sustainable than dishonesty.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors uses the phrase "artificially jacked the algorithm" to convey a sense of manipulation and deceit regarding test scores, highlighting the unethical practices at play. The word "artificially" suggests a lack of authenticity, framing the actions of the cheating teachers as fundamentally fraudulent. Additionally, the contrast between "expected to do great" and "students failed miserably" highlights the detachment between the teachers' actions and the actual outcomes for the students. This shows the impact of cheating not only on educational integrity but also on student success, portraying it as a betrayal of trust. By describing this scenario as "the cruelest twist" in high-stakes testing, the authors create a sense of injustice, highlighting the broader implications of such unethical behavior in the education system for the audience.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors juxtapose "condemned" and "appreciate his motive" to contrast the conflicting emotions surrounding cheating in sports, as it illustrates the moral outrage while also inviting empathy for an athlete's desire to win. Framing the athlete's actions in this way, the authors underscore the complexity of human motivations, suggesting that while the act of cheating is wrong, the underlying passion is justifiable. The tension encourages readers to engage with the moral ambiguity of the situation, allowing deeper reflection on the values that drive athletes to bend the rules.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors use a contrasting structure to show the difference between morality and economics, framing morality as an idealistic vision "the way we would like the world to work" versus "how it actually does work". This juxtaposition not only shows the tension between ethical aspirations and  practices in the real world but also sets the stage for a deeper exploration of Feldman's bagel business as a case study in this. The phrase "very thin intersection" possibly suggests the delicate balance between these two realms, showing challenges of navigating ethical dilemmas within economic frameworks. By placing Feldman’s story at this intersection, the author prompts readers to reflect on the conflicted nature of business decisions, emphasizing that moral choices are commonly twisted with economic imperatives.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors employ a comparison to challenge narratives about Hitler's influences, highlighting the complexity of historical connections. The phrase "Papers all state Hitler is trying to copy Mussolini" reflects a common consensus, setting the stage for a critical reevaluation. By asserting, "Looks to me like it's the Ku Klux that he is copying," the authors introduce a possible alternative perspective that draws attention to the racial ideologies that could have informed Hitler's actions. The authors use this to disrupt established beliefs and convey to the audience that they should consider the broader implications of how ideologies can intersect across different movements. The authors encourage a more nuanced understanding of history, emphasizing the importance of examining multiple influences and motivations behind significant political figures.

# data[].attributes.body
In this quote, the author uses the metaphor of "slain the beast" to illustrate the challenge of information asymmetry in the age of the Internet. This figurative language conveys the idea that, despite the power of digital communication, the imbalance of information remains an issue. The phrase "powerful as it is" acknowledges the Internet's capabilities while simultaneously highlighting its limitations, creating tension between potential and reality. Characterizing information asymmetry as a "beast," the authors emphasize its complexity, suggesting that it is not easy to get rid of. This shows the audience the struggles related to access and transparency in the information age, highlighting the need for continued caution when navigating the internet.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors emphasize the varying motivations of experts across different fields, effectively illustrating the complexities of decision-making influenced by personal incentives. Saying "Of course an expert... tends to have different incentives than the rest of us" acknowledges a common understanding while hinting at the potential biases that come with expertise. By stating that "an expert's incentives may shift 180 degrees, depending on the situation," the authors show the fluidity of these motivations, suggesting that what guides an expert's advice can potentially be self-serving. This tells the audience that they should critically evaluate the sources of information they encounter. Ultimately, this analysis encourages a skepticism towards authority, emphasizing the need to consider underlying motives when assessing expert claims.

# data[].attributes.body
In this quote, the authors ask the rhetorical question "if drug dealers make so much money, why are they still living with their mothers?" to engage the audience and provoke critical thinking about common assumptions regarding drug dealers' wealth. The question helps sets up the authors’ point that "except for the top cats, they don't make much money." This shift not only distracts the initial expectation but also highlights the struggle many people suffer within the drug trade, emphasizing that most dealers struggle financially despite the stereotype of easy riches. The phrase "had no choice but to live with their mothers" further highlights the harsh realities faced by many individuals in this environment, suggesting that economic necessity drives their living situations rather than any notion of comfort or choice. This invites readers to reconsider their perceptions and acknowledge the complexities in the lives of those involved in illegal trades.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors uses the phrase "the sort of person who did drugs" to categorize drug users, implying a specific social image associated with drug use. This choice of wording suggests that cocaine was not just a drug but a status symbol among higher classes. The mention of "rock stars and movie stars, ballplayers" reinforces this idea by associating the drug with fame, painting a vivid picture of its cultural significance during the 1970s. The use of "classier" implies a hierarchy among drugs, suggesting that cocaine was perceived as more sophisticated compared to others, which shows the audience the societal values that glamorize certain substances. This highlights the intersection of drug use and celebrity culture, capturing the era and its implications for social identity

# data[].attributes.body
The authors use Nicolae Ceaușescu's declaration on abortion to expose the extreme ideology of Communist policies in Romania. The statement "The fetus is the property of the entire society" shows a collectivist mindset that prioritizes state interests over individual rights, framing reproductive choices as societal obligations rather than personal decisions. This rhetorical choice highlights the dehumanizing nature of such ideology, reducing a woman's autonomy to a matter of national duty. Furthermore, the phrase "Anyone who avoids having children is a deserter" employs militaristic language, conveying a sense of moral condemnation and reinforcing the potential punishments of noncompliance. The authors provoke critical reflection on the intersections of government control, personal freedom, and societal expectations, prompting the audience to consider the broader implications of state intervention in private lives.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors employ a historical context to illustrate the shifts in the justice system, using the phrase "a more lenient justice system" to highlight the changes in a certain way. This choice of words sets a more critical tone, suggesting that the reforms may have been viewed negatively by some. The mention of "conviction rates declined during the 1960s" and "criminals who were convicted served shorter sentences" provides evidence, reinforcing the argument that systemic changes were occurring. In addition, the authors saying that "driven in part by an expansion of the rights of the people accused" highlights the moral imperative behind these changes, positioning them as a necessary evolution in justice rather than mere leniency. By describing this expansion as "long overdue," the authors show the importance of these reforms in promoting fairness, showing the audience the complexities and justifications behind a seemingly lenient system.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors employ a nuanced tone to examine the effectiveness of Bill Bratton's policing strategies, balancing acknowledgment of achievements with skepticism about their overall impact. Stating that "It would be churlish to argue that smart policing isn't a good thing" gets rid of potential dissent by recognizing the value of effective law enforcement, yet it also critiques the uncritical acceptance of such strategies. By stating that "there is frighteningly little evidence that his strategy was the crime panacea," the authors convey a sense of urgency, suggesting that the narrative may be oversimplified. This shows the audience to question the relationship between public perception and empirical evidence, emphasizing the importance of scrutinizing celebrated policies rather than accepting them at face value. Through this approach, the authors encourage a deeper examination of the complexities surrounding crime reduction and policing.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors draw a stark connection between socioeconomic factors and the outcomes for children born to women who sought abortions, creating a compelling narrative around choice and consequence. The phrase "the very factors that drove millions of American women to have an abortion" highlights the social and economic pressures influencing reproductive decisions, suggesting that these same pressures can affect children's futures. By stating that these factors "seemed to predict that their children... would lead unhappy and possibly criminal lives," the authors employ language that shows the gravity of these circumstances. This shows the audience the societal implications of individual choices, emphasizing that decisions around abortion are deeply connected with issues of poverty, education, and crime. Ultimately, this analysis compels the audience to reflect on the nature of human behavior and the factors that shape lives from the very beginning.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors create the question of parental influence with a tone that balances curiosity and complexity, showing the multifaceted nature of parenting. The phrase "Still the question of how much parents matter is a good one" acknowledges the validity of the inquiry while hinting at its nature. By following up with "It is also terribly complicated," they emphasize the challenges parental impact, which shows the variability in child development outcomes. The listing of different dimensions “his personality? His school grades? His moral behavior?” further illustrates the factors that can be considered, making it clear that studying parental influence is not a straightforward task. This shows the audience the interplay between parenting and child outcomes, highlighting the complexity of social science research.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
The authors illustrate the complex relationship between parental involvement and children's academic success, challenging simplistic causal assumptions. The statement "A child whose parents are involved in the PTA tends to do well in school" sets up a common belief linking parental engagement to positive educational outcomes. However, the subsequent clause"which probably indicates that parents with a strong relationship to education get involved in PTA" shifts the focus, suggesting that it's the values and attitudes of the parents that contribute to both their involvement and the child's success. This emphasizes the importance of examining the root causes of observed phenomena, rather than assuming a direct influence. The authors suggest that the correlation does not imply causation and prompting deeper reflections on the factors that truly contribute to a child's academic achievement.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors use a parallel structure in the phrases "something traditional or something bohemian, something unique or frum, something perfectly trendy," which emphasizes the motivations parents have when naming their child. This shows the range of choices available, reflecting the cultural and personal significance of naming. The contrasting adjectives "traditional" and "bohemian," "unique" and "trendy" shows parental desires, suggesting that names can carry deeper meanings and reflect individual identity. By presenting these varied motives, the authors show the audience the complexities involved in what might seem like a simple decision, illustrating that naming a child is a complicated process influenced by personal values, societal trends, and cultural heritage.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors highlight Steven Levitt's approach to academic success through a contrast with his peers, effectively showcasing his commitment to impactful research. The phrase "Levitt set his own course" signals his determination to diverge from the crowd, suggesting a proactive attitude that sets him apart from other graduate students. By stating that "Other grad students stayed up all night working on problem sets," the authors paint a picture of the normal academic grind, which Levitt rejects. His assertion, "My view was that the way you succeed in this profession is you write great papers," not only highlights his prioritization of quality research over  performance but also reflects a broader idea about what constitutes true achievement. This shows the audience the values of innovative thinking in the pursuit of knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors utilize rhetorical questions to challenge conventional assumptions about voting, engaging the audience in an examination of behavior. The phrase "But wait a minute, you say" creates an informal tone, inviting the audience to consider their own perspectives. By suggesting that "no voter goes to the polls actually believing that her single vote will affect the outcome," the authors highlight how many may feel about participating in elections. This not only emphasizes the disconnect between individual action and collective outcome but also serves to question the broader implications of engagement. The authors attempt to spark thoughts about the motivations behind voting and the nature of democratic participation.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors employ a casual tone with the audience an informal structure to engage readers in the topic of leisure time. The phrase "Economists have been trying for decades" creates a sense of urgency and highlights the ongoing struggle within the field, while the use of "precious little consensus" conveys frustration regarding the lack of agreement among experts. The end suggests that the argument is incomplete, inviting readers to ponder the deeper meanings of how society defines and values leisure. By framing the issue in this way, the authors draw attention to the nature of leisure time, prompting the audience to reconsider their own perceptions and experiences.