# data[].attributes.body
you must have people seeking knowledge and be able to tell them the facts it would be like knowing the secrets of the universe but only knowing how to speak georgian

# data[].attributes.body
Math&Science made some valid points and English&Art didn't have strong evidence

# data[].attributes.body
i agree

# data[].attributes.body
Math had more valid points and had a better argument overall but the other guy was being more funny and was not as good of a debater as the other guy. But the  other guy could have won with better points.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that math and science won because the points he gave were much stronger overall. Unlike the english and arts side, the points stood on their own and strongly supported their side. Art and english on the other-hand had points that were more of counterarguments. Most of the points they made were just saying that without art and english math and science wouldn't have progressed as much.

# data[].attributes.headline
i think math won because he made valid points and english and arts whole aregument was laughing 

# data[].attributes.subject
i think math won because he made valid points and english and arts whole aregument was laughing 

# data[].attributes.body
math and science has better themes then art we need math to get through life .- rhann

# data[].attributes.body
though good, if not better, points were made on the english and arts side, the presentaition of the facts solidified math's win

# data[].attributes.body
i already agreed with maths point more but arts points just didn't seem as strong

# data[].attributes.body
By cutting to the core of communication he was able to really show how you need English( or a common language) in order to d math and science. This means that You would first have to learn Language before anything else.

# data[].attributes.body
Math and science did have more information to back up there counter arguments but in reality communication is key and without it were just like apes without speaking manner

# data[].attributes.body
I think that English and Arts won because the arguments that the person gave were more convincing and had some emotion and facts, while on the other hand, the Science and Math guy spoke in more just facts and kept going to the single topic of it saving lives, which I thought was bland. Also it was fun watching the person for English and Arts basically roast the other guy. Overall, they were both evenly convincing, except  the guy from English and Arts was more organized and goofy.

# data[].attributes.headline
math won but i feel as if arts could have won if  they used different points

# data[].attributes.subject
math won but i feel as if arts could have won if  they used different points

# data[].attributes.body
I think math won because they had a better argument when it came to mentioning math and science being used every day. And English could only connect to Math by saying that English is a way that science and math communicate.

# data[].attributes.body
the biggest problem i had with the language side was that all their arguments were not really strong. it seemed like his only arguments were counter arguments. when math stated why he believed math was better, the counter was just that communication propelled math and science which doesn't actually prove that its more important, its just a stalling tactic

# data[].attributes.body
He gave valid points, communication is how we share important information with each other and arts can help us express it in various other ways. he also was able to quickly put down any of the arguments for math and science and convey it all using charisma.