# data[].attributes.body
Jim i know was trying to get his suit cleaned but, bruh! its a wee stain! i agree

# data[].attributes.body
Do you agree that Jim had used the "Freedom of Speech" correctly? You must have evidence from the case.

# data[].attributes.body
Do you agree that Larry's Rights were violated? Was he treated fairly? You must have evidence from the case.

# data[].attributes.body
Jim said the stain was not there when he brought it in but Larry said it was there and the stain would not come out, Larry said he would never lie to his customers but some in the back stood up and said " he did not pay me when he damaged my sweater! it's fine to make mistakes because we make them every now and then, but to not to take responsibility! you'v lost my  business after that!"
so in my understanding it has happen more then once, which means Larry is lying and does not take responsibility for his actions

# data[].attributes.headline
Larry the Dry Cleaner Lied Giana Poorcelan 

# data[].attributes.subject
Larry the Dry Cleaner Lied Giana Poorcelan 

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Larry lied because he Jim's girlfriend said " there was no stain when they got to the dry cleaning." There was only a little bit of dirt on the cuff of the sleeves. I don't think all of the add stuff about Larry was necessary though. I mean he need the suit for his interview that was coming up, so yes he may be mad. The stain is noticeable so maybe he didn't want to have to wear that to his interview. He can't just buy a new suit, some suits are expensive. But Jim did not use his freedom of speech   correctly. I don't know that much about dry cleaning but, maybe Larry could have had some oxi clean or something that could remove stains. Maybe Larry spilled something on the suit but, does not want to admit he did.

# data[].attributes.headline
Larry Lied  because Jim told him that when he came in asked if he could clean the cuffs of the shirt because they were dirty. but when he came to retrieve it, it looks like from the image that there was a big stain on the right sleeve. so I think Larry lied about Jim coming in with the stain and he was not able to wash it out.

# data[].attributes.subject
Larry Lied  because Jim told him that when he came in asked if he could clean the cuffs of the shirt because they were dirty. but when he came to retrieve it, it looks like from the image that there was a big stain on the right sleeve. so I think Larry lied about Jim coming in with the stain and he was not able to wash it out.

# data[].attributes.body
Larry has gone through this situation before. Another customer named Robert Banks had gotten his sweater ruined and Robert states, "He didn't want to pay me. I had to make a scene in his shop." Larry also lied when he said that he had "pointed out the stain" to Jim when he came in. He also said that Jim then told him to try his best to get it out. But when Jim first had it, it had no stain whatsoever and Mr.Jones was sitting 20 feet away so there was not really a possibility for him to spot the stain.But I do believe that Larry, or Mr.Jones did not take Jim's money before he dry cleaned it. I rest my case.

# data[].attributes.body
Jim just doesn't want to be accused for putting the stain on the suit. Since Larry is the customer, he needs to apologize for putting a stain in the suit. Larry has a right to complain about this.
Jim did not use the 'Freedom of Speech' correctly.
But Larry used the 'Freedom of Speech' correctly and has a a right to complain.
Arisha

# data[].attributes.body
Saanvi Rawat
I think that Jim lied that his coat was not stained like this before dropping it at the dry cleaner. I think he lied he said the same thing in the court. In my opinion both the sweater of the witness and Jim's coat had stains before they were dropped at the dry cleaners. But I do believe that Larry made a mistake and not give a ticket to Jim, but he tried his best to remove the stain.

# data[].attributes.body
Larry is the one who gives the service, if the costumer is not happy then you have to fix it. Jim the costumer has the right to give a complaint about the incident. Larry's rights were not violated and Jim used the the freedom of speech correctly.

# data[].attributes.body
I think they're overreacting, and something happened like a mix up. Maybe Larry the Dry Cleaner could see if anyone had a similar suit. I think they both sound pretty sincere, but I'm pretty sure we need more evidence to be 100% sure.
Overall I think that somehow it's none of their fault, but like I said, more evidence.
- Sadie the not so good judge

# data[].attributes.headline
Jim is being a brat and is accusing larry! =(

# data[].attributes.subject
Jim is being a brat and is accusing larry! =(

# data[].attributes.body
Jim i know was trying to get his suit cleaned but, bruh! its a wee stain! i agree with larry on this one, seriously, its a satin, GEt. ANoTHER. SUIT. -mason =>

# data[].attributes.body
Larry lied because Jim said he stained his sweater in the past so maybe he did the same thing this time but it was too expensive to pay back. Gabriel

# data[].attributes.body
Asa
I agree that Larry's rights were violated and I disagree that Larry was treated fairly. I do not believe this because Jim violated the freedom of speech and used libel he used libel  because he hurt Larry's reputation. I do not think that he was treated correctly because he said that there was a stain when Jim gave him his suit and he stated that the stain might not come out and Jim must have ignored him because when he got his suit back the stain was still there and he freaked out.

# data[].attributes.body
Jim is correct because the ticket that he was given by Larry. but still it is just a stain you wouldn't go to court you could just by a new one

Henry

# data[].attributes.body
Larry is correct because he had already seen a stain on the suit and one of his workers said he heard the whole thing happen.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Larry was treated unfairly and that he made an honest mistake and forgot to add that there was a stain on the suit when he gave the ticket to Jim.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe  he hadn't used the "Freedom of Speech" correctly because you can inform with the "Freedom of Speech" but you cant call some one a criminal unless it is proven.

# data[].attributes.body
i think no ones job should be taken away because one customers stain didn't get out and he said it might not get out he gave him the truth and costumer service and that's enough to keep a job and he has helped many people with there cloths so i say he should keep helping them
wyatt

# data[].attributes.body
There is no real proof that there was a stain on the suit before the dry cleaners, and Larry has not paid stuff before

- Orlando

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that that Jim is correct  because on the last page of the story it talks about a man named Robert Banks claiming that Larry had ruined a sweater and refused to pay him back.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that that Jim is correct  because on the last page of the story it talks about a man named Robert Banks claiming that Larry had ruined a sweater and refused to pay him back.

# data[].attributes.body
-Liam

# data[].attributes.headline
I think Jim should not have said bad things about Larry's dry cleaner but, Jim also was forced to pay for a under done job.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think Jim should not have said bad things about Larry's dry cleaner but, Jim also was forced to pay for a under done job.

# data[].attributes.body
-Bridger

# data[].attributes.headline
I am on Larry's side because he had witnesses. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I am on Larry's side because he had witnesses. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Larry's says that he saw the stain in the suit and pointed it out to the customer and he ruing his being treated unfair.

# data[].attributes.subject
Larry's says that he saw the stain in the suit and pointed it out to the customer and he ruing his being treated unfair.

# data[].attributes.body
Larry's is strong because after 20 years he made a small mistake and Jim made a bad influence to is basins.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that Jim didn't use the Freedom of speech wrong because he didn't have any proof and blamed him hurting his business. And Jim called him a incompetent criminal.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that Jim didn't use the Freedom of speech wrong because he didn't have any proof and blamed him hurting his business. And Jim called him a incompetent criminal.

# data[].attributes.body
-Andrew